Cognitive versus stimulus-response theories of learning

Learning and Behavior

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 227-241

  Holland, Peter C ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN; COGNITION; LEARNING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ANIMALS; COGNITION; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; LEARNING; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

EID: 48249092601     PISSN: 15434494     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/LB.36.3.227     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. ADAMS, C. D. (1982). Variations in the sensitivity of instrumental responding to reinforcer devaluation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34B, 77-98.
2. ADAMS, C. D., & DICKINSON, A. (1981). Instrumental responding following reinforcer devaluation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33B, 109-121.
3. BALLEINE, B. W., & DICKINSON, A. (1991). Instrumental performance following reinforcer devaluation depends upon incentive learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40B, 279-296.
4. BERNSTEIN, I., & KOH, M. T. (2007). Molecular signaling during taste aversion learning. Chemical Senses, 32, 99-103.
5. BERRIDGE, K. C. (2000). Measuring hedonic impact in animals and infants: Microstructure of affective taste reactivity patterns. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 173-198.
6. BROGDEN, W. J. (1947). Sensory pre-conditioning of human subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 527-539.
7. COLWILL, R. M., & RESCORLA, R. A. (1985a). Instrumental responding remains sensitive to reinforcer devaluation after extensive training. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 520-526.
8. COLWILL, R. M., & RESCORLA, R. A. (1985b). Post-conditioning devaluation of a reinforcer affects instrumental responding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 120-132.
9. COLWILL, R. M., & RESCORLA, R. A. (1986). Associative structures in instrumental learning. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 20, pp. 55-104). San Diego: Academic Press.
10. COLWILL, R. M., & RESCORLA, R. A. (1990). Effect of reinforcer devaluation on discriminative control of instrumental behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 40-47.
11. COLWILL, R. M., & TRIOLA, S. M. (2002). Instrumental responding remains under the control of the consequent outcome after extended training. Behavioural Processes, 57, 51-64.
12. COOK, R. G., RILEY, D. A., & BROWN, M. F. (1992). Spatial and configurai factors in compound stimulus processing by pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior, 20, 41-55.
13. DOTY, R. W., & GIURGEA, C. (1961). Conditioned reflexes established by coupling electrical excitation of two cortical areas. In J. F. Delafresnaye (Ed.), Brain mechanisms and learning (pp. 133-151). Oxford: Blackwell.
14. ELLIOT, M. H. (1928). The effect of change of reward on the maze performance of rats. University of California Publications in Psychology, 4, 19-30.
15. FINCH, G. (1938). Salivary conditioning in atropinized dogs. American Journal of Psychology, 124, 136-141.
16. FOWLER, H., & MILLER, N. E. (1963). Facilitation and inhibition of runway performance by hind- and forepaw shock of various intensities. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 56, 801-805.
17. FURUYASHIKI, T., HOLLAND, P. C., & GALLAGHER, M. (2008). Rat orbitofrontal cortex separately encodes response and outcome information during performance of goal-directed behavior. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 5127-5138.
18. GALARCE, E. M., CROMBAG, H. S., & HOLLAND, P. C. (2007). Reinforcer-specificity of appetitive and consummatory behavior of rats after Pavlovian conditioning with food reinforcers. Physiology & Behavior, 91, 95-105.
19. GALLAGHER, M., MCMAHAN, R. W., & SCHOENBAUM, G. (1999). Orbitofrontal cortex and representation of incentive value in associative learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 6610-6614.
20. GRILL, H. J., & NORGREN, R. (1978). The taste reactivity test: I. Mimetic responses to gustatory stimuli in neurologically normal rats. Brain Research, 143, 263-279.
21. GUTHRIE, E. R. (1935). The psychology of learning. New York: Harper & Row.
22. GUTHRIE, E. R. (1946). Psychological facts and psychological theories. Psychological Bulletin, 43, 1-20.
23. GUZOWSKI, J. F., & WORLEY, P. F. (2001). Cellular compartment analysis of temporal activity by fluorescent in situ hybidization (catFISH). In G. P. Taylor (Ed.), Current protocols in neuroscience (pp. 1-16). New York: Wiley.
