Splitting statistical potentials into meaningful scoring functions: Testing the prediction of near-native structures from decoy conformations

BMC Structural Biology

Volumn 9, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Aloy, Patrick ^a,b   Oliva, Baldo ^c  

^a BARCELONA SUPERCOMPUTING CENTER   (Spain)

^b INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; KNOWLEDGE BASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SCORING SYSTEM; THEORY-PRACTICE RELATIONSHIP; ALGORITHM; CHEMISTRY; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE;

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHMS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 72249099227     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6807-9-71     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. CB Anfinsen, Science 1973 181 96 223 230 10.1126/science.181.4096.223 4124164
2. Are there pathways for protein folding? C Levinthal, J Chem Phys 1968 65 44 45
3. Levinthal's paradox. R Zwanzig A Szabo B Bagchi, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992 89 20 22 10.1073/pnas.89.1.20 1729690
4. Protein folding thermodynamics and dynamics: where physics, chemistry, and biology meet. E Shakhnovich, Chem Rev 2006 106 5 1559 1588 10.1021/cr040425u 16683745
5. Development of a physics-based force field for the scoring and refinement of protein models. L Wroblewska A Jagielska J Skolnick, Biophys J 2008 4 8 3227 3240 10.1529/biophysj.107.121947
6. A consensus view of protein dynamics. M Rueda C Ferrer-Costa T Meyer A Perez J Camps A Hospital JL Gelpi M Orozco, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007 104 3 796 801 10.1073/pnas.0605534104 17215349
7. Biomolecular modeling: Goals, problems, perspectives. WF van Gunsteren D Bakowies R Baron I Chandrasekhar M Christen X Daura P Gee DP Geerke A Glattli PH Hunenberger, et al. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2006 45 25 4064 4092 10.1002/anie.200502655 16761306
8. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. MJ Sippl, Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995 5 2 229 235 10.1016/0959-440X(95)80081-6 7648326
9. Combination of threading potentials and sequence profiles improves fold recognition. A Panchenko A Marchler-Bauer SH Bryant, J Mol Biol 2000 296 1319 1331 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3541 10698636
10. The RCSB PDB information portal for structural genomics. A Kouranov L Xie J de la Cruz L Chen J Westbrook PE Bourne HM Berman, Nucleic Acids Res 2006 34 Database 302 305 10.1093/nar/gkj120 16381872
11. Protein model refinement using an optimized physics-based all-atom force field. A Jagielska L Wroblewska J Skolnick, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008 105 24 8268 8273 10.1073/pnas.0800054105 18550813
12. QMEAN: A comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment. P Benkert SC Tosatto D Schomburg, Proteins 2008 71 1 261 277 10.1002/prot.21715 17932912
13. Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. N Eswar B Webb MA Marti-Renom MS Madhusudhan D Eramian MY Shen U Pieper A Sali, Curr Protoc Protein Sci 2007 Chapter 2 Unit 2 9 18429317
14. The SWISS-MODEL Repository of annotated three-dimensional protein structure homology models. J Kopp T Schwede, Nucl Acids Res 2004 32 230 D234 10.1093/nar/gkh008 14681401
15. Enhancement of protein modeling by human intervention in applying the automatic programs 3D-JIGSAW and 3D-PSSM. PA Bates LA Kelley RM MacCallum MJ Sternberg, Proteins 2001 Suppl 5 39 46 10.1002/prot.1168 11835480
16. Exploring the extremes of sequence/structure space with ensemble fold recognition in the program Phyre. RM Bennett-Lovsey AD Herbert MJ Sternberg LA Kelley, Proteins 2008 70 3 611 625 10.1002/prot.21688 17876813
17. Enhanced Genome Annotation Using Structural Profiles in the Program 3D-PSSM. LA Kelley RM MacCallum MJE Sternberg, Journal of Molecular Biology 2000 299 2 501 522 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3741
18. TOPITS: threading one-dimensional predictions into three-dimensional structures. B Rost, Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 1995 3 314 321 7584454
19. GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomicsequences. D Jones, J Mol Biol 1999 287 797 815 10.1006/jmbi.1999. 2583 10191147
20. Linear programming optimization and a double statistical filter for protein threading protocols. J Meller R Elber, Proteins 2001 45 3 241 261 10.1002/prot.1145 11599028
21. FUGUE: Sequence-structure Homology Recognition Using Environment-specific Substitution Tables and Structure-dependent Gap Penalties. J Shi TL Blundell K Mizuguchi, Journal of Molecular Biology 2001 310 1 243 257 10.1006/jmbi.2001. 4762 11419950
22. Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale. Y Zhang J Skolnick, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004 101 20 7594 7599 10.1073/pnas.0305695101 15126668
23. Rosetta in CASP4: progress in ab initio protein structure prediction. R Bonneau J Tsai I Ruczinski D Chivian C Rohl CE Strauss D Baker, Proteins 2001 Suppl 5 119 126 10.1002/prot.1170 11835488 (Pubitemid 34113174)
24. Pcons: a neural-network-based consensus predictor that improves fold recognition. J Lundstrom L Rychlewski J Bujnicki A Elofsson, Protein Sci 2001 10 2354 2362 10.1110/ps.08501 11604541
25. 3D-SHOTGUN: a novel, cooperative, fold-recognition meta-predictor. D Fischer, Proteins 2003 51 3 434 441 10.1002/prot.10357 12696054
26. Predictions without templates: new folds, secondary structure, and contacts in CASP5. P Aloy A Stark C Hadley RB Russell, Proteins 2003 53 Suppl 6 436 456 10.1002/prot.10546 14579333
27. Can a physics-based, all-atom potential find a protein's native structure among misfolded structures? I. Large scale AMBER benchmarking. L Wroblewska J Skolnick, J Comput Chem 2007 28 12 2059 2066 10.1002/jcc.20720 17407093
28. SPICKER: a clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds. Y Zhang J Skolnick, J Comput Chem 2004 25 6 865 871 10.1002/jcc.20011 15011258
29. Protein model quality assessment prediction by combining fragment comparisons and a consensus C(alpha) contact potential. H Zhou J Skolnick, Proteins 2008 71 3 1211 1218 10.1002/prot.21813 18004783
30. In silico protein recombination: enhancing template and sequence alignment selection for comparative protein modelling. B Contreras-Moreira PW Fitzjohn PA Bates, J Mol Biol 2003 328 3 593 608 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00309-7 12706719
31. Evolutionary potentials: structure specific knowledge-based potentials exploiting the evolutionary record of sequence homologs. A Panjkovich F Melo MA Marti-Renom, Genome Biol 2008 9 4 68 10.1186/gb-2008-9-4-r68 18397517
32. Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. MY Shen A Sali, Protein Sci 2006 15 11 2507 2524 10.1110/ps.062416606 17075131
33. Improvement of the GenTHREADER method for genomic fold recognition. LJ McGuffin DT Jones, Bioinformatics 2003 19 7 874 881 10.1093/bioinformatics/ btg097 12724298
34. Refinement of modelled structures by knowledge-based energy profiles and secondary structure prediction: application to the human procarboxypeptidase A2. P Aloy JM Mas MA Marti-Renom E Querol FX Aviles B Oliva, J Comput Aided Mol Des 2000 14 1 83 92 10.1023/A:1008197831529 10702927
35. Protein meta-functional signatures from combining sequence, structure, evolution, and amino acid property information. K Wang JA Horst G Cheng DC Nickle R Samudrala, PLoS Comput Biol 2008 4 9 1000181 10.1371/journal.pcbi. 1000181 18818722
36. Structural analysis and prediction of protein mutant stability using distance and torsion potentials: role of secondary structure and solvent accessibility. V Parthiban MM Gromiha C Hoppe D Schomburg, Proteins 2007 66 1 41 52 10.1002/prot.21115 17068801
37. Progress in proteins structure prediction: assesment of CASP3. M Sternberg P Bates L Kelley R MacCallum, Curr Opin Struct Biol 1999 9 368 373 10.1016/S0959-440X(99)80050-5 10361096
38. A composite score for predicting errors in protein structure models. D Eramian MY Shen D Devos F Melo A Sali MA Marti-Renom, Protein Sci 2006 15 7 1653 1666 10.1110/ps.062095806 16751606
39. Probing protein fold space with a simplified model. P Minary M Levitt, J Mol Biol 2008 375 4 920 933 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.10.087 18054792
40. A new approach to protein fold recognition. DT Jones WR Taylor JM Thornton, Nature 1992 358 6381 86 89 10.1038/358086a0 1614539
41. Derivation of protein-specific pair potentials based on weak sequence fragment similarity. J Skolnick A Kolinski A Ortiz, Proteins 2000 38 1 3 16 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(20000101)38:1<3::AID-PROT2>3.0.CO;2-S 10651034
42. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. MJJ Sippl, J Mol Biol 1990 213 859 883 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80269-4 2359125
43. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. H Zhou Y Zhou, Protein Sci 2002 11 11 2714 2726 10.1110/ps.0217002 12381853
44. An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. R Samudrala J Moult, J Mol Biol 1998 275 5 895 916 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1479 9480776
