Highly effective acyclic carbohydrate receptors consisting of aminopyridine, imidazole, and indole recognition units

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 2405-2419

  Mazik, Monika ^a   Kuschel, Matthias ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Carbohydrates; Hydrogen bonds; Molecular recognition; Receptors; Supramolecular chemistry

Indexed keywords

BIOMOLECULES; COMPLEXATION; FLOW INTERACTIONS; HYDROGEN; HYDROGEN BONDS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; SUGAR (SUCROSE); SUGARS;

AMINOPYRIDINE; AROMATIC RINGS; BINDING MOTIFS; CARBOHYDRATE RECEPTORS; GLUCOPYRANOSIDE; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; MULTIPLE INTERACTIONS; NEUTRAL HYDROGEN; ORGANIC MEDIUM; PROTEIN-CARBOHYDRATE; RECEPTORS; RECOGNITION UNITS; SUPRAMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY;

CARBOHYDRATES;

AMINOPYRIDINE DERIVATIVE; CARBOHYDRATE; DISACCHARIDE; IMIDAZOLE; IMIDAZOLE DERIVATIVE; INDOLE; INDOLE DERIVATIVE;

AMARANTHUS; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; TITRIMETRY; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

AMARANTHUS; AMINOPYRIDINES; CARBOHYDRATES; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DISACCHARIDES; IMIDAZOLES; INDOLES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; TITRIMETRY;

