Learning: From association to cognition

Annual Review of Psychology

Volumn 61, Issue , 2010, Pages 273-301

  Shanks, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Association; Awareness; Blocking; Cognition; Conditioning; Inference; Reasoning

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; COGNITION; CONDITIONING; HUMAN; LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; THINKING;

ANIMALS; COGNITION; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; LEARNING; THINKING;

EID: 77449118063     PISSN: 00664308     EISSN: 15452085     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100519     Document Type: Article

References (143)

1. Aitken MRF, Larkin MJW, Dickinson A. 2001. Re-examination of the role of within-compound associations in the retrospective revaluation of causal judgements. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 54B:27-51
2. Baeyens F, Eelen P, Van den Bergh O, Crombez G. 1990. Flavor-flavor and color-flavor conditioning in humans. Learn. Motiv. 21:434-455
3. Beckers T, De Houwer J, Pineño O, Miller RR. 2005. Outcome additivity and outcome maximality influence cue competition in human causal learning. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 31:238-249
4. Beckers T, Miller RR, De Houwer J, Urushihara K. 2006. Reasoning rats: forward blocking in Pavlo-vian animal conditioning is sensitive to constraints of causal inference. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 135:92-102
5. Bellebaum C, Daum I. 2004. Effects of age and awareness on eyeblink conditional discrimination learning. Behav. Neurosci. 118:1157-1165
6. Berry CJ, Henson RNA, Shanks DR. 2006. On the relationship between repetition priming and recognition memory: insights from a computational model. J. Mem. Lang. 55:515-533
7. Bouton ME. 1993. Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychol. Bull. 114:80-99
8. Bremner AJ, Mareschal D, Destrebecqz A, Cleeremans A. 2007. Cognitive control of sequential knowledge in 2-year-olds: evidence from an incidental sequence-learning and-generation task. Psychol. Sci. 18:261-266
9. Brewer WF. 1974. There is no convincing evidence for operant or classical conditioning in adult humans. In Cognition and the Symbolic Processes, ed. WB Weimer, DS Palermo, pp. 1-42. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
10. Broadbent DE, Fitzgerald P, Broadbent MHP. 1986. Implicit and explicit knowledge in the control ofcomplex systems. Br. J. Psychol. 77:33-50
11. Cheng PW. 1997. From covariation to causation: a causal power theory. Psychol. Rev. 104:367-405
12. Cheng PW, Holyoak KJ. 1995. Complex adaptive systems as intuitive statisticians: causality, contingency, and prediction. In Comparative Approaches to Cognitive Science, ed. HL Roitblat, J-A Meyer, pp. 271-302. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
13. Chun MM, Jiang Y. 1998. Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cogn. Psychol. 36:28-71
14. Chun MM, Jiang Y. 2003. Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 29:224-234
15. Chun MM, Phelps EA. 1999. Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage. Nat. Neurosci. 2:844-847
16. Clark RE, Squire LR. 1998. Classical conditioning and brain systems: the role of awareness. Science 280:77-81
17. Cobos PL, Ló pez FJ, Caño A, Almaraz J, Shanks DR. 2002. Mechanisms of predictive and diagnostic causal induction. J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Process. 28:331-346
18. Cook SW, Harris RE. 1937. The verbal conditioning of the galvanic skin reflex. J. Exp. Psychol. 21:202-210
19. Cornwell BR, Echiverri AM, Grillon C. 2007. Sensitivity to masked conditioned stimuli predicts conditioned response magnitude under masked conditions. Psychophysiology 44:403-406
20. Dawson ME, Rissling AJ, Schell AM, WilcoxR. 2007. Under what conditions can human affective conditioning occur without contingency awareness? Test of the evaluative conditioning paradigm. Emotion 7:755-766
21. Dawson ME, Schell AM. 1982. Electrodermal responses to attended and nonattended significant stimuli during dichotic listening. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 8:315-324
22. De Houwer J. 2009. The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learn. Behav. 37:1-20
23. De Houwer J, Beckers T. 2002a. Higher-order retrospective revaluation in human causal learning. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 55B:137-151
24. De Houwer J, Beckers T. 2002b. Second-order backward blocking and unovershadowing in human causal learning. Exp. Psychol. 49:27-33
25. De Houwer J, Beckers T, Glautier S. 2002. Outcome and cue properties modulate blocking. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 55A:965-985
26. De Houwer J, Vandorpe S, Beckers T. 2007. Statistical contingency has a different impact on preparation judgements than on causal judgements. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 60:418-432
