Integration of computers into an EFL reading classroom

ReCALL

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 212-229

  Lim, Kang Mi ^a   Shen, Hui Zhong ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Call based; collaboration; EFL reading; hypermedia; interaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 43249159394     PISSN: 09583440     EISSN: 14740109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0958344006000528     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Adair-Hauck, B., Willinghan-McLain, L. and Youngs, B.E. (1999) Evaluating the integration of technology and second language learning. CALICO Journal, 16(2): 269-305.
2. Allum, P. (2002) CALL and the classroom: the case for comparative studies. ReCALL, 14(1): 146-166.
3. Ayres, R. (2002) Learner attitudes towards the use of CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(3): 241-249.
4. Chapelle, C. (1998) Multimedia CALL: Lesson to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning Technology, 2(1): 22-34.
5. Chapelle, C. (2000) Computer Application in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: University Press.
6. Chapelle, C. and Hegelheimer, V. (2000) Methodological issues in research on learner-computer interactions in CALL. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1): 41-59.
7. Clark, R.E. (1994) Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2): 21-29.
8. Debski, R. and Gruba, P. (1999) A Qualitative survey of tertiary instructor attitude towards project-based CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(3): 219-239.
9. Doty, D., Popplewell, S. and Byers, G. (2001) Interactive CD-ROM storybooks and young readers; reading comprehension, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4): 374-384.
10. Dunkel, P. (1991) Computer-assisted language learning and testing: Research issues and practice. New York: Newbury House.
11. Echavez-Solano, N. (2003) A comparison of student outcomes and attitudes in technology-enhanced vs. traditional second-semester Spanish language course. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Minnesota.
12. Hird, B. (1995) How communicative can English language teaching be in China? Prospect, 10(3): 21-27.
13. Holmes, B. (1998) Initial Perceptions of CALL by Japanese University Students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 11(4): 397-409.
14. Johnson, E.M. and Brine, J.W. (2000) Design and Development of CALL Courses in Japan. CALICO Journal, 17(2): 251-268.
15. Kern, R.D. (1995) Restructuring Classroom Interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4): 457-476.
16. Lawrence, G. and Lam, Y. (2002) Teacher-students role redefinition during a computer-based second language project: Are computers catalysts for empowering change? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(3): 295-313.
17. Levy, M. (2000) Scope, goals and methods in CALL research: Questions of coherence and autonomy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(2): 170-195.
18. Levy, M. (2001) Coherence and direction in CALL research: comparative designs. In: Cameron, K. (ed.), C.A.L.L. -The challenge of change. Exeter: Elm bank publication, 5-13.
19. Levy, M. (1997) Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Context and Conceptualization. Oxford: Clarendon.
20. Lewis, R. and Atzert, S. (2000) Dealing with computer-related anxiety in the project oriented CALL classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(4): 377-395.
21. Lim, K. (2000) The attitudes of Korean students to learning English in Australia. Unpublished Master thesis, The University of Melbourne.
22. Matthew, K.I. (1997) A comparison of the influence of interactive CD-ROM storybooks and traditional print storybooks on reading comprehension. Journal of Research on computing in Education, 29(3): 263-275.
23. Meunier, L.E. (1999) Personality and motivational factors in computer-mediated foreign language communication. In: Muyskens, J. (ed.), New ways of learning and teaching: focus on technology and foreign language education. Boston, Mass: Heinle & Heinle Publishers, 145-197.
24. Nunan, D. (1989) Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Oxford, R. (1990) Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
26. Oxford, R. (1993) Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions. TESOL Journal, Winter: 18-22.
27. O'Malley, M. and Chamot, A.U. (1990) Language strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Pallant, J. (2001) SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (version 10). St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
29. Pederson, K.M. (1987) Research on CALL. In: Smith, W. F. (ed.), Modern media in foreign language education: Theory and implementation. Lincolnwood, Ill., USA: National Textbook Co., 99-132
30. Stepp-Greany, J. (2002) Student perceptions on language learning in a technological environment: implication for the new millennium. Language learning and Technology, 6(1): 165-180.
31. Strambi, A. (2001) The interaction of web-based interaction and collaboration on the language learner. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Sydney.
32. Sullivan, N. and Pratt, E. (1996) A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: a computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 29(4): 491-501.
33. Warschauer, M. (1996) Motivational aspects of using computers for writing and communication. In: Warschauer, M. (ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning. Honolulu, Hawaii: Second language Teaching & Curriculum Centre, 29-46.
34. Warschauer, M. (2000) The changing global economy and the future of English teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3): 511-535.
35. Williams, M. and Burden, R.L. (1997) Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Zhong, Y.X. and Shen, H.Z. (2002) Where is the technology-induced pedagogy? Snapshots from two multimedia EFL classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1): 39-52.