45. Fold assessment for comparative protein structure modeling. F Melo A Sali, Protein Sci 2007 16 11 2412 2426 10.1110/ps.072895107 17905832 (Pubitemid 350036748)
46. Nativelike topology assembly of small proteins using predicted restraints in Monte Carlo folding simulations. AR Ortiz A Kolinski J Skolnick, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998 95 3 1020 1025 10.1073/pnas.95.3.1020 9448278 (Pubitemid 28124905)
47. Automatic consensus-based fold recognition using Pcons, ProQ, and Pmodeller. B Wallner H Fang A Elofsson, Proteins 2003 53 Suppl 6 534 541 10.1002/prot.10536 14579343
48. Bhageerath: an energy based web enabled computer software suite for limiting the search space of tertiary structures of small globular proteins. B Jayaram K Bhushan SR Shenoy P Narang S Bose P Agrawal D Sahu V Pandey, Nucleic Acids Res 2006 34 21 6195 6204 10.1093/nar/gkl789 17090600
49. Structure-derived hydrophobic potential. Hydrophobic potential derived from X-ray structures of globular proteins is able to identify native folds. G Casari MJ Sippl, J Mol Biol 1992 224 3 725 732 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90556-Y 1569551
50. A Novel Approach to Decoy Set Generation: Designing a Physical Energy Function Having Local Minima with Native Structure Characteristics. C Keasar M Levitt, Journal of Molecular Biology 2003 329 159 174 10.1016/S0022-2836(03) 00323-1 12742025
51. The FoldX web server: an online force field. J Schymkowitz J Borg F Stricher R Nys F Rousseau L Serrano, Nucleic Acids Res 2005 33 Web Server 382 388 10.1093/nar/gki387 15980494
52. Why do protein architectures have Boltzmann-like statistics? AV Finkelstein A Badretdinov AM Gutin, Proteins 1995 23 2 142 150 10.1002/prot.340230204 8592696
53. Effects of amino acid composition, finite size of proteins, and sparse statistics on distance-dependent statistical pair potentials. D Rykunov A Fiser, Proteins 2007 67 3 559 568 10.1002/prot.21279 17335003
54. Physically realistic homology models built with ROSETTA can be more accurate than their templates. KM Misura D Chivian CA Rohl DE Kim D Baker, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006 103 14 5361 5366 10.1073/pnas.0509355103 16567638
55. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and bayesian scoring functions. K Simons C Kooperberg E Huang D Baker, J Mol Biol 1997 268 209 225 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0959 9149153
56. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. K Simons I Ruczinski C Kooperberg B Fox C Bystroff D Baker, Proteins: Struc Func and Gene 1999 34 82 95 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990101)34:1<82::AID- PROT7>3.0.CO;2-A
57. Decomposition of the free energy of a system in terms of specific interactions. Implications for theoretical and experimental studies. AE Mark WF van Gunsteren, J Mol Biol 1994 240 2 167 176 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1430 8028000
58. Novel knowledge-based mean force potential at atomic level. F Melo E Feytmans, J Mol Biol 1997 267 207 222 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0868 9096219
59. How effective for fold recognition is a potential of mean force that includes relative orientations between contacting residues in proteins? S Miyazawa RL Jernigan, J Chem Phys 2005 122 2 024901 10.1063/1.1824012 15638624
60. StAR: a simple tool for the statistical comparison of ROC curves. IA Vergara T Norambuena E Ferrada AW Slater F Melo, BMC Bioinformatics 2008 9 265 10.1186/1471-2105-9-265 18534022
61. Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments. A Andreeva D Howorth JM Chandonia SE Brenner TJ Hubbard C Chothia AG Murzin, Nucleic Acids Res 2007 35 Database 419 D425 10.1093/nar/gkm993 18000004
62. A simple reference state makes a significant improvement in near-native selections from structurally refined docking decoys. S Liang S Liu C Zhang Y Zhou, Proteins 2007 69 2 244 253 10.1002/prot.21498 17623864
63. Comparative protein structure modeling by iterative alignment, model building and model assessment. B John A Sali, Nucleic Acids Res 2003 31 3982 3992 10.1093/nar/gkg460 12853614
64. Decoys 'R' Us: a database of incorrect conformations to improve protein structure prediction. R Samudrala M Levitt, Protein Sci 2000 9 7 1399 1401 10.1110/ps.9.7.1399 10933507
65. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys. B Park M Levitt, J Mol Biol 1996 258 2 367 392 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0256 8627632
66. ProSA-web: interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. M Wiederstein MJ Sippl, Nucleic Acids Res 2007 35 Web Server 407 410 10.1093/nar/gkm290 17517781