Multidimensional targeting: Using physical and chemical forces in unison

Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 320-332

  van Lehn, R C ^a   Sing, C E ^a   Chen, H ^a   Alexander Katz, A ^a  

^a USA   (United States)

Author keywords

Antibodies; Biodistribution; Catch bonds; Dendrimers; Micelles; Nanoparticle; Protein corona; Targeted drug delivery

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMICAL MARKER; DENDRIMER; DRUG CARRIER; LIPOSOME; MAGNETIC NANOPARTICLE; NANOPARTICLE; QUANTUM DOT;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG DISTRIBUTION; DRUG TARGETING; MICELLE; MULTIDIMENSIONAL TARGETING; PARTICLE SIZE; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SURFACE CHARGE; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CHEMISTRY, PHARMACEUTICAL; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; HUMANS; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; PHYSICAL PROCESSES;

EID: 77953782614     PISSN: 13892010     EISSN: 18734316     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/138920110791233299     Document Type: Article

References (130)

1. Maeda, H. The enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumor vasculature: The key role of tumor-selective macromolecular drug targeting. Adv. Enzyme Regul., 2001, 41, 189-207.
2. Sadler, J. E. Biochemistry and genetics of von willebrand factor. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 1998, 67, 395-424.
3. Savage, B.; Saldivar, E.; Ruggeri, Z. Initiation of platelet adhesion by arrest onto fibrinogen or translocation on von Willebrand Factor. Cell, 1996, 84, 289-297.
4. Langer, R. New methods of drug delivery. Science, 1990, 249, 1527-1533.
5. Elbert, D. L.; Jubbell, J. A. Surface treatments of polymers for biocompatibility. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci., 1996, 26, 365-394.
6. Lee, J. H.; Lee, H. B.; Andrade, J. D. Blood compatibility of polyethylene surfaces. Prog. PolySci., 1995, 20, 1043-1079.
7. Dormidontova, E. E. Influence of end groups on phase behavior and properties of PEO in aqueous solutions. Macromolecules, 2004, 37, 7747-7761.
8. Maria, V. J.; Duncan, R. Polymer conjugates: nanosized medicines for treating cancer. Trends Biotechnol., 2006, 24, 29-47.
9. Gao, X.; Cui, Y.; Levenson, R. M.; Chung, L. W.; Nie, S. In vivo cancer targeting and imaging with semiconductor quantum dots. Nat. Biotechnol., 2004, 22, 969-976.
10. Johnston, A. P.; Cortez, C.; Angelatos, A. S.; Caruso, F. Layer-by-layer engineered capsules and their applications. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci., 2006, 11, 203-209.
11. Torchilin, V. P. Micellar nanocarriers: pharmaceutical perspectives. Pharm. Res., 2007, 24, 1-15.
12. Rapoport, N. Physical stimuli-responsive polymeric micelles for anti-cancer drug delivery. Prog. Polym. Sci., 2007, 32, 962-990.
13. Kwon, G. S.; Okano, T. Polymeric micelles as new drug carriers. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 1996, 21, 107-116.
14. Mauk, M. R.; Gamble, R. C.; Baldeschwieler, J. D. Targeting of lipid vesicles: Specificity of carbohydrate receptor analogues for leukocytes in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1980, 77, 4430-4434.
15. Boas, U.; Heegaard P.M.H. Dendrimers in drug research. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2004, 33, 43-63.
16. Mornet, S.; Vasseur, S.; Grasset, F.; Duguet, E. Magnetic nanopar-ticle design for medical diagnosis and therapy. J. Mater. Chem., 2004, 14, 2161-2175.
17. Plank, C.; Schillinger, U.; Bergemann, C.; Remy, J.; Krotz, F.; Anton, M., Lausier, J.; Rosenecker, J. The Magnetofection method: using magnetic force to enhance gene delivery. Biol. Chem., 2003, 384, 737-747.
18. Deng, Y.; Wang, C.; Shen, X.; Yang, W.; Jin, L.; Gao, H.; Fu, S. Preparation, characterization, and application of multistimuli-responsive microspheres with fluorescence-labeled magnetic cores and thermoresponsive shells. Chem. A Eur. J., 2005, 11, 6006-6013.
