Fold assessment for comparative protein structure modeling

Protein Science

Volumn 16, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 2412-2426

  Melo, Francisco ^a   Sali, Andrej ^b,c  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Fold assessment; Model assessment; Protein structure modeling; Protein structure prediction; Statistical potentials

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; DATA BASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SCORING SYSTEM; STEREOCHEMISTRY;

BAYES THEOREM; DATABASES, PROTEIN; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; STEREOISOMERISM;

EID: 35648999092     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: 1469896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.072895107     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Abagyan, R.A. and Totrov, M.M. 1997. Contact area difference: A robust measure to evaluate accuracy of protein models. J. Mol. Biol. 268: 678-685.
2. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D.J. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389-3402.
3. Baker, D. and Sali, A. 2001. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 294: 93-96.
4. Berman, H.M., Battistuz, T., Bhat, T.N., Bluhm, W.F., Bourne, P.E., Burkhardt, K., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G.L., Iype, L., Jain, S., et al. 2002. The Protein Data Bank. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 58: 899-907.
5. Bondi, A. 1964. Van der Waals volumes and radii. J. Phys. Chem. 68: 441-451.
6. Bonneau, R., Ruczinski, I., Tsai, J., and Baker, D. 2002a. Contact order and ab initio protein structure prediction. Protein Sci. 11: 1937-1944.
7. Bonneau, R., Strauss, C.E., Rohl, C.A., Chivian, D., Bradley, P., Malmstrom, L., Robertson, T., and Baker, D. 2002b. De novo prediction of three-dimensional structures for major protein families. J. Mol. Biol. 322: 65-78.
8. Chothia, C. and Lesk, A.M. 1986. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J. 5: 823-826.
9. Chothia, C. and Lesk, A.M. 1987. The evolution of protein structures. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. LII: 399-405.
10. Christianini, N. and Shaw-Taylor, J. 2000. An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods, 1st ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
11. Contreras-Moreira, B., Fitzjohn, P.W., and Bates, P.A. 2002. Comparative modelling: An essential methodology for protein structure prediction in the post-genomic era. Appl. Bioinformatics 1: 177-190.
12. DeBolt, S.E. and Skolnick, J. 1996. Evaluation of atomic level mean force potentials via inverse folding and inverse refinement of protein structures: Atomic burial position and pairwise non-bonded interactions. Protein Eng. 9: 637-655.
13. Duda, R., Hart, P.E., and Stork, D.G. 2001. Pattern classification, 2d ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
14. Dunbrack Jr., R.L. 2006. Sequence comparison and protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 16: 374-384.
15. Eramian, D., Shen, M.Y., Devos, D., Melo, F., Sali, A., and Marti-Renom, M.A. 2006. A composite score for predicting errors in protein structure models. Protein Sci. 15: 1653-1666.
16. Eswar, N., John, B., Mirkovic, N., Fiser, A., Ilyin, V.A., Pieper, U., Stuart, A.C., Marti-Renom, M.A., Madhusudhan, M.S., Yerkovich, B., et al. 2003. Tools for comparative protein structure modeling and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 31: 3375-3380.
17. Fawcett, T. 2004. ROC graphs: Notes and practical considerations for researchers. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
18. Fiser, A., Sanchez, R., Melo, F., and Sali, A. 2001. Comparative protein structure modeling. In Computational biochemistry and biophysics (eds. M. Watanabe et al.), pp. 275-312. Marcel Dekker, New York.
19. Ginalski, K. 2006. Comparative modeling for protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 16: 172-177.
20. Goldberg, D.E. 1989. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.
21. Gregoret, L.M. and Cohen, F.E. 1991. Protein folding. Effect of packing density on chain conformation. J. Mol. Biol. 219: 109-122.
22. Guex, N., Diemand, A., and Peitsch, M.C. 1999. Protein modelling for all. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24: 364-367.
