Early metalinguistic awareness of derivational morphology: Observations from a comparison of English and French

Applied Psycholinguistics

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 405-440

  Duncan, Lynne G ^a   Casalis, Séverine ^b   Col, Pascalé ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIV LILLE   (France)

^c AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450227572     PISSN: 01427164     EISSN: 14691817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0142716409090213     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society of Research in Child Development, 58(Serial No. 238, No. 10), 1-166.
2. Bauer, L. (2003). English prefixation-A typological shift? Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 50, 33-40.
3. Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150-177.
4. Bishop, D. V. M. (1997). Uncommon understanding: Development and disorders of language comprehension in children. Hove: Psychology Press.
5. Browne, D. (1997). Putting knowledge to work. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 353-354.
6. Carlisle, J. F. (1995).Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189-209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing, 12, 169-190.
8. Carlisle, J. F.,&Nomanbhoy, D. M. (1993). Phonological andmorphological awareness in 1 st-graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177-195.
9. Carlisle, J. F., Stone, C. A., & Katz, L. A. (2001). The effects of phonological transparency on reading derived words. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 249-274.
10. Casalis, S.,&Coĺe, P. (2009). On the relationship between morphological and phonological awareness: Effects of training in kindergarten and in first grade reading. First Language, 29, 113-142.
11. Casalis, S., Coĺe, P., & Sopo, D. (2004). Morphological awareness in developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 114-138.
12. Casalis, S., & Louis-Alexandre, M.-F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 12, 303-335.
13. Clark, E. V. (1978). Awareness of language: Some evidence from what children say and do. In A. Sinclair, R. Jarvella, &W. J. M. Levelt (Eds.), The child's conception of language (pp. 17-43). New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Clark, E. V., & Cohen, S. R. (1984). Productivity and memory for newly formed words. Journal of Child Language, 11, 611-625.
16. Clark, E. V., & Hecht, B. F. (1982). Learning to coin agent and instrument nouns. Cognition, 12, 1-24.
17. Coĺe, P., Royer, C., Leuwers, C., & Casalis, S. (2004). Derivational knowledge and reading acquisition for French beginning-readers from Grade 1 to Grade 3. Anńee Psychologique, 104, 701-750.
18. Crystal, D. (2003). The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Cutler, A., & Clifton, C. (1984). The use of prosodic information in word recognition. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance: Vol.10. Control of language processes (pp. 183-196). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 51-62.
21. Deacon, S. H., & Bryant, P. (2005). What young children do and do not know about the spelling of inflections and derivations. Developmental Science, 8, 583-594.
22. Delattre, P. (1965). Comparing the phonetic features of English, French, German and Spanish: An interim report. Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag.
23. Dell, G. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
24. Derwing, B. L. (1976). Morpheme recognition and the learning of rules for derivational morphology. Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 21, 38-66.
25. Derwing, B. L., & Baker, W. J. (1979). Recent research on the acquisition of English morphology. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (Eds.), Language acquisition (pp. 209-223). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Duncan, L. G., Coĺe, P., Seymour, P. H. K., & Magnan, A. (2006). Differing sequences of metaphonological development in French and English. Journal of Child Language, 33, 369-399.
27. Duncan, L. G., Seymour, P.H. K.,&Hill, S. (1997).Howimportant are rhyme and analogy in beginning reading? Cognition, 63, 171-208.
28. Duncan, L. G., Seymour, P. H. K., & Hill, S. (2000). A small to large unit progression in metaphonological awareness and reading? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 1081-1104.
29. Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Pintillie, D. (1982). British Picture Vocabulary Scale (BPVS). Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
30. Dunn, L. M., Thériault-Whalen, C. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1993). Échelle de vocabulaire en images Peabody (EVIP). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
31. Elliot, C., Murray, D., & Pearson, L. (1983). British Abilities Scales, manual 4. Windsor: NFER- Nelson.
32. Finkenstaedt, T., & Wolff, D. (1973). Ordered profusion: Studies in dictionaries and the English lexicon. Heidelberg: Winter.
33. Freyd, P.,&Baron, J. (1982). Individual-differences in acquisition of derivationalmorphology. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 282-295.
34. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2003). A supralexical model for French derivational morphology. In E. M. H. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 139-157). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
35. Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