EID: 42349088499     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: 15213765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200701269     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. a) F. A. Quiocho, Pure. Appl. Chem. 1989, 61, 1293-1306;
2. b) S. P. Spurlino, G.-Y. Lu, F. A. Quiocho, J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 5202-5219;
3. c) F. A. Quiocho, D. K. Wilson, Nature 1989, 340, 404-408;
4. d) N. K. Vyas, M. N. Vyas, F. A. Quiocho, Science 1988, 242, 1290-1295;
5. e) R. U. Lemieux, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1989, 18, 347-374;
6. f) W. I. Weiss, K. Drickamer, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1996, 65, 441-473;
7. g) H. Lis, N. Sharon. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 637-674;
8. h) H. Lis, N. Sharon, Lectins, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2003;
9. i) T. R. Transue, A. K. Smith, H. Mo, I. J. Goldstein, M. A. Saper, Nat. Struct. Biol. 1997, 4, 779-782;
10. j) M. Cygler, D. R. Rose, D. R. Bundle, Science 1991, 253, 442-445.
11. For reviews on carbohydrate recognition with artificial receptors, see: a) A. P. Davis, T. D. James in Functional Synthetic Receptors, (Eds.; T. Schrader, A. D. Hamilton), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2005, p. 45-109;
12. b) A. P. Davis, R. S. Wareham. Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 3161-3179;
13. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2979-2996;
14. c) Host-Guest Chemistry - Mimetic Approaches to Study Carbohydrate Recognition (Ed.; S. Penadés). Top. Curr. Chem. Vol. 218, Springer, Berlin, 2002.
15. For recent examples of carbohydrate receptors operating through noncovalent interactions, see: a) E. Klein, Y. Ferrand, E. K. Auty, A. P. Davis, PhysChemComm 2007, 2390-2392;
16. b) M. Mazik, H. Cavga, J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 831-838;
17. c) M. Mazik, A. König, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 3271-3276;
18. d) M. Mazik, H. Cavga, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 3633-3638;
19. e) C. Schmuck, M. Heller, Org. Biomot. Chem. 2007, 5, 787-791;
20. f) O. Francesconi, A. Ienco, G. Moneti, C. Nativi, S. Roelens, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 6845-6848;
21. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6693-6696;
22. g) M. Mazik, A. König, J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7854-7857;
23. h) M. Mazik, H. Cavga, J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 2957-2963;
24. i) M. Mazik, M. Kuschel, W. Sicking, Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 855-858;
25. j) M. Mazik, H. Cavga, P. G. Jones, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9045-9052;
26. k) H. Abe, Y. Aoyagi, M. Inouye, Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 59-61;
27. l) E. Klein, M. P. Crump, A. P. Davis, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 302-306;
28. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 298-302;
29. m) M. G. J. ten Cale, D. N. Reinhoudt, M. Crego-Calama, J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 8443-8453;
30. n) H. Abe, N. Masuda, M. Waki, M. Inouye. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16189-16196;
31. o) J. M. Benito, M. Meldal, QASR Comb. Sci. 2004, 23, 117-129;
32. p) G. Gupta, C. R. Lowe, J. Mol. Recognit. 2004, 17, 218-235;
33. q) T. Velasco, G. Lecollinet, T. Ryan, A. P. Davis, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 645-647;
34. r) J.-M. Fang, S. Selvi, J.-H. Liao, Z. Slanina, C.-T. Chen, P.-T. Chou, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 645-647;
35. s) M. Mazik, W. Radunz, R. Boese, J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 7448-7462;
36. t) M. Mazik, W. Sicking. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 3117-3121.
37. a) R. Welti, Y. Abel, V. Gramlich, F. Diederich, Helv. Chim. Acta 2003, 86, 548-562;
38. b) K. Wada, T. Mizutani, S. Kitagawa, J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5123-5131;
39. c) M. Segura, B. Bricoli, A. Casnati, E. M. Muñoz, F. Sansone, R. Ungaro, C. Vicent, J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 6296-6303;
40. d) R. Welti, F. Diederich, Helv. Chim. Acta 2003, 86. 494-503;
41. e) M. Dukh, D. Saman, K. Lang, V. Pouzar, I. Cerny, P. Drasar, V. Král, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 3458-3463;
42. f) T. Ishi-I, M. A. Maleos-Timoneda, P. Timmerman, M. Crego-Calama, D. N. Reinhoudl, S. Shinkai, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 2402-2407;
43. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 2300-2305;
44. g) G. Lecollinet, A. P. Dominey, T. Velasco, A. P. Davis, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 4267-4270;
45. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4093-4096;
46. h) S.-i. Tamaru, S. Shinkai, A. B. Khasanov, T. W. Bell, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 4972-4976;
47. i) K. Ladomenou, R. P. Bonar-Law. Chem. Commun. 2002, 2108-2109;
48. j) O. Rusin, K. Lang, V. Král, Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 655-663;
49. k) M. Mazik, W. Radunz, W. Sicking, Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4579-4582;
50. l) J. Billing, H. Grundberg, U. J. Nilsson, Supramol. Chem. 2002, 14, 367-372;
51. m) A. S. Droz, U. Neidlein, S. Anderson, P. Seiler, F. Diederich, Helv. Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 2243-2289;
52. n) D. W. P. M. Löwik, C. R. Lowe, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 2825-2839;
53. o) J. M. Benito, M. Gomez-Garcia, J. L. Jimenez Blanco, C. Ortiz Mellet, J. M. Garcia Fernandez, J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1366-1372;