19. Chertok, B.; Moffat, B. A.; David, A. E.; Yu, F.; Bergemann, C.; Ross, B. D.; Yang, V. C. Iron oxide nanoparticles as a drug delivery vehicle for MRI monitored magnetic targeting of brain tumors. Biomaterials, 2008, 29, 487-496.
20. Strom, V.; Hultenby, K.; Gruttner, C.; Teller, J.; Xu, B.; Holgersson, J. A novel and rapid method for quantification of magnetic nanoparticle-cell interactions using a desktop susceptometer. Nanotechnology, 2004, 15, 457-466.
21. Liong, M.; Lu, J.; Kovochich, M.; Xia, T.; Ruehm, S. G.; Nel, A.; Tamanoi, F.; Zink, J. I. Multifunctional inorganic nanoparticles for imaging, targeting, and drug delivery. ACS Nano, 2008, 2, 889-896.
22. Alexion, C.; Schmid, R. J.; Jurgons, R.; Kremer, M.; Wanner, G.; Bergemann, C.; Huenges, E.; Nawroth, T.; Arnold, W.; Parak, F. G. Targeting cancer cells: magnetic nanoparticles as drug carriers. Euro. Biophys. J., 2006, 35, 446-450.
23. Wu, A. M.; Senter, P. D. Arming antibodies: prospects and challenges for immunoconjugates. Nat. Biotechnol., 2005, 23, 1137-1146.
24. Zhang, J. L. Srivastava, R. S.; Misra, R. D. Core-shell magnetite nanoparticles surface encapsulated with smart stimuli-responsive polymer: synthesis, characterization, and LCST of viable drug-targeting delivery system. Langmuir, 2007, 23, 6342-6351.
25. Sing, C. E.; Schmid, L.; Schneider, M. F.; Franke, T.; Alexander-Katz, A. Controlled surface-induced flows from the motion of self-assembled colloidal walkers. PNAS, 2009, 107(2), 535-540.
26. Larson, R. G. Monte Carlo simulation of microstructural transitions in surfactant systems. J. Chem. Phys., 1992, 96, 7904-7918.
27. Nagarajan, R.; Ganesh, K. Block copolymer self-assembly in selective solvent: Spherical micelles with segregated cores. J. Chem. Phys., 1989, 90, 5843-5856.
28. Halperin, A. Polymeric micelles: a star model. Macromolecules, 1987, 20, 2943-2946.
29. Borisov, O. V.; Zhulina, E. B. Reentrant morphological transitions in copolymer micelles with pH-sensitive corona. Langmuir, 2005, 21, 3229-3231.
30. Leibler, L.; Orland, H.; Wheeler, J.C. Theory of critical micelle concentration for solutions of block co-polymers. J. Chem. Phys., 1983, 79, 3550-3557.
31. Lee, E. S.; Na, K.; Bae, Y. H. Polymeric micelle for tumor pH and folate-mediated targeting. J. Control. Release, 2003, 91, 103-113.
32. Sethuraman, V. A.; Bae, Y. H. TAT peptide-based micelle system for potential active targeting of anti-cancer agents to acidic solid tumors. J. Control. Release, 2007, 118, 216-224.
33. Nasongkla, N.; Shuai, X.; Ai, H.; Weinberg, B. D.; Pink, J.; Boothman, D. A.; Gao, J. cRGD-functionalized polymer micelles for targeted doxorubicin delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 2004, 43, 6323-6327.
34. Torchilin, V. P.; Lukyanov, A. N.; Gao, Z.; Papahadjopoulos-Sternberg, B. Immunomicelles: Targeted pharmaceutical carriers for poorly soluble drugs. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 2003, 100, 6039-6044.
35. Lukyanov, A. N.; Gao, Z.; Torchilin, V. P. Micelles from polyethylene glycol/phosphatidylethanolamine conjugates for tumor drug delivery. J. Control. Release, 2003, 91, 97-102.
36. Nagasaki, Y.; Yasugi, K.; Yamamoto, Y.; Harada, A.; Kataoka, K. Sugar-installed block copolymer micelles: their preparation and specific Interaction with Lectin molecules. Biomacromolecules, 2001, 2, 2-5.
37. Chung, J. E.; Yokoyama, M.; Yamato, M.; Aoyagi, T.; Sakurai, Y.; Okano, T. Thermo-responsive drug delivery from polymeric micelles constructed using block copolymers of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) and poly(butylmethacrylate). J. Control. Release, 1999, 62, 115-127.
