Constraints on contact-induced linguistic change

Journal of Language Contact

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 57-90

  Heine, Bernd ^a   Kuteva, Tania ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69849125605     PISSN: 18774091     EISSN: 19552629     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/000000008792525363     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (171)

1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1996. Areal diffusion in northwest Amazonia: the case of Tariana. Anthropological Linguistics 38:73-116.
2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2002. Language contact in Amazonia. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003a. Mechanisms of change in areal diffusion: new morphology and language contact. Journal of Linguistics 39:1-29.
4. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003b. Multilingualism and ethnic stereotypes: the Tariana of northwest Amazonia. Language in Society 32:1-21.
5. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.) 2001. Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Alanne, Eero. 1972. Zur Rolle der syntaktischen Interferenz der verwandten und unverwandten Sprachen. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 73:568-74.
7. Backus, Ad 2005. Codeswitching and language change: one thing leads to another? International Journal of Bilingualism 9.3-4:307-40.
8. Bakker, Peter & Maarten Mous (eds.) 1994. Mixed languages: 15 case studies in language intertwining. Amsterdam: Institute for Functional Research into Language and Language Use (IFOTT).
9. Bender, Marvin L., J. D. Bowen, R. L. Cooper, & Charles A. Ferguson (eds.) 1976. Language in Ethiopia. London: Oxford University Press.
10. Blake, Barry, Kate Burridge, & John Taylor (eds.) 2003. Historical Linguistics 2001. Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13-17
11. August 2001. (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science. Series IV: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 237). Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
12. Boretzky, Norbert. 1989. Zum Interferenzverhalten des Romani. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42.3:357-74.
13. Boretzky, Norbert, Werner Enninger, & Thomas Stolz (eds.) 1989. Beiträge zum 5. Essener Kolloquium über "Grammatikalisierung: Natürlichkeit und Systemökonomie". Vol. 1. (Essener Beiträge zur Sprachwandelforschung, 7). Bochum: Brockmeyer.
14. Boretzky, Norbert & Birgit Igla. 1999. Balkanische (südosteuropäische) Einflüsse im Romani. In Hinrichs & Büttner 1999. 709-31.
15. Breu, Walter (ed.) 1990a. Slavistische Linguistik 1989. Munich: Otto Sagner.
16. Breu, Walter. 1990b. Sprache und Sprachverhalten in den slavischen Dörfern des Molise (Süditalien). In Breu 1990a. 35-65.
17. Breu, Walter. 1992. Das italokroatische Verbsystem zwischen slavischem Erbe und kontaktbedingter Entwicklung. In Reuther 1992. 93-122.
18. Breu, Walter. 1994. Der Faktor Sprachkontakt in einer dynamischen Typologie des Slavischen. In Mehlig 1994. 41-64.
19. Breu, Walter. 1996. Überlegungen zu einer Klassifizierung des grammatischen Wandels im Sprachkontakt (am Beispiel slavischer Kontaktfälle). Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 49.1:21-38.
20. Breu, Walter. 1998. Romanisches Adstrat im Moliseslavischen. Die Welt der Slaven 43:339-54.
21. Breu, Walter. 1999. Die Komparation im Moliseslavischen. In Métrich et al. 1999. 37-63.
22. Breu, Walter. 2003a. Der indefinite Artikel in slavischen Mikrosprachen: Grammatikalisierung im totalen Sprachkontakt. In Kuße 2003. 27-68.
23. Breu, Walter. 2003b. Bilingualism and linguistic interference in the Slavic-Romance contact area of Molise (Southern Italy). In Eckardt et al. 2003. 351-73.
24. Breu, Walter. 2003c. Impersonales Neutrum im Moliseslavischen. In Kempgen et al. 2003. 57-71.
25. Breu, Walter. 2004. Der definite Artikel in der obersorbischen Umgangssprache. In Krause & Sappok 2004. 9-57.
26. Bright, William (ed.) 1992. International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Vol. 1. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. (Research Surveys in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1968. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Fishman 1968. 252-81.
