DNA damage and decisions: CtIP coordinates DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoints

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 402-409

  You, Zhongsheng ^a   Bailis, Julie M ^b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b AMGEN INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; BRCA1 PROTEIN; CARBOXY TERMINAL BINDING PROTEIN INTERACTING PROTEIN; CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE; MRE11 PROTEIN; NIBRIN; PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3,4,5 TRISPHOSPHATE 3 PHOSPHATASE; RAD50 PROTEIN; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLELE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; NONHOMOLOGOUS END JOINING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; UBIQUITINATION;

ALCOHOL OXIDOREDUCTASES; ANIMALS; CARRIER PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; HUMANS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS;

EID: 77954313601     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.04.002     Document Type: Review

References (104)

1. Fusco C., et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel retinoblastoma-binding protein. Genomics 1998, 51:351-358.
2. Meloni A.R., et al. A mechanism for Rb/p130-mediated transcription repression involving recruitment of the CtBP corepressor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999, 96:9574-9579.
3. Schaeper U., et al. Interaction between a cellular protein that binds to the C-terminal region of adenovirus E1A (CtBP) and a novel cellular protein is disrupted by E1A through a conserved PLDLS motif. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273:8549-8552.
4. Wong A.K., et al. Characterization of a carboxy-terminal BRCA1 interacting protein. Oncogene 1998, 17:2279-2285.
5. Liu F., Lee W.H. CtIP activates its own and cyclin D1 promoters via the E2F/RB pathway during G1/S progression. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 26:3124-3134.
6. Sterner J.M., et al. Negative regulation of DNA replication by the retinoblastoma protein is mediated by its association with MCM7. Mol. Cell Biol. 1998, 18:2748-2757.
7. Chinnadurai G. CtIP, a candidate tumor susceptibility gene is a team player with luminaries. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1765:67-73.
8. Wu G., Lee W.H. CtIP, a multivalent adaptor connecting transcriptional regulation, checkpoint control and tumor suppression. Cell Cycle 2006, 5:1592-1596.
9. Yu X., Chen J. DNA damage-induced cell cycle checkpoint control requires CtIP, a phosphorylation-dependent binding partner of BRCA1 C-terminal domains. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 24:9478-9486.
10. Chen L., et al. Cell cycle-dependent complex formation of BRCA1.CtIP.MRN is important for DNA double-strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:7713-7720.
11. Greenberg R.A., et al. Multifactorial contributions to an acute DNA damage response by BRCA1/BARD1-containing complexes. Genes Dev. 2006, 20:34-46.
12. Li S., et al. Functional link of BRCA1 and ataxia telangiectasia gene product in DNA damage response. Nature 2000, 406:210-215.
13. Wu-Baer F., Baer R. Effect of DNA damage on a BRCA1 complex. Nature 2001, 414:36.
14. You Z., et al. The role of single-stranded DNA and polymerase alpha in establishing the ATR, Hus1 DNA replication checkpoint. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:27088-27093.
15. Zou L., Elledge S.J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 2003, 300:1542-1548.
16. Yuan J., Chen J. N terminus of CtIP is critical for homologous recombination-mediated double-strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:31746-31752.
17. Sartori A.A., et al. Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature 2007, 450:509-514.
18. You Z., et al. CtIP links DNA double-strand break sensing to resection. Mol. Cell 2009, 36:954-969.
19. Byun T.S., et al. Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:1040-1052.
20. Branzei D., Foiani M. Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9:297-308.
21. Sung P., Klein H. Mechanism of homologous recombination: mediators and helicases take on regulatory functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7:739-750.
22. Yun M.H., Hiom K. CtIP-BRCA1 modulates the choice of DNA double-strand-break repair pathway throughout the cell cycle. Nature 2009, 459:460-463.
23. Limbo O., et al. Ctp1 is a cell-cycle-regulated protein that functions with Mre11 complex to control double-strand break repair by homologous recombination. Mol. Cell 2007, 28:134-146.