23. Haykin, S.S. and Haykin, S. 1998. Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation, 2d ed. Prentice Hall, Lebanon, IN.
24. Holm, L. and Sander, C. 1993a. Globin fold in a bacterial toxin. Nature 361: 309. doi: 10.1038/361309a0.
25. Holm, L. and Sander, C. 1993b. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 233: 123-138.
26. Holm, L. and Sander, C. 1994a. The FSSP database of structurally aligned protein fold families. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 3600-3609.
27. Holm, L. and Sander, C. 1994b. Structural similarity between plant endochitinase and lysozymes from animals and phage: An evolutionary connection. FEBS Lett. 340: 129-132.
28. Holm, L. and Sander, C. 1995. Evolutionary link between glycogen phosphorylase and a DNA modifying enzyme. EMBO J. 14: 1287-1293.
29. Jin, S., Martinek, S., Joo, W.S., Wortman, J.R., Mirkovic, N., Sali, A., Yandell, M.D., Pavletich, N.P., Young, M.W., and Levine, A.J. 2000. Identification and characterization of a p53 homologue in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 7301-7306.
30. Jolliffe, I.T. 2002. Principal component analysis, 2d ed. Springer-Verlag, New York.
31. Jones, D.T. 1999. GenTHREADER: An efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 287: 797-815.
32. Jones, D.T., Taylor, W.R., and Thornton, J.M. 1992. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 358: 86-89.
33. Kabsch, W.a.S.C. 1983. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22: 2577-2637.
34. Kihara, D., Zhang, Y., Lu, H., Kolinski, A., and Skolnick, J. 2002. Ab initio protein structure prediction on a genomic scale: Application to the Mycoplasma genitalium genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 5993-5998.
35. Kim, D., Xu, D., Guo, J.T., Ellrott, K., and Xu, Y. 2003. PROSPECT II: Protein structure prediction program for genome-scale applications. Protein Eng. 16: 641-650.
36. Kim, D.E., Chivian, D., and Baker, D. 2004. Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server. Nucleic Acids Res. 32: W526-W531. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh468.
37. Kopp, J. and Schwede, T. 2004. The SWISS-MODEL repository of annotated three-dimensional protein structure homology models. Nucleic Acids Res. 32: D230-D234. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj056.
38. Krieger, E., Nabuurs, S.B., and Vriend, G. 2003. Homology modeling. Methods Biochem. Anal. 44: 509-523.
39. Laskowski, R.A., MacArthur, M.W., Moss, D.S., and Thornton, J.M. 1993. PROCHECK: A program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26: 283-291.
40. Lazaridis, T. and Karplus, M. 1998. Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. J. Mol. Biol. 288: 477-487.
41. Liolios, K., Tavernarakis, N., Hugenholtz, P., and Kyrpides, N.C. 2006. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) v.2: A monitor of genome projects worldwide. Nucleic Acids Res. 34: 332-334.
42. Lu, H. and Skolnick, J. 2001. A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins 44: 223-232.
43. Lu, L., Arakaki, A.K., Lu, H., and Skolnick, J. 2003. Multimeric threading-based prediction of protein-protein interactions on a genomic scale: Application to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteome. Genome Res. 13: 1146-1154.
44. Luthy, R., Bowie, J.U., and Eisenberg, D. 1992. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature 356: 83-85.
45. Marti-Renom, M.A., Stuart, A., Fiser, A., Sanchez, R., Melo, F., and Sali, A. 2000. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 29: 291-325.
46. McGuffin, L.J. and Jones, D.T. 2003. Improvement of the GenTHREADER method for genomic fold recognition. Bioinformatics 19: 874-881.
47. McGuffin, L.J., Bryson, K., and Jones, D.T. 2000. The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 16: 404-405.
48. Melo, F. and Feytmans, E. 1997. Novel knowledge-based mean force potential at atomic level. J. Mol. Biol. 267: 207-222.
49. Melo, F. and Feytmans, E. 1998. Assessing protein structures with a nonlocal atomic interaction energy. J. Mol. Biol. 277: 1141-1152.
50. Melo, F., Sanchez, R., and Sali, A. 2002. Statistical potentials for fold assessment. Protein Sci. 11: 430-448.
