"Where is the action?" challenges to studying the teaching of reading in elementary classrooms

Educational Researcher

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 100-108

  Croninger, Robert G ^a   Valli, Linda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

High stakes accountability; Reading instruction; Research methodology; Teacher effectiveness

Indexed keywords

EID: 68249090766     PISSN: 0013189X     EISSN: 1935102X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X09333206     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alexander, P., & Fives, H. (2000). Achieving expertise in teaching reading. In L. Baker, M. Dreher, & J. Guthrie (Eds.), Engaging young readers: Promoting achievement and motivation (pp. 285-308). New York: Guilford.
2. Alexander, P., & Murphy, P. (1998). The research base for APA's learnercentered psychological principles. In N. Lambert & B. McCombs (Eds.), How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education (pp. 25-60). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3. Allington, R., & Cunningham, P. (1996). Schools that work: Where all children read and write. New York: HarperCollins.
4. Allington, R., & Johnston, P. (2002). Reading to learn: Lessons from exemplary fourth-grade classrooms. New York: Guilford.
5. Ball, D., & Cohen, D. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Ball, D., & Lampert, M. (1999). Multiples of evidence, time, and perspective: Revising the study of teaching and learning. In E. Lagemann & L. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research (pp. 371-398). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Barr, R., & Dreeben, R. (1983). How schools work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Bransford, J., Brown, L., & Cocking, R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9. Byrnes, J. (2000). Using instructional time effectively. In L. Baker, M. Dreher, & J. Guthrie (Eds.), Engaging young readers: Promoting achievement and motivation (pp. 188-208). New York: Guilford.
10. Chall, J., & Jacobs, V. (2003). Poor children's fourth-grade slump. American Educator, 27(1), 14-17.
11. Chall, J., Jacobs, V., & Baldwin, L. (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Chambers, J., Lieberman, J., Parrish, T., Kaleba, D., Van Campen, J., & Stullich, S. (2000). Study of education resources and federal funding: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Planning and Evaluation Service.
13. Chambliss, M., & Graeber, A. (2003, April). Does subject matter matter? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
14. Cohen, D., Raudenbush, S., & Ball, D. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 119-142.
15. Fenstermacher, G., & Richardson, V. (2005). On making determinations of quality in teaching. Teachers College Record, 107, 186-213.
16. Fuhrman, S., Cohen, D., & Mosher, F. (2007). The state of education policy research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Gallego, M., & Hollingsworth, S. (Eds.). (2000). What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard. New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Gee, J. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Falmer.
19. Good, T., & Brophy, J. (2003). Looking in classrooms (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20. Heath, S. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. International Reading Association & National Council of Teachers of English. (1996). Standards for the English language arts: A project of International Reading Association and National Council of Teachers of English. Newark, DE, and Urbana, IL: Authors.
22. Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23. Lash, A., & Kirkpatrick, S. (1990). A classroom perspective on student mobility. Elementary School Journal, 91, 177-191.
24. Lee, C. (2001). Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 97-142.
25. Lee, C. (2007). Culture, literacy, and learning: Taking bloom in the midst of the whirlwind. New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. McCaffrey, D., Lockwood, J., Koretz, D., & Hamilton, L. (2003). Evaluating value-added models for teacher accountability. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
28. Miller, R., Murnane, R., & Willet, J. (2008, August). Do teacher absences impact student achievement? Longitudinal evidence from one urban school district. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 181-200.
29. Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132-141.
30. Monk, D., & Ibrahim, M. (1984). Patterns of absence and pupil achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 295-310.
31. Morrow, L., Wamsley, G., Duhammel, K., & Fittipaldi, N. (2002). A case study of exemplary practice in fourth grade. In B. Taylor, P. Pearson, K. Clark, & S. Walpole (Eds.), Teaching reading: Effective schools, accomplished teachers (pp. 289-307). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourses, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 261-290.
33. Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 545-561). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Pressley, M., Yokoi, L., Rankin, J., Wharton-McDonald, R., & Mistretta, J. (1997). A survey of the instructional practices of Grade 5 teachers nominated as effective in promoting literacy. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 145-160.
35. Raudenbush, S. (2008). Advancing policy by advancing research on instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 206-230.
36. Raudenbush, S., Martinez, A., & Spybrook, J. (2007). Strategies for improving precision in group randomized experiments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29, 5-29.
37. Rowan, B., & Correnti, R. (2009). Studying reading instruction with teacher logs: Lessons from the Study of Instructional Improvement. Educational Researcher, 38, 120-131.
38. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
39. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2002). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Taylor, B., Pearson, P., Clark, K., & Walpole, S. (Eds.). (2002). Teaching reading: Effective schools, accomplished teachers. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Valli, L., Croninger, R., & Buese, D. (2006, April). Studying high-quality teaching in a high-stakes policy environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
42. Valli, L., Croninger, R., Chambliss, M., Graeber, A., & Buese, D. (2008). Test driven: High-stakes accountability in elementary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
43. Valli, L., Croninger, R., & Walters, K. (2007). Who (else) is the teacher? Cautionary notes on teacher accountability systems. American Journal of Education, 113, 635-662.