24. Akamatsu Y., et al. Molecular characterization of the role of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe nip1+/ctp1+ gene in DNA double-strand break repair in association with the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 28:3639-3651.
25. Chen P.L., et al. Inactivation of CtIP leads to early embryonic lethality mediated by G1 restraint and to tumorigenesis by haploid insufficiency. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 25:3535-3542.
26. Penkner A., et al. A conserved function for a Caenorhabditis elegans Com1/Sae2/CtIP protein homolog in meiotic recombination. EMBO J. 2007, 26:5071-5082.
27. Uanschou C., et al. A novel plant gene essential for meiosis is related to the human CtIP and the yeast COM1/SAE2 gene. EMBO J. 2007, 26:5061-5070.
28. Huertas P., et al. CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination. Nature 2008, 455:689-692.
29. Dubin M.J., et al. Dimerization of CtIP, a BRCA1- and CtBP-interacting protein, is mediated by an N-terminal coiled-coil motif. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:26932-26938.
30. Kim H.S., et al. Functional interactions between Sae2 and the Mre11 complex. Genetics 2008, 178:711-723.
31. Bernstein K.A., Rothstein R. At loose ends: resecting a double-strand break. Cell 2009, 137:807-810.
32. Mimitou E.P., Symington L.S. DNA end resection: many nucleases make light work. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2009, 8:983-995.
33. Takeda S., et al. Ctp1/CtIP and the MRN complex collaborate in the initial steps of homologous recombination. Mol. Cell 2007, 28:351-352.
34. D'Amours D., Jackson S.P. The Mre11 complex: at the crossroads of DNA repair and checkpoint signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 3:317-327.
35. Hopfner K.P. DNA double-strand breaks come into focus. Cell 2009, 139:25-27.
36. Hopfner K.P., et al. Structural biochemistry and interaction architecture of the DNA double-strand break repair Mre11 nuclease and Rad50-ATPase. Cell 2001, 105:473-485.
37. Petrini J.H., Stracker T.H. The cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks: defining the sensors and mediators. Trends Cell Biol. 2003, 13:458-462.
38. Difilippantonio S., Nussenzweig A. The NBS1-ATM connection revisited. Cell Cycle 2007, 6:2366-2370.
39. You Z., et al. Rapid activation of ATM on DNA flanking double-strand breaks. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9:1311-1318.
40. Adams K.E., et al. Recruitment of ATR to sites of ionising radiation-induced DNA damage requires ATM and components of the MRN protein complex. Oncogene 2006, 25:3894-3904.
41. Cuadrado M., et al. ATM regulates ATR chromatin loading in response to DNA double-strand breaks. J. Exp. Med. 2006, 203:297-303.
42. Jazayeri A., et al. ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:37-45.
43. Myers J.S., Cortez D. Rapid activation of ATR by ionizing radiation requires ATM and Mre11. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:9346-9350.
44. Paull T.T., Gellert M. Nbs1 potentiates ATP-driven DNA unwinding and endonuclease cleavage by the Mre11/Rad50 complex. Genes Dev. 1999, 13:1276-1288.
45. Lee J.H., Paull T.T. ATM activation by DNA double-strand breaks through the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex. Science 2005, 308:551-554.
46. Buis J., et al. Mre11 nuclease activity has essential roles in DNA repair and genomic stability distinct from ATM activation. Cell 2008, 135:85-96.
47. Williams R.S., et al. Mre11 dimers coordinate DNA end bridging and nuclease processing in double-strand-break repair. Cell 2008, 135:97-109.
48. Lloyd J., et al. A supramodular FHA/BRCT-repeat architecture mediates Nbs1 adaptor function in response to DNA damage. Cell 2009, 139:100-111.
49. Williams R.S., et al. Nbs1 flexibly tethers Ctp1 and Mre11-Rad50 to coordinate DNA double-strand break processing and repair. Cell 2009, 139:87-99.
50. Chapman J.R., Jackson S.P. Phospho-dependent interactions between NBS1 and MDC1 mediate chromatin retention of the MRN complex at sites of DNA damage. EMBO Rep. 2008, 9:795-801.
