Quality Teacher Induction: “Fourth-Wave” (1997–2006) Induction Programs

New Educator

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-23

  Wood, Ann L ^a   Stanulis, Randi Nevins ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77953932028     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15499243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1547688X.2009.10399561     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Abdal-Haqq, I., 1996. Making time for teacher professional development Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education. ERIC Digest. ED400259
2. Alliance for Excellent Education (AEE). 2004. Tapping the potential: Retaining and developing high-quality new teachers Washington, DC: Strumbos D.
3. Ames, K. T., Stanulis, R. N., and VanZee, D., Moving beyond superficial conversations: Mentoring beginning teachers in literacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference. Los Angeles, California.
4. Arends, R. I., and Rigazio-DiGilio, A. J., Beginning teacher induction: Research and examples of contemporary practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Japan-United States Teacher Education Consortium. Tokyo, Japan.
5. Athanases, S., and Achinstein, B., 2003. Focusing new teachers on individual and low performing students: The centrality of formative assessment in the mentor's repertoire of practice. Teachers College Record, 105 (8): 1486–1520.
6. Ball, D. L., 1996. Teacher learning and the mathematics reforms: What do we think we know and what do we need to learn. Phi Delta Kappan, 77 (7): 500–508.
7. Ball, D. L., and Cohen, D. K., 1999. “ Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. ”. In Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice Edited by: Darling-Hammond, L., and Sykes, G., 3–32. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
8. Bartell, C., 2005. Cultivating high-quality teaching through induction and mentoring Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
9. Billingsley, B., Carlson, E., and Klein, S., 2004. The working conditions and induction support of early career special educators. Exceptional Children, 70 (3): 333–347.
10. Boyer, L., 2005. Supporting the induction of special educators: Program descriptions of university-school district partnerships. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37 (3): 44–51.
11. Britton, E., Paine, L., Pimm, D., and Raizen, S., 2003. Comprehensive teacher induction: Systems for early career learning Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Brock, B., and Grady, M., 1997. From first-year to first-rate: Principals guiding beginning teachers Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
13. Brock, B., and Grady, M., 2005. Developing a teacher induction plan: A guide for school leaders Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
14. Costa, A. L., and Garmston, R. J., 2002. Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools (), 2nd ed. Norwood, Massachusetts: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
15. Danielson, C., 1996. Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria Virginia: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
16. Darling-Hammond, L., 1997. Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching Katztown, Pennsylvania: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
17. Darling-Hammond, L., and Baratz-Snowden, J., 2005. A good teacher in every classroom: Preparing the highly qualified teachers our children deserve SanFrancisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
18. Darling-Hammond, L., LaFors, J., and Snyder, J., 2001. Educating teachers for California's future. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28 (1): 9–55.
19. Educational Testing Service (ETS). 2003. Pathwise Retrieved July 10, 2001, from http://www.ets.org/pathwise/index.html
20. Evertson, C. M., and Smithey, M. W., 2000. Mentoring effects on proteges' classroom practice: An experimental field study. Journal of Educational Research, 93 (5): 294–304.
21. Feiman-Nemser, S., 2001a. From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103 (6): 1013–1055.
22. Feiman-Nemser, S., 2001b. Helping novices learn to teach: Lessons from an exemplary support teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 52 (1): 17–30.
23. Feiman-Nemser, S., Schwille, S., Carver, C., and Yusko, B., 1999. A conceptual review of literature on new teacher induction Washington, DC: National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching.
24. Fideler, E., and Haselkorn, D., 1999. Learning the ropes: Urban teacher induction programs and practices in the United States Belmont, Massachusetts: Recruiting New Teachers.
25. Fletcher, S., Strong, M., and Villar, A., 2008. An investigation of the effects of variations in mentor-based induction on the performance of students in California. Teachers College Record, 110 (10): 2271–2289.
26. Fox, S., and Singletary, T., 1986. Deductions about support induction. Journal of Teacher Education, 37 (1): 12–15.
27. Furtwengler, C. B., The reform movement: A fifty-state survey of state actions for beginning teacher programs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Atlanta, Georgia.
28. Gitomer, D., 1999. Evaluating a teacher induction support program. Teaching and Change, 6 (3): 272–283.
29. Glazerman, S., Senesky, S., Seftor, N., and Johnson, A., 2006. Design of an impact evaluation of teacher induction programs. Final report Washington, DC: Mathematic Policy Research, Inc.
