Postverbal elements in immigrant Turkish: Evidence of change?

International Journal of Bilingualism

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 185-220

  Seza Dogruoz A ^a   Backus, ad ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

contact induced change; information structure; Turkish; word order

Indexed keywords

EID: 51249160802     PISSN: 13670069     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/13670069070110020301     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Akinci, M.A., & Backus, A. (2005). The structure and the role of code-switching in Turkish-French conversations. In J. N., J⊘rgensen, S. Talayman & C. Dabelsteen (Eds.), Languaging and language practices (pp. 156-166). Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen, Faculty of the Humanities.
2. Backus, A. (1996). Two in one. Bilingual speech of Turkisch immigrants in the Netherlands. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
3. Backus, A. (2004). Convergence as a mechanism of language change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 179-181.
4. Backus, A. (2005). Codeswitching and language change: One thing leads to another? International Journal of Bilingualism, 9, 307-340.
5. Boeschoten, H.E. (1990). Acquisition of Turkish by immigrant children: A multiple case study of Turkish children in the Netherlands aged 4 to 6. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
6. Bolonyai, A. (1998). In-between languages: Language shift/maintenance in childhood bilingualism. International Journal of Bilingualism, 2, 21-43.
7. Bullock, B.E., & Gerfen, C. (2004). Frenchville French: A case study in phonological attrition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8, 303-320.
8. Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Csáto, E.A. (1996). Some typological properties of North-Western Karaim in areal perspectives. In N. Boretzky, W. Enninger & T. Stolz (Eds.), Areale, Kontakte, Dialekte. Sprache und ihre Dynamik in Mehrsprachigen Situationen (pp. 68-83). Bochum: Brockmeyer.
10. CBS. (2006). Bevolking Naar Herkomstgroepering en Generatie. (Retrieved 16.02.2006 from Centraal Bureu voor de Statistiek,
11. Doğruöz, A.S., & Backus, A. (2006). Turkish in the Netherlands: Development of a new variety? Paper presented in Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, Washington DC.
12. Dorian, N. (1981). Language death: The life cycle of a Scottish Gaelic dialect. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
13. Elsik, V., & Matras, Y. (2006). Markedness and language change: The Romani sample. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
14. Erdal, M. (1999). Das nachfeld im Türkischen und im Deutschen. In L.Johanson & J. Rehbein (Eds.), Türkisch und Deutsch im Verleich (pp. 53-95). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
15. Erguvanli-Taylan, E. (1979). The function of word order in Turkish grammar. Unpublished PhD thesis, UCLA, USA.
16. Erkü, F. (1983). Discourse pragmatics and word order in Turkish. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Minnesota, U.S.A.
17. Extra, G., Yağmur, K., & Avoird, T. van der (2004). Methodological considerations. In G. Extra & K. Yağmur (Eds.), Urban multilingualism in Europe: Immigrant minority languages at home and school (pp. 109-132). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
18. Field, F.W. (2002). Linguistic borrowing in bilingual contexts. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
19. Field, F.W. (2005). Long-term effects of CS: Clues to structural borrowing. International Journal of Bilingualism, 9, 341-360.
20. Flores Farfán, J.A. (2004). Notes on Nahuatl typological change. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 57, 85-97.
21. Fortescue, M. (1993). Eskimo word order variation and its contact-induced perturbation. Journal of Linguistics, 29, 267-289.
22. Göksel, A., & Özsoy, A.S. (2000). Is there a focus position in Turkish? Proceedings of the IXth International Conference on Turkish Linguistics (pp. 219-228). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Göksel, A., & Özsoy, A.S. (2003). dA: A focus/topic associated clitic in Turkish. Lingua, 113, 1143-1167.
24. Heine, B. (2006). Contact induced word order change without word order change. Working Papers in Multilingualism, Series B, 76.
25. Hill, J.H., & Hill, K.C. (2004). Word order type change and the penetration of Spanish de in modern Nahuatl. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 57, 1-23.
26. İşsever, S. (2003). Information structure in Turkish: The word order-prosody interface. Lingua, 113, 1025- 1033.
27. Johanson, L. (2002). Structural factors in Turkic language contacts. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.
28. Kiliçaslan, Y. (2004). Syntax of information structure in Turkish. Linguistics, 42, 717-764.
29. Kirschner, C. (1996). Language attrition and the Spanish-English bilingual: A case of syntactic reduction. Bilingual Review, 21, 123-130.
30. Kroskrity, P. (1993 [1978]). Aspects of syntactic and semantic variation within the Arizona Tewa speech community. Anthropological Linguistics, 35, 250-273.
31. Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
32. Leisiö, L. (2000). The word order in genitive constructions in a diaspora Russian. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 4, 301-325.
33. Lestrade, P. (2002). The continuing decline of Isleño Spanish in Louisiana. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 21, 99-117.
34. Makihara, M. (2001). Modern Rapanui adaptation of Spanish elements. Oceanic Linguistics, 40, 191-223.
35. Menz, A. (1999). Gagausische Syntax: Eine Studie zum kontakinduzierten Sprachwandel. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
36. Menz, A. (2001). Gagauz right-branching propositions introduced by the element ani. Turkic Languages, 5, 234-244.
37. Nichols, J. (1992). Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
38. Owens, J. (1996). Idiomatic structure and the theory of genetic relationship. Diachronica, 13, 283 - 318.
39. Pfaff, C.W. (1992). Turkish in contact with German: Language maintenance and loss among imigrant children in West Berlin. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 90, 97 - 129.
40. Rehbein, J. (2001). Turkish in European societies. Lingua E Stile, 36, 317-334.
41. Ross, M. (2001). Contact-induced change in oceanic languages in North-West Melanesia. In A. Y.Aikhenvald & R. M. W.Dixon (Eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics (pp. 134-166). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Rostila, J. (2006). Storage as a way to grammaticalization. Constructions, 1, 1-59.
43. Sever, S. (2003). Information structure in Turkish: The word order-prosody interface. Lingua, 113, 1025-1053.
44. Silva-Corvalàn, C. (1994). Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
45. Slobin, D. (1978). Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. Paper presented in Workshop-conference on Language Acquisition, State of Art, University of Penn.
46. Thomason, S.G. (2001). Language contact: An introduction. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
47. Thomason, S.G., & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
48. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
49. Vallduvi, E., & Engdahl, E. (1996). The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics, 34, 459-519.
50. Winford, D. (2003). An introduction to contact linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.