The spindle assembly checkpoint in Caenorhabditis elegans: One who lacks Mad1 becomes mad one

Cell Cycle

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 338-344

  Kitagawa, Risa ^a  

^a ST JUDE CHILDREN S RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

C. elegans; Cell cycle; Kinetochore; MAD1; Spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC)

Indexed keywords

ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX; BUB1 RELATED PROTEIN; PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3 KINASE; PROTEIN KINASE B; PROTEIN MAD1; PROTEIN MAD2;

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CENTROMERE; GENE INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; REVIEW; RNA INTERFERENCE;

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS;

EID: 59449090370     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.8.3.7448     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. May KM, Hardwick KG. The spindle checkpoint. J Cell Sci 2006; 119:4139-42.
2. Musacchio A, Salmon ED. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:379-93.
3. Varetti G, Musacchio A. The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Biol 2008; 18:591-5.
4. Li R, Murray AW. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 1991; 66:519-31.
5. Hoyt MA, Totis L, Roberts BT. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell 1991; 66:507-17.
6. Warren CD, Brady DM, Johnston RC, Hanna JS, Hardwick KG, Spencer FA. Distinct chromosome segregation roles for spindle checkpoint proteins. Mol Biol Cell 2002; 13:3029-41.
7. Daniel JA, Keyes BE, Ng YP, Freeman CO, Burke DJ. Diverse functions of spindle assembly checkpoint genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2006; 172:53-65.
8. Lee MS, Spencer FA. Bipolar orientation of chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is monitored by Mad1 and Mad2, but not by Mad3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:10655-60.
9. Foijer F, Draviam VM, Sorger PK. Studying chromosome instability in the mouse. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008; 1786:73-82.
10. Dobles M, Liberal V, Scott ML, Benezra R, Sorger PK. Chromosome missegregation and apoptosis in mice lacking the mitotic checkpoint protein Mad2. Cell 2000; 101:635-45.
11. Meraldi P, Draviam VM, Sorger PK. Timing and checkpoints in the regulation of mitotic progression. Dev Cell 2004; 7:45-60.
12. Hardwick KG, Weiss E, Luca FC, Winey M, Murray AW. Activation of the budding yeast spindle assembly checkpoint without mitotic spindle disruption. Science 1996; 273:953-6.
13. Weiss E, Winey M. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle pole body duplication gene MPS1 is part of a mitotic checkpoint. J Cell Biol 1996; 132:111-23.
14. Abrieu A, Magnaghi-Jaulin L, Kahana JA, Peter M, Castro A, Vigneron S, et al. Mps1 is a kinetochore-associated kinase essential for the vertebrate mitotic checkpoint. Cell 2001; 106:83-93.
15. Karess R. Rod-Zw10-Zwilch: a key player in the spindle checkpoint. Trends Cell Biol 2005; 15:386-92.
16. Vader G, Cruijsen CW, van Harn T, Vromans MJ, Medema RH, Lens SM. The chromosomal passenger complex controls spindle checkpoint function independent from its role in correcting microtubule kinetochore interactions. Mol Biol Cell 2007; 18:4553-64.
17. Lou Y, Yao J, Zereshki A, Dou Z, Ahmed K, Wang H, et al. NEK2A interacts with MAD1 and possibly functions as a novel integrator of the spindle checkpoint signaling. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:20049-57.
18. Montembault E, Dutertre S, Prigent C, Giet R. PRP4 is a spindle assembly checkpoint protein required for MPS1, MAD1 and MAD2 localization to the kinetochores. J Cell Biol 2007; 179:601-9.
19. D'Angiolella V, Mari C, Nocera D, Rametti L, Grieco D. The spindle checkpoint requires cyclin-dependent kinase activity. Genes Dev 2003; 17:2520-5.
20. Draviam VM, Stegmeier F, Nalepa G, Sowa ME, Chen J, Liang A, et al. A functional genomic screen identifies a role for TAO1 kinase in spindle-checkpoint signalling. Nat Cell Biol 2007; 9:556-64.
21. Baumann C, Korner R, Hofmann K, Nigg EA. PICH, a centromere-associated SNF2 family ATPase, is regulated by Plk1 and required for the spindle checkpoint. Cell 2007; 128:101-14.
22. Chen RH, Waters JC, Salmon ED, Murray AW. Association of spindle assembly checkpoint component XMAD2 with unattached kinetochores. Science 1996; 274:242-6.
23. Chen RH, Shevchenko A, Mann M, Murray AW. Spindle checkpoint protein Xmad1 recruits Xmad2 to unattached kinetochores. J Cell Biol 1998; 143:283-95.
24. Waters JC, Chen RH, Murray AW, Salmon ED. Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension. J Cell Biol 1998; 141:1181-91.