38. Liu, X.; Yang, Y.; Leong, K. W. Thermally responsive polymeric micellar nanoparticles self-assembled from cholesteryl end-capped random poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-N,N-dimethylacrylamide): synthesis, temperature-sensitivity, and morphologies. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2003, 266, 295-303.
39. Chung, J. E.; Yokoyama, M.; Aoyagi, T.; Sakurai, Y.; Okano, T. Effect of molecular architecture of hydrophobically modified poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) on the formation of thermoresponsive core-shell micellar drug carriers. J. Control. Release, 1998, 53, 119-130.
40. Bae, Y.; Nishiyama, N.; Fukushima, S.; Koyama, H.; Yasuhiro, M.; Kataoka, K. Preparation and biological characterization of polymeric micelle drug carriers with intracellular pH-triggered drug release property: Tumor permeability, Controlled subcellular drug distribution, and enhanced in vivo antitumor efficacy. Bioconjug. Chem., 2005, 16, 122-130.
41. Bae, Y.; Fukushima, S.; Harada, A.; Kataoka, K. Design of environment-sensitive supramolecular assemblies for intracellular drug delivery: Polymeric micelles that are responsive to intracellular pH change. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 4640-4643.
42. Borisov, O. V.; Zhulina, E. B. Morphology of micelles formed by diblock copolymer with a polyelectrolyte block. Macromolecules, 2003, 36, 10029-10036.
43. Borisov, O. V.; Zhulina, E. B. Effect of salt on self-assembly in charged block copolymer micelles. Macromolecules, 2002, 35, 4472-4480.
44. Kakizawa, Y.; Harada, A.; Kataoka, K. Environment-sensitive stabilization of core-shell structured polyion complex micelle by reversible cross-linking of the core through disulfide bond. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 11247-11248.
45. Gao, Z.; Fain, H. D.; Rapoport, N. Controlled and targeted tumor chemotherapy by micellar-encapsulated drug and ultrasound. J. Control. Release, 2005, 102, 203-222.
46. Hawker, C.J.; Frechet, J.M.J. Preparation of polymers with Controlled molecular architecture - a new convergent approach to dendritic macromolecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 2638-2647.
47. Quintana, A.; Raczka, E.; Piehler, L.; Lee, I.; Myc, A.; Majoros, I.; Patri, A. K.; Thomas, T.; Mule, J.; Jr, J. R. () Design and function of a dendrimer-based therapeutic nanodevice targeted to tumor cells through the folate receptor. Pharm. Res., 2002, 19, 1310-1316.
48. Tang, M. X.; Redemann, C. T.; Szoka, F. C. In vitro gene delivery by degraded polyamidoamine dendrimers. Bioconj. Chem., 1996, 7, 703-714.
49. Jansen, J. F.; de Brabander-van Den Berg, E. M.; Meijer, E. W. Encapsulation of guest molecules into a dendritic box. Science, 1994, 266, 1226-1229.
50. Patri, A. K.; Kukowska-Latallo, J. F.; and Baker, J. R. Targeted drug delivery with dendrimers: Comparison of the release kinetics of covalently conjugated drug and non-covalent drug inclusion complex. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 2005, 57, 2203-2214.
51. Maiti, P. K.; Cagin, T.; Wang, G.; Goddard, W. A. Structure of PAMAM dendrimers: Generations 1 through 11. Macromolecules, 2004, 37, 6236-6254.
52. Boris, D.; Rubinstein, M. A self-consistent mean field model of a starburst dendrimer: Dense core vs dense shell. Macromolecules, 1996, 29, 7251-7260.
53. Recker, J.; Tomcik, D. J.; Parquette, J. R. Folding dendrons: The development of solvent-, temperature-, and generation-dependent chiral conformational order in intramolecularly hydrogen-bonded dendrons. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 10298-10307.
54. Rietveld, I. B.; Bouwman, W. G.; Baars, M. W.; Heenan, R. K. Location of the outer shell and influence of pH on carboxylic acid-functionalized poly(propyleneimine) dendrimers. Macromolecules, 2001, 34, 8380-8383.
55. Bosman, A. W.; Bruining, M. J.; Kooijman, H.; Spek, A. L.; Jans-sen, R. A.; Meijer, E. W. Concerning the localization of end groups in dendrimers. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 8547-8548.