29. Burridge, Kate. 1995. From modal auxiliary to lexical verb: The curious case of Pennsylvania German wotte. In Hogg & van Bergen 1995. 19-33.
30. Bybee, Joan L., William Pagliuca & Revere D. Perkins. 1991. Back to the future. In Traugott & Heine 1991. 17-58.
31. Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Campbell, Lyle. 1987. Syntactic change in Pipil. International Journal of American Linguistics 53.3:253-80.
33. Campbell, Lyle. 1993. On proposed universals of grammatical borrowing. In Jeffers 1993. 91-109.
34. Cárdenas, Hernán Urrutia. 1995. Morphosyntactic features in the Spanish of the Basque country. In Silva-Corvalán 1995. 243-59.
35. Chambers, J. K., Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.) 2001. The handbook of language variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell.
36. Chikovani, Guram. 2005. Linguistic contacts in Central Asia. In Csató et al. 2005. 127-32.
37. Crass, Joachim & Ronny Meyer. 2008. Ethiopia. In Heine & Nurse 2008. 228-50.
38. Csató, Eva Agnes, Bo Isaksson & Carina Jahani (eds.) 2005. Linguistic convergence and areal diffusion: Case studies from Iranian, Semitic and Turkic. London-New York: Routledge Curzon.
39. Comrie, Bernard & Greville G. Corbett (eds.) 1993. The Slavonic languages. London-New York: Routledge.
40. Curnow, Timothy Jowan. 2001. What language features can be 'borrowed'? In Aikhenvald & Dixon 2001. 412-36.
41. Dahl, Östen (ed.) 2000a. Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, Eurotyp, 20-6). Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
42. Dahl, Östen. 2000b. The grammar of future time reference in European languages. In Dahl 2000a. 309-28.
43. Dahl, Östen & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.) 2001. Circum-Baltic languages: Typology and contact. Volume 2: Grammar and typology. (Studies in Language and Companion Series, 55). Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
44. Doʇruöz, Seza & Ad Backus. 2007. Innovative constructions in Dutch Turkish: An assessment of on-going contact-induced change. Typescript, University of Tilburg.
45. Doʇruöz, Seza & Ad Backus forthc. (2007). Postverbal elements in immigrant Turkish: evidence of change? International Journal of Bilingualism 11.
46. Dorian, Nancie. 1994. Varieties and variation in a very small place: social homogeneity, prestige norms, and linguistic variation. Language 70:631-96.
47. Drewes, A. J. 1994. Borrowing in Maltese. In Bakker & Mous 1994. 83-111.
48. Durie, Mark & Malcolm D. Ross (eds.) 1996. The comparative method reviewed: regularity and irregularity in language change. New York: Oxford University Press.
49. Dutkova-Cope, L. 2001. The language of Czech Moravians in Texas: Do you know what Párknu Káru u Hauza means? Southwest Journal of Linguistics 20:51-84.
50. Eckardt, Regine, Klaus von Heusinger & Christoph Schwarze (eds.) 2003. Words in time: diachronic semantics from different points of view. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
51. Ferguson, Charles A. 1976. The Ethiopian language area. In Bender et al. 1976. Language in Ethiopia. 63-76.
52. Filppula, Marku. 2003. The quest for the most 'parsimonious' explanations: endogeny vs. contact revisited. In Hickey 2003. 161-73.
53. Fishman, Joshua A. (ed.) 1968. Readings in the sociology of language. The Hague, Paris: Mouton.
54. Flores Farfán, José Antonio. 2004. Notes on Nahuatl typological change. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 57:85-97.
55. Fortescue, Michael. 1993. Eskimo word order variation and its contact-induced perturbation. Journal of Linguistics 29:267-89.
