Non-genetic cell-to-cell variability and the consequences for pharmacology

Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 5-6, 2009, Pages 556-561

  Niepel, Mario ^a   Spencer, Sabrina L ^a   Sorger, Peter K ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL INTERACTION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ANIMALS; CELLS; DRUG THERAPY; HUMANS; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; PHARMACOLOGICAL PROCESSES; PHENOTYPE; PROTEINS;

EID: 70549093092     PISSN: 13675931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.09.015     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Albeck J.G., Burke J.M., Aldridge B.B., Zhang M., Lauffenburger D.A., and Sorger P.K. Quantitative analysis of pathways controlling extrinsic apoptosis in single cells. Mol Cell 30 (2008) 11-25
2. Feinerman O., Veiga J., Dorfman J.R., Germain R.N., and Altan-Bonnet G. Variability and robustness in T cell activation from regulated heterogeneity in protein levels. Science 321 (2008) 1081-1084. This study linked variability in the activation of a clonal population of T cells to endogenous variability in the levels of two proteins, CD8 and SHP-1. The authors measured covariation in the levels of these two proteins and using modeling, showed that this covariation reduced the diversity of T cell response.
3. Gascoigne K.E., and Taylor S.S. Cancer cells display profound intra- and interline variation following prolonged exposure to antimitotic drugs. Cancer Cell 14 (2008) 111-122. This paper characterized the response of 15 cell lines to 3 different classes of antimitotic drugs and found significant interline as well as intraline variation, with cells within any given cell line exhibiting multiple distinct phenotypes in response to treatment.
4. Orth J.D., Tang Y., Shi J., Loy C.T., Amendt C., Wilm C., Zenke F.T., and Mitchison T.J. Quantitative live imaging of cancer and normal cells treated with Kinesin-5 inhibitors indicates significant differences in phenotypic responses and cell fate. Mol Cancer Ther 7 (2008) 3480-3489
5. Spencer S.L., Gaudet S., Albeck J.G., Burke J.M., and Sorger P.K. Non-genetic origins of cell-to-cell variability in TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Nature 459 (2009) 428-432. This paper examined why, in a clonal population, some cells die after a death-inducing stimulus, while others survive indefinitely. Using time-lapse imaging, flow cytometry, and mathematical modeling, the authors showed that stochastic differences in the levels of proteins are the primary causes of cell-to-cell variability in the timing and probability of death.
6. Irish J.M., Hovland R., Krutzik P.O., Perez O.D., Bruserud O., Gjertsen B.T., and Nolan G.P. Single cell profiling of potentiated phospho-protein networks in cancer cells. Cell 118 (2004) 217-228
7. Cohen A.A., Geva-Zatorsky N., Eden E., Frenkel-Morgenstern M., Issaeva I., Sigal A., Milo R., Cohen-Saidon C., Liron Y., Kam Z., et al. Dynamic proteomics of individual cancer cells in response to a drug. Science 322 (2008) 1511-1516. This paper used time-lapse imaging of a library of proteins tagged with yellow fluorescent protein at their endogenous locus to monitor drug responses at a single-cell level. The authors identified two proteins whose levels rise in cells that survive treatment with the cancer drug camptothecin and decrease in cells that died, thereby correlating variability arising subsequent to drug treatment with cell fate.
8. Geva-Zatorsky N., Rosenfeld N., Itzkovitz S., Milo R., Sigal A., Dekel E., Yarnitzky T., Liron Y., Polak P., Lahav G., et al. Oscillations and variability in the p53 system. Mol Syst Biol 2 (2006) 2006 0033. This study described the dynamic changes of p53 and Mdm2 expression in genetically identical cells. In response to gamma irradiation, a high degree of cell-to-cell variability was observed, with some cells showing persistent oscillations. While these oscillations were random in amplitude, the oscillating behavior of recently divided sister cells was found to be correlated.
9. Chang H.H., Hemberg M., Barahona M., Ingber D.E., and Huang S. Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells. Nature 453 (2008) 544-547. Chang et al. found highly variable expression levels of the stem-cell marker Sca-1 in a clonal population of multipotent hematopoietic cells. Expression levels correlated with lineage choice and extreme outliers with very high or very low expression were able to repopulate the original protein distribution.
10. Sigal A., Milo R., Cohen A., Geva-Zatorsky N., Klein Y., Liron Y., Rosenfeld N., Danon T., Perzov N., and Alon U. Variability and memory of protein levels in human cells. Nature 444 (2006) 643-646. This pioneering study measured fluctuations over time in the levels of 20 proteins tagged with yellow fluorescent protein at their endogenous locus in human cells. This method allowed dynamic observation of protein-level heterogeneity and examined whether cells that have higher than average protein levels eventually become lower. This mixing occurred for all proteins, and the half-life for mixing time was found to range between 0.8 and 2.5 cell generations.