56. Lee, I.; Athey, B. D.; Wetzel, A. W.; Meixner, W.,and Baker, J. R. Structural molecular dynamics studies on polyamidoamine den-drimers for a therapeutic application: Effects of pH and generation. Macromolecules, 2002, 35, 4510-4520.
57. Lee, H.; Larson, R. G. Multiscale modeling of dendrimers and their interactions with bilayers and polyelectrolytes. Molecules, 2009, 14, 423-438.
58. Nel, A.; Madler, L.; Velegol, D.; Xia, T.; Hoek, E. M.; Somasundaran, P.; Klaessig, F.; Castranova, V.; Thompson, M. () Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat. Mater., 2009, 8, 543-557.
59. Deserno, M.; Bickel, T. Wrapping of a spherical colloid by a fluid membrane. Europhy. Lett., 2003, 62, 767-773.
60. Zhang, S.L.; Li, J.; Lykotrafitis, G.; Bao, G.; Suresh, S. Size-dependent endocytosis of nanoparticles. Adv. Mater., 2009, 21, 419-424.
61. Chithrani, B.D. Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells. Nano Lett., 2004, 6, 662-668.
62. Rejman, J.; Oberle, V.; Zuhorn, I. S.; Hoekstra, D. Size-dependent internalization of particles via the pathways of clathrin- and caveo-lae-mediated endocytosis. Biochem. J., 2004, 377, 159-169.
63. Park, J.; Lu, W. Interaction of nanoparticles with lipid layers. Phys. Rev. E., 2009, 80, 021607.
64. Ge, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xia, J.; Ma, M.; He, S.; Nie, F.; Gu, N. Effect of surface charge and agglomerate degree of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles on KB cellular uptake in vitro. Colloids Surf. B: Bio-interfaces, 2009, 73, 294-301.
65. Thorek, D. L.; Tsourkas, A. Size, charge and concentration dependent uptake of iron oxide particles by non-phagocytic cells. Biomaterials, 2008, 29, 3583-3590.
66. Jin, H.; Heller, D.A.; Sharma, R.; Strano, M.S. Size-dependent cellular uptake and expulsion of single-walled carbon nanotubes: Single particle tracking and a generic uptake model for nanoparticles. ACSNano, 2009, 3, 149-158.
67. Illya, G, and Deserno, M. Coarse-grained simulation studies of peptide-induced pore formation. Biophys. J., 2008, 95, 4163-4173.
68. Champion, J. A.; Katare, Y. K.; Mitragotri, S. Particle shape: A new design parameter for micro- and nanoscale drug delivery carriers. J. Control. Release, 2007, 121, 3-9.
69. Cossart, P. Subversion of the mammalian cell cytoskeleton by invasive bacteria. J. Clin. Invest., 1997, 9, 2307-2311.
70. Decuzzi, P.; Ferrari, P. The receptor-mediated endocytosis of non-spherical particles. Biophys. J., 2008, 94, 3790-3797.
71. Gratton, S. E. A.; Ropp, P.A.; Pohlhaus, P.D.; Luft, J.C.; Madden, V.J.; Napier, M.E.; DeSimone, J.M. The effect of particle design on cellular internalization pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2008, 105, 11613-11618.
72. Decuzzi, P.; Pasqualini, R.; Arap, W.; Ferrari. M Intravascular delivery of particulate systems: Does geometry really matter? Pharm. Res., 2009, 26, 235-243.
73. Glotzer, S.C.; Solomon, M.J. Anisotropy of building blocks and their assembly into complex structures. Nat. Mater., 2007, 6, 557-562.
74. Roiter, Y.; Ornatska, M.; Rammohan, A.R.; Balakrishnan, J.; Heine, D.R.; Minko, S. Interaction of Lipid Membrane with Nanostructured Surfaces. Langmuir, 2009, 25, 6287-6299.
75. Dalby, M. J.; Berry, C.C.; Riehle, M.O.; Sutherland, D.S.; Agheli, H.; Curtis, A.S.G. Attempted endocytosis of nano-environment produced by colloidal lithography by human fibroblasts. Exp. Cell Res., 2004, 295, 387-394.