27. Dennis NA, Howard JH, Howard DV. 2006. Implicit sequence learning without motor sequencing in young and old adults. Exp. Brain Res. 175:153-164
28. Dickinson A. 1980. Contemporary Animal Learning Theory. London: Cambridge Univ. Press
29. Dickinson A. 2009. What are association formation models? Learn. Behav. 37:21-24
30. Dickinson A, Brown KJ. 2007. Flavor-evaluative conditioning is unaffected by contingency knowledge during training with color-flavor compounds. Learn. Behav. 35:36-42
31. Dickinson A, Burke J. 1996. Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 49B:60-80
32. Dickinson A, Shanks DR, Evenden JL. 1984. Judgement of act-outcome contingency: the role of selective attribution. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 36A:29-50
33. Evans JSBT. 2008. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59:255-278
34. Field AP, Davey GCL. 1999. Reevaluating evaluative conditioning: a nonassociative explanation of conditioning effects in the visual evaluative conditioning paradigm. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 25:211-224
35. Fletcher PC, Anderson JM, Shanks DR, Honey R, Carpenter TA, et al. 2001. Responses of human frontal cortex to surprising events are predicted by formal associative learning theory. Nat. Neurosci. 4:1043-1048
36. Fu QF, Dienes Z, Fu XL. 2009. Can unconscious knowledge allow control in sequence learning? Conscious. Cogn. In Press
37. Fu QF, Fu XL, Dienes Z. 2008. Implicit sequence learning and conscious awareness. Conscious. Cogn. 17:185-202
38. Gaillard V, Destrebecqz A, Michiels S, Cleeremans A. 2009. Effects of age and practice in sequence learning: a graded account of ageing, learning and control. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 21:255-282
39. Gawronski B, Hofmann W, Wilbur CJ. 2006. Are "implicit" attitudes unconscious? Conscious. Cogn. 15:485-499
40. Ghirlanda S. 2005. Retrospective revaluation as simple associative learning. J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Process. 31:107-111
41. Griffiths O, Mitchell CJ. 2008. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 137:626-648
42. Haselgrove M. 2009. Reasoning rats or associative animals? A common-element analysis of the effects of additive and subadditive pretraining on blocking. J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Process. In Press
43. Holland PC. 2008. Cognitive versus stimulus-response theories of learning. Learn. Behav. 36:227-241
44. Howard JH, Howard DV, Dennis NA, Yankovich H, Vaidya CJ. 2004. Implicit spatial contextual learning in healthy aging. Neuropsychology 18:124-134
45. Jacoby LL. 1991. A process dissociation framework: separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. J. Mem. Lang. 30:513-541
46. Jiménez L, Vaquero JMM, Lupiáñez J. 2006. Qualitative differences between implicit and explicit sequence learning. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 32:475-490
47. Kahneman D. 2003. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am. Psychol. 58:697-720
48. Kamin LJ. 1969. Selective association and conditioning. In Fundamental Issues in Associative Learning, ed. NJ Mackintosh, WK Honig, pp. 42-64. Halifax: Dalhousie Univ. Press
49. Kinder A, Shanks DR. 2003. Neuropsychological dissociations between priming and recognition: a single-system connectionist account. Psychol. Rev. 110:728-744
50. Knight DC, Nguyen HT, Bandettini PA. 2003. Expression of conditional fear with and without awareness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100:15280-15283
51. Knight DC, Nguyen HT, Bandettini PA. 2006. The role of awareness in delay and trace fear conditioning in humans. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 6:157-162
52. Knight DC, Waters NS, Bandettini PA. 2009. Neural substrates of explicit and implicit fear memory. NeuroImage 45:208-214
53. Knuttinen M-G, Power JM, Preston AR, Disterhoft JF. 2001. Awareness in classical differential eyeblink conditioning in young and aging humans. Behav. Neurosci. 115:747-757
54. Koedijker JM, Oudejans RRD, Beek PJ. 2008. Table tennis performance following explicit and analogy learning over 10, 000 repetitions. Int. J. Sport Psychol. 39:237-256
55. Kruschke JK. 2008. Bayesian approaches to associative learning: from passive to active learning. Learn. Behav. 36:210-226
56. Lagnado DA, Shanks DR. 2002. Probability judgment in hierarchical learning: a conflict between predictive-ness and coherence. Cognition 83:81-112
57. Le Pelley ME, Beesley T, Suret MB. 2007. Blocking of human causal learning involves learned changes in stimulus processing. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 60:1468-1476
