School-aged children's phonological production of derived English words

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 294-308

  Jarmulowicz, Linda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Derivational morphology; Elementary school pupils; Normal language development; Phonology

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; AUDIO RECORDING; CONSONANT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; SCHOOL CHILD; SPEECH ARTICULATION; STRESS; VOWEL; CHILD; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

CHILD; CHILD LANGUAGE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT;

EID: 33747862308     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/024)     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allen, G., & Hawkins, S. (1980). Phonological rhythm: Definition and development. In G. Yeni-Komshian, J. Kavanagh, & C. Ferguson (Eds.), Child phonology: Volume 1. Production (pp. 227-256). New York: Academic Press.
2. Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(10), 1-166.
3. Baayen, H. R., & Lieber, R. (1991). Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics, 29, 801-843.
4. Baayen, H. R., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD- ROM]. Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
5. Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150-177.
6. Bradley, D. (1979). Lexical representation of derivational relation. In M. Aronoff & M. L. Kean (Eds.), Juncture (pp. 37-55). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Burzio, L. (2002). Surface-to-surface morphology: When your representations turn into constraints. In P. Boucher (Ed.), Many morphologies (pp. 142-177). Medford, MA: Cascadilla Press. (Preliminary version: ROA 341 0999). Retrieved April 26, 2005, from http://roa.rutgers.edu
8. Carlisle, J. F. (1987). The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning disabled and normal students. Annals of Dyslexia, 37, 90-108.
9. Carlisle, J. F. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 247-266.
10. Carlisle, J. F., & Nomanbhoy, D. (1993). Phonological and morphological awareness in first graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177-195.
11. Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., & Richman, B. (1971). American Heritage word frequency book. New York: American Heritage.
12. Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
13. Cutler, A. (1997). The syllable's role in the segmentation of stress languages. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 839-845.
14. Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just "more phonological"? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223-238.
15. Derwing, B. L., & Baker, W. J. (1979). Recent research on the acquisition of English morphology. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (Eds.), Language acquisition: Studies in first language Development (1st ed., 209-223). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Emmorey, K. (1989). Auditory morphological priming in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 73-92.
17. Fowler, A. E., & Liberman, I. Y. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157-188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Freyd, P., & Baron, J. (1982). Individual differences in acquisition of derivational morphology. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 282-295.
19. Gerken, L. (1996). Prosodic structure in young children's language production. Language, 72, 683-712.
20. Gordon, P. (1989). Levels of affixation in the acquisition of English morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 519-530.
21. Hay, J. (2001). Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? Linguistics, 391041-1070.
22. Hay, J. (2002). From speech perception to morphology: Affix ordering revisited. Language, 78, 527-555.
23. Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Hayes, B. (2001). Phonological acquisition in optimality theory: The early stages (Preprint version). Retrieved January 17, 2005, from http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/hayes/Acquisition/index.htm
25. Jaeger, J. J. (1984). Assessing the psychological status of the vowel shift rule. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 13, 13-36.
26. Jarmulowicz, L. D. (2002). English derivational suffix frequency and children's stress judgments. Brain and Language, 81, 192-204.
27. Kehoe, M. (1997). Stress error patterns in English-speaking children's word productions. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 11, 389-409.
28. Klein, H. B. (1984). Learning to stress: A case study. Journal of Child Language, 11, 375-390.
29. Leong, C. K. (1989). Productive knowledge of derivational rules in poor readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 94-115.
30. Lewis, D. J., & Windsor, J. (1996). Children's analysis of derivational suffix meanings. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 39, 209-216.
31. Moskowitz, B. A. (1973). On the status of vowel shift in English. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 223-260). New York: Academic Press.
32. Oxford English Dictionary. (2005). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Retrieved July 22, 2005, from www.oed.com
33. Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2003). Probabilistic phonology: Discrimination and robustness. In R. Bod, J. Hay, & S. Jannedy (Eds.), Probabilistic linguistics (pp. 175-228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved February 22, 2005, from http://www.ling.nwu.edu/~jbp/publications.html
34. Pollock, K. E., Brammer, D. M., & Hageman, C. F. (1993). An acoustic analysis of young children's productions of word stress. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 183-203.
35. Rubin, H., Patterson, P. A., & Kantor, M. (1991). Morphological development and writing ability in children and adults. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 22, 228-235.
36. Schwartz, R. G., Petinou, K., Goffman, L., Lazowski, G., & Cartusciello, C. (1996). Young children's production of syllable stress: An acoustic analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 3192-3200.
37. Selkirk, E. O. (1982). The syllable. In H. van der Hulst & M. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations, Part II (pp. 337-383). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
38. Singson, M., Mahony, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 219-252.
39. Templeton, S., & Scarborough-Franks, L. (1985). The spelling's the thing: Knowledge of derivational morphology in orthography and phonology among older students. Applied Psycholinguistics, 6, 371-390.
40. Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 649-667.
41. Windsor, J. (1994). Children's comprehension and production of derivational suffixes. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 408-417.
42. Windsor, J. (2000). The role of phonological opacity in reading achievement. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 50-61.
43. Windsor, J., & Hwang, M. (1999a). Children's auditory lexical decisions: A limited processing capacity account of language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 990-1002.
44. Windsor, J., & Hwang, M. (1999b). Derivational suffix productivity for students with and without language-learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 220-230.
45. Wysocki, K., & Jenkins, J. R. (1987). Deriving word meanings through morphological generalization. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 66-81.