Derivation of protein-specific pair potentials based on weak sequence fragment similarity

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 3-16

  Skolnick, Jeffrey ^a   Kolinski, Andrzej ^a,b   Ortiz, Angel ^a  

^a DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

Knowledge based potentials; Potential derivation; Sequence analysis; Tertiary structure prediction

Indexed keywords

M PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

AMINO ACIDS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0033970623     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(20000101)38:1<3::AID-PROT2>3.0.CO;2-S     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Skolnick J, Kolinski A, Ortiz AR. Reduced protein models and their application to the protein folding problem. J. Biomol Struct Dyn 1998;16:381-396.
2. Monge A, Lathrop EJP, Gunn JR, et al. Computer modeling of protein folding: conformational and energetic analysis of reduced and detailed protein models. J Mol Biol 1995;247:995-1012.
3. Liwo A, Oldziej S, Kazmieckiewicz R, et al. Design of a knowledge-based force field for off-lattice simulations of protein structure. Acta Biochim Pol 1997;44:527-547.
4. Brooks BR, Brucculeri R, Olafson B, et al. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy minimization, and molecular dynamics. J Comp Chem 1983;4:187-217.
5. Roterman IK, et al. A comparison of the CHARMM, AMBER and ECEPP potentials for peptides. II. Phi-psi maps for N-acetyl alanine N′-methyl amide: comparisons, contrasts and simple experimental tests. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1989;7:421-453.
6. Pearlman DA, Case DA, Caldwell JC. AMBER. San Francisco: University of California, 1991.
7. Park BH, Levitt M. The complexity and accuracy of discrete state models of protein structure. J Mol Biol 1995;249:493-507.
8. Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Lattice models of protein folding, dynamics and thermodynamics. Austin, TX: R.G. Landes, 1996. p 200.
9. Go N, Abe H, Mnuno H, et al. Protein folding. N. Jaenicke, editor. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland, 1980. pp 167-181.
10. Go N, Taketomi H. Respective roles of short-and long-range interactions in protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1978;75: 559-563.
11. Jernigan RL, Bahar I. Structure-derived potentials and protein simulations. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:195-209.
12. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 1985;18:534-552.
13. Godzik A, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Are proteins ideal mixtures of amino acids? Analysis of energy parameter sets. Protein Sci 1995;4:2107-2117.
14. Skolnick J, et al. Derivation and testing of pair potentials for protein folding. When is the quasichemical approximation correct? Protein Sci 1997;6:676-688.
15. Karlin S. Statistical significance of sequence patterns in proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995;5:360-371.
16. Henikoff S, Greene EA, Pietrovski S, et al. Gene families: the taxonomy of protein paralogs and chimeras. Science 1997;278:609-614.
17. Altschul SF, Koonin EV. Iterated profile searches with PSI-BLAST - a tool for discovery in protein databases. Trends Biochem Sci 1998;23:444-447.
18. Abagyan RA, Batalov S. Do aligned sequences share the same fold? J Mol Biol 1997;273:355-368.
19. Duan Y, Wang L, Kollman PA. The early stage of folding of villin headpiece subdomain observed in a 200-nanosecond fully solvated molecular dynamics simulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95: 9897-9902.
20. Duan Y, Kollman PA. Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science 1998;282:740-744.
21. Daura X, Jaun B, Seebach D, et al. Reversible peptide folding in solution by molecular dynamics simulation. J Mol Biol 1998;280: 925-932.
22. Barker JA, Henderson D. What is liquid? Understanding the states of matter. Rev Mod Phys 1976;48:587-671.
23. Tanaka S, Scheraga HA. Medium-and long-range interactions parameters between amino acids for prediction of three-dimensional structures of proteins. Macromolecules 1975;9:945-950.
24. Jernigan RL. Protein folds. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1992;2:248-256.
25. Sippl MJ, Weitckus S. Detection of native-like models for amino acid sequences of unknown three-dimensional structure in a database of known protein conformations. Proteins 1992;13:258-271.
26. Levitt M, Gerstein M, Huang E, et al. Protein folding: the endgame. Annu Rev Biochem 1997;66:549-579.
27. Betancourt MR, Thirumalai D. Pair potentials for protein folding: choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes. Protein Sci 1999;8:361-369.
28. Maiorov VN, Crippen GM. Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1992;277:876-888.
29. Maiorov VN, Crippen GM. Learning about protein folding via potential functions. Proteins 1994;20:167-173.
30. Hao MH, Scheraga HA. How optimization of potential functions affects protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:4984-4989.
31. Hao MH, Scheraga HA. Optimizing potential functions for protein folding. J Phys Chem 1996;100:14540-14548.
32. Altschul SF, Madden TF, Schaffer AP, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:3389-3402.
33. Pearson WR. Using the FASTA program to search protein and DNA sequence databases. Methods Mol Biol 1994;24:307-331.
34. Salamov AA, Solovyev VV. Protein secondary structure prediction using local alignments. J Mol Biol 1997;268:31-36.
35. Bystroff C, Baker D. Prediction of local structure in proteins using a library of sequence-structure motifs. J Mol Biol 1998;281:565-577.
36. Shortle D, Simons KT, Baker D. Clustering of low-energy conformations near the native structures of small proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:11158-11162.
37. Shortle D. The state of the art. Curr Biol 1999;9:R205-R209.
38. Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang E, et al. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997;268:209-225.
39. Kolinski A, Kolinsk A, Jaraszewski L, Rotkiewicz P, et al. An efficient Monte Carlo model of protein chains. Modeling the short-range correlations between side groups centers of mass. J Phys Chem 1998;102:4628-4637.
40. Finkelstein AV. 3D protein folds: homologs against errors - an estimate based on the random energy model. Phys Rev Lett 1998;80:4823-4825.
41. Reva B, Skolnick J, Finkelstein A. Averaging interaction energies over homologs improves fold recognition in gapless threading. Proteins 1999;35:353-399.
42. Dodge C, Schneider R, Sander C. The HSSP database of protein structure-sequence alignments and family profiles. Nucleic Acids Res 1998;26:313-315.
43. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Performance evaluation of amino acid substitution matrices. Proteins 1993;17:49-61.
44. McLachlan AD. Test for comparing related amino acid sequences. J Mol Biol 1971;61:409-424.
45. Pearson WR, Lipman DJ. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988;85:2444-2448.
46. Sander C, Schneider R. Database of homology derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins 1991;9:56-68.
47. Badretdinov A, Finkelstein AV. How homologs can help to predict protein folds even though they cannot be predicted for individual sequences. J Comput Biol 1998;5:369-376.
48. Hobohm U, Sander C. Selection of a representative set of structures from the Brookhaven Protein Databank. Protein Sci 1992;1: 409-417.
49. Kolinski A, Rotkiewicz P, Ilkowski I, et al. A method for the improvement of threading based protein models. Proteins 1999, in press.
50. Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Assembly of protein structure from sparse experimental data. An efficient Monte Carlo Model. Proteins 1998;32:475-494.
51. Rost B, Sander C. Prediction of secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J Mol Biol 1993;232:584-599.
52. Zhang L, Skolnick J. How do potentials derived from structural databases relate to "true" potentials? Protein Sci 1998;7:112-122.
53. Mohanty D, et al. Correlation between knowledge based and detailed atomic potentials: application to the unfolding of the GCN4 leucine zipper. Proteins 1999;35:447-452.
54. Bahar I, Jernigan RL. Coordination geometry of nonbonded residues in globular proteins. Fold Des 1996;1:357-370.