58. Leow RP, Bowles MA. 2005. Attention and awareness in SLA. In External and Internal Factors in Adult SLA, ed. C Sanz, pp. 179-203. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press
59. Livesey EJ, Boakes RA. 2004. Outcome additivity, elemental processing and blocking in human causality judgements. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 57B:361-379
60. López FJ, Cobos PL, Caño A. 2005. Associative and causal reasoning accounts of causal induction: symmetries and asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic inferences. Mem. Cogn. 33:1388-1398
61. López FJ, Cobos PL, Caño A, Shanks DR. 1998. The rational analysis of human causal and probability judgment. In Rational Models of Cognition, ed. M Oaksford, N Chater, pp. 314-352 London: Oxford Univ. Press
62. Lovibond PF. 2003. Causal beliefs and conditioned responses: retrospective revaluation induced by experience and by instruction. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 29:97-106
63. Lovibond PF, Been S-L, Mitchell CJ, Bouton ME, Frohardt R. 2003. Forward and backward blocking of causal judgment is enhanced by additivity of effect magnitude. Mem. Cogn. 31:133-142
64. Lovibond PF, Shanks DR. 2002. The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: empirical evidence and theoretical implications. J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Process. 28:3-26
65. Mackintosh NJ. 1975. A theory of attention: variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychol. Rev. 82:276-298
66. Mackintosh NJ. 1983. Conditioning and Associative Learning. Oxford, UK: Clarendon
67. Maia TV, Cleeremans A. 2005. Consciousness: converging insights from connectionist modeling and neuro-science. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9:397-404
68. Maia TV, McClelland JL. 2004. A reexamination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: what participants really know in the Iowa gambling task. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:16075-16080
69. Matute H, Vegas S, De Marez PJ. 2002. Flexible use of recent information in causal and predictive judgments. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 28:714-725
70. McClelland JL, McNaughton BL, O'Reilly RC. 1995. Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychol. Rev. 102:419-457
71. McClelland JL, Rumelhart DE. 1986. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Vol. 2: Psychological and Biological Models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
72. McNally RJ. 1981. Phobias and preparedness: instructional reversal of electrodermal conditioning to fear-relevant stimuli. Psychol. Rep. 48:175-180
73. Melchers KG, Lachnit H, Shanks DR. 2004a. Past experience influences the processing ofstimulus compounds in human Pavlovian conditioning. Learn. Motiv. 35:167-188
74. Melchers KG, Lachnit H, Shanks DR. 2004b. Within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation and in direct learning: a challenge for comparator theory. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 57B:25-53
75. Melchers KG, Lachnit H, Shanks DR. 2006. The comparator theory fails to account for the selective role of within-compound associations in cue selection effects. Exp. Psychol. 53:316-320
76. Melchers KG, Shanks DR, Lachnit H. 2008. Stimulus coding in human associative learning: flexible representations of parts and wholes. Behav. Process. 77:413-427
77. Melton AW. 1950. Learning. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1:9-30
78. Miller RR, Barnet RC, Grahame NJ. 1995. Assessment of the Rescorla-Wagner model. Psychol. Bull. 117:363-386
79. Mitchell CJ, De Houwer J, Lovibond PF. 2009. The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behav. Brain Sci. 32:183-246
80. Mitchell CJ, Killedar A, Lovibond PF. 2005a. Inference-based retrospective revaluation in human causal judgments requires knowledge of within-compound relationships. J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Process. 31:418-424
81. Mitchell CJ, Livesey E, Lovibond PF. 2007. A dissociation between causal judgement and the ease with which a cause is categorized with its effect. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 60:400-417
82. Mitchell CJ, Lovibond PF. 2002. Backward and forward blocking in human electrodermal conditioning: blocking requires an assumption of outcome additivity. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 55B:311-329
83. Mitchell CJ, Lovibond PF, Condoleon M. 2005b. Evidence for deductive reasoning in blocking of causal judgments. Learn. Motiv. 36:77-87
84. Mitchell CJ, Lovibond PF, Gan CY. 2005c. A dissociation between causal judgment and outcome recall. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12:950-954
85. Mitchell CJ, Lovibond PF, Minard E, Lavis Y. 2006. Forward blocking in human learning sometimes reflects the failure to encode a cue-outcome relationship. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 59:830-844
