Further evidence for involvement of a noncanonical function of uracil DNA glycosylase in class switch recombination

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 106, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 2752-2757

  Begum, Nasim A ^a   Stanlie, Andre ^a   Doi, Tomomitsu ^a   Sasaki, Yoko ^a   Jin, Hai Wei ^a   Kim, Yong Sung ^a   Nagaoka, Hitoshi ^a   Honjo, Tasuku ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

N terminal region deletion; Point mutants; SMUG1

Indexed keywords

GLYCOSIDASE INHIBITOR; SINGLE STRANDED DNA; URACIL DNA GLYCOSIDASE;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; DNA CLEAVAGE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; BIOCATALYSIS; CELL LINE; DNA PRIMERS; IMMUNOGLOBULIN CLASS SWITCHING; MICE; MUTATION; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; URACIL-DNA GLYCOSIDASE;

EID: 62449164136     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0813252106     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Honjo T, Kinoshita K, Muramatsu M (2002) Molecular mechanism of class switch recombination: Linkage with somatic hypermutation. Annu Rev Immunol 20:165-196.
2. Muramatsu M, et al. (2000) Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell 102:553-563.
3. Revy P, et al. (2000) Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) deficiency causes the autosomal recessive form of the Hyper-IgM syndrome (HIGM2). Cell 102:565-575.
4. Doi T, et al. (2007) The C-terminal region of AID is responsible for a novel function other than DNA cleavage in class switch recombination. PNAS, in press.
5. Nagaoka H, Ito S, Muramatsu M, Nakata M, Honjo T (2005) DNA cleavage in immunoglobulin somatic hypermutation depends on de novo protein synthesis but not on uracil DNA glycosylase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:2022-2027.
6. Petersen 5, et al. (2001) AID is required to initiate Nbs1/gamma-H2AX focus formation and mutations at sites of class switching. Nature 414:660-665.
7. Honjo T, Nagaoka H, Shinkura R, Muramatsu M (2005) AID to overcome the limitations of genomic information. Nat Immunol 6:655-661.
8. Di Noia J, Neuberger MS (2002) Altering the pathway of immunoglobulin hypermutation by inhibiting uracil-DNA glycosylase. Nature 419:43-48.
9. Di Noia JM, Neuberger MS (2007) Molecular mechanisms of antibody somatic hypermutation. Annu Rev Biochem 76:1-22.
10. Petersen-Mahrt SK, Harris RS, Neuberger MS (2002) AID mutates E, coii suggesting a DNA deamination mechanism for antibody diversification. Nature 418:99-103.
11. Begum NA, et al. (2004) Uracil DNA glycosylase activity is dispensable for immunoglobulin class switch. Science 305:1160-1163.
12. Begum NA, et al. (2007) Requirement of non-canonical activity of uracil DNA glycosylase for class switch recombination. J Biol Chem 282:731-742.
13. Mol CD, et al. (1995) Crystal structure and mutational analysis of human uracil-DNA glycosylase: Structural basis for specificity and catalysis. Cell 80:869-878.
14. Di Noia JM, et al. (2007) Dependence of antibody gene diversification on uracil excision. J Exp Med 204:3209-3219.
15. Drohat AC, Jagadeesh J, Ferguson E, Stivers JT (1999) Role of electrophilicand general base catalysis in the mechanism of Escherichia coli uracil DNA glycosylase. Biochemistry 38:11866-11875.
16. Drohat AC, et al. (1999) Heteronuclear NMR and crystal log raphic studies of wild-type and H187Q Escherichia coli uracil DNA glycosylase: Electrophilic catalysis of uracil expulsion by a neutral histidine 187. Biochemistry 38:11876-11886.
17. Hagen L, et al. (2008) Cell cycle-specific UNG2 phosphorylations regulate protein turnover, activity and association with RPA. EMBO J 27:51-61.
18. Di Noia JM, Rada C, Neuberger MS (2006) 5MUG1 is able to excise uracil from immunoglobulin genes: Insight into mutation versus repair. EMBO J 25:585-595.
19. Pearl LH (2000) Structure and function in the uracil-DNA glycosylase superfamily. Mutat Res 460:165-181.
20. Wibley JE, Waters TR, Haushalter K, Verdine GL, Pearl LH (2003) Structure and specificity of the vertebrate anti-mutator uracil-DNA glycosylase SM UG1. Mol Cell 11:1647- 1659.
21. Pettersen HS, et al. (2007) Uracil-DNA glycosylases SMUGI and UNG2 coordinate the initial steps of base excision repair by distinct mechanisms. Nucleic Acids Res 35:3879-3892.
22. Mol CD, et al. (1995) Crystal structure of human uracil-DNA glycosylase in complex with a protein inhibitor: protein mimicry of DNA. Ceil 82:701-708.
23. Ju BG, et al. (2006) A topoisomerase llbeta-mediated dsDNA break required for regulated transcription. Science 312:1798-1802.
24. Muramatsu M, Nagaoka H, Shinkura R, Begum NA, Honjo T (2007) Discovery of activation-induced cytidine deaminase, the engraver of antibody memory. Adv Immunol 94:1-36.
25. Kavli B, Otterlei M, Slupphaug G, Krokan HE (2007) Uracil in DNA-General mutagen, but normal intermediate in acquired immunity. DNA Repair (Amst) 6:505-516.