Pedagogy, process, and classroom context: Integrating teacher voice and experience into research on technology-enhanced language learning

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 93, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2009, Pages 754-768

  Egbert, Joy ^a   Huff, Leslie ^b   Mcneil, Levi ^c   Preuss, Cara ^a   Sellen, Joanne ^d  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c Sookmyung Women's University   (South Korea)

^d American Language and Culture Program   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71849085909     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00971.x     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. AbuSeileek A F. Cooperative vs. individual learning of oral skills in a CALL environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning: 20 2007, 493-514.
2. Alderson J C. Assessing reading 2000, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
3. Ariew R, Ercetin G. Exploring the potential of hypermedia annotations for second language reading. Computer Assisted Language Learning 2004, 17:237-259.
4. Barbieri F, Eckhardt S. Applying corpus-based findings to form-focused instruction: The case of reported speech. Language Teaching Research 2007, 11:319-346.
5. Bernhardt E B. Progress and procrastination in second language reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 2005, 25:133-150.
6. Biesenbach-Lucas S, Meloni C, Weasenforth D. Use of cohesive features in ESL students' e-mail and word-processed texts: A comparative study. Computer Assisted Language Learning 2000, 13(3):1-17.
7. Biesenbach-Lucas S, Weasenforth D. E-mail and word processing in the ESL classroom: How the medium affects the message. Language Learning & Technology 2001, 5(1):135-165.
8. Bloch J. Abdullah's blogging: A generation 1. 5 student enters the blogosphere: Language Learning & Technology 2007, 20(4):128-141.
9. Byrne T. Marrying two existing software packages into an efficient online tutoring tool. Computer Assisted Language Learning 2007, 20:459-469.
10. Chamot A. Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 2005, 25:112-130.
11. Chamot A U, Keatley C W. Learning strategies of adolescent low literacy Hispanic ESL students 2003, April, Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL
12. Chapelle C A, Compton L, Kon E, Sauro S, Lomicka L, Cooke-Plagwitz J. Theory, research and practice in CALL: Making the links. Teaching with technology 2004, 189-208. In, Eds, pp, Boston, Heinle
13. Chapelle C, Jamieson J, Dunkel P. Internal and external validity issues in research on CALL effectiveness. Computer-assisted language learning and testing: Research issues and practice 1990, 37-59. In, Ed, pp, New York, Newbury House
14. Chiu C-Y, Savignon S J. Writing to mean: Computer-mediated feedback in online tutoring of multidraft compositions. CALICO Journal 2006, 24(1):97-114.
15. Chiu T-L, Liou H-C, Yeh Y. A study of Web-based oral activities enhanced by automatic speech recognition for EFL college learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 2007, 20:209-233.
16. Coleman J. CALL from the margins: Effective dissemination of CALL research and good practices. ReCALL Journal 2005, 17(1):18-31.
17. Coniam D, Wong R. Internet Relay Chat as a tool in the autonomous development of ESL learners' English language ability: An exploratory study. System 2004, 32:321-335.
18. Debski R. Analysis of research in CALL (1980-2000) with a reflection on CALL as an academic discipline. ReCALL Journal 2003, 15(2):177-188.
19. Dreyer C, Nel C. Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System 2003, 31:349-365.
20. Egbert J. Asking useful questions: Goals, engagement, and differentiation in technology-enhanced language learning. Teaching English with Technology 2009, 7(1). http://www.iatefl.org.pl/call/j_article27.htm, Retrieved July 21, from
21. Ercetin G. Exploring ESL learners' use of hypermedia reading glosses. CALICO Journal 2003, 20(1):261-284.
22. Farhan A, AbuSeileek M. Hypermedia annotation presentation: Learners' preferences and effect on EFL reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition. CALICO Journal 2008, 25(2):189-205.
23. Felix U. What do meta-analyses tell us about CALL effectiveness?. ReCALL Journal 2005, 17(2):269-288.
24. Fitze M. Discourse and participation in ESL face-to-face and written electronic conferences. Language Learning & Technology 2006, 10(1):67-86.
25. Fuentes A C. The use of coropora and IT in evaluating oral task competence for tourism English. CALICO Journal 2004, 22(1):5-22.
26. Garrett N. Technology in the service of language learning: Trends and issues. Modern Language Journal 1991, 75:74-101.
27. Gaskell D, Cobb T. Can learners use concordance feedback for writing errors?. System 2004, 32:301-319.
28. Glendinning E, Howard R. Lotus ScreenCam as an aid to investigating student writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning 2003, 16:31-46.
29. Huang H T, Liou H S. Vocabulary learning in an automated graded reading program. Language Learning & Technology 2007, 11(3):64-82.
30. Hubbard P. A survey of unanswered questions in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning: 16 2003, 2-3.
31. Hubbard R, Power B. Living the questions: A guide for teacher-researchers 1999, Portland, ME, Stenhouse