86. Mitchell CJ, Wardle SG, Lovibond PF, Weidemann G, Chang BPI. 2009. Is Perruchet's dissociation between cued reaction time and outcome expectancy evidence for two separate associative learning processes? J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. In Press
87. Mowrer RR, Klein SB. 2001. The transitive nature of contemporary learning theory. In Handbook of Contemporary Learning Theories, ed. RR Mowrer, SB Klein, pp. 1-21. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
88. Nisbett RE, Wilson TD. 1977. Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol. Rev. 84:231-259
89. Nissen MJ, Bullemer P. 1987. Attentional requirements of learning: evidence from performance measures. Cogn. Psychol. 19:1-32
90. Norman E, Price MC, Duff SC. 2006. Fringe consciousness in sequence learning: the influence of individual differences. Conscious. Cogn. 15:723-760
91. Norman E, Price MC, Duff SC, Mentzoni RA. 2007. Gradations of awareness in a modified sequence learning task. Conscious. Cogn. 16:809-837
92. Pearce JM, Hall G. 1980. A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychol. Rev. 87:532-552
93. Perales JC, Shanks DR. 2007. Models of covariation-based causal judgment: a review and synthesis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14:577-596
94. Perales JC, Shanks DR. 2008. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 34:1482-1494
95. Perruchet P. 1985. A pitfall for the expectancy theory of human eyelid conditioning. Pavlov. J. Biol. Sci. 20:163-170
96. Perruchet P, Amorim M-A. 1992. Conscious knowledge and changes in performance in sequence learning: evidence against dissociation. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 18:785-800
97. Perruchet P, Bigand E, Benoit-Gonin F. 1997. The emergence of explicit knowledge during the early phase of learning in sequential reaction time tasks. Psychol. Res. 60:4-13
98. Perruchet P, Cleeremans A, Destrebecqz A. 2006. Dissociating the effects of automatic activation and explicit expectancy on reaction times in a simple associative learning task. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 32:955-965
99. Pleyers G, Corneille O, Luminet O, Yzerbyt V. 2007. Aware and (dis)liking: Item-based analyses reveal that valence acquisition via evaluative conditioning emerges only when there is contingency awareness. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 33:130-144
100. Postman L. 1962. Rewards and punishments in human learning. In Psychology in the Making: Histories of Selected Research Problems, ed. L Postman, pp. 331-401. New York: Knopf
101. Preston AR, Gabrieli JDE. 2008. Dissociation between explicit memory and configural memory in the human medial temporal lobe. Cereb. Cortex 18:2192-2207
102. Price PC, Yates JF. 1993. Judgmental overshadowing: further evidence of cue interaction in contingency judgment. Mem. Cogn. 21:561-572
103. Rachman S. 1977. The conditioning theory of fear-acquisition: a critical examination. Behav. Res. Ther. 15:375-387
104. Rescorla RA, Wagner AR. 1972. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In Classical Conditioning II: Current Theory and Research, ed. AH Black, WF Prokasy, pp. 64-99. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts
105. Rogers RF, Matzel LD. 1996. Higher-order associative processing in Hermissenda suggests multiple sites of neuronal modulation. Learn. Mem. 2:279-298
106. Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL. 1986. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
107. Schmajuk N, Larrauri J. 2008. Associative models can describe both causal learning and conditioning. Behav. Process. 77:443-445
108. Scully AL, Mitchell CJ. 2008. Extinction in human learning and memory. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 61:1472-1478
109. Shanks DR. 1985. Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgement. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 37B:1-21
110. Shanks DR. 1990. On the cognitive theory of conditioning. Biol. Psychol. 30:171-179
111. Shanks DR, Channon S, Wilkinson L, Curran HV. 2006. Disruption of sequential priming in organic and pharmacological amnesia: a role for the medial temporal lobes in implicit contextual learning. Neuropsy-chopharmacology 31:1768-1776
112. Shanks DR, Darby RJ. 1998. Feature-and rule-based generalization in human associative learning. J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Process. 24:405-415
113. Shanks DR, Dickinson A. 1990. Contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning: a comment on Baeyens, Eelen, and Van den Bergh. Cogn. Emot. 4:19-30
114. Shanks DR, Johnstone T. 1999. Evaluating the relationship between explicit and implicit knowledge in a sequential reaction time task. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 25:1435-1451