24. HATFIELD, T., HAN, J.-S., CONLEY, M., GALLAGHER, M., & HOLLAND, P. C. (1996). Neurotoxic lesions of the basolateral, but not central, amygdala interfere with Pavlovian second order conditioning and reinforcer devaluation effects. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 5256-5265.
25. HOLLAND, P. C. (1981a). Acquisition of representation mediated conditioned food aversions. Learning & Motivation, 12, 1-18.
26. HOLLAND, P. C. (1981b). The effects of satiation after first- and second-order appetitive conditioning. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 16, 18-24.
27. HOLLAND, P. C. (1990). Event representation in Pavlovian conditioning: Image and action. Cognition, 37, 105-131.
28. HOLLAND, P. C. (1997). Brain mechanisms for changes in processing of conditioned stimuli in Pavlovian conditioning: Implications for behavior theory. Animal Learning & Behavior, 25, 373-399.
29. HOLLAND, P. C. (1998). Amount of training affects associatively-activated event representation. Neuropharmacology, 37, 461-469.
30. HOLLAND, P. C. (2004). Relations between Pavlovian-instrumental transfer and reinforcer devaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 30, 104-117.
31. HOLLAND, P. C. (2005). Amount of training effects in representation-mediated food aversion learning: No evidence of a role for associability changes. Learning & Behavior, 33, 464-478.
32. HOLLAND, P. C., & FORBES, D. T. (1982). Control of conditional discrimination performance by CS-evoked event representations. Animal Learning & Behavior, 10, 249-256.
33. HOLLAND, P. C., & GALLAGHER, M. (2004). Amygdala-frontal interactions and reward expectancy. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 148-155.
34. HOLLAND, P. C., LASSETER, H., & AGARWAL, I. (2008). Amount of training and cue-evoked taste-reactivity responding in reinforcer devaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 119-132.
35. HOLLAND, P. C., & RESCORLA, R. A. (1975). The effect of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after first- and second-order appetitive conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 355-363.
36. HOLLAND, P. C., & STRAUB, J. J. (1979). Differential effects of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after Pavlovian appetitive conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 65-78.
37. HOLLAND, P. C., & WHEELER, D. S. (in press). Representation-mediated food aversions. In S. Reilly & T. Schachtman (Eds.), Conditioned taste aversion: Behavioral and neural processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. HULL, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
39. JOHNSON, A. W., GALLAGHER, M., & HOLLAND, P. C. (2007, November). Examining the role of the basolateral amygdala in the expression of reinforcer devaluation. Poster presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, San Diego.
40. KERFOOT, E. C., AGARWAL, I., LEE, H. J., & HOLLAND, P. C. (2007). Control of appetitive and aversive taste-reactivity responses by an auditory conditioned stimulus in a devaluation task: A FOS and behavioral analysis. Learning & Memory, 14, 581-589.
41. KIEFER, S. W., & ORR, M. R. (1992). Taste avoidance, but not aversion, learning in rats lacking gustatory cortex. Behavioral Neuroscience, 106, 140-146.
42. KIMBLE, G. A., & PERLMUTER, L. C. (1970). The problem of volition. Psychological Review, 77, 361-384.
43. KOFFKA, K. (1935). The principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
44. KOHLER, W. (1940). Dynamics in psychology. New York: Liveright.
45. KONORSKI, J. (1967). Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46. LAMPRECHT, R., & DUDAI, Y. (2000). The amygdala in conditioned taste aversion: It's there but where? In J. P. Aggleton (Ed.), The amygdala: A functional analysis (pp. 331-351). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. LEE, H. J., GROSHEK, F., PETROVICH, G. D., CANTALINI, J. P., GALLAGHER, M., & HOLLAND, P. C. (2005). Role of amygdalo-nigral circuitry in conditioning of a visual stimulus paired with food. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 3881-3888.