56. Friedman, Victor A. 2003. Turkish in Macedonia and beyond: Studies in contact, typology and other phenomena in the Balkans and the Caucasus. (Turcologica, 52). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
57. Gast, Volker & Johan van der Auwera. 2006. What is 'contact-induced grammaticalization'? Evidence from Mayan and Mixe-Zoquean languages. Typescript, University of Antwerp.
58. Gil, David. 2003. English goes Asian: Number and (in)definiteness in the Singlish noun phrase. In Plank 2003. 467-514.
59. Gomez-Imbert, E. 1996. When animals become "rounded" and "feminine": conceptual categories and linguistic classification in a multilingual setting. In Gumperz & Levinson 1996. 438-69.
60. Greenberg, Joseph H., Charles A. Ferguson & Edith Moravcsik (eds.) 1978. Universals of human language. Volume 3: Word structure. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
61. Gumperz, John & Stephen Levinson (eds.) 1996. Rethinking linguistic relativity. (Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Langage, 17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Haase, Martin. 1992. Sprachkontakt und Sprachwandel im Baskenland: die Einflüsse des Gaskognischen und Französischen auf das Baskische. Hamburg: Buske.
63. Haase, Martin. 1997. Gascon et basque: bilinguisme et substrat. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 50.3:189-228.
64. Haig, Geoffrey. 2001. Linguistic diffusion in present-day East Anatolia:from top to bottom. In Aikhenvald & Dixon 2001. 195-224.
65. Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
66. Haugen, Einar. 1950a. Problems of bilingualism. Lingua 2:271-90.
67. Haugen, Einar. 1950b. The analysis of linguistic borrowing. Language 26:210-31.
68. Haugen, Einar. 1953. The Norwegian language in America: A study in bilingual behavior. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
69. Head, Brian F. 1978. Respect degrees in pronominal reference. In Greenberg, Ferguson & Moravcsik 1978. 151-211.
70. Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession: Sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71. Heine, Bernd. 2003. On degrammaticalization. In Blake et al. 2003 163-79.
72. Heine, Bernd. 2007. On polysemy copying and grammaticalization in language contact. Typescript, University of Cologne.
73. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2003. Contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 27:529-72.
75. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2006. The changing languages of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
77. Heine, Bernd & Hiroyuki Miyashita. 2008. Accounting for a functional category: German drohen 'to threaten'. Language Sciences 30:53-101.
78. Heine, Bernd and Derek Nurse (eds.) 2008. A linguistic geography of Africa. (Cambridge Approaches to Language Contact). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
79. Helmbrecht, Johannes. 2005. Typologie und Diffusion von Höflichkeitspronomina in Europa. Folia Linguistica 39.3-4:417-52.
80. Hickey, Raymond (ed.) 2003. Motives for language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81. Hickey, Raymond (ed.) forthcoming. The handbook of language contact. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
82. Hill, Jane H. & Kenneth C. Hill. 2004. Word order type change and the penetration of Spanish de in modern Nahuatl. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 57:23-48.
83. Hinrichs, Uwe & Uwe Büttner (eds.) 1999. Handbuch der Südosteuropa-Linguistik. (Slavistische Studienbücher, Neue Folge.) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
84. Hogg, Richard M. & Linda van Bergen (eds.). 1995. Historical linguistics 1995. Vol. 2: Germanic linguistics. (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, 162.) Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
85. Hurch, Bernhard. 1989. Hispanisierung im Baskischen. In Boretzky, Enninger, & Stolz 1989. 11-35.
86. Jastrow, Otto. 2005. Uzbekistan Arbic: A language created by Semitic-Iranian-Turkic linguistic convergence. In Csató et al. 205. 133-9.
87. Jeffers, Robert (ed.) 1993. Selected papers of the Ninth International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterstam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
88. Jenkins, Rebecca Sue. 2002. Language contact and Composite Structures in New Ireland, Papua New Guinea. Ann Arbor: UMI Dissertation Services.