30. Gless, J., 2004. Mentor teacher selection Santa Cruz, California: The New Teacher Center at the University of California.
31. Gold, Y., 1996. “ Beginning teacher support: Attrition, mentoring, and induction. ”. In Handbook of research on teacher education (), 2nd ed. Edited by: Sikula, J., Buttery, T., and Guyton, E., 548–594. New York: Macmillan.
32. Haberman, M., 2005. Star teachers: The ideology and best practices of effective teachers of diverse children and youth in poverty Houston, Texas: The Haberman Educational Foundation.
33. Helman, L., 2006. “ What's in a conversation? Mentoring stances in coaching conferences and how they matter. ”. In Mentors in the making: Developing new leaders for new teachers Edited by: Achinstein, B., and Athanases, S. Z., 69–82. New York: Teachers College Press.
34. Hirsch, E., Impact of teacher quality. Paper presented at Teacher Quality Matters-Transitioning to New Standards, New Roles, New Assessments: Title II Summer 2001 Workshop: Focus on SB2042. San Diego, California.
35. Horn, P. J., Sterling, H. A., Blair, H. C., and Metler-Armijo, K., Induction strategies for future teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (AACTE). San Diego, California.
36. Huling-Austin, L., 1986. What can and cannot reasonably be expected from teacher induction programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 37 (1): 2–5.
37. Huling-Austin, L., 1989. “ Beginning teacher assistance programs: An overview. ”. In Assisting the Beginning Teacher Edited by: Huling-Austin, L., Odell, S. J., Ishler, P., Kay, R. S., and Edelfelt, R. A., 5–13. Reston, Virginia: Association of Teacher Educators.
38. Huling-Austin, L., 1990. “ Teacher induction programs and internships. ”. In Handbook of research on teacher education Edited by: Houston, W. R., Haberman, M., and Sikula, J., 535–548. New York: Macmillan.
39. Huling-Austin, L., 1992. Research on learning to teach: Implications for teacher induction and mentoring programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 43 (3): 173–180.
40. Ingersoll, R. M., and Smith, T. M., 2004. Do teacher induction and mentoring matter?. NASSP Bulletin, 88 (638): 28–40.
41. Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC). 1992. Model standards for beginning teacher licensing and development: A resource for state dialogue Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. http://www.ccsso.org
42. Johnson, S. M., 2004. Finders and keepers: Helping new teachers survive and thrive in our schools San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43. Johnson, S. M., and Kardos, S. M., 2004. “ Professional culture and the promise of colleagues. ”. In Finders and keepers: Helping new teachers survive and thrive in our schools Edited by: Johnson, S. M., 139San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
44. Kelchtermans, G., and Ballet, K., 2002. The micropolitics of teacher induction: A narrative-biographical study of teacher socialization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18 (1): 105–120.
45. Kennedy, V., and Burstein, N., 2004. An induction program for special education teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27 (4): 444–447.
46. Kershaw, C., Blank, M., Benner, S., and Cagle, L., Talented teachers as leaders in supporting their beginning colleagues: The urban specialist certificate and mentoring and induction programs.?. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education. San Diego.
47. Kilgore, K., Griffin, C., Otis-Wilborn, A., and Winn, J., 2003. The problems of beginning special education teachers: Exploring the contextual factors influencing their work. Action in Teacher Education, 25 (1): 38–47.
48. Lieberman, A., and Miller, L., 2000. “ Teaching and teacher development: A new synthesis for a new century. ”. In Education in a New Era (2000 ASCD Yearbook) Edited by: Brandt, R., 47–66. Alexandria, Virginia: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
49. Little, J. W., 2003. Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 105 (6): 913–945.
50. Luft, J. A., Roehrig, G. H., and Patterson, N. C., 2003. Contrasting landscapes: A comparison of the impact of different induction programs on beginning secondary science teachers' practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (1): 77–97.
51. McGlamery, S., Fluckiger, J., and Edick, N., 2002. Omaha induction keeps one foot in the university. Journal of Staff Development, 23 (4): 37–40.
52. Meckel, A., and Rolland, L., 2000. BTSA models for support provision. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 29 (3): 18–20.