48. LEWIN, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
49. LOUCKS, R. B. (1935). The experimental delimination of neural structures essential for learning: The attempt to condition striped muscle responses to faradization of the sigmoid gyri. Journal of Psychology, 1, 5-44.
50. MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
51. MADDUX, J.-M., & HOLLAND, P. C. (2007, November). Lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex impair Pavlovian devaluation. Poster presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, San Diego.
52. MEDINA, J. F., NORES, W. L., OHYAMA, T., & MAUK, M. D. (2000). Mechanisms of cerebellar learning suggested by eyelid conditioning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 10, 717-724.
53. MILLER, N. E. (1935). A reply to "Sign gestalt or conditioned reflex?" Psychological Review, 42, 280-292.
54. OSGOOD, C. E. (1953). Method and theory in experimental psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
55. PACKARD, M. G., & MCGAUGH, J. L. (1996). Inactivation of hippocampus or caudate nucleus with lidocaine differentially affects expression of place and response learning. Neurobiology of Learning & Memory, 65, 65-72.
56. PARKINSON, J. A., ROBERTS, A. C., EVERITT, B. J., & DI CIANO, P. (2005). Acquisition of instrumental conditioned reinforcement is resistant to the devaluation of the unconditioned stimulus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58B, 19-30.
57. PEARCE, J. M., & HALL, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 106, 532-552.
58. PETROVICH, G. D., HOLLAND, P. C., & GALLAGHER, M. (2005). Amygdalar and prefrontal pathways to the lateral hypothalamus are activated by a learned cue that stimulates eating. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 8295-8302.
59. PICKENS, C. L. (2008). A limited role for mediodorsal thalamus in devaluation tasks. Behavioral Neuroscience, 122, 659-676.
60. PICKENS, C. L., & HOLLAND, P. C. (2004). Conditioning and cognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 651-661.
61. PICKENS, C. L., SADDORIS, M. P., GALLAGHER, M., & HOLLAND, P. C. (2005). Orbitofrontal lesions impair use of cue-outcome associations in a devaluation task. Behavioral Neuroscience, 119, 317-322.
62. PICKENS, C. L., SADDORIS, M. P., SETLOW, B., GALLAGHER, M., HOLLAND, P. C., & SCHOENBAUM, G. (2003). Different roles for orbitofrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala in a reinforcer devaluation task. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 11078-11084.
63. POLDRACK, R. A., & PACKARD, M. G. (2003). Competition among multiple memory systems: Converging evidence from animal and human brain studies. Neuropsychologia, 41, 245-251.
64. RESCORLA, R. A. (1973). Effect of US habituation following conditioning. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 82, 137-143.
65. RESCORLA, R. A. (1974). Effect of inflation of the unconditioned stimulus value following conditioning. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 86, 101-106.
66. RESCORLA, R. A. (1975). Pavlovian excitatory and inhibitory conditioning. In W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 2, pp. 7-35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
67. RESCORLA, R. A. (1986). Two perceptual variables in within-event learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 14, 387-392.
68. RESCORLA, R. A. (1987). A Pavlovian analysis of goal directed behavior. American Psychologist, 42, 119-129.
69. RESCORLA, R. A. (1988). Pavlovian conditioning: It's not what you think it is. American Psychologist, 43, 151-160.
70. RESCORLA, R. A. (1994). Transfer of instrumental control mediated by a devalued outcome. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 27-33.
71. REYNOLDS, S. M., & BERRIDGE, K. C. (2002). Positive and negative motivation in nucleus accumbens shell: Bivalent rostrocaudal gradients for GABA-elicited eating, taste "liking"/ "disliking" reactions, place preference/avoidance, and fear. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 7308-7320.
72. ROZEBOOM, W. W. (1958). "What is learned?" An empirical enigma. Psychological Review, 65, 22-33.
73. SADDORIS, M. P., GALLAGHER, M., & SCHOENBAUM, G. (2005). Rapid associative encoding in basolateral amygdala depends on connections with orbitofrontal cortex. Neuron, 46, 321-331.
74. SCHOENBAUM, G., CHIBA, A. A., & GALLAGHER, M. (1998). Orbitofrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala encode expected outcomes during learning. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 155-159.
