Predictions Without Templates: New Folds, Secondary Structure, and Contacts in CASP5

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 53, Issue SUPPL. 6, 2003, Pages 436-456

  Aloy, Patrick ^a   Stark, Alexander ^a   Hadley, Caroline ^a   Russell, Robert B ^a  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

Author keywords

CASP5 assessment; De novo ab initio structure prediction; Residue residue contacts; Secondary structure

Indexed keywords

CASP4 MODEL; CASP5 TARGET; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DNA TEMPLATE; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 0242299187     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10546     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Defay T, Cohen FE. Evaluation of current techniques for ab initio protein structure prediction. Proteins 1995;23:431-445.
2. Lesk AM. CASP2: report on ab initio predictions. Proteins 1997; Suppl 1:151-166.
3. Orengo CA, Bray JE, Hubbard T, LoConte L, Sillitoe I. Analysis and assessment of ab initio three-dimensional prediction, secondary structure, and contacts prediction. Proteins 1999;Suppl 3:149-170.
4. Lesk AM, Lo Conte L, Hubbard TJ. Assessment of novel fold targets in CASP4: predictions of three-dimensional structures, secondary structures, and interresidue contacts. Proteins 2001; Suppl 5:98-118.
5. Bystroff C, Baker D. Prediction of local structure in proteins using a library of sequence-structure motifs. J Mol Biol 1998;281:565-577.
6. Jones DT. Successful ab initio prediction of the tertiary structure of NK-lysin using multiple sequences and recognized supersecondary structural motifs. Proteins 1997;Suppl 1:185-191.
7. Bonneau R, Strauss CE, Rohl CA, Chivian D, Bradley P, Malmstrom L, Robertson T, Baker D. De novo prediction of three-dimensional structures for major protein families. J Mol Biol 2002;322:65-78.
8. Fukushima K, Kikuchi J, Koshiba S, Kigawa T, Kuroda Y, Yokoyama S. Solution structure of the DFF-C domain of DFF45/ICAD. A structural basis for the regulation of apoptotic DNA fragmentation. J Mol Biol 2002;321:317-327.
9. MacLachlan AD. Gene duplications in the structural evolution of chymotrypsin. J Mol Biol 1979;128:49-79.
10. Hubbard TJ. RMS/coverage graphs: a qualitative method for comparing three-dimensional protein structure predictions. Proteins 1999;Suppl 3:15-21.
11. Zemla A, Venclovas C, Fidelis K, Rost B. A modified definition of Sov, a segment-based measure for protein secondary structure prediction assessment. Proteins 1999;34:220-223.
12. Zemla A, Venclovas C, Moult J, Fidelis K. Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions. Proteins 1999;Suppl 3:22-29.
13. Sayle RA, Milner-White EJ. RASMOL: biomolecular graphics for all. Trends Biochem Sci 1995;20:374.
14. Russell RB, Barton GJ. Multiple protein sequence alignment from tertiary structure comparison: assignment of global and residue confidence levels. Proteins 1992;14:309-323.
15. Kinch LN, Qi Y, Hubbard T, Grishin NV. Target classification. Proteins 2003;Suppl 6:340-351.
16. Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 1999;292:195-202.
17. Kinch LN, Wrabl JO, Krishna SS, Majumdar I, Sadreyev RI, Qi Y, Pei J, Cheng H, Grishin NV. CASP5 assessment of fold recognition target predictions. Proteins 2003;Suppl 6:395-409.
18. Rost B, Sander C, Schneider R. Redefining the goals of protein secondary structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1994;235:13-26.
19. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22:2577-2637.
20. Tramontano A, Morea V, Assessment of homology based predictions in CASP5. Proteins 2003;Suppl 6:352-368.
21. Baldi P, Brunak S, Frasconi P, Soda G, Pollastri G. Exploiting the past and the future in protein secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics 1999;15:937-946.
22. Karplus K, Karchin R, Barrett C, Tu S, Cline M, Diekhans M, Grate L, Casper J, Hughey R. What is the value added by human intervention in protein structure prediction? Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:86-91.
23. Vitkup D, Melamud E, Moult J, Sander C. Completeness in structural genomics. Nat Struct Biol 2001;8:559-566.
24. Vajda S, Vakser IA, Sternberg MJ, Janin J. Modeling of protein interactions in genomes. Proteins 2002;47:444-446.
25. Kabsch W, Sander C. How good are predictions of protein secondary structure? FEBS Lett 1983;155:179-182.
26. Russell RB, Barton GJ. The limits of protein secondary structure prediction accuracy from multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol 1993;234:951-957.
27. Rost B, Eyrich VA. EVA: large-scale analysis of secondary structure prediction. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:192-199.
28. Eyrich VA, Marti-Renom MA, Przybylski D, Madhusudhan MS, Fiser A, Pazos F, Valencia A, Sali A, Rost B. EVA: continuous automatic evaluation of protein structure prediction servers. Bioinformatics 2001;17:1242-1243.
29. Marti-Renom MA, Madhusudhan MS, Fiser A, Rost B, Sali A. Reliability of assessment of protein structure prediction methods. Structure (Camb) 2002;10:435-440.
30. Pollastri G, Baldi P, Fariselli P, Casadio R. Improved prediction of the number of residue contacts in proteins by recurrent neural networks. Bioinformatics 2001;17 Suppl 1:S234-S242.
31. Bystroff C, Thorsson V, Baker D. HMMSTR: a hidden Markov model for local sequence-structure correlations in proteins. J Mol Biol 2000;301:173-190.
32. Shao Y, Bystroff C. Predicting inter-residue contacts using templates and pathways. Proteins 2003;Suppl 6:497-502.
33. Kraulis PJ. MOLSCRIPT: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr 1991;24: 946-950.
34. Merritt EA, Bacon DJ. Raster3D: photorealistic molecular graphics. Methods Enzymol 1997;277:505-524.