115. Shanks DR, Perruchet P. 2002. Dissociation between priming and recognition in the expression of sequential knowledge. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9:362-367
116. Shanks DR, Rowland LA, Ranger MS. 2005. Attentional load and implicit sequence learning. Psychol. Res. 69:369-382
117. Shanks DR, Wilkinson L, Channon S. 2003. Relationship between priming and recognition in deterministic and probabilistic sequence learning. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 29:248-261
118. Sloman SA. 1996. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychol. Bull. 119:3-22
119. Smith CN, Clark RE, Manns JR, Squire LR. 2005. Acquisition of differential delay eyeblink classical conditioning is independent of awareness. Behav. Neurosci. 119:78-86
120. Smyth AC, Shanks DR. 2008. Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent tests. Mem. Cogn. 36:403-415
121. Stahl C, Unkelbach C, Corneille O. 2009. Onthe respective contributions of awareness of unconditioned stimulus valence and unconditioned stimulus identity in attitude formation through evaluative conditioning. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 97:404-420
122. Stefaniak N, Willems S, Adam S, Meulemans T. 2008. What is the impact of the explicit knowledge of sequence regularities on both deterministic and probabilistic serial reaction time task performance? Mem. Cogn. 36:1283-1298
123. Thomas MSC, McClelland JL. 2008. Connectionist models of cognition. In The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology, ed. R Sun, pp. 23-58. London: Cambridge Univ. Press
124. Thorndike EL. 1931. Human Learning. New York: Century
125. Vadillo MA, Miller RR, Matute H. 2005. Causal and predictive-value judgments, but not predictions, are based on cue-outcome contingency. Learn. Behav. 33:172-183
126. Vaidya CJ, Huger M, Howard DV, Howard JH. 2007. Developmental differences in implicit learning of spatial context. Neuropsychology 21:497-506
127. Van Hamme LJ, Wasserman EA. 1994. Cue competition in causality judgments: the role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements. Learn. Motiv. 25:127-151
128. Vandenberghe M, Schmidt N, Fery P, Cleeremans A. 2006. Can amnesic patients learn without awareness? New evidence comparing deterministic and probabilistic sequence learning. Neuropsychologia 44:1629-1641
129. Vandorpe S, de Houwer J, Beckers T. 2007. The role of memory for compounds in cue competition. Learn. Motiv. 38:195-207
130. Waelti P, Dickinson A, Schultz W. 2001. Dopamine responses comply with basic assumptions of formal learning theory. Nature 412:43-48
131. Wagner AR. 1981. SOP: a model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In Information Processing in Animals: Memory Mechanisms, ed. NE Spear, RR Miller, pp. 5-47. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
132. Waldmann MR. 2000. Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 26:53-76
133. Waldmann MR, Holyoak KJ. 1990. Can causal induction be reduced to associative learning? Proceedings 12th Ann. Conf. Cogn. Sci. Soc., pp. 190-197 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
134. Waldmann MR, Holyoak KJ. 1992. Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: asymmetries in cue competition. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 121:222-236
135. Walther E, Nagengast B. 2006. Evaluative conditioning and the awareness issue: assessing contingency awareness with the four-picture recognition test. J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Process. 32:454-459
136. Wardle SG, Mitchell CJ, Lovibond PF. 2007. Flavor evaluative conditioning and contingency awareness. Learn. Behav. 35:233-241
137. Weidemann G, Tangen JM, Lovibond PF, Mitchell CJ. 2009. Is Perruchet's dissociation between eyeblink conditioned responding and outcome expectancy evidence for two learning systems? J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Process. 35:169-176
138. Weike AI, Schupp HT, Hamm AO. 2007. Fear acquisition requires awareness in trace but not delay conditioning. Psychophysiology 44:170-180
139. Wheeler DS, Beckers T, Miller RR. 2008. The effect of subadditive pretraining on blocking: limits on generalization. Learn. Behav. 36:341-351
140. Wilkinson L, Shanks DR. 2004. Intentional control and implicit sequence learning. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 30:354-369
141. Williams DA, Sagness KE, McPhee JE. 1994. Configural and elemental strategies in predictive learning. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 20:694-709
142. Willingham DB, Salidis J, Gabrieli JDE. 2002. Direct comparison of neural systems mediating conscious and unconscious skill learning. J. Neurophysiol. 88:1451-1460
143. Wilson TD. 2002. Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Belknap