89. Johanson, Lars. 1992. Strukturelle Faktoren in türkischen Sprachkontakten. (Sitzungsberichte der Wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft an der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, volume 29, 5. 169-299.) Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
90. Johanson, Lars. 2002a. Structural factors in Turkic language contacts. London: Curzon.
91. Johanson, Lars. 2002b. Contact-induced linguistic change in a code-copying framework. In Jones & Esch 2002. 285-313.
92. Jones, Mari C. 2002. Mette a haout dauve la grippe des Angllais: convergence on the Island of Guernsey. In Jones & Esch 2002. 143-68.
93. Jones, Mari C. & Edith Esch (eds.) 2002. Language change: the interplay of internal, external and extra-linguistic factors. (Contributions to the Sociology of Language, 86.) Berlin: Mouton: de Gruyter.
94. Joseph, Brian D. 1992. The Balkan languages. In Bright 1992. 153-55.
95. Kahr, Joan Casper. 1976. The renewal of case morphology: sources and constraints. Working Papers on Language Universals (Stanford) 20:107-151.
96. Karttunen, Frances. 1976. Uto-Aztecan and Spanish-type dependent clauses in Nahuatl. (Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax.) Chicago Linguistic Society 1976. 150-8.
97. Kempgen, Sebastian, Ulrich Schweier & Tilman Berger (eds.) 2003. Rusistika, Slavistika, Lingvistika: Festschrift für Werner Lehfeldt. (Die Welt der Slaven, 19.) Munich: Otto Sagner.
98. King, Ruth. 2000. The lexical basis of grammatical borrowing: a Prince Edward Island French case study. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
99. Kral, Filiz. 2005. Modal constructions in Turkic of Iran. In Csató et al. 2005. 285-93.
100. Krause, Marion & Christian Sappok (eds.) 2004. Slavistische Linguistik 2002. Munich: Sagner.
101. Krauss, W., Z. Stieber, J. Belic & V. I. Borkovskij (eds.) 1969. Slawisch-deutsche Wechselbeziehungen in Sprache, Literatur und Kultur. (Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Slawistik, 44.) Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
102. Kroskrity, P. 1993 [1978]. Aspects of syntactic and semantic variation within the Arizona Tewa speech community. Anthropological Linguistics 35:250-73.
103. Kuße, Holger (ed.) 2003. Slavistische Linguistik 2001. Munich:Sagner.
104. Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
105. Leisiö, Larisa. 2000. The word order in genitive constructions in a diaspora Russian. International Journal of Bilingualism 4:301-25.
106. Leslau, Wolf. 1945. The influence of Cushitic on the Semitic languages of Ethiopia. A problem of substratum. Word 1.1:59-82.
107. Leslau, Wolf. 1952. The influence of Sidamo on the Ethiopic languages of Gurage. Language 28.1:63-81.
108. Li, Charles N. 1983. Language contact in western China. Papers in East Asian Languages 1:31-51.
109. Li, Charles N. 1984. From verb-medial analytic language to verb-final synthetic language: a case of typological change. Berkeley Linguistics Society 10:307-23.
110. Lötzsch, Ronald. 1969. Zum indirekten Passiv im Deutschen und Slawischen. In Krauss et al. 1969. 102-109.
111. Lötzsch, Ronald. 1996. Interferenzbedingte grammatische Konvergenzen und Divergenzen zwischen Sorbisch und Jiddisch. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 49.1:50-59.
112. Louden, Mark L. 2008. Structural convergence in Pennsylvania Dutch. Paper presented at the 30. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft, Bamberg, 27-29 February, 2008.
113. Luraghi, Silvia. 2001. Some remarks on instrument, comitative, and agent in Indo-European. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 54.4:385-401.
114. Matras, Yaron. 1998. Convergent development, grammaticalization, and the problem of "mutual isomorphism." In Boeder et al. 1998. 89-103.
