On the relationship between morphological and phonological awareness: Effects of training in kindergarten and in first-grade reading

First Language

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 113-142

  Casalis, Séverine ^a   Colé, Pascale ^b  

^a UNIV LILLE   (France)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Learning to read; Morphological awareness; Morphological training; Phonological awareness; Phonological training

Indexed keywords

EID: 61249678463     PISSN: 01427237     EISSN: 17402344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0142723708097484     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Arnbak, E. & Elbro, C. (2000). The effects of morphological awareness training on the reading and spelling skills of young dyslexies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44(3), 89-111.
2. Baayen, R. & Schreuder, R. (2003). Morphological structure in language processing. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
3. Bishop, D. V. M. (1989). Test for reception of grammar (2nd ed.). Manchester: University of Manchester Age and Cognitive Performance Centre.
4. Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419-421.
5. Brady, S. & Shankweler, D. (1991). Phonological processes in literacy. A tribute to Isabelle Liberman. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Burani, C., Marcolini, S. & Stella, G. (2002). How early does morpholexical reading develop in readers of a shallow orthography? Brain and Language, 81, 568-586.
7. Byrne, B., Freebody, P. & Gates, A. (1992). Longitudinal data on the relations of word-reading strategies to comprehension, reading time and phonemic awareness. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 141-151.
8. Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189-209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169-190.
10. Carlisle, J. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read. A commentary. Reading Psychology, 24, 373-404.
11. Carlisle, J. & Nomanbhoy, D. M. (1993). Phonological and morphological awareness in first graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177-195.
12. Carlisle, J. & Stone, C. (2003). The effects of morphological structure on children's reading of derived words in English. In M. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds), Reading complex words (pp. 27-52). New York: Kluwer Academic.
13. Casalis, S., Colé, P. & Sopo, D. (2004). Morphological awareness in developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 54(1), 114-138.
14. Casalis, S. & Louis-Alexandre, M. F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 303-335.
15. Castles, A. & Coltheart, M. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? Cognition, 91, 77-111.
16. Cole, P., Royer, C., Leuwers, C. & Casalis, S. (2004). Les connaissances morphologiques dérivationnelles et l'apprentissage de la lecture chez l'apprenti-lecteur français du C.P. au C.E.2. L'Année Psychologique, 104, 701-750.
17. Deacon, H. & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness : just "more phonological"? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223-238.
18. Elbro, C. & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209-240.
19. Feldman, L. B. (Ed.) (1995). Morphological aspects of language processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Feldman, L. B., Rueckl, J., diLiberto, K., Paztizzo, M. & Vellutino, F. (2002). Morphological analysis by child readers as revealed by the fragment completion task. Psychonomic Bulletin, 9, 529-535.
21. Fowler, A., Feldman, L., Andjelkovic, D. & Oney, B. (2003). Morphological and phonological analysis by beginning readers: Evidence from Serbian and Turkish. In M. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds), Reading complex words (pp.53-80). New York: Kluwer Academic.
22. Fowler, A. & Liberman, I. (1995). The role of phonology and morphology in morphological awareness. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157-188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Goswami, U. & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
24. Hatcher, P., Hume, C. & Ellis, A. (1994). Ameliorating early failure by integrating the teaching of reading and phonological skills: The phonological linkage hypothesis. Child Development, 65, 41-57.
25. Henry, M. (1988). Beyond phonics: Integrated decoding and spelling instruction based on word origin and structure. Annals of Dyslexia, 38, 258-275.
26. Henry, M. (1993). Morphological structure: Latin and Greek roots and affixes as upper grade strategies. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 227-241.
27. Huot, H. (2001). Morphologie. Forme et sens des mots du français. Paris: Armand Colin.
28. Laxon, V., Rickard, M. & Coltheart, V. (1992). Children read affixed words and non-words. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 407-423.
29. Lecocq, P. (1991). Apprentissage de la lecture et dyslexie. Liège: Mardaga.
30. Lecocq, P. (1993). Entraînement à l'analyse segmentale et apprentissage de la lecture. International Journal of Psychology 30, 329-353.
31. Lecocq, P. (1996). L'ECOSSE: Une épreuve de compréhension syntaxico-sémantique. Lille: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.
32. Légé, Y. & Dague, P. (1974). Test de vocabulaire en images. Paris: ECPA.
33. Leong, C. K. (2000). Rapid processing of base and derived forms of words in grades 4, 5 and 6 children's spelling. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 277-302.
34. Lundberg, I., Frost, J. & Petersen, O.-P. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 265-284.
35. Lyster, S.-A. (2002). The effects of morphological versus phonological awareness training in kindergarten on reading development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 261-294.
36. Mahony, D. (1994). Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 19-44.
37. Mahony, D., Singson, M. & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 191-218.
38. Mann, V. & Singson, M. (2003). Linking morphological knowledge to English decoding ability: Large effects of little suffixes. In M. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds), Reading complex words (pp. 1-26). New York: Kluwer Academic.
39. Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. & Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40, 665-681.
40. Nagy, W. & Anderson, R. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 262-282.
41. Nunes, T., Bryant, P. & Olsson, J. (2003). Learning morphological and phonological spelling rules: An intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 289-307.
42. Pasquier, D. (1979). TLCP. Test de Lecture pour le Cours Préparatoire. Paris: EAP.
43. Raven, J. C. (1976). Colored Progressive Matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
44. Rey-Debove, J. (1984). Le domaine de la morphologie lexicale. Cahiers de lexicologie, 45, 3-19.
45. Seymour, P. H., Aro, M. & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143-174.
46. Troia, G. (1999). Phonological awareness intervention research: A critical review of the experimental psychology. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 28-52.
47. Verhoeven, L., Schreuder, R. & Baayen, H. (2003). Units of analysis in reading Dutch bisyllabic pseudowords. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 255-271.
48. Ziegler, J., Jacobs, A. M. & Stone, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 28, 504-515.