Discourse and participation in esl face-to-face and written electronic conferences

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 67-86

  Fitze, Michael ^a  

^a Dubai Women's College ^*  (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30644473621     PISSN: 10943501     EISSN: 10943501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Beauvois, M. H. (1992). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 5, 455-465.
2. Beauvois, M. H. (1998). Conversation in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54 (2), 198-217.
3. Bohlke, O. (2003). A comparison of student participation levels by group size and language stages during chatroom and face-to-face discussions in German. CALICO Journal, 21 (1), 67-87.
4. Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4 (1), 120-136. Retrieved November 29, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/blake/
5. Braine, O. (1997). Beyond word processing: Networked computers in ESL writing classes. Computers and Composition, 14, 45-58.
6. Braine, G. (2001). A study of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writers on a Local-Area Network (LAN) and in traditional classes. Computers and Composition, 18, 275-292.
7. Chun, D. M. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22(1), 17-31.
8. Cooper, M., & Seife, C. (1990). Computer conferences and learning: Authority, resistance, and internally persuasive discourse. College English, 52, 847-869.
9. Fernandez-Garcia, M. & Martinez-Arbelaiz, A. (2002). Negotiation of meaning in non-native speaker - non-native speaker synchronous discussions. CALICO Journal, 19, 279-294.
10. Hayne, S., Rice, R., & Licker, P. (1994). Social cues and anonymous group interaction using group support systems. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4, 79-88.
11. Herring, S. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4: 4. Retrieved July 2005, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue4/herring.html
12. Keim, O. R. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25 (5), 441-454.
13. Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79 (4), 457-475.
14. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39 (10), 1123-1134.
15. Kitade, K. (2000). L2 learners' discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in Internet chat. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 13 (2), 146-166.
16. Koide R. T., & Shumway D. L. (1998). Characterizing Effects of Mycorrhizal Fungi on Plant Population Structure. In A. Varma (Ed.), Mycorrhiza Manual (pp. 65-75). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Retrieved February, 2003, from http://www.cas.psu.edu/docs/casdept/hort/EnvHort/homework/images/LORENZgood.pdf
17. Lee, L. (2002). Enhancing learners' communication skills through synchronous electronic interaction and task-based instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 35 (1), 16-24.
18. Lee, L. (2004). Learners' perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US. Language Learning & Technology, 8 (1), 83-100. Retrieved November 29, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num1/lee/
19. Marjanovic, O. (1999). Learning and teaching in a synchronous collaborative environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15, 129-138.
20. Neuwirth, C. M., Palmquist, M., Cochran, C., Gillespie, T., Hartmen, K., & Hajduk, T. (1993). Why write - together - concurrently on a computer network? In J. Bruce, P. Kreeft, & T. Batson (Eds.), Network-Based Classrooms: Promises and Realities (pp. 181-209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Ortega, L. (1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interactions: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning & Technology, 1 (1), 82-93. Retrieved November 29, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num1/ortega/default.html
22. Pennington, M. (1996). The computer and the non-native writer: A natural partnership. Creskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press Inc.
23. Perkins, J., & Newman, K. (1999). Meaning in e-discourse. International Journal of Educational Communications, 5 (2), 157-168.
24. Peterson, M. (1997). Language teaching and networking. System, 25 (1), 29-37.
25. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language-learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
26. Scott, M. (1998). WordSmith tools manual version 3.0. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved November 29, 2005, from www.lexically.net/wordsmith/version3/manual.pdf
27. Seife, C. L., & Meyer, P. R. (1991). Testing claims for online conferences. Written Communication, 8 (2), 163-192.
28. Simpson, J. (2005). Conversational floors in synchronous text-based CMC discourse. Discourse Studies, 7 (3), 337-361.
29. Slatin, J. (1998). The computer writing and research lab: A brief institutional history. In J. Swaffar, S. Romano, P. Markley, & K. Arens, (Eds.), Language learning online: Theory and practice in the ESL and L2 computer classroom (pp. 19-38). Austin, TX: Labyrinth Publications.
30. Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 38-57
31. Sotillo, S. M. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4 (1), 82-119. Retrieved November 29, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/sotillo/default.html
32. Sullivan, N. (1998). Developing critical reading and writing skills: Empowering minority students in a networked computer classroom. In J. Swaffar, S. Romano, P. Markley, & K. Arens, (Eds.), Language learning online: Theory and practice in the ESL and L2 computer classroom (pp. 41-56). Austin, TX: Labyrinth Publications.
33. Sullivan, N., & Pratt, E. (1996). A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 29 (4), 491-501.
34. Toyoda, E. & Harrison, R. (2002). Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning & Technology, 6 (1), 82-99. Retrieved November 29, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/TOYODA/
35. Vavra, E. (2000). Dr. Ed Vavra's KISS approach to sentence structure. Retrieved February 15, 2003, from http://nweb.pct.edu/homepage/staff/evavra/ED498/Essay009_Def_TUnit.htm
36. Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13 (2), 7-26.
37. Warschauer, M., Turbee, L., & Roberts, B. (1996). Computer learning networks and student empowerment. System, 24 (1), 1-14.
38. Yagelski, R. P., & Grabill, J. T. (1998). Computer-mediated communication in the undergraduate writing classroom: A study of the relationship of online discourse and classroom discourse in two writing classes. Computers and Composition, 15, 11-40.