76. Verma, A.; Uzun, O.; Hu, Y.H.; Hu, Y.; Han, H.S.; Watson, N.; Chen, S.; Irvine, D.J.; Stellacci, F. Surface-structure-regulated cell-membrane penetration by monolayer-protected nanoparticles. Nat. Mater., 2008, 7, 588-595.
77. Jackson, A. M.; Hu, Y.; Silva, P. J.; Stellacci, F. From homoligand-to mixed-ligand- monolayer-protected metal nanoparticles: a scanning tunneling microscopy investigation. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 11135-11149.
78. Djohari, H.; Dormidontova, E. E. Kinetics of nanoparticle targeting by dissipative particle dynamics simulations. Biomacromolecules, 2009, 10, 3089-3097.
79. Germain, M.A.; Hatton, A.; Williams, S.; Matthews, J.B.; Stone, M.H.; Fisher, J.; Ingham, E. Comparison of the cytotoxicity of clinically relevant cobalt-chromium and alumina ceramic wear particles in vitro. Biomaterials, 2003, 24, 469-479.
80. Chen, J.; Hessler, J.A.; Putchakayala, K.; Khan, D.P.; Hong, S.; Mullen, D.G.; Dimaggio, S.C.; Som, A.; Tew, G.N.; Lopatin, A.N.; Baker, J.R.; Holl, M.M.B.; Orr, B.G. Cationic nanoparticles induce nanoscale disruption in living cell plasma membranes. J. Phys. Chem., B, 2009, 113, 11179-11185.
81. Li, Y.; Chen, X.; Gu. N. Computational investigation of interaction between nanoparticles and membranes: Hydrophobic/hydrophilic effect. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2008, 112, 16647-16653.
82. Ginzburg, V.V.; Balijepalli, S. Modeling the thermodynamics of the interaction of nanoparticles with cell membranes. Nano Lett., 2007, 7, 3716-3722.
83. Feick, J. D.; Chukwumah, N.; Noel, A.E.; Velegol, D. Altering surface charge nonuniformity on individual colloidal particles. Langmuir, 2004, 20, 3090-3095.
84. Edwards, E. W.; Chanana, M.; Wang, D. Capping gold nanoparti-cles with stimuli-responsive polymers to cross water-oil interfaces: In-depth insight to the trans-interfacial activity of nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 15207-15219.
85. Motornov, M.; Sheparovych, R.; Lupitskyy, R.; MacWilliams, E.; Hoy, O.; Luzinov, I.; Minko, S. Stimuli-responsive colloidal systems from mixed brush-coated nanoparticles. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2007, 17, 2307-2314.
86. Uhlmann, P.; Merlitz, H.; Sommer, J.; Stamm, M. Polymer brushes for surface tuning. Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2009, 30, 732-740.
87. Chaudhury, M.K.; Whitesides, G.M. How to make water run uphill. Science, 1992, 256, 1539.
88. Sun, A.; Lahann, J. Dynamically switchable biointerfaces. Soft Matter., 2009, 5, 1555-1561.
89. Lynch, I.; Dawson, K.A. Protein-nanoparticle interactions. Nano Today, 2008, 3, 40-47.
90. Potzl, M.; Zhang, F.; Parak, W.J.; Nienhaus, G.U.; Rocker, C. A quantitative fluorescence study of protein monolayer formation on colloidal nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol., 2009, 4, 577-580.
91. Hellstrand, E.; Iseult L.; Andersson, A.; Dawson, K.A.; Linse, S.; Cedervall, T. Complete high-density lipoproteins in nanoparticle corona. FEBS J., 2009, 276, 3372-3381.
92. Xu, G.; Li, Y.; Li, Bo.; Feng, X.; Gao, H. Self-assembled lipid nanostructures encapsulating nanoparticles in aqueous solution. Soft Matter., 2009, 5, 3977-3983.
93. Li, W.; Szoka, F. C. Lipid-based nanoparticles for nucleic acid delivery. Pharm. L. Res., 2007, 24, 438-449.
94. Peer, D.; Karp, J. M.; Hong, S.; Farokhzad, O. C.; Margalit, R.; Langer, R. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat. Nanotech., 2007, 2, 751-760.
95. Weiner, L. M.; Adams, G. P. New approaches to antibody therapy. Oncogene, 2000, 19, 6144-6151.
96. Carter, P. Improving the efficacy of antibody-based cancer therapies. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2001, 1, 118-129.
