Codeswitching and language change: One thing leads to another?

International Journal of Bilingualism

Volumn 9, Issue 3-4, 2005, Pages 307-340

  Backus, Ad ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

codeswitching; contact induced; structural change

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846689491     PISSN: 13670069     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/13670069050090030101     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Aikhenvald, A. (1996). Areal diffusion in Northwest Amazonia: The case of Tariana. Anthropological Linguistics, 38, 73-116.
2. Aikhenvald, A. (2002). Language awareness and correct speech among the Tariana of Northwest Amazonia. Anthropological Linguistics, 43, 411-430.
3. Aikhenvald, A. (2003a). Mechanisms of change in areal diffusion: New morphology and language contact. Journal of Linguistics, 39, 1-29.
4. Aikhenvald, A. (2003b). Multilingualism and ethnic stereotypes: The Tariana of northwest Amazonia. Language in Society, 32, 1-21.
5. Alvarez-Caccamo, C. (1998). From “switching code” to “codeswitching”: Towards a reconceptualization of communicative codes. In P. Auer (Ed.), Codeswitching in conversation. language, interaction and identity (pp.27-48). London: Routledge.
6. Backus, A. (1992). Patterns of language mixing. A study in Turkish-Dutch bilingualism. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
7. Backus, A. (1996). Two in one. Bilingual speech of Turkish immigrants in the Netherlands. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
8. Backus, A. (2003). Units in codeswitching: Evidence for multimorphemic elements in the lexicon. Linguistics, 41, 83-132.
9. Boeschoten, H. (1997). Codeswitching, codemixing and code alternation: What a difference. In R. Jacobson (Ed.), Codeswitching worldwide (pp. 15-24). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
10. Bolonyai, A. (2000). “Elective affinities”: Language contact in the abstract lexicon and its structural consequences. International Journal of Bilingualism, 4, 81-106.
11. Boumans, L. (1996). Embedding verbs and collocations in Moroccan Arabic/Dutch codeswitching. In M. Eid & D. Parkinson (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics IX (pp.45-67). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12. Bynon, T. (1977). Historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Clyne, M. (1967). Transference and triggering. Observations on the language assimilation of postwar German-speaking migrants in Australia. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
14. Clyne, M. (2003). Dynamics of language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Croft, W. (2000). Explaining language change. An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Pearson Education.
16. De Reuse, W.J. (1994). Siberian Yupik Eskimo. The language and its contacts with Chukchi. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
17. Dorian, N. (1993). Internally and externally motivated change in language contact settings: doubts about dichotomy. In C. Jones (Ed.), Historical linguistics. Problems and perspectives (pp. 131-154). London: Longman.
18. Dorian, N. (1994). Varieties of variation in a very small place: Social homogeneity, prestige norms, and linguistic variation. Language, 70, 631-696.
19. Dutkova-Cope, L. (2001). The language of Czech Moravians in Texas: Do you know what Párknu Káru u Hauza means? Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 20, 51-84.
20. Finlayson, R., & Slabbert, S. (1997). “We just mix”: Codeswitching in a South African township. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 125, 65-98.
21. Fortescue, M. (1993). Eskimo word order variation and its contact-induced perturbation. Journal of Linguistics, 29, 267-289.
22. Gomez-Imbert, E. (1996). When animals become “rounded” and “feminine”: Conceptual categories and linguistic classification in a multilingual setting. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (studies in the social and cultural foundations of language, No. 17.) (pp.438-469). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 131-149.
24. Györi, G. (2002). Semantic change and cognition. Cognitive Linguistics, 13, 123-166.
25. Haase, M. (1992). Sprachkontakt und Sprachwandel im Baskenland. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
26. Halmari, H. (1997). Government and codeswitching. Explaining American Finnish. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
27. Harris, A., & Campbell, L. (1995). Historical syntax in cross-linguistic pespective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Haugen, E. (1972). The ecology of language. Essays by Einar Haugen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
29. Haust, D. (1995). Codeswitching in Gambia. Eine soziolinguistische Untersuchung von Mandinka, Wolof und Englisch in Kontakt. (Sprachkontakt in Afrika, Band 1.) Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.
30. Hewitt, G. (2001). Convergence in language change: morphosyntactic patterns in Mingrelian (and Laz). Transactions of the Philological Society, 99, 99-145.
31. Hill, J., & Hill, K. (1986). Speaking Mexicano. Dynamics of syncretic language in Central Mexico. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
32. Hock, H.H., & Joseph, B. (1996). Language history, language change and language relationship. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
33. Hopper, P., & Traugott, E.C. (2003). Grammaticalization. (Second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Johanson, L. (1992). Strukturelle Faktoren in Türkischen Sprachkontakten. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
35. Johanson, L. (1993). Code-copying in immigrant Turkish. In G. Extra & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Immigrant languages in Europe (pp. 197-221). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
36. Johanson, L. (1998). Code-copying in Irano-Turkic. Language Sciences, 20, 325-337.
37. Johanson, L. (1999a). Frame-changing code-copying in immigrant varieties. In G. Extra & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Bilingualism and migration. (Studies on Language Acquisition 14) (pp.247-260). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
38. Johanson, L. (1999b). The dynamics of code-copying in language encounters. In B. Brendemoen, E. Lanza & E. Ryen (Eds.), Language encounters in time and space (pp.37-62). Oslo: Novus.
39. Johanson, L. (2002). Structural factors in turkic language contact. London: Curzon.
40. Keller, R. (1990). Sprachwandel. Tübingen: Francke.
41. Kontra, M. (2001). Hungarian verbal puzzles and the intensity of language contact. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5, 163-179.
42. Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, volume 1, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
43. Langacker, R. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar, volume 2, Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
44. Langacker, R. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp.1-63). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
45. Matras, Y. (1998). Utterance modifiers and universals of grammatical borrowing. Linguistics, 36, 281-331.
46. Matras, Y. (2000). How predictable is contact-induced change in grammar? In C. Renfrew, A. McMahon & L. Trask (Eds.), Time depth in historical linguistics (pp. 563-583). Cambridge: McDonald Institute.
47. McMahon, A.M.S. (1994). Understanding language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Menz, A. (1999). Gagausische Syntax. Eine Studie zum Kontaktinduzierten Sprachwandel. (Turkologica, vol. 41). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
49. Mougeon, R., & Beniak, E. (1991). Linguistic consequences of language contact. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
50. Muysken, P. (2000). Bilingual speech. A typology of codemixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Myers-Scotton, C. (1997). Duelling languages. Grammatical structure in codeswitching. (Second edition.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
52. Myers-Scotton, C. (2002). Contact linguistics. Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53. Nettle, D., & Romaine, S. (2000). Vanishing voices. The extinction of the world’s languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Nortier, J. (1990). Dutch-Moroccan Arabic codeswitching. Dordrecht: Foris.
55. Otheguy, R. (1992). A reconsideration of the notion of loan translation in the analysis of U.S. Spanish. In A. Roca & J. Lipski (Eds.), Spanish in the United States. Linguistic contact and diversity (pp. 21 -45). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
56. Owens, J. (1996). Idiomatic structure and the theory of genetic relationship. Diachronica, 13, 283 - 318.
57. Owens, J. (2002). Processing the world piece by piece: Iconicity, lexical insertion, and possessives in Nigerian Arabic codeswitching. Language Variation and Change, 14, 173-209.
58. Pandharipande, R. (1989). Formal and functional constraints on codemixing. In R. Jacobson (Ed.), Codeswitching as a worldwide phenomenon (pp.15-31). New York: Peter Lang.
59. Pfaff, C.W. (1993). Turkish language development in Germany. In G. Extra & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Immigrant languages in Europe (pp. 119-146). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
60. Poplack, S., & Meechan, M. (1998). Introduction: How languages fit together in codemixing. International Journal of Bilingualism, 2, 127-138.
61. Romaine, S. (1989). Pidgins, creoles, immigrant, and dying languages. In N. Dorian (Ed.), Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death (pp.369-383). Cambridge University Press.
62. Sarhimaa, A. (1999). Syntactic transfer, contact-induced change, and the evolution of bilingual mixed codes. Focus on Karelian-Russian language alternation. Studia Fennica, Linguistica 9. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
63. Savić, J. (1995). Structural convergence and language change: Evidence from Serbian/English codeswitching. Language in Society, 24, 475-492.
64. Sebba, M. (1998). A congruence approach to the syntax of codeswitching. International Journal of Bilingualism, 2, 1-19.
65. Sgall, P., Hronek, J., Stich, A., & Horecky, J. (1992). Variation in language. Codeswitching in Czech as a challenge for sociolinguistics. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
66. Siegel, J. (1993). Dialect contact and koineization: A review of Dialects in contact, by Peter Trudgill. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 99, 105-121.
67. Silva-Corvalán, C. (1994). Language contact and change. Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Clarendon.
68. Stolz, C., & Stolz, T. (1996). Funktionswortentlehnung in Mesoamerika. Spanisch-amerindischer Sprachkontakt (Hispanoindiana II). Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 49, 86-123.
69. Subbarao, K.V., & Arora, H. (1988). On extreme convergence: The case of Dakkhini Hindi-Urdu. Indian Linguistics, 49, 92-108.
70. Symeonidis, C. (1997). Türkisch-griechische phraseologische Isoglossen anhand von Bezeichnungen für menschliche Körperteile und Organe. Zeitschrift für Balkanologie, 39, 76 - 112.
71. Thomason, S.G. (1999). Speakers’ choices in language change. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 29, 19-43.
72. Thomason, S.G. (2001). Language contact. An introduction. Washington: Georgetown UP.
73. Thomason, S.G., & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
74. Toribio, A.J. (2004). Convergence as an optimization strategy in bilingual speech: Evidence from codeswitching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 165-173.
75. Treffers-Daller, J. (1994). Mixing two languages: French-Dutch contact in a comparative perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
76. Trudgill, P. (1985). Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.
77. Van Coetsem, F. (2000). A general and unified theory of the transmission process in language contact. Heidelberg: Winter.
78. Van Hout, R., & Muysken, P. (1994). Modeling lexical borrowability. Language variation and change, 6, 39-62.
79. Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in contact. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York Publication no. 2.
80. Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions for historical linguistics (pp. 97 -195). Austin: University of Texas Press.
81. Whaley, L. (1997). Introduction to typology. The unity and diversity of language. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
82. Winford, D. (2003). An introduction to contact linguistics. London: Blackwell.