The deletion of YLR042c improves ethanolic xylose fermentation by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Yeast

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 741-751

  Parachin, Nádia S ^a   Bengtsson, Oskar ^a   Hahn Hägerdal, Bärbel ^a   Gorwa Grauslund, Marie F ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Xylose consumption; YLR042c

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; XYLOSE;

ANAEROBIC GROWTH; ARTICLE; BATCH FERMENTATION; CATABOLISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS GROWTH; GENE DELETION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; GROWTH RATE; NONHUMAN; PENTOSE PHOSPHATE CYCLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

AEROBIOSIS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE DELETION; XYLITOL; XYLOSE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 77956804303     PISSN: 0749503X     EISSN: 10970061     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/yea.1777     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Baudin A, Ozier-Kalogeropoulos O, Denouel A, et al. 1993. A simple and efficient method for direct gene deletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 21: 3329-3330.
2. Bengtsson O, Jeppsson M, Sonderegger M, et al. 2008. Identification of common traits in improved xylose-growing Saccharomyces cerevisiae for inverse metabolic engineering. Yeast 25: 835-847.
3. Boorsma A, de Nobel H, ter Riet B, et al. 2004. Characterization of the transcriptional response to cell wall stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 21: 413-427.
4. Caro LH, Tettelin H, Vossen JH, et al. 1997. In silico identification of glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-anchored plasma-membrane and cell wall proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 13: 1477-1489.
5. Chu BC, Lee H. 2007. Genetic improvement of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for xylose fermentation. Biotechnol Adv 25: 425-441.
6. Eliasson A, Christensson C, Wahlbom CF, Hahn-Hägerdal B. 2000. Anaerobic xylose fermentation by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae carrying XYL1, XYL2, and XKS1 in mineral medium chemostat cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 3381-3386.
7. Garcia R, Bermejo C, Grau C, et al. 2004. The global transcriptional response to transient cell wall damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its regulation by the cell integrity signaling pathway. J Biol Chem 279: 15183-15195.
8. Ǵardonyi M, Jeppsson M, Ĺiden G, et al. 2003. Control of xylose consumption by xylose transport in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 82: 818-824.
9. Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, et al. 2002. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418: 387-391.
10. Gietz RD, Schiestl RH, Willems AR, Woods RA. 1995. Studies on the transformation of intact yeast cells by the LiAc/SS-DNA/PEG procedure. Yeast 11: 355-360.
11. Guldener U, Heck S, Fielder T, et al. 1996. A new efficient gene disruption cassette for repeated use in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 24: 2519-2524.
12. Hahn-Hägerdal B, Karhumaa K, Jeppsson M, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. 2007. Metabolic engineering for pentose utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 108: 147-177.
13. Hamada K, Terashima H, Arisawa M, et al. 1999. Amino acid residues in the omega-minus region participate in cellular localization of yeast glycosylphosphatidylinositolattached proteins. J Bacteriol 181: 3886-3889.
14. Hohmann S. 2002. Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66: 300-372.
15. Jeffries TW. 2006. Engineering yeasts for xylose metabolism. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17: 320-326.
16. Jeppsson M, Johansson B, Jensen PR, et al. 2003a. The level of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity strongly influences xylose fermentation and inhibitor sensitivity in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Yeast 20: 1263-1272.
17. Jeppsson M, Träff K, Johansson B, et al. 2003b. Effect of enhanced xylose reductase activity on xylose consumption and product distribution in xylose-fermenting recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 3: 167-175.
18. Jin YS, Laplaza JM, Jeffries TW. 2004. Saccharomyces cerevisiae engineered for xylose metabolism exhibits a respiratory response. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 6816-6825.
19. Johansson B, Hahn-Hägerdal B. 2002. The non-oxidative pentose phosphate pathway controls the fermentation rate of xylulose but not of xylose in Saccharomyces cerevisiae TMB3001. FEMS Yeast Res 2: 277-282.
20. Karhumaa K, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. 2005. Investigation of limiting metabolic steps in the utilization of xylose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae using metabolic engineering. Yeast 22: 359-368.
21. Klein CJL, Olsson L, Nielsen J. 1998. Glucose control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: The role of MIG1 in metabolic functions. Microbiology Sgm 144: 13-24.