36. Gonnerman, L. M., Seidenberg, M. S., & Andersen, E. S. (2007). Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 323-345.
37. Goswami, U., & East, M. (2000). Rhyme and analogy in beginning reading: Conceptual and methodological issues. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 63-93.
38. Hay, J. B., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Shifting paradigms: Gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 342-348.
39. Jaffŕe, J.-P. (2006). Orthographes et lit́eracies: Les particularit́es du Français. Les Cahiers du CENTAL, 1, 51-59.
40. Jarmulowicz, L. D. (2002). English derivational suffix frequency and children's stress judgments. Brain and Language, 81, 192-204.
41. Jarmulowicz, L. (2006). School-aged children's phonological production of derived English words. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 294-308.
42. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1986). From meta-processes to conscious access-Evidence from children's metalinguistic and repair data. Cognition, 23, 95-147.
43. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1997). Promissory notes, genetic clocks, and epigenetic outcomes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 355-360.
45. Lefavrais, P. (1963). Du diagnostic de la dyslexie ́a l'́etude clinique de la lecture. Un nouvel instrument: Le test "l'Alouette." Revue de Psychologie Appliqúee, 13, 189-207.
46. Ĺet́e, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Coĺe, P. (2004). MANULEX: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary-school readers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 156-166.
47. Lewis, D. J., & Windsor, J. (1996). Children's analysis of derivational suffix meanings. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 209-216.
48. Longtin, C. M., Segú?, J., & Halle, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 313-334.
49. Mahony, D., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing, 12, 191-218.
50. Mann, V., & Singson, M. (2003). Linking morphological knowledge to English decoding ability: Large effects of little suffixes. In E. M. H. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 1-25). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
51. Manza, L., & Reber, A. S. (1997). Representing artificial grammar: Transfer across stimulus forms and modalities. In D. C. Berry (Ed.), How implicit is implicit learning? (pp. 73-106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. Melinger, A. (2003).Morphological structure in the lexical representation of prefixed words: Evidence from speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 335-362.
53. Moats, L. C. (2000). Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
54. Nagy,W., Berninger, V.W., & Abbott, R. D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134-147.
55. Pacton, S., Fayol, M., & Perruchet, P. (2005). Children's implicit learning of graphotactic and morphological regularities. Child Development, 76, 324-339.
56. Pacton, S., Perruchet, P., Fayol,M., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 401-426.
57. Pillon, A. (1998). Morpheme units in speech production: Evidence from laboratory-induced verbal slips. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 465-498.
58. Pitt, M. A., &Samuel, A. G. (1990). The use of rhythm in attending to speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 564-573.
59. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (2000). Lexical and nonlexical print-to-sound translation of disyllabic words and nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 342-364.
60. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090-1098.
61. Seidenberg, M. S., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 353-361.
62. Seidler, S. (1988). Untersuchung zum Erwerb von Wortbildungsregeln Deverbativa Nomina (Agens und Instrument) im Französischen. Unpublished MA thesis, Universität Hamburg.
63. Śeńechal, M., & Kearnan, K. (2007). The role of morphology in reading and spelling. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 35, 297-325.
64. Stuart,M., Dixon, M.,Masterson, J., & Gray, B. (2003). Children's early reading vocabulary: Description and word frequency lists. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 585-598.
65. Singson, M.,Mahony, D., &Mann, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing, 12, 219-252.
66. Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271-294.
67. Tyler, A., & Nagy,W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 649-667.
68. Ullman, M. T. (2001). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 37-69.
69. Ullman,M. T. (2004).Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231-270.
70. Valtin, R. (1984). The development of metalinguistic abilities in children learning to read and write. In J. Downing & R. Valtin (Eds.), Language awareness and learning to read (pp. 207-226). New York: Springer-Verlag.
71. Vihman, M. M., Nakai, S., DePaolis, R. A., & Halle, P. (2004). The role of accentual pattern in early lexical representation. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 336-353.
72. Windsor, J. (1994). Children's comprehension and production of derivational suffixes. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 409-417.
73. Zhang, J., Anderson, R. C., Packard, J., Wu, X., & Tang, S. (2009). Development of knowledge about compound word structures in Chinese and English. Unpublished manuscript.