97. Allen, T. M. Ligand-targeted therapeutics in anticancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2002, 2, 750-763.
98. von Mehren, M.; Adams, G. P.; Weiner, L. M. (Monoclonal antibody therapy for cancer. Annu. Rev. Med., 2003, 4, 343-369.
99. Sergeeva, A.; Kolonin, M. G.; Molldrem, J. J.; Pasqualini, R.; Arap, W. Display technology: Application for the discovery of drug and gene delivery agents. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 2006, 58, 1622-1654.
100. White, R. R.; Sullenger, B. A.; Rusconi, C. P. () Developing aptamers into therapeutics. J. Clin. Invest., 2000, 106, 929-934.
101. Farokhzad, O. C.; Cheng, J.J.; Teply, B.A.; Sherifi, I.; Jon, S.; Kantoff, P.W.; Richie, J.P.; Langer, R. Targeted nanoparticle-aptamer bioconjugates for cancer chemotherapy in vivo. PNAS, 2006, 103, 6315-6320.
102. Levy-Nissenbaum, E.; Radovic-Moreno, A. F.; Wang, A. Z.; Langer, R.; Farokhzad, O. C. Nanotechnology and aptamers: applications in drug delivery. Trends Biotech., 2008, 26, 442-449.
103. Kukowska-Latallo, J. F.; Candido, K.A.; Cao, Z.Y.; Nigavekar, S.S.; Majoros, I.J.; Thomas, T.P.; Balogh, L.P.; Khan, M.K.; Baker, J.R. Nanoparticle targeting of anticancer drug improves therapeutic response in animal model of human epithelial cancer. Cancer Res., 2005, 65, 5317-5324.
104. Ishida, O.; Maruyama, K.; Tanahashi, H.; Iwatsuru, M.; Sasaki, K.; Eriguchi, M.; Yanagie, H. Liposomes bearing polyethyleneglycol-coupled transferrin with intracellular targeting property to the solid tumors in vivo. Pharm. Res., 2001, 18, 1042-1048.
105. Iinuma, H.; Maruyama, K.; Okinaga, K.; Sasaki, K.; Ishida, S.; Ogiwara, N.; Johkura, K.; Yonemura, Y. Intracellular targeting therapy of cisplatin-encapsulated transferrin-polyethylene glycol liposome on peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer. Int. J. Cancer, 2002, 99, 130-137.
106. Li, J.J.; Ji, J.F.; Holmes, L.M.; Burgin, K.E.; Barton, L.B.; Yu, X.Z.; Wagner, T.E and Wei, Y.Z. Fusion protein from RGD pep-tide and Fc fragment of mouse immunoglobulin G inhibits angio-genesis in tumor. Cancer Gene Ther., 2004, 11, 363-370.
107. Eliza, R. E.; Szoka, F. C. Jr. Liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin targeted to CD44: a strategy to kill CD44-overexpressing tumor cells. Cancer Res., 2004, 61, 2592-2601.
108. Peer, D.; Margalit, R. Loading mitomycin C inside long circulating hyaluronan targeted nano-liposomes increases its antitumor activity in three mice tumor models. Int. J. Cancer, 2004, 108, 780-789.
109. Peer, D.; Margalit, R. Tumor-targeted hyaluronan nanoliposomes increase the antitumor activity of liposomal doxorubicin in synge-neic and human xenograft mouse tumor models. Neoplasia, 2004, 6, 343-353.
110. Schmidt, S. R. Fusion proteins as biopharmaceuticals - Applications and challenges. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Dev., 2009, 12(2), 284-295.
111. Nord, K.; Gunneriusson, E.; Ringdahl, J.; Stahl, S.; Uhlen, M.; Nygren P.A. Binding proteins selected from combinatorial libraries of an alpha-helical bacterial receptor domain. Nat. Biotech., 1997, 15, 772-777.
112. Cortez-Retamozo, V.; Backmann, N.; Senter, P. D.; Wernery, U.; De Baetselier, P.; Muyldermans, S.; Revets, H. () Efficient cancer therapy with a nanobody-based conjugate. Cancer Res., 2004, 64, 2853-2857.