11. Rando O.J., and Verstrepen K.J. Timescales of genetic and epigenetic inheritance. Cell 128 (2007) 655-668
12. Rosenfeld N., Young J.W., Alon U., Swain P.S., and Elowitz M.B. Gene regulation at the single-cell level. Science 307 (2005) 1962-1965
13. Golding I., Paulsson J., Zawilski S.M., and Cox E.C. Real-time kinetics of gene activity in individual bacteria. Cell 123 (2005) 1025-1036
14. Jacobson S., and Pillus L. Modifying chromatin and concepts of cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev 9 (1999) 175-184
15. Kouzarides T. Histone acetylases and deacetylases in cell proliferation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 9 (1999) 40-48
16. Cowen L.E., and Lindquist S. Hsp90 potentiates the rapid evolution of new traits: drug resistance in diverse fungi. Science 309 (2005) 2185-2189
17. Kalmar T., Lim C., Hayward P., Munoz-Descalzo S., Nichols J., Garcia-Ojalvo J., and Martinez Arias A. Regulated fluctuations in nanog expression mediate cell fate decisions in embryonic stem cells. PLoS Biol 7 (2009) e1000149. By monitoring the expression levels of the transcription factor Nanog, the authors found two distinguishable states in isogenic embryonic stem cells. The high Nanog state is stable while the low Nanog state is unstable and promotes differentiation. Mathematical modeling suggested that transcriptional noise underlies this behavior.
18. Sigal A., Milo R., Cohen A., Geva-Zatorsky N., Klein Y., Alaluf I., Swerdlin N., Perzov N., Danon T., Liron Y., et al. Dynamic proteomics in individual human cells uncovers widespread cell-cycle dependence of nuclear proteins. Nat Methods 3 (2006) 525-531
19. Newman J.R., Ghaemmaghami S., Ihmels J., Breslow D.K., Noble M., DeRisi J.L., and Weissman J.S. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 441 (2006) 840-846
20. Bar-Even A., Paulsson J., Maheshri N., Carmi M., O'Shea E., Pilpel Y., and Barkai N. Noise in protein expression scales with natural protein abundance. Nat Genet 38 (2006) 636-643
21. Goldstein J.C., Kluck R.M., and Green D.R. A single cell analysis of apoptosis. Ordering the apoptotic phenotype. Ann N Y Acad Sci 926 (2000) 132-141
22. Tyas L., Brophy V.A., Pope A., Rivett A.J., and Tavare J.M. Rapid caspase-3 activation during apoptosis revealed using fluorescence-resonance energy transfer. EMBO Rep 1 (2000) 266-270
23. Albeck J.G., Burke J.M., Spencer S.L., Lauffenburger D.A., and Sorger P.K. Modeling a snap-action, variable-delay switch controlling extrinsic cell death. PLoS Biol 6 (2008) 2831-2852
24. Hawkins E.D., Turner M.L., Dowling M.R., van Gend C., and Hodgkin P.D. A model of immune regulation as a consequence of randomized lymphocyte division and death times. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104 (2007) 5032-5037
25. Yu R.C., Pesce C.G., Colman-Lerner A., Lok L., Pincus D., Serra E., Holl M., Benjamin K., Gordon A., and Brent R. Negative feedback that improves information transmission in yeast signalling. Nature 456 (2008) 755-761
26. Liu F., Fan D., Qi J., Zhu H., Zhou Y., Yang C., Zhu Z., and Xiong D. Co-expression of cytokeratin 8 and breast cancer resistant protein indicates a multifactorial drug-resistant phenotype in human breast cancer cell line. Life Sci 83 (2008) 496-501
27. Violini S., D'Ascenzo S., Bagnoli M., Millimaggi D., Miotti S., Canevari S., Pavan A., and Dolo V. Induction of a multifactorial resistance phenotype by high paclitaxel selective pressure in a human ovarian carcinoma cell line. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 23 (2004) 83-91
28. Overton M.C., and Blumer K.J. G-protein-coupled receptors function as oligomers in vivo. Curr Biol 10 (2000) 341-344
29. Goley E.D., Rodenbusch S.E., Martin A.C., and Welch M.D. Critical conformational changes in the Arp2/3 complex are induced by nucleotide and nucleation promoting factor. Mol Cell 16 (2004) 269-279
30. Harvey C.D., Ehrhardt A.G., Cellurale C., Zhong H., Yasuda R., Davis R.J., and Svoboda K. A genetically encoded fluorescent sensor of ERK activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105 (2008) 19264-19269