22. Linde M, Galbe M, Zacchi G. 2006. Steam pretreatment of acidsprayed and acid-soaked barley straw for production of ethanol. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 129-132: 546-562.
23. Lutfiyya LL, Iyer VR, DeRisi J, et al. 1998. Characterization of three related glucose repressors and genes they regulate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 150: 1377-1391.
24. Mumberg D, Müller R, Funk M. 1995. Yeast vectors for the controlled expression of heterologous proteins in different genetic backgrounds. Gene 156: 119-122.
25. Musti AM, Zehner Z, Bostian KA, et al. 1983. Transcriptional mapping of two yeast genes coding for glyceraldehyde 3- phosphate dehydrogenase isolated by sequence homology with the chicken gene. Gene 25: 133-143.
26. Ni HY, Laplaza JM, Jeffries TW. 2007. Transposon mutagenesis to improve the growth of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae on D-xylose. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 2061-2066.
27. Öhgren K, Galbe M, Zacchi G. 2005. Optimization of steam pretreatment of SO2-impregnated corn stover for fuel ethanol production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 121-124: 1055-1067.
28. Osborne BI, Guarente L. 1989. Mutational analysis of a yeast transcriptional terminator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 4097-4101.
29. Piskur J, Rozpedowska E, Polakova S, et al. 2006. How did Saccharomyces evolve to become a good brewer? Trends Genet 22: 183-186.
30. Roberts CJ, Nelson B, Marton MJ, et al. 2000. Signaling and circuitry of multiple MAPK pathways revealed by a matrix of global gene expression profiles. Science 287: 873-880.
31. Rudolf A, Karhumaa K, Hahn-Hägerdal B. 2009. Ethanol production from traditional and emerging raw materials. In Yeast Biotechnology: Diversity and Applications, Satyanarayana T, Kunze G, (eds). Springer: Netherlands.
32. Runquist D, Fonseca C, Rådström P, et al. 2009. Expression of the Gxf1 transporter from Candida intermedia improves fermentation performance in recombinant xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82: 123-130.
33. Salusjärvi L, Kankainen M, Soliymani R, et al. 2008. Regulation of xylose metabolism in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact 7: 18.
34. Salusjärvi L, Pitkänen JP, Aristidou A, et al. 2006. Transcription analysis of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals novel responses to xylose. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 128: 237-261.
35. Sassner P, Galbe M, Zacchi G. 2008. Techno-economic evaluation of bioethanol production from three different lignocellulosic materials. Biomass Bioenergy 32: 422-430.
36. Schmitt AP, McEntee K. 1996. Msn2p, a zinc finger DNAbinding protein, is the transcriptional activator of the multistress response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 5777-5782.
37. Söderström J, Pilcher L, Galbe M, Zacchi G. 2003. Two-step steam pretreatment of softwood by dilute H2SO4 impregnation for ethanol production. Biomass Bioenergy 24: 475-486.
38. Sonderegger M, Jeppsson M, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Sauer U. 2004a. Molecular basis for anaerobic growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on xylose, investigated by global gene expression and metabolic flux analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 2307-2317.
39. Sonderegger M, Jeppsson M, Larsson C, et al. 2004b. Fermentation performance of engineered and evolved xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Biotechnol Bioeng 87: 90-98.
40. Sonderegger M, Sauer U. 2003. Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for anaerobic growth on xylose. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 1990-1998.
41. Souto-Maior AM, Runquist D, Hahn-Hägerdal B. 2009. Crabtreenegative characteristics of recombinant xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biotechnol 143: 119-123.
42. Teixeira MC, Monteiro P, Jain P, et al. 2006. The YEASTRACT database: A tool for the analysis of transcription regulatory associations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D446-451.
43. Van Vleet JH, Jeffries TW, Olsson L. 2008. Deleting the paranitrophenyl phosphatase (pNPPase), PHO13, in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves growth and ethanol production on D-xylose. Metabol Eng 10: 360-369.
44. Wahlbom CF, Cordero Otero RR, van Zyl WH, et al. 2003a. Molecular analysis of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant with improved ability to utilize xylose shows enhanced expression of proteins involved in transport, initial xylose metabolism, and the pentose phosphate pathway. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 740-746.
45. Wahlbom CF, van Zyl WH, Jönsson LJ, et al. 2003b. Generation of the improved recombinant xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae TMB 3400 by random mutagenesis and physiological comparison with Pichia stipitis CBS 6054. FEMS Yeast Res 3: 319-326.
46. Walfridsson M, Anderlund M, Bao X, Hahn-Hägerdal B. 1997. Expression of different levels of enzymes from the Pichia stipitis XYL1 and XYL2 genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its effects on product formation during xylose utilization. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 48: 218-224.