115. Matras, Yaron & Peter Bakker (eds.) 2003. The mixed language debate: theoretical and empirical advances. (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs, 145.) Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
116. Matras, Yaron & Jeanette Sakel. 2007. Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence. Studies in Language 31.4:829-65.
117. Menz, A. 1999. Gagausische Syntax: eine Studie zum kontaktinduzierten Sprachwandel. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
118. Métrich, René, Albert Hudlett & Heinz-Helmut Lüger (eds.). 1999. Des racines et des ailes: théories, modéles, expériences en linguistique et en didactique. Nancy: A.N.C.A.
119. Miller, Roy Andrew. 1967. The Japanese language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
120. Milroy, James. 2003. On the role of the speaker in language change. In Hickey 2003. 143-57.
121. Milroy, L. & James Milroy 1985. Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21:339-84.
122. Montrul, S. 2004. Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7.2:125-42.
123. Mougeon, Raymond & Edouard Beniak. 1991. Linguistic consequences of language contact and restriction: The case of French in Ontario, Canada. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
124. Mühlhäusler, Peter & Rom Harré. 1990. Pronouns and people: the linguistic construction of social and personal identity. (Language in Society, 15). Oxford: Blackwell.
125. Myers-Scotton, Carol. 2002. Contact linguistics: Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
126. Nadkarni, Mangesh V. 1975. Bilingualism and syntactic change in Konkani. Language 51.3:672-83.
127. Nau, Nicole. 1995. Möglichkeiten und Mechanismen kontaktbewegten Sprachwandels unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Finnischen. (Edition Linguistik, 08.) Munich-Newcastle: LINCOM Europa.
128. Oksaar, Els. 1972. Bilingualism. In Sebeok 1972. 476-511.
129. Plank, Frans (ed.) 2003. Noun phrase structure in the languages of Europe. (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, 20-7). Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
130. Platt, John T. 1975. The Singapore English speech continuum and its basilect 'Singlish' as a 'creoloid'. Anthropological Linguistics 17.7:363-74.
131. Prince, Ellen F. 1998. The borrowing of meaning as a cause of internal syntactic change. In Schmid, Austin & Stein 1998. 339-62.
132. Ramat, Paolo. 1998. Typological comparison and linguistic areas: some introductory remarks. Language Sciences 20.3:227-40.
133. Ramisch, Heinrich. 1989. The variation of English in Guernsey/Channel Islands. (Bamberger Beiträge zur Englischen Sprachwissenschaft, 24.) Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
134. Ratcliffe, Robert R. 2005. Bukhara Arabic: a metatypized dialect of Arabic in Cental Asia. In Csató et al. 2005. 141-59.
135. Rayfield, Joan Rachel. 1970. The language of a bilingual community. (Janua Linguarum, Series Practica, 77.) The Hague: Mouton.
136. Reichl, Karl. 1983. Syntactic interference in Afghan Uzbek. Anthropos 78:481-500.
137. Reuther, Tilmann (ed.) 1992. Slavistische Linguistik 1991. Munich: Otto Sagner.
138. Ross, Malcolm D. 1996. Contact-induced change and the comparative method: cases from Papua New Guinea. In Durie & Ross 1996. 180-217.
139. Ross, Malcolm D. 2001. Contact-induced change in Oceanic languages in North-West Melanesia. In Aikhenvald & Dixon 2001. 134-66.
140. Ross, Malcolm D. 2003. Diagnosic prehistoric language contact. In Hickey 2003. 174-98.
141. Ross, Malcolm D. 2006. Calquing and metatypy. Journal of Language Contact, Thema 1:116-143. www.jlc-journal.org/.
142. Sánchez, Liliana. 2004. Functional convergence in the tense, evidentiality and aspectual systems of Quechua Spanish bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7.2: 147-62.
143. Sanchez, Tara Savannah. 2005. Constraints on structural borrowing in a multilingual contact situation (Aruba, Bonaire, Cura ao). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
144. Sankoff, Gilian 2001. Linguistic outcomes of language contact. In Chambers, Trudgill & Schilling-Estes 2002. 338-368.