53. Mitchell, D. E., Scott, L. D., Takahashi, S. S., and Hendrick, I. G., 1997. The California beginning teacher support and assessment program: The 1997 Statewide evaluation study. Riverside, CA: California Educational Research Cooperative, University of California, Riverside.
54. Mitchell, D., Scott, L., and Boyns, D., 2000. The California beginning teacher support and assessment program: The 2000 statewide evaluation technical report. Riverside, CA: California Educational Research Cooperative, University of California, Riverside.
55. Mitchell, D., Scott, L., Hendrick, I., and Boyns, D., 1998. The California beginning teacher support and assessment program: The 1998 statewide evaluation technical report. Riverside, CA: California Educational Research Cooperative, University of California, Riverside.
56. Mitchell, D., Scott, L., Hendrick, I., and Boyns, D., 1999. The California beginning teacher support and assessment program: The 1999 statewide evaluation technical report. Riverside, CA: California Educational Research Cooperative, University of California, Riverside.
57. Moir, E., Launching the next generation of teachers through quality induction. Paper prepared for the National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. 2003 Annual Commissioners and Partner States' Symposium.
58. Moir, E., and Baron, W., 2002. Looking closely, every step of the way. Formative assessment helps to shape new professionals. Journal of Staff Development, 23 (4): 54–56.
59. Moir, E., and Gless, J., 2001. Quality induction: An investment in teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28 (1): 109–114.
60. Moir, E., and Stobbe, C., 1995. Professional growth for new teachers: Support and assessment through collegial relationships. Teacher Education Quarterly, 22 (4): 83–91.
61. Norman, P. J., and Feiman-Nemser, S., 2005. Mind activity in teaching and mentoring. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21 (6): 679–697.
62. Odell, S. J., 1986. A model university-school system collaboration in teacher induction. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 22 (54): 120–121.
63. Odell, S. J., 1990. Mentor teacher programs (What research says to the teacher) Washington, DC: National Education Association (NEA).
64. Odell, S. J., and Huling, L., eds. 2000. Quality mentoring for novice teachers Indianapolis, Indiana: Association of Teacher Educators & Kappa Delta Pi.
65. Olebe, M., 1999. California Formative Assessment and Support System for Teachers (CFASST): Investing in teachers' professional development. Teaching and Change, 6 (3): 258–271.
66. Olebe, M., 2001. A decade of support for California's new teachers: The beginning teacher support and assessment program. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28 (1): 71–84.
67. Olebe, M., Jackson, A., and Danielson, C., 1999. Investing in beginning teachers—The California model. Educational Leadership, 56 (8): 41–44.
68. Peterson, M., 2005. Hazed!. Educational Leadership, 62 (8): 20–23.
69. Phlegar, J. M., and Hurley, N., 1999. Designing job-embedded professional learning: The authentic task approach Stoneham, Massachusetts: Learning Innovations, A Division of WestEd.
70. Putnam, R. T., and Borko, H., 1997. “ Teacher learning: Implications of the new view of cognition. ”. In The international handbook of teachers and teaching Edited by: Biddle, B. J., Good, T. L., and Goodson, I. F., Vol. II, 1223–1296. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
71. Quartz, H., and TEP Research Group. 2003. Too angry to leave: Supporting new teachers commitment to transform urban schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 54 (2): 99–111.
72. Resta, V., Huling, L., White, S., and Matscheck, D., 1997. The teacher fellows program: Ayearto grow. Journal of Staff Development, 18 (1): 42–45.
73. Rosenberg, M. S., Griffin, C. C., Kilgore, K. L., and Carpenter, S. L., 1997. Beginning teachers in special education: A model for providing individualized support. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20 (4): 301–321.
74. Schlechty, P., and Vance, V., 1981. Do academically able teachers leave education? The North Carolina case. Phi Delta Kappan, 5 (2): 106–112.
75. Schwille, S. A., and Dynak, J., 2000. “ Mentor preparation and development. ”. In Quality mentoring for novice teachers Edited by: Odell, S. J., and Huling, L., 67–76. Indianapolis, Indiana: Association of Teacher Educators & Kappa Delta Pi.
76. Schwille, S. A., Nagel, A. L., and DeBolt, G. P., 2000. “ Mentor selection and mentor/novice matching. ”. In Quality mentoring for novice teachers Edited by: Odell, S. J., and Huling, L., 57–66. Indianapolis, Indiana: Association of Teacher Educators & Kappa Delta Pi.