51. Melander F., et al. Phosphorylation of SDT repeats in the MDC1N terminus triggers retention of NBS1 at the DNA damage-modified chromatin. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 181:213-226.
52. Spycher C., et al. Constitutive phosphorylation of MDC1 physically links the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex to damaged chromatin. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 181:227-240.
53. Wu L., et al. MDC1 regulates intra-S-phase checkpoint by targeting NBS1 to DNA double-strand breaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:11200-11205.
54. Tsukuda T., et al. Chromatin remodelling at a DNA double-strand break site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2005, 438:379-383.
55. Shim E.Y., et al. The yeast chromatin remodeler RSC complex facilitates end joining repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 25:3934-3944.
56. Lengsfeld B.M., et al. Sae2 is an endonuclease that processes hairpin DNA cooperatively with the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex. Mol. Cell 2007, 28:638-651.
57. Budd M.E., Campbell J.L. Interplay of Mre11 nuclease with Dna2 plus Sgs1 in Rad51-dependent recombinational repair. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e4267.
58. Mimitou E.P., Symington L.S. Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 2008, 455:770-774.
59. Zhu Z., et al. Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 2008, 134:981-994.
60. Nimonkar A.V., et al. Human exonuclease 1 and BLM helicase interact to resect DNA and initiate DNA repair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:16906-16911.
61. Schaetzlein S., et al. Exonuclease-1 deletion impairs DNA damage signaling and prolongs lifespan of telomere-dysfunctional mice. Cell 2007, 130:863-877.
62. Gravel S., et al. DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes Dev. 2008, 22:2767-2772.
63. Toczylowski T., Yan H. Mechanistic analysis of a DNA end processing pathway mediated by the Xenopus Werner syndrome protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:33198-33205.
64. Milman N., et al. Meiotic DNA double-strand break repair requires two nucleases, MRN and Ctp1, to produce a single size class of Rec12 (Spo11)-oligonucleotide complexes. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 29:5998-6005.
65. Farah J.A., et al. Ctp1 and Exonuclease 1, alternative nucleases regulated by the MRN complex, are required for efficient meiotic recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:9356-9361.
66. Rothenberg M., et al. Ctp1 and the MRN-complex are required for endonucleolytic Rec12 removal with release of a single class of oligonucleotides in fission yeast. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000722.
67. Hartsuiker E., et al. Distinct requirements for the Rad32(Mre11) nuclease and Ctp1(CtIP) in the removal of covalently bound topoisomerase I and II from DNA. Mol. Cell 2009, 33:117-123.
68. Keeney S., Kleckner N. Covalent protein-DNA complexes at the 5' strand termini of meiosis-specific double-strand breaks in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1995, 92:11274-11278.
69. Neale M.J., et al. Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 2005, 436:1053-1057.
70. Spo11 removal is dispensable for other MRN-dependent meiotic functions. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 29:1671-1681.
71. Aylon Y., et al. The CDK regulates repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO J. 2004, 23:4868-4875.
72. Ira G., et al. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 2004, 431:1011-1017.
73. Huertas P., Jackson S.P. Human CtIP mediates cell cycle control of DNA end resection and double strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:9558-9565.
74. Yu X., et al. The C-terminal (BRCT) domains of BRCA1 interact in vivo with CtIP, a protein implicated in the CtBP pathway of transcriptional repression. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273:25388-25392.
75. Varma A.K., et al. Structural basis for cell cycle checkpoint control by the BRCA1-CtIP complex. Biochemistry 2005, 44:10941-10946.
76. Yu X., et al. BRCA1 ubiquitinates its phosphorylation-dependent binding partner CtIP. Genes Dev. 2006, 20:1721-1726.
77. Nakamura, K. et al. Collaborative action of Brca1 and CtIP in elimination of covalent modifications from double-strand breaks to facilitate subsequent break repair. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000828.
78. Kim H., et al. Ubiquitin-binding protein RAP80 mediates BRCA1-dependent DNA damage response. Science 2007, 316:1202-1205.