31. Nelson D.E., Ihekwaba A.E., Elliott M., Johnson J.R., Gibney C.A., Foreman B.E., Nelson G., See V., Horton C.A., Spiller D.G., et al. Oscillations in NF-kappaB signaling control the dynamics of gene expression. Science 306 (2004) 704-708
32. Sakaue-Sawano A., Kurokawa H., Morimura T., Hanyu A., Hama H., Osawa H., Kashiwagi S., Fukami K., Miyata T., Miyoshi H., et al. Visualizing spatiotemporal dynamics of multicellular cell-cycle progression. Cell 132 (2008) 487-498
33. Sigal A., Danon T., Cohen A., Milo R., Geva-Zatorsky N., Lustig G., Liron Y., Alon U., and Perzov N. Generation of a fluorescently labeled endogenous protein library in living human cells. Nat Protoc 2 (2007) 1515-1527
34. Krutzik P.O., Crane J.M., Clutter M.R., and Nolan G.P. High-content single-cell drug screening with phosphospecific flow cytometry. Nat Chem Biol 4 (2008) 132-142
35. Perlman Z.E., Slack M.D., Feng Y., Mitchison T.J., Wu L.F., and Altschuler S.J. Multidimensional drug profiling by automated microscopy. Science 306 (2004) 1194-1198
36. Loo L.H., Wu L.F., and Altschuler S.J. Image-based multivariate profiling of drug responses from single cells. Nat Methods 4 (2007) 445-453
37. Bandura D.R., Baranov V.I., Ornatsky O.I., Antonov A., Kinach R., Lou X., Pavlov S., Vorobiev S., Dick J.E., and Tanner S.D. Mass cytometry: technique for real time single cell multitarget immunoassay based on inductively coupled plasma time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Chem (2009)
38. Sachs K., Perez O., Pe'er D., Lauffenburger D.A., and Nolan G.P. Causal protein-signaling networks derived from multiparameter single-cell data. Science 308 (2005) 523-529
39. Rodriguez A.S., Espina B.H., Espina V., and Liotta L.A. Automated laser capture microdissection for tissue proteomics. Methods Mol Biol 441 (2008) 71-90
40. Rubakhin S.S., Churchill J.D., Greenough W.T., and Sweedler J.V. Profiling signaling peptides in single mammalian cells using mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 78 (2006) 7267-7272
41. Berenbaum M.C. In vivo determination of the fractional kill of human tumor cells by chemotherapeutic agents. Cancer Chemother Rep 56 (1972) 563-571
42. Chabner B., and Longo D.L. Cancer Chemotherapy and Biotherapy: Principles and Practice. edn 4 (2006), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
43. Skeel R.T. Handbook of Cancer Chemotherapy. edn 6 (2003), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
44. Reya T., Morrison S.J., Clarke M.F., and Weissman I.L. Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature 414 (2001) 105-111
45. Brock A., Chang H., and Huang S. Non-genetic heterogeneity - a mutation-independent driving force for the somatic evolution of tumours. Nat Rev Genet (2009)
46. Elowitz M.B., Levine A.J., Siggia E.D., and Swain P.S. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297 (2002) 1183-1186
47. Ozbudak E.M., Thattai M., Kurtser I., Grossman A.D., and van Oudenaarden A. Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene. Nat Genet 31 (2002) 69-73
48. Raj A., Peskin C.S., Tranchina D., Vargas D.Y., and Tyagi S. Stochastic mRNA synthesis in mammalian cells. PLoS Biol 4 (2006) e309. Raj et al. used a modified fluorescence in situ hybridization method to visualize individual mRNA molecules in mammalian cells. They observed extensive stochastic variation in mRNA levels in isogenic cells, owing to random switching between active and inactive states of the reporter gene.
49. Pedraza J.M., and van Oudenaarden A. Noise propagation in gene networks. Science 307 (2005) 1965-1969
50. Dublanche Y., Michalodimitrakis K., Kummerer N., Foglierini M., and Serrano L. Noise in transcription negative feedback loops: simulation and experimental analysis. Mol Syst Biol 2 (2006) 41
51. Suel G.M., Garcia-Ojalvo J., Liberman L.M., and Elowitz M.B. An excitable gene regulatory circuit induces transient cellular differentiation. Nature 440 (2006) 545-550
52. Gillespie D.T. Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J Phys Chem 81 (1977) 2340-2361