25. Gillett ES, Espelin CW, Sorger PK. Spindle checkpoint proteins and chromosome-microtubule attachment in budding yeast. J Cell Biol 2004; 164:535-46.
26. Campbell MS, Chan GK, Yen TJ. Mitotic checkpoint proteins HsMAD1 and HsMAD2 are associated with nuclear pore complexes in interphase. J Cell Sci 2001; 114:953-63.
27. Farr KA, Hoyt MA. Bub1p kinase activates the Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle assembly checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 1998; 18:2738-47.
28. Chan GK, Jablonski SA, Starr DA, Goldberg ML, Yen TJ. Human Zw10 and ROD are mitotic checkpoint proteins that bind to kinetochores. Nat Cell Biol 2000; 2:944-7.
29. Kops GJ, Kim Y, Weaver BA, Mao Y, McLeod I, Yates JR, 3rd, et al. ZW10 links mitotic checkpoint signaling to the structural kinetochore. J Cell Biol 2005; 169:49-60.
30. Liu ST, Rattner JB, Jablonski SA, Yen TJ. Mapping the assembly pathways that specify formation of the trilaminar kinetochore plates in human cells. J Cell Biol 2006; 175:41-53.
31. Liu ST, Hittle JC, Jablonski SA, Campbell MS, Yoda K, Yen TJ. Human CENP-I specifies localization of CENP-F, MAD1 and MAD2 to kinetochores and is essential for mitosis. Nat Cell Biol 2003; 5:341-5.
32. Sczaniecka MM, Hardwick KG. The spindle checkpoint: how do cells delay anaphase onset? SEB Exp Biol Ser 2008; 59:243-56.
33. Sudakin V, Chan GK, Yen TJ. Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20 and MAD2. J Cell Biol 2001; 154:925-36.
34. Braunstein I, Miniowitz S, Moshe Y, Hershko A. Inhibitory factors associated with anaphase-promoting complex/cylosome in mitotic checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:4870-5.
35. King EM, van der Sar SJ, Hardwick KG. Mad3 KEN boxes mediate both Cdc20 and Mad3 turnover, and are critical for the spindle checkpoint. PLoS ONE 2007; 2:342.
36. Luo X, Tang Z, Rizo J, Yu H. The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein undergoes similar major conformational changes upon binding to either Mad1 or Cdc20. Mol Cell 2002; 9:59-71.
37. Sironi L, Mapelli M, Knapp S, De Antoni A, Jeang KT, Musacchio A. Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1-Mad2 core complex: implications of a 'safety belt' binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J 2002; 21:2496-506.
38. Iouk T, Kerscher O, Scott RJ, Basrai MA, Wozniak RW. The yeast nuclear pore complex functionally interacts with components of the spindle assembly checkpoint. J Cell Biol 2002; 159:807-19.
39. Brady DM, Hardwick KG. Complex formation between Mad1p, Bub1p and Bub3p is crucial for spindle checkpoint function. Curr Biol 2000; 10:675-8.
40. Seeley TW, Wang L, Zhen JY. Phosphorylation of human MAD1 by the BUB1 kinase in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1999; 257:589-95.
41. Hardwick KG, Murray AW. Mad1p, a phosphoprotein component of the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast. J Cell Biol 1995; 131:709-20.
42. Kitagawa R. Key players in chromosome segregation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Front Biosci 2009; 14:1529-57.
43. Kitagawa R, Rose AM. Components of the spindle-assembly checkpoint are essential in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Cell Biol 1999; 1:514-21.
44. Hyman AA, White JG. Determination of cell division axes in the early embryogenesis of Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol 1987; 105:2123-35.
45. Strome S, Wood WB. Generation of asymmetry and segregation of germ-line granules in early C. elegans embryos. Cell 1983; 35:15-25.
46. Encalada SE, Willis J, Lyczak R, Bowerman B. A spindle checkpoint functions during mitosis in the early Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. Mol Biol Cell 2005; 16:1056-70.
47. Nystul TG, Goldmark JP, Padilla PA, Roth MB. Suspended animation in C. elegans requires the spindle checkpoint. Science 2003; 302:1038-41.
48. Yamamoto TG, Watanabe S, Essex A, Kitagawa R. SPDL-1 functions as a kinetochore receptor for MDF-1 in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol 2008; 183:187-94.
49. Gassmann R, Essex A, Hu JS, Maddox PS, Motegi F, Sugimoto A, et al. A new mechanism controlling kinetochore-microtubule interactions revealed by comparison of two dynein-targeting components: SPDL-1 and the Rod/Zwilch/Zw10 complex. Genes Dev 2008; 22:2385-99.
50. Sonnichsen B, Koski LB, Walsh A, Marschall P, Neumann B, Brehm M, et al. Full-genome RNAi profiling of early embryogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 2005; 434:462-9.
51. Starr DA, Williams BC, Li Z, Etemad-Moghadam B, Dawe RK, Goldberg ML. Conservation of the centromere/kinetochore protein ZW10. J Cell Biol 1997; 138:1289-301.
52. Tarailo M, Tarailo S, Rose AM. Synthetic lethal interactions identify phenotypic "interologs" of the spindle assembly checkpoint components. Genetics 2007; 177:2525-30.