51. Metz, C.E. 1986. ROC methodology in radiological imaging. Invest. Radiol. 21: 720-733.
52. Metz, C.E., Wang, P.L., and Kronman, H.B. 1984. A new approach for testing the significance of differences between ROC curves measured from correlated data. In Information processing in medical imaging (ed. F. Deconinck), pp. 432-445. Nijhoff, The Hague.
53. Metz, C.E., Herman, B.A., and Roe, C.A. 1998. Statistical comparison of two ROC curve estimates obtained from partially paired data sets. Med. Decis. Making 18: 110-121.
54. Miyazawa, S. and Jernigan, R.L. 1985. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: Quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 18: 534-552.
55. Montelione, G.T. and Anderson, S. 1999. Structural genomics: Keystone for a human proteome project. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6: 11-12.
56. Moult, J. 2005. A decade of CASP: Progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15: 285-289.
57. Moult, J., Fidelis, K., Rost, B., Hubbard, T., and Tramontano, A. 2005. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round 6. Proteins S7: 3-7.
58. Park, B.H. and Levitt, M. 1996. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near-native folds from well-constructed decoys. J. Mol. Biol. 258: 367-392.
59. Park, B.H., Huang, E.S., and Levitt, M. 1997. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J. Mol. Biol. 266: 831-846.
60. Pattabiraman, N., Ward, K.B., and Fleming, P.J. 1995. Occluded molecular surface: Analysis of protein packing. J. Mol. Recognit. 8: 334-344.
61. Petrey, D.a.H.B. 2005. Protein structure prediction: Inroads to biology. Mol. Cell 20: 811-819.
62. Pieper, U., Eswar, N., Braberg, H., Madhusudhan, M.S., Davis, F., Rossi, A., Marti-Renom, M.A., Karchin, R., Webb, B., Melo, F., et al. 2006. MODBASE, a database of annotated comparative protein structure models, and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 33: 291-295.
63. Pontius, J., Richelle, J., and Wodak, S.J. 1996. Deviations from standard atomic volumes as a quality measure for protein crystal structures. J. Mol. Biol. 264: 121-136.
64. Sali, A. and Blundell, T.L. 1993. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234: 779-815.
65. Samudrala, R. and Moult, J. 1998. An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 275: 895-916.
66. Sanchez, R. and Sali, A. 1998. Large-scale protein structure modeling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95: 13597-13602.
67. Schwede, T., Kopp, J., Guex, N., and Peitsch, M.C. 2003. SWISS-MODEL: An automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res. 31: 3381-3385.
68. Shah, M., Passovets, S., Kim, D., Ellrott, K., Wang, L., Vokler, I., LoCascio, P., Xu, D., and Xu, Y. 2003. A computational pipeline for protein structure prediction and analysis at genome scale. Bioinformatics 19: 1985-1996.
69. Sippl, M.J. 1993. Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins 17: 355-362.
70. Swets, J.A. 1988. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240: 1285-1293.
71. Swets, J.A., Dawes, R.M., and Monahan, J. 2000. Better decisions through science. Sci. Am. 283: 82-87.
72. Thomas, P.D. and Dill, K.A. 1996. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: How accurate are they? J. Mol. Biol. 257: 457-469.
73. Wang, K., Fan, B., Levitt, M., and Samudrala, R. 2004. Improved protein structure selection using decoy-dependent discriminatory functions. BMC Struct. Biol. 4: 8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6807-4-8.
74. Watkin, T.L.H., Rau, A., and Biehl, M. 1993. The statistical mechanics of learning a rule. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65: 499-556.
75. Xia, Y., Huang, E.S., Levitt, M., and Samudrala, R. 2000. Ab initio construction of protein tertiary structures using a hierarchical approach. J. Mol. Biol. 300: 171-185.
76. Xiang, Z. 2006. Advances in homology protein structure modeling. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 7: 217-227.
77. Zhang, Y., Kolinski, A., and Skolnick, J. 2003. TOUCHSTONE II: A new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction. Biophys. J. 85: 1145-1164.
78. Zhou, H. and Zhou, Y. 2002. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci. 11: 2714-2726.