Professional development that supports the teaching of cognitive reading strategy instruction

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 110, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 301-322

  Sailors, Misty ^a   Price, Larry R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77749322465     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/648980     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. Reading Teacher, 61, 364-373.
2. Almasi, J. F. (2003). Teaching strategic processes in reading. New York: Guildford.
3. American Educational Research Association/ American Psychological Association/National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
4. American Guidance Services. (2001). Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation (GRADE). Circle Pines, MN: Author.
5. Anders, P. L., Hoffman, J. V., & Duffy, G. G. (2000). Teaching teachers to teach reading: Paradigm shifts, persistent problems, and challenges. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Anderson, V. (1992). A teacher development project in transactional strategy instruction for teachers of severely reading-disabled adolescents. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 391-403.
7. Bean, R. M. (2004). The reading specialist: Leadership for the classroom, school, and community. New York: Guilford.
8. Birman, B. F., Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., & Garet, M. S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57, 28-33.
9. Block, C. C., & Pressley, M. (2002). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. New York: Guilford.
10. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33, 3-15.
11. Borko, H., Davinroy, K. H., Bliem, C. L., & Cumbo, K. B. (2000). Exploring and supporting teacher change: Two third-grade teachers' experiences in a mathematics and literacy staff development project. Elementary School Journal, 100, 273-306.
12. Brady, S., Gillis, M., Smith, T., Lavalette, M., Liss-Bronstein, L., Lowe, E., et al. (2009). First grade teachers' knowledge of phonological awareness and code concepts: Examining gains from an intensive form of professional development and corresponding teacher attitudes. Reading and Writing, 22, 425-455.
13. Brown, R., Pressley, M., Van Meter, P., & Schuder, T. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 18-37.
14. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 171- 246). Chicago: Rand McNally.
15. Cantrell, S. C., & Hughes, H. K. (2008). Teacher efficacy and content literacy implementation: An exploration of the effects of extended professional development with coaching. Journal of Literacy Research, 40, 95-127.
16. Cassidy, J., & Cassidy, D. (2008). What's hot for 2008. Reading Today, 25(4), 1, 10, 11.
17. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). Relationship of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Nejad & C. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 249-306). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
18. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. New York: Erlbaum.
19. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasiexperimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
20. Costa, A. L., & Garmston, R. J. (2002). Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools. Norwood, MA: Christoper-Gordon.
21. Croninger, R. G., & Valli, L. (2009). "Where is the action?" Challenges to studying the teaching of reading in elementary classrooms. Educational Researcher, 38, 100-108.
22. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8. Retrieved November 6, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/vol8.html
23. Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers' instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81-112.
24. DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Dole, J. (2004). The changing role of the reading specialist in school reform. Reading Teacher, 57, 462-471.
26. Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239-264.
27. Dole, J. A., Nokes, J. D., & Drits, D. (2008). Cognitive strategy instruction. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 347-372). New York: Routledge.
28. Duffy, G. G. (1993a). Teachers' progress toward becoming expert strategy teachers. Elementary School Journal, 94, 109-120.
29. Duffy, G. G. (1993b). Rethinking strategy instruction: Four teachers' development and their low achievers' understandings. Elementary School Journal, 93, 231-264.
30. Duffy, G. G. (1998). Teaching and the balancing of round stones. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 777-780.
31. Duffy, G. G. (2003). Explaining reading: A resource for teaching concepts, skills, and strategies. New York: Guilford.
32. Duffy, G. G. (2004). Teachers who improve reading achievement. In D. S. Stickland & M. L. Kamala (Eds.), Improving reading achievement through professional development (pp. 3-22). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
33. Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., Meloth, M. S., Vavrus, L. G., Book, C., Putnam, J., et al. (1986). The relationship between explicit verbal explanations during reading skill instruction and student awareness and achievement: A study of reading teacher effects. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 237-252.
34. Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., Sivan, E., Rackliffe, G., Book, C., Meloth, M. S., et al. (1987). Effects of explaining the reasoning associated with using reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 347-368.
35. Fleiss, J. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
36. Frey, N., & Kelly, P. R. (2002). The effects of staff development, modeling, and coaching of interactive writing on instructional repertoires of K-1 teachers in a professional development school. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 51, 176-185.
37. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915-945.
38. Gersten, R., Morvant, M., & Brengelman, S. (1995). Close to the classroom is close to the bone: Coaching as a means to translate research into classroom practice. Exceptional Children, 62, 52-66.
39. Grissom, R. J., & Kim, J. J. (2005). Effect sizes for research: A broad practical approach. Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Herbert, J., & Attridge, C. (1975). A guide for developers and users of observation systems and manuals. American Educational Research Journal, 12, 1-20.
41. Hintze, J. M. (2005). Psychometrics of direct observation. School Psychology Review, 34, 507-519.
42. Hoffman, J. V., & Duffy, G. G. (1999). In pursuit of an illusion: The flawed search for a perfect method. Reading Teacher, 53, 10-16.
43. Hoffman, J. V., & Pearson, P. D. (2000). Reading teacher education in the next millennium: What your grandmother's teacher didn't know that your granddaugher's teacher should. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 28-44.
44. International Reading Association. (2004). The role and qualifications of the reading coach in the United States. Newark, DE: Author.
45. International Reading Association. (2006). Standards for middle and high school literacy coaches. Newark, DE: Author.
46. Knapp, M. S. (1995). Teaching for meaning in highpoverty classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
47. Kucan, L. (2007). Insights from teachers who analyzed transcripts of their own classroom discussions. Reading Teacher, 61, 228-236.
48. Langer, J. A. (2000). Beating the odds: Teaching middle and high school students to read and write well (Report Series 12014). Albany: University at Albany State University of New York, National Research Center on English Language Learning and Achievement.
49. Lee, J., Grigg, W., & Donahue, P. (2007). The nation's report card: Reading 2007 (NCES 2007-496). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
50. Lipson, M. Y., Mosenthal, J. H., Mekkelsen, J., & Russ, B. (2004). Building knowledge and fashioning success one school at a time. Reading Teacher, 57, 534-542.
51. Lovette, M. W., Lacerenza, L., De Palma, M., Benson, N. J., Steinbach, K. A., & Frijters, J. C. (2008). Preparing teachers to remediate reading disabilities in high school: What is needed for effective professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1083-1097.
52. Martin, J. (1977). The development and use of classroom observation instruments. Canadian Journal of Education, 2, 43-54.
53. Metsala, J. L., Wharton-McDonald, R., Pressley, M. J., Rankin, J., Mistretta, J., & Ettenberger, S. (1997). Effective primary-grades literacy instruction-balanced literacy instruction. Reading Teacher, 50, 518-521.
54. Miller, E. (1998). The old model of staff development survives in a world where everything else has changed. Harvard Education Letter, 11, 2-4.
55. Morrow, L. M., Tracey, D. H., Woo, D. G., & Pressley, M. (1999). Characteristics of exemplary first-grade literacy instruction. Reading Teacher, 52, 462-476.
56. Mowbray, C. T., Holter, M. C., Teague, G. B., & Bybee, D. (2003). Fidelity criteria: Development, measurement, and validation. American Journal of Evaluation, 24, 315-340.
57. National Center for Educational Statistics. (1999). Teacher quality: A report on the preparation and qualifications of public school teachers. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
58. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2003). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 reading assessment. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
59. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
60. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. (1978). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. O'Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 33-84.
61. Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293-316.
62. Paris, S., Waskik, B., & Turner, J. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M. Kamala, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 609-640). New York: Longman.
63. Pearson, P. D., & Dole, J. A. (1987). Explicit comprehension instruction: A review of research and a new conceptualization of instruction. Elementary School Journal, 88, 151-165.
64. Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Desimone, L. M., & Birman, B. F. (2003). Providing effective professional development: Lessons from the Eisenhower Program. Science Educator, 12, 23-40.
65. Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 545-562). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Pressley, M. (2002). Metacognition and selfregulated comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 291-309). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
67. Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Schneider, W. (1989). Good information processing: What it is and how education can promote it. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 857-867.
68. Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P., Gaskins, I., Schuder, T., Bergman, J., Almasi, L., et al. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. Elementary School Journal, 92, 511-554.
69. Pressley, M., Rankin, T., & Yokoi, L. (1996). A survey of instructional practices of primary teachers nominated as effective in promoting literacy. Elementary School Journal, 96, 363-384.
70. Pressley, M., & Wharton-McDonald, R. (1997). Skilled comprehension and its development through instruction. School Psychology Review, 26, 448-466.
71. Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., MistrettaHampston, J., & Echevarria, M. (1998). The nature of literacy instruction in ten grade 1/5 classrooms in upstate New York. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 159-194.
72. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4-15.
73. Raudenbush, S., & Byrk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74. Raudenbush, S., Byrk, A., Cheong, F., Congdon, R., & DuToit, M. (2004). Optimal HLM 6.0 Software [Computer software]. Chicago: Scientific Software.
75. Reutzel, D. R., Smith, J. A., & Fawson, P. C. (2005). An evaluation of two approaches for teaching reading comprehension strategies in the primary years using science information texts. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20, 276-305.
76. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula, T. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102-119). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
77. Roller, C. (2006). Reading and literacy coaches report on hiring requirements and duties survey. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
78. Sailors, M. (2006). Comprehension Instruction Observation Protocol: Capturing the instructional comprehension practices of classroom teachers, grades 2-8. Unpublished data collection instrument, The University of Texas at San Antonio.
79. Sailors, M. (2008). Improving comprehension instruction through quality professional development. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 645-658). New York: Routledge.
80. Sailors, M., & Henderson, S. (2008, December). Who's teaching reading comprehension? A status of reading instruction in grades 2-8 in the south. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Orlando, FL.
81. Scantlebury, K., Gallo-Fox, J., & Wassell, B. (2008). Coteaching as a model for preservice secondary teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 967-981.
82. Shanklin, N. L. (2006). What are the characteristics of effective literacy coaching? Denver: Literacy Coaching Clearinghouse. Retrieved March 1, 2007, from http://www.literacycoachingonline. org
83. Shulman, L. S. (1983). Autonomy and obligation: The remote control of teaching. In L. S. Shulman and G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbooks of teaching and policy (pp. 484-504). New York: Longman.
84. Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
85. Snow, C. E., Burns, S. M., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
86. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson/ Allyn & Bacon.
87. Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Clark, K. F., & Walpole, S. (2000). Effective schools and accomplished teachers: Lessons about primary-grade reading instruction in low-income schools. Elementary School Journal, 101, 121-165.
88. Toll, C. A. (2005). The literacy coach's survival guide: Essential questions and practical answers. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
89. Van Keer, H., & Verhaeghe, J. P. (2005). Effects of explicit reading strategies instruction and peer tutoring on second and fifth graders' reading comprehension and self-efficacy perception. Journal of Experimental Education, 73, 291-329.
90. Vogt, M., & Shearer, B. (2006). Reading specialists and literacy coaches in the real world (2nd ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.
91. Volpe, R. J., & McConaughy, S. H. (2005). Systematic direct observational assessment of student behavior: Its use and interpretation in multiple settings: An introduction to the miniseries. School Psychology Review, 34, 451-453.
92. Walpole, S., & McKenna, M. C. (2004). The literacy coach's handbook: A guide to research-based practice. New York: Guilford.
93. Zwart, R. C., Wubbels, T., Bolhuis, S., & Bergen, T. C. M. (2008). Teacher learning through reciprocal peer coaching: An analysis of activity sequences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 982-1002.