54. p) S.-i. Tamaru, M. Yamamoto, S. Shinkai, A. B. Khasanow, T. W. Bell, Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 5270-5276;
55. q) H. J. Kim, Y. H. Kim, J. I. Hong, Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5049-5052;
56. r) J. Bitta, S. Kubik, Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2637-2640;
57. s) M. Mazik, W. Sicking, Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 664-670;
58. t) M. Mazik, H. Bandmann, W. Sicking, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 562-565;
59. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 551-554;
60. u) F. Eblinger, H.-J. Schneider, Collect, Czech. Chem. Commun. 2000, 65, 667-672.
61. For examples of boronic acid based receptors that use covalent interactions for sugar binding, see: a) T. Zhang, E. V. Anslyn, Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1649-1652;
62. b) G. Heinrichs, M. Schellenträger, S. Kubik, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 4177-4186;
63. c) S. Jiang, J. O. Escobedo, K. K. Kim, O. Alptürk, G. K. Samoei, S. O. Fakayode, I. M. Warner, O. Rusin, R. M. Strongin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12221-12228;
64. d) A. T. Wright, Z. Zhong, E. V. Anslyn, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 2-5;
65. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5679-5682;
66. e) Z. Wang, D. Zhang, D. Zhu, J Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 5729-5732;
67. f) D. Stones, S. Manku, X. Lu, D. G. Hall, Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 92-99;
68. g) J. Zhao, T. M. Fyles, T. D. James, Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 3543-3546;
69. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3461-3464;
70. h) S. Arimori, M. L. Bell, C. S. Oh, K. A. Frimat, T. D. James, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 2002, 803-808;
71. i) H. Fang, G. Kaur, B. Wang, J. Fluorescence 2004, 14, 481-489;
72. j) H. Cao, M. H. Heagy, J. Fluorescence 2004, 14, 569-584;
73. k) C. W. Gray, Jr., B. T. Walker, R. A. Foley, T. A. Houston, Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 3309-3312;
74. l) M. Yamamoto, M. Takeuchi, S. Shinkai, F. Tani, Y. Naruta. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 2000, 9-16;
75. m) T. Mizuno, M. Yamamoto, M. Takeuchi, S. Shinkai, Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 6193-6198; For reviews, see;
76. n) T. D. James, S. Shinkai, Top. Curr. Chem. 2002, 218, 159-200;
77. o) S. Striegler, Curr. Org. Chem. 2003, 7, 81-102;
78. p) T. D. James, K. R. A. S. Sandanayake, S. Shinkai, Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 2038-2050;
79. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1910-1922.
80. Anslyn and co-workers have exploited the 2-aminopyridine unit as a heterocyclic analogue of the asparagine/glutamine primary amide side chain for binding of cyclohexane diols and triols; C.-Y. Huang, L. A. Cabell, E. V. Anslyn, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2778-2792.
81. For recent discussions on the importance of carbohydrate-aromatic interactions, see: a) G. Terraneo, D. Potenza, A. Canales, J. Jiménez-Barbero, K. K. Baldridge, A. Bernardi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 2890-2900;
82. b) M. I. Chávez, C. Andreu, P. Vidal, N. Aboitiz, F. Freire, P. Groves, J. L. Asensio, G. Asensio, M. Muraki, F. J. Canada, J. Jiménez-Barbero, Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 7060-7074.
83. Many biological interactions occur in enzyme pockets or in membranes, meaning that they occur in an environment with a lower dielectric constant relative to the bulk solvent. For this reason, many theoretical studies on different enzyme model systems have been performed in a medium with a lower dielectric constant (mostly ε = 5.7. which corresponds to the chlorobenzene), See, for example: a) K.-B. Cho, Y. Moreau, D. Kumar, D. A. Rock, J. P. Jones, S. Shaik, Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 4103-4115;
84. b) S. P. de Visser, S. Shaik, P. K. Sharma, D. Kumar, W. Thiel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15779-15788;
85. c) S. P. de Visser, J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 11050-11057.
86. a) V. Král, O. Rusin, F. P. Schmidtchen, Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 873-876;
87. b) R. D. Hubbard, S. R. Horner, B. L. Miller, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5810-5811;
88. c) R. Yanagihara, Y. Aoyama, Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 9725-9728.
89. C. S. Wilcox, N. M. Glagovich, Program HOSTEST5.6. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh. PA, 1994.
90. a) C. Frassineti, S. Ghelli, P. Gans, A. Sabatini, M. S. Moruzzi, A. Vacca. Anal. Biochem. 1995, 251, 374-382;
91. b) P. Gans, A. Sabatini, A. Vacca. Talanta 1996, 43, 1739-1753.
92. K. J. Wallace, R. Hanes, E. Anslyn, J. Morey, K. V. Kilway, J. Siegel, J. Synthesis 2005, 2080-2083.
93. A. R. Katritzky, A. F. Pozharski, Handbook of Heterocyclic chemistry, Pergamon, Amsterdam, 2000, p. 131.
94. 1H NMR titrations were carried out; for each titration 15-20 samples were prepared.
95. a was less than 10%;
96. 12.
97. a) For each system, at least two fluorescence titrations were carried out: for each titration, 20 samples were prepared.
98. a estimation was less than 15%.
99. For a discussion on limitations of the NMR method, see: L. Fielding, Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 6151-6170.
100. 3OD, 88:12 v/v). see; U, Neidlein, F. Diederich, Chem. Commun. 1996, 1493-1494.
101. For examples of CH⋯π interactions in the crystal structures of the complexes formed between artificial receptors and carbohydrates, see reference [3j].