75. SCHOENBAUM, G., SETLOW, B., SADDORIS, M. P., & GALLAGHER, M. (2003). Encoding predicted outcome and acquired value in orbitofrontal cortex during cue sampling depends upon input from basolateral amygdala. Neuron, 39, 855-867.
76. SIEGEL, S. (1967). Overtraining and transfer processes. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 64, 471-477.
77. SPENCE, K. W. (1936). The nature of discrimination learning in animals. Psychological Review, 43, 427-449.
78. SPENCE, K. W. (1948, September). Cognitive versus S-R theories of learning. Address to the Division of Theoretical-Experimental Psychology at the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston.
79. SPENCE, K. W. (1950). Cognitive versus stimulus-response theories of learning. Psychological Review, 57, 159-172.
80. STEINMETZ, J. E., LAVOND, D. G., & THOMPSON, R. F. (1989). Classical-conditioning in rabbits using pontine nucleus stimulation as a conditioned-stimulus and inferior olive stimulation as an unconditioned stimulus. Synapse, 3, 225-233.
81. TERRY, W. S., & WAGNER, A. R. (1975). Short term memory for "surprising" versus "expected" unconditioned stimuli in Pavlovian conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 122-133.
82. THOMAS, E. (1971). The role of postural adjustments in conditioning of dogs with electrical stimulation of the motor cortex as the unconditioned stimulus. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 76, 187-198.
83. THOMPSON, R. F. (1972). Sensory preconditioning. In R. F. Thompson & J. S. Voss (Eds.), Topics in learning and performance (pp. 105-129). New York: Academic Press.
84. THOMPSON, R. F., THOMPSON, J. K., KIM, J. J., KRIPA, D. J., & SHINKMAN, P. G. (1998). The nature of reinforcement in cerebellar learning. Neurobiology of Learning & Memory, 70, 150-176.
85. THORNDIKE, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psychological Review Monograph Supplements, 2(4, Whole No. 8).
86. TINKLEPAUGH, O. L. (1928). An experimental study of representative factors in monkeys. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 8, 197-236.
87. TOLMAN, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Appleton Century.
88. TOLMAN, E. C. (1933). Sign-gestalt or conditioned reflex. Psychological Review, 40, 246-255.
89. TOLMAN, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189-208.
90. TOLMAN, E. C., & GLEITMAN, H. (1949). Studies in learning and motivation: I. Equal reinforcements in both end-boxes, followed by shock in one end-box. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 810-819.
91. TOLMAN, E. C., RITCHIE, B. F., & KALISH, D. (1946a). Studies in spatial learning: I. Orientation and the short-cut. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 13-25.
92. TOLMAN, E. C., RITCHIE, B. F., & KALISH, D. (1946b). Studies in spatial learning: II. Place learning versus response learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 221-229.
93. VIDAL-GONZALEZ, I., VIDAL-GONZALEZ, B., RAUCH, S. L., & QUIRK, G. J. (2006). Microstimulation reveals opposing influences of prelimbic and infralimbic cortex on the expression of conditioned fear. Learning & Memory, 13, 728-733.
94. WAGNER, A. R., THOMAS, E., & NORTON, T. (1967). Conditioning with electrical stimulation of the motor cortex: Evidence of a possible source of motivation. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 64, 191-199.
95. WARD-ROBINSON, J., & HALL, G. (1996). Backward sensory preconditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 395-404.
96. YAMAMOTO, T. (2007). Brain regions responsible for the expression of conditioned taste aversion in rats. Chemical Senses, 32, 105-109.
97. ZENER, K. (1937). The significance of behavior accompanying conditioned salivary secretion for theories of the conditioned response. American Journal of Psychology, 50, 384-403.
98. ZENER, K., & MCCURDY, H. G. (1939). Analysis of motivational factions in conditioned behavior: I. The differential effect of changes in hunger on conditioned, unconditioned, and spontaneous salivary secretion. Journal of Psychology, 8, 321-350.