RTI (Response to Intervention): Rethinking special education for students with reading difficulties (yet again)

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 99-108

  Gersten, Russell ^a,b,c,d   Dimino, Joseph A ^a  

^a Instructional Research Group   (United States)

^b Research Institute   (United States)

^c RG Research Group   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31944436089     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.41.1.5     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. ABT ASSOCIATES FOR INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES. (2005). Retrieved June 9, 2005, from http://www.abtassociates.com/index.cfm
2. ADAMS, M.J. (1990). Beginnings read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. BADIAN, N.A. (1994). Preschool prediction: Orthographic and phonological skills, and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 3-25.
4. BAKER, J., & ZIGMOND, N. (1990). Are regular education classes equipped to accommodate students with learning disabilities? Exceptional Children, 56, 515-526.
5. BECK, I.L., & MCKEOWN, M.G. (2001). Text talk: Capturing the benefits of read-aloud experiences for young children. The Reading Teacher, 55, 10-20.
6. CAMPIONE, J., & BROWN, A. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment (pp. 82-116). New York: Guilford.
7. COYNE, M.D., SIMMONS, D., & KAME'ENUI, E.J. (2004). Vocabulary instruction for young children at risk for experiencing reading difficulties: Teaching word meanings through shared storybook readings. In J.F. Baumann & E.J. Kame'enui (Eds.), Vocabulary instruction: From research to practice (pp. 41-58). New York: Guilford.
8. DENTON, C.A., VAUGHN, S., & FLETCHER, J.M. (2003). Bringing research-based practice in reading intervention to scale. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 201-211.
9. FELTON, R.H. (1992). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 212-229.
10. FUCHS, D., & FUCHS, L.S. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 204-219.
11. FUCHS, L., & FUCHS, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 199-208.
12. GERSTEN, R., BAKER, S., HAAGER, D., & GRAVES, A. (2005). Exploring the role of teacher quality in predicting reading outcomes for first grade English learners: An observational study. Remedial & Special Education, 26, 197-206
13. GERSTEN, R., & DIMINO, J. (2001). The realities of translating research into classroom practice. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 120-130.
14. GERSTEN, R., FUCHS, D., WILLIAMS, J., & BAKER, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279-320.
15. GERSTEN, R., KEATING, T.J., & IRVIN, L.K. (1995). The burden of proof: Validity as improvement of instructional practice. Exceptional Children, 61, 510-519.
16. GERSTEN, R., MORVANT, M., & BRENGELMAN, S. (1995). Close to the classroom is close to the bone: Coaching as a means to translate research into classroom practice. Exceptional Children, 62, 52-66.
17. GOOD, R.H., & KAMINSKI, R.A. (2001). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
18. HAAGER, D. & MADHAVI, J.N. (in press). What can we reasonably expect of teachers in a three-tiered Intervention model? In D. Haager, S. Vaughn, & J.K. Klingner (Eds.), Validated practices in three-tiered reading intervention models. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
19. HALL, G.E., & HORD, S.M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20. HUBERMAN, A.M., & MILES, M.B. (1984). Innovation up close: How school improvement works. New York: Plenum Press.
21. JENKINS, J.R., & O'CONNOR, R.E. (2000). Early Identification and intervention for young children with reading learning disabilities. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities (99-149). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. JUEL, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437-447.
23. LESAUX, N., & SIEGEL, L. (2003). The development of reading in children who speak English as a second language. Developmental Psychology, 39, 1005-1019.
24. NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT OF 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Star. 1425 (2002).
25. O'CONNOR, P.D., & JENKINS, J.R. (1999). Prediction of reading disabilities in kindergarten and first grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 159-197.
26. O'CONNOR, R.E. (2000). Increasing the intensity of intervention in kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 43-54.
27. ROBBINS, C., & EHRI, L. (1994). Reading storybooks to kinder-garteners helps them learn new vocabulary words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 54-64.
28. SCARBOROUGH, H. (2005). Developmental relationships between language and reading: Reconciling a beautiful hypothesis with some ugly facts. In H.W. Catts & A.G. Kamhi (Eds.), The connections between language and reading disabilities (pp. 3-24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. SHADISH, W.R., COOK, T.D., & CAMPBELL, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for general causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
30. SPEECE, D.L., CASE, L.P., & MOLLOY, D.E. (2003). Responsiveness to general education instruction as the first gate to learning disabilities identification. Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 18, 147-156.
31. STANOVICH, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-406.
32. TORGESEN, J.K., RASHOTTE, C.A., & ALEXANDER, A.W. (2001). Principles of fluency instruction in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 333-335). Timonium, MD: York Press.
33. TORGESEN, J.K., WAGNER, R.K., RASHOTTE, C.A., ALEXANDER, A.W., & CONWAY, T. (1997). Preventive and remedial interventions for children with severe reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 51-61.
34. U.S. DEPARMENT OF EDUCATION. (2005). The Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services. Retrieved June 22, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/about/ offices/list/osers/index.html
35. VAUGHN, S., & FUCHS, D. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137-146.
36. VAUGHN, S., LINAN-THOMPSON, S., & HICKMAN, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391-409.
37. VAUGHN, S., MATHES, P., LINAN-THOMPSON, S., CIRINO, P., CARLSON, C., FRANCIS, D., ET AL. (in press). First-grade English language learners at-risk for reading problems: Effectiveness of an English intervention. Elementary School Journal.