77. Showers, B., and Joyce, B., 1996. The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53 (6): 12–16.
78. Smith, T. M., and Ingersoll, R. M., Reducing teacher turnover: What are the components of effective induction?. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.
79. Spillane, J., 2002. Local Theories of teacher change: The pedagogy of district policies and programs. Teachers College Record, 104 (3): 377–420.
80. Stansbury, K., and Zimmerman, J., 2002. Smart induction programs become lifelines for the beginning teacher. Journal of Staff Development, 23 (4): 10–17.
81. Stanulis, R. N., Keeping content and context central: District-based comprehensive induction in the Michigan State University/teachers for a New Era induction program. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, California.
82. Stanulis, R. N., Burrill, G., and Ames, K., 2007. Fitting in and learning to teach: Tensions in developing a vision for a university-based induction program for beginning teachers. Teacher Educator Quarterly, (online article, June 22).
83. Stanulis, R. N., Fallona, C. A., and Pearson, C. A., 2002. “Am I doing what I am supposed to be doing?”: Mentoring novice teachers through the Uncertainties and Challenges of their First Year of teaching. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 10 (1): 71–81.
84. Stanulis, R. N., Meloche, B. H., and Ames, K., Challenges in developing, enacting, and analyzing mentoring that focuses on teaching and learning: A university-school collaboration. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York. pp. 23
85. Storms, B., Wing, J., Jinks, T., Banks, K., and Cavazos, P., 2000. California formative assessment and support system for teachers (field review) implementation 1999–2000: A formative evaluation report Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service (ETS).
86. Strong, M., and Baron, W., 2004a. An analysis of mentoring conversations with beginning teachers: Suggestions and responses. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20 (1): 47–57.
87. Strong, M., and Baron, W., Induction, mentoring, and teacher retention: A summary of the research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators. Boston, Massachusetts.
88. Sweeny, B., 2000. Survey: What's happening in mentoring & induction in each state in the United States? Retrieved from http://www.teachermentors.com/RsrchStateList.php
89. Urban Teacher Collaborative. 2000. The urban teacher challenge: Teacher demand and supply in the great city schools Belmont, Massachusetts: Recruiting New Teachers.
90. Villani, S., 2002. Mentoring programs for new teachers: Models of induction and support Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
91. Villar, A., Measuring the benefits and costs of mentor-based induction: A value-added assessment of new teacher effectiveness linked to student achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego, California.
92. Wang, J., Strong, M., and Odell, S., 2004. Mentor-novice conversations about teaching: A comparison of two U.S. and two Chinese cases. Teachers College Record, 106 (4): 775–813.
93. Whitaker, S. D., 2000. What do first-year special education teachers need?. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33 (1): 28–36.
94. Wilson, S., and Berne, J., 1999. “ Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. ”. In Review of research in education Edited by: Iran-Nejad, A., and Pearson, P. D., 173–209. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
95. Wood, A. L., 1999. “ How can new teachers become the BEST?. ”. In A better beginning: Supporting and mentoring new teachers Edited by: Scherer, M., 116–123. Alexandria, Virginia: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
96. Wood, A. L., 2000. “ Teaching portfolios: Tools for reflective teaching in inner city teacher induction. ”. In Research on effective models for teacher education, teacher education yearbook VIII Edited by: McIntyre, D. J., and Byrd, D., 111–126. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
97. Wood, A. L., 2001. What Does Research Say about Teacher Induction and IHE/LEA Collaborative Programs?. Issues in Teacher Education, 10 (2): 69–81.
98. Wood, A. L., 2005. The Importance of principals: Site administrators' roles in teacher induction. American Secondary Education, 33 (2): 39–62.
99. Wood, A. L., and Waarich-Fishman, N., 2006. “ Two induction models in one urban district: Transitioning to teaching credentialing. ”. In Research on teacher induction: Teacher education yearbook XIV Edited by: Dangel, J., 67–87. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
100. Yopp, R. H., and Young, B. L., 1999. A model for beginning teacher support and assessment. Action in Teacher Education, 21 (1): 24–36.
101. Youngs, P., 2007. District induction policy and new teachers' experiences: An examination of local policy implementation in Connecticut. Teachers College Record, 109 (3): 797–837.