113. Silverman, J.; Lu, Q.; Bakker, A.; To, W.; Duguay, A.; Alba, B.M.; Smith, R.; Rivas, A.; Li, P.; Le, H.; Whitehorn, E.; Moore, K.W.; Swimmer, C.; Perlroth, V.; Vogt, M.; Kolkman, J.; Stemmer, W.P.C. Multivalent avimer proteins evolved by exon shuffling of a family of human receptor domains. Nat. Biotech., 2005, 23, 1556-1561.
114. Pardridge, W. M. Re-engineering biopharmaceuticals for delivery to brain with molecular Trojan horses. Bioconj. Chem., 2008, 19(7), 1327-1338.
115. Kopecek, J. Smart and genetically engineered biomaterials and drug delivery systems. Euro. J. Pharm. Sci., 2003, 20(1), 1-16.
116. Dembo, M.; Torney, D. C.; Saxman, K.; Hammer, D. The reaction-limited kinetics of membrane-to-surface adhesion and detachment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 1988, 234, 55-83.
117. Evans, E.; Ritchie, K. Dynamic strength of molecular adhesion bonds. Biophys. J., 1997, 72, 1541-1555.
118. Marshall, B. T.; Long, M.; Piper, J. W.; Yao, T.; McEver, R. P.; Zhu, C. Direct observation of catch bonds involving cell-adhesion molecules. Nature, 2003, 423, 8-11.
119. Thomas, W. E.; Trintchina, E.; Forero, M.; Vogel, V.; Sokurenko E. V. Bacterial adhesion to target cells enhanced by shear force. Cell, 2002, 109, 913-923.
120. Marshall, B. T.; Long, M.; Piper, J. W.; Yago, T.; McEver, R. P.; Zhu, C. Direct observation of catch bonds involving cell-adhesion molecules. Nature, 2003, 423, 190-193.
121. Sarangapani, K. K.; Yago, T.; Klopocki, A.G.; Lawrence, M.B.; Fleger, C.B.; Rosen, S.D.; McEver, R.P.; Zhu, C. Low force decelerates l-selectin dissociation from p-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 and endoglycan. J. Biol. Chem., 2004, 279, 2291-2298.
122. Guo, B.; Guilford, W. H. Mechanics of actomyosin bonds in different nucleotide states are tuned to muscle contraction. PNAS, 2006, 103, 9844-9849.
123. Yago, T.; Lou, J.; Wu, T.; Yang, J.; Miner, J.L.; Coburn, L.; Lopez, J.A.; Cruz, M.A.; Dong, J.F.; McIntire, L.V.; McEver, R.P.; Zhu, C. Platelet glycoprotein lb alpha forms catch bonds with human WT vWF but not with type 2B von Willebrand disease vWF. J. Clin. Invest., 2008, 118, 3195-3207.
124. Kong, F.; Garcia, A. J.; Mould, A. P.; Humphries, M. J.; Zhu, C. Demonstration of catch bonds between an integrin and its ligand. J. Cell Biol., 2009,187, 1275-1284.
125. Sokurenko, E. V.; Vogel, V.; Thomas, W. E. Catch-bond mechanism of force-enhanced adhesion: counterintuitive, elusive, but widespread? Cell Host Microbe, 2008, 4, 314-323.
126. Forero, M.; Thomas, W. E.; Bland, C.; Nilsson, L. M.; Sokurenko, E. V.; Vogel, V. A catch-bond based nanoadhesive sensitive to shear stress. Nano Lett., 2004, 4, 1593-1597.
127. Agarwal, A.; Katira, P.; Hess, H. Millisecond curing time of a molecular adhesive causes velocity-dependent cargo-loading of molecular shuttles. Nano Lett., 2009, 9, 1170-1175.
128. Alexander-Katz, A.; Schneider, M. F.; Schneider, S. W.; Wixforth, A.; Netz, R. R. Shear-flow-induced unfolding of polymeric globules. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2006, 97, 1-4.
129. Schneider, S. W.; Nuschele, S.; Wixforth, A.; Gorzelanny, C.; Alexander-Katz, A.; Netz, R. R.; Schneider, M.F. Shear-induced unfolding triggers adhesion of von Willebrand factor fibers. PNAS, 2007, 104, 7899-7903.
130. Alexander-Katz, A.; Netz, R. R. Surface-enhanced unfolding of collapsed polymers in shear flow. Europhys. Lett., 2007, 80. 18001