A functional genomic screen identifies a role for TAO1 kinase in spindle-checkpoint signalling

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 556-564

  Draviam, Viji M ^a,c   Stegmeier, Frank ^b   Nalepa, Grzegorz ^c   Sowa, Mathew E ^c   Chen, Jing ^c   Liang, Anthony ^b   Hannon, Gregory J ^d   Sorger, Peter K ^a   Harper, J Wade ^c   Elledge, Stephen J ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b LABORATORY FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d Howard Hughes Medical Institute Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cold Spring Harbor   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUB1 RELATED PROTEIN; MICROTUBULE AFFINITY REGULATING KINASE KINASE; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE; PROTEIN MAD1; PROTEIN MAD2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANAPHASE; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL PROTECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; GENETIC SCREENING; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MICROTUBULE ASSEMBLY; MITOSIS SPINDLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANTIMITOTIC AGENTS; CALCIUM-BINDING PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; GENE LIBRARY; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; GENOMICS; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; KINETOCHORES; MAP KINASE KINASE KINASES; MITOSIS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; MUTATION; NOCODAZOLE; PACLITAXEL; PROTEIN KINASES; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RNA INTERFERENCE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TIME FACTORS; TRANSFECTION; TUBULIN MODULATORS;

EID: 34247846356     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncb1569     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bharadwaj, R. & Yu, H. The spindle checkpoint, aneuploidy, and cancer. Oncogene 23, 2016-2027 (2004).
2. Taylor, S. S., Scott, M. I. & Holland, A. J. The spindle checkpoint: A quality control mechanism which ensures accurate chromosome segregation. Chromosome Res. 12, 599-616 (2004).
3. Yu, H. Structural activation of Mad2 in the mitotic spindle checkpoint: the two-state Mad2 model versus the Mad2 template model. J. Cell Biol. 173, 153-157 (2006).
4. Chan, G. K., Liu, S. T. & Yen, T. J. Kinetochore structure and function. Trends Cell Biol. 15, 589-598 (2005).
5. Basto, R., Gomes, R. & Karess, R. E. Rough deal and Zw10 are required for the metaphase checkpoint in Drosophila. Nature Cell Biol. 2 939-943 (2000).
6. Habu, T., Kim, S. H., Weinstein, J. & Matsumoto, T. Identification of a MAD2-binding protein, CMT2, and its role in mitosis. EMBO J. 21 6419-6428 (2002).
7. Lou, Y. et al. NEK2A interacts with MAD1 and possibly functions as a novel integrator of the spindle checkpoint signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 20049-20057 (2004).
8. Hutchison, M., Berman, K. S. & Cobb, M. H. Isolation of TAO1, a protein kinase that activates MEKs in stress-activated protein kinase cascades. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 28625-28632 (1998).
9. Takenaka, K., Moriguchi, T. & Nishida, E. Activation of the protein kinase p38 in the spindle assembly checkpoint and mitotic arrest. Science 280, 599-602 (1998).
10. Mikhailov, A., Shinohara, M. & Rieder, C. L. Topoisomerase II and histone deacetylase inhibitors delay the G2/M transition by triggering the p38 MAPK checkpoint pathway. J. Cell Biol. 166, 517-526 (2004).
11. Matsusaka, T. & Pines, J. Chfr acts with the p38 stress kinases to block entry to mitosis in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 166, 507-516 (2004).
12. Yustein, J. T. et al. Comparative studies of a new subfamily of human Ste20-like kinases: Homodimerization, subcellular localization, and selective activation of MKK3 and p38. Oncogene 22, 6129-6141 (2003).
13. Pines, J. Mitosis: A matter of getting rid of the right protein at the right time. Trends Cell Biol. 16, 55-63 (2006).
14. Pinsky, B. A. & Biggins, S. The spindle checkpoint: Tension versus attachment. Trends Cell Biol. 15, 486-493 (2005).
15. Timm, T. et al. MARKK, a Ste20-like kinase, activates the polarity-inducing kinase MARK/PAR-1. EMBO J. 22, 5090-5101 (2003).
16. Taylor, S. S. & McKeon, F. Kinetochore localization of murine Bub1 is required for normal mitotic timing and checkpoint response to spindle damage. Cell 89, 727-735 (1997).
17. Gorbsky, G. J., Chen, R. H. & Murray, A. W. Microinjection of antibody to Mad2 protein into mammalian cells in mitosis induces premature anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 141, 1193-1205 (1998).
18. Johnson, V. L., Scott, M. I., Holt, S. V., Hussein, D. & Taylor, S. S. Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of BubR1, Cenp-E, Cenp-F and Mad2, and chromosome congression. J. Cell Sci. 117, 1577-1589 (2004).
19. Meraldi, P. & Sorger, P. K. A dual role for Bub1 in the spindle checkpoint and chromosome congression. EMBO J. 24, 1621-1633 (2005).
20. Morrow, C. J. et al. Bub1 and aurora B cooperate to maintain BubR1-mediated inhibition of APC/CCdc20. J. Cell Sci. 118, 3639-3652 (2005).
21. Lampson, M. A. & Kapoor, T. M. The human mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1 regulates chromosome-spindle attachments. Nature Cell Biol. 7, 93-98 (2005).
22. Harrington, E. A. et al. VX-680, a potent and selective small-molecule inhibitor of the Aurora kinases, suppresses tumor growth in vivo. Nature Med. 10, 262-267 (2004).
23. Zeitlin, S. G., Shelby, R. D. & Sullivan, K. F. CENP-A is phosphorylated