145. Sarhimaa, Anneli. 1999. Syntactic transfer, contact-induced change, and the evolution of bilingual mixed codes: Focus on Karelian-Russian language alternation. (Studia Fennica, Linguistica, 9). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
146. Schmid, Monika S., Jennifer R. Austin & Dieter Stein (eds.) 1998. Historical Linguistics 1997: Selected papers from the 13th International Conference on Historical Linguistics
147. Düsseldorf, 10-17 August 1997. (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, 164.) Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
148. Sebeok, Thomas. A. (ed.) 1972. Current trends in linguistics. Volume 9. The Hague: Mouton.
149. Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1994. Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. (Oxford Studies in Language Contact). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
150. Silva-Corvalán, Carmen (ed.) 1995. Spanish in four continents: studies in language contact and bilingualism. (Georgetown Studies in Romance Linguistics). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
151. Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 2008. The limits of convergence in language contact. (This volume).
152. Simon, Horst J. 1997. Die Diachronie der deutschen Anredepronomina aus Sicht der Universalienforschung. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF, Berlin) 50.3: 267-81.
153. Soper, John David. 1987. Loan syntax in Turkic and Iranian: The verb systems of Tajik, Usbek, and Qashqay. Ann Arbor, Mi.: UMI Dissertation Services.
154. Stolz, Thomas. 1991. Sprachbund im Baltikum? Estnisch und Lettisch im Zentrum einer sprachlichen Konvergenzlandschaft. (Bochum-Essener Beiträge zur Sprachwandelforschung, 13.) Bochum: N. Brockmeyer.
155. Stolz, Thomas. 2001. On Circum-Baltic instrumentals and comitatives. In Dahl & Koptjevskaja Tamm 2001. 591-612.
156. Stolz, Thomas. 2003. Not quite the right mixture: Chamorro and Malti as candidates for the status of mixed language. In Matras & Bakker 2003. 271-315.
157. Stolz, Thomas, Cornelia Stroh & Aina Urdze. 2006. On comitatives and related categories: a typological study with special focus on the languages of Europe. (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, 33). Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
158. Sussex, Ronald. 1993. Slavonic languages in emigration. In Comrie & Corbett 1993. 999-1035.
159. Ternes, Elmar. 1999. Ist Bretonisch SVO oder VSO? Typologische Überlegungen zu einerumstrittenen Frage. In Zimmer, Ködderitzsch & Wigger 1999. 236-53.
160. Thomason, Sarah G. 2001a. Language contact: an introduction. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
161. Thomason, Sarah G. 2001b. Language contact. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
162. Thomason, Sarah G. 2008. Social and linguistic factors as predictors of contact-induced change. (This volume).
163. Thomason, Sarah G. & Daniel L. Everett 2005. Pronoun borrowing. Berkeley Linguistics Society 27:301-15.
164. Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press.
165. Tosco, Mauro. 2000. Is there an "Ethiopian language area"? Anthropological Linguistics 42.3:329-65.
166. Trask, Robert L. 1998. The typological position of Basque: then and now. Language Sciences 20.3:313-24.
167. Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Bernd Heine (eds.). 1991. Approaches to grammaticalization. Volume 2. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
168. Verschik, Anna. 2004. Estonian compound nouns and their equivalents in the local variety of Russian. Scando-Slavica 50:93-109.
169. Wehr, Barbara. 1984. Diskurs-Strategien im Romanischen: ein Beitrag zur romanischen Syntax. Tübingen: Narr.
170. Zavala, Roberto. 2002. Calcos sintácticos en algunos complejos verbales Mayas y Mixe-Zoques. Pueblos y Fronteras 4:169-87.
171. Zimmer, Stefan, Rolf Ködderitzsch, & Arndt Wigger (eds.) 1999. Akten des Zweiten Deutschen Keltologen-Symposiums. Tübingen: Niemeyer.