53. Stein KK, Davis ES, Hays T, Golden A. Components of the spindle assembly checkpoint regulate the anaphase-promoting complex during meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 2007; 175:107-23.
54. Hajeri VA, Stewart AM, Moore LL, Padilla PA. Genetic analysis of the spindle checkpoint genes san-1, mdf-2, bub-3 and the CENP-F like homologues hcp-1 and hcp-2 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Div 2008; 3:6.
55. Kitagawa R, Law E, Tang L, Rose AM. The Cdc20 homolog, FZY-1, and its interacting protein, IFY-1, are required for proper chromosome segregation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol 2002; 12:2118-23.
56. Furuta T, Tuck S, Kirchner J, Koch B, Auty R, Kitagawa R, et al. EMB-30: an APC4 homologue required for metaphase-to-anaphase transitions during meiosis and mitosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biol Cell 2000; 11:1401-19.
57. Tarailo M, Kitagawa R, Rose AM. Suppressors of spindle checkpoint defect (such) mutants identify new mdf-1/MAD1 interactors in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 2007; 175:1665-79.
58. Watanabe S, Yamamoto TG, Kitagawa R. Spindle assembly checkpoint gene mdf-1 regulates germ cell proliferation in response to nutrition signals in C. elegans. EMBO J 2008; 27:1085-96.
59. Fukuyama M, Rougvie AE, Rothman JH. C. elegans DAF-18/PTEN mediates nutrient-dependent arrest of cell cycle and growth in the germline. Curr Biol 2006; 16:773-9.
60. Kao G, Nordenson C, Still M, Ronnlund A, Tuck S, Naredi P. ASNA-1 positively regulates insulin secretion in C. elegans and mammalian cells. Cell 2007; 128:577-87.
61. Baugh LR, Sternberg PW. DAF-16/FOXO regulates transcription of cki-1/Cip/Kip and repression of lin-4 during C. elegans L1 arrest. Curr Biol 2006; 16:780-5.
62. Pierce SB, Costa M, Wisotzkey R, Devadhar S, Homburger SA, Buchman AR, et al. Regulation of DAF-2 receptor signaling by human insulin and ins-1, a member of the unusually large and diverse C. elegans insulin gene family. Genes Dev 2001; 15:672-86.
63. Gems D, Sutton AJ, Sundermeyer ML, Albert PS, King KV, Edgley ML, et al. Two pleiotropic classes of daf-2 mutation affect larval arrest, adult behavior, reproduction and longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 1998; 150:129-55.
64. Hong Y, Roy R, Ambros V. Developmental regulation of a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor controls postembryonic cell cycle progression in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 1998; 125:3585-97.
65. 1 progression in C. elegans. Development 2001; 128:4349-59.
66. Fukuyama M, Gendreau SB, Derry WB, Rothman JH. Essential embryonic roles of the CKI-1 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor in cell cycle exit and morphogenesis in C. elegans. Dev Biol 2003; 260:273-86.
67. Cheeseman IM, Desai A. A combined approach for the localization and tandem affinity purification of protein complexes from metazoans. Sci STKE 2005; 2005:1.
68. Civril F, Musacchio A. Spindly attachments. Genes Dev 2008; 22:2302-7.
69. Griffis ER, Stuurman N, Vale RD. Spindly, a novel protein essential for silencing the spindle assembly checkpoint, recruits dynein to the kinetochore. J Cell Biol 2007; 177:1005-15.
70. Cypser JR, Tedesco P, Johnson TE. Hormesis and aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. Exp Gerontol 2006; 41:935-9.
71. Masse I, Molin L, Billaud M, Solari F. Lifespan and dauer regulation by tissue-specific activities of Caenorhabditis elegans DAF-18. Dev Biol 2005; 286:91-101.
72. Scott BA, Avidan MS, Crowder CM. Regulation of hypoxic death in C. elegans by the insulin/IGF receptor homolog DAF-2. Science 2002; 296:2388-91.
73. Rouault JP, Kuwabara PE, Sinilnikova OM, Duret L, Thierry-Mieg D, Billaud M. Regulation of dauer larva development in Caenorhabditis elegans by daf-18, a homologue of the tumour suppressor PTEN. Curr Biol 1999; 9:329-32.
74. Gil EB, Malone Link E, Liu LX, Johnson CD, Lees JA. Regulation of the insulin-like developmental pathway of Caenorhabditis elegans by a homolog of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96:2925-30.
75. Paradis S, Ruvkun G. Caenorhabditis elegans Akt/PKB transduces insulin receptor-like signals from AGE-1 PI3 kinase to the DAF-16 transcription factor. Genes Dev 1998; 12:2488-98.
76. Ogg S, Paradis S, Gottlieb S, Patterson GI, Lee L, Tissenbaum HA, et al. The Fork head transcription factor DAF-16 transduces insulin-like metabolic and longevity signals in C. elegans. Nature 1997; 389:994-9.
77. Dorman JB, Albinder B, Shroyer T, Kenyon C. The age-1 and daf-2 genes function in a common pathway to control the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 1995; 141:1399-406.