79. Sobhian B., et al. RAP80 targets BRCA1 to specific ubiquitin structures at DNA damage sites. Science 2007, 316:1198-1202.
80. Wang B., et al. Abraxas and RAP80 form a BRCA1 protein complex required for the DNA damage response. Science 2007, 316:1194-1198.
81. Germani A., et al. SIAH-1 interacts with CtIP and promotes its degradation by the proteasome pathway. Oncogene 2003, 22:8845-8851.
82. Yu X., Baer R. Nuclear localization and cell cycle-specific expression of CtIP, a protein that associates with the BRCA1 tumor suppressor. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275:18541-18549.
83. Shiotani B., Zou L. Single-stranded DNA orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR switch at DNA breaks. Mol. Cell 2009, 33:547-558.
84. Vilkki S., et al. Screening for microsatellite instability target genes in colorectal cancers. J. Med. Genet. 2002, 39:785-789.
85. Wu M., et al. CtIP silencing as a novel mechanism of tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 2007, 5:1285-1295.
86. Fackenthal J.D., Olopade O.I. Breast cancer risk associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in diverse populations. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2007, 7:937-948.
87. Cantor S.B., et al. BACH1, a novel helicase-like protein, interacts directly with BRCA1 and contributes to its DNA repair function. Cell 2001, 105:149-160.
88. Drikos I., et al. Characterization of cancer-linked BRCA1-BRCT missense variants and their interaction with phosphoprotein targets. Proteins 2009, 77:464-476.
89. Kaelin W.G. The concept of synthetic lethality in the context of anticancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2005, 5:689-698.
90. Farmer H., et al. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature 2005, 434:917-921.
91. Bryant H.E., et al. Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature 2005, 434:913-917.
92. McCabe N., et al. Deficiency in the repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination and sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. Cancer Res. 2006, 66:8109-8115.
93. Mendes-Pereira A.M., et al. Synthetic lethal targeting of PTEN mutant cells with PARP inhibitors. EMBO Mol. Med. 2009, 1:315-322.
94. Clerici M., et al. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein promotes resection and bridging of double strand break ends. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:38631-38638.
95. McKee A.H., Kleckner N. A general method for identifying recessive diploid-specific mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, its application to the isolation of mutants blocked at intermediate stages of meiotic prophase and characterization of a new gene SAE2. Genetics 1997, 146:797-816.
96. Lobachev K.S., et al. The Mre11 complex is required for repair of hairpin-capped double-strand breaks and prevention of chromosome rearrangements. Cell 2002, 108:183-193.
97. Prinz S., et al. Isolation of COM1, a new gene required to complete meiotic double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1997, 146:781-795.
98. Rattray A.J., et al. Fidelity of mitotic double-strand-break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a role for SAE2/COM1. Genetics 2001, 158:109-122.
99. Cartagena-Lirola H., et al. Budding yeast Sae2 is an in vivo target of the Mec1 and Tel1 checkpoint kinases during meiosis. Cell Cycle 2006, 5:1549-1559.
100. Baroni E., et al. The functions of budding yeast Sae2 in the DNA damage response require Mec1- and Tel1-dependent phosphorylation. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 24:4151-4165.
101. Ahmed K.M., et al. Derepression of HMGA2 via removal of ZBRK1/BRCA1/CTIP complex enhances mammary tumorigenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 285:4464-4471.
102. Koipally J., Georgopoulos K. Ikaros-CtIP interactions do not require C-terminal binding protein and participate in a deacetylase-independent mode of repression. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:23143-23149.
103. Sum E.Y., et al. The LIM domain protein LMO4 interacts with the cofactor CtIP and the tumor suppressor BRCA1 and inhibits BRCA1 activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:7849-7856.
104. Gu B., Chen P.L. Expression of PCNA-binding domain of CtIP, a motif required for CtIP localization at DNA replication foci, causes DNA damage and activation of DNA damage checkpoint. Cell Cycle 2009, 8:1409-1420.