32. Jung U. CALL: Past, present, and future-a bibliometric approach. ReCALL Journal 2005, 17(1):4-17.
33. Kang M L, Shen Z. Integration of computers into an EFL reading classroom. ReCALL Journal 2006, 18(2):212-229.
34. Kern R. Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly 2006, 40:183-210.
35. Keys C, Bryan L. Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2001, 38:631-645.
36. Koda K. Reading and language learning: Crosslinguistic constraints on second language reading development. Language Learning 2007, 57:1-44.
37. Koyama T, Takeuchi O. Does look-up frequency help reading comprehension of EFL learners? Two empirical studies of electronic dictionaries. CALICO Journal 2007, 25(1):34-51.
38. Lai C, Zhao Y. Noticing and text-based chat. Language Learning & Technology 2006, 10(3):102-120.
39. Levy M. Responding to the context of CALL: Directions for research. Prospect 1999, 14(3):24-31.
40. Levy M. Scope, goals, and methods in CALL research: Questions of coherence and autonomy. ReCALL Journal 2000, 12(2):170-195.
41. Li Y. Linguistic characteristics of ESL writing in task-based e-mail activities. System 2000, 28:229-245.
42. Lirola M M, Cuevas M T. Integrating CALL and genre theory: A proposal to increase students' literacy. ReCALL Journal 2008, 20(1):67-81.
43. Loewen S, Erlam R. Corrective feedback in the chatroom: An experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning 2006, 19:1-14.
44. McIntosh S, Braul B, Chao T. A case study in asynchronous voice conferencing for language instruction. Educational Media International 2003, 40:63-73.
45. McNeil L. A second language reading model of interaction and influence. 2009, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington State University, Pullman
46. Mohr M, Rogers C, Sanford B, Nocerino M, MacLean M, Clawson S. Teacher research for better schools 2003, New York, Teachers College Press
47. Ngu B H, Rethinasamy S. Evaluating a CALL software on the learning of English Prepositions. Computers and Education 2006, 47:41-55.
48. Nuttall C. Teaching reading skills in a foreign language 2005, Oxford, Macmillan
49. O'Keeffe A, McCarthy M, Carter R. From corpus to classroom 2007, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
50. Parks S, Huot D, Hamers J, Lemonnier F. Crossing boundaries: Multimedia technology and pedagogical innovation in a high school class. Language Learning & Technology 2003, 7(1):28-45.
51. Poulsen R, Hastings P, Allbritton D. Tutoring bilingual students with an automated reading tutor that listens. Journal of Educational Computing 2007, 36(2):191-221.
52. Ramirez Verdugo D. A study of intonation awareness and learning in non-native speakers of English. Language Awareness 2006, 15:141-159.
53. Ramirez Verdugo D, Alonso Belmonte I. Using digital stories to improve listening comprehension with Spanish young learners of English. Language Learning & Teaching 2007, 11(1):87-101.
54. Rosenshine B, Meister C, Chapman S. Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research 1996, 66:181-221.
55. Sakar A, Ercetin G. Effectiveness of hypermedia annotations for foreign language reading. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2005, 21:28-38.
56. Shamsudin S, Nesi H. Computer-mediated communication in English for specific purposes: A case study with computer science students at University Teknologi Malaysia. Computer Assisted Language Learning 2006, 19:317-339.
57. Shang H-F. An exploratory study of e-mail application on FL writing performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning 2007, 20:79-96.
58. Stake R E, Denzin N, Lincoln Y. Qualitative case studies. The Sage handbook of qualitative research 2005, 443-446. In, Eds, 3rd ed., pp, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage
59. Stockwell G. A review of technology choice for teaching language skills and areas in the CALL literature. ReCALL Journal 2007, 19(2):105-120.
60. Sun Y -C. Learner perceptions of a concordancing tool for academic writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20 2007, 323-343.
61. Thornley C, Parker R, Read K, Eason V. Developing a research partnership: Teachers as researchers and researchers as teacher educators. Teachers and Teaching 2004, 10:20-33.
62. Torlakovic E, Deugo D. Application of a CALL system in the acquisition of adverbs in English. Computer Assisted Language Learning 2004, 17:203-235.
63. Tseng M C. Comparing EFL learners' reading comprehension between hypertext and printed text. CALL Electronic Journal Online 2008, 9(2). http://www.tell.is.ritsumei.ac.jp/callejonline/mod/resource/view.php?id= 8, Retrieved April 22, 2008, from
64. Tseng Y -C, Liou H -C. The effects of online conjunction materials on college EFL students' writing. System 2006, 34:270-283.
65. Tsou W, Wang W, Tzeng Y. Applying a multimedia storytelling website in foreign language learning. Computers and Education 2006, 47:17-28.
66. Vannestal M E, Lindquist H. Learning English grammar with a corpus: Experimenting with concordancing in a university grammar course. ReCALL Journal 2007, 19(3):329-350.
67. Warschauer M, Cook J. Service learning and technology in TESOL. Prospect 1999, 14(3):32-39.
68. Zhao Y. Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal 2003, 21(1):7-28.