The quest for the most ‘parsimonious’ explanations: Endogeny vs. Contact revisited

Motives for Language Change

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 161-173

  Filppula, Markku ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885088804     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511486937.0011     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. Braaten, B. 1967. ‘Notes on continuous tenses in English’, Norsk tidskrift for sprogvidenskap 21: 167–80.
2. Breeze, Andrew. 1994. ‘Celtic etymologies for Middle English brag “boast”, gird “strike”, and lethe “soften” ’, Journal of Celtic Linguistics 3: 135–48.
3. Breeze, Andrew. 1995. ‘Old English gop “servant” in Riddle 49: Old Irish gop “snout” ’, Neophilologus 79: 671–3.
4. Breeze, Andrew. 1997. ‘A Celtic etymology for Old English deor “brave”’, in J. Roberts and J. L. Nelson with M. Godden (eds.), Alfred the wise: studies in honour of Janet Bately on the occasion of her sixty-fifth birthday. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 1–4.
5. Dal, Ingerid. 1952. ‘Zur Entstellung des Englischen Participium Praesentis auf -ing’, Norsk tidskrift for sprogvidenskap 16: 5–116.
6. Filppula, Markku. 1999. The grammar of Irish English: language in Hibernian style. Routledge Studies in Germanic Linguistics 5. London and New York: Routledge.
7. Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991. Principles of historical linguistics, 2nd edition. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
8. Kallen, Jeffrey L. 1989. ‘Tense and aspect categories in Irish English’, English World- Wide 10: 1–39.
9. Keller, Wolfgang. 1925. ‘Keltisches im englischen Verbum’, Anglica: Untersuchungen zur englischen Philologie (Alois Brandl zum siebzigsten Geburtstage ¨uberreicht), 55–66.
10. Kyto, Merja. 1991. Manual to the diachronic part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.
11. Lass, Roger. 1990a. ‘Where do Extraterritorial Englishes come from?’, in Sylvia Adamson et al. (eds.), Papers from the 5th International Conference of English Historical Linguistics, Cambridge, 6–9 April 1987. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins, 245–80.
12. Lass, Roger. 1990b. ‘Early mainland residues in Southern Hiberno-English’, Irish University Review 20: 137–48.
13. Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge University Press.
14. Lass, Roger and Susan Wright. 1986. ‘Endogeny vs. contact: “Afrikaans influence” on South African English’, English World-Wide 7: 201–23.
15. Macafee, Caroline. 1996. ‘Editor’s introduction’, in Caroline Macafee (ed.), A concise Ulster dictionary. Oxford University Press, xvi–xxxvii.
16. Macafee, Caroline and Colm ´O Baoill. 1997. ‘Why Scots is not a Celtic English’, in Hildegard L. C. Tristram (ed.), The Celtic Englishes. Heidelberg: Universit¨atsverlag C. Winter, 245–86.
17. Mosse, Fernand. 1938. Histoire de la forme p´eriphrastique ETRE + participe pr´esent en germanique. Deuxi`eme partie: moyen-anglais et anglais moderne. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.
18. Odlin, Terence. 1997. ‘Bilingualism and substrate influence: a look at clefts and reflexives’, in Jeffrey L. Kallen (ed.), Focus on Ireland. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 35–50.
19. OSe, Diarmuid. 1992. ‘The perfect in Modern English’, E´riu 43: 39–67.
20. Siadhail, Micheal. 1980. Learning Irish: an introductory self-tutor. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.
21. Poussa, Patricia. 1990. ‘A contact-universals origin for periphrastic do, with special consideration of OE-Celtic contact’, in Sylvia Adamson et al. (eds.), Papers from the 5th International Conference of English Historical Linguistics, Cambridge, 6–9 April 1987. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 407–33.
22. Preusler, Wolfgang. 1956. ‘Keltischer Einfluss im Englischen’, Revue des langues vivantes 22: 322–50.
23. Ryden, Mats. 1991. ‘The be/have variation with intransitives in its crucial phases’, in Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Historical English syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 343–54.
24. Sabban, Annette. 1982. Galisch-Englischer Sprachkontakt. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.
25. Thomason, Sarah G. and Terence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
26. Visser, Gerrard J. 1955. ‘Celtic influence in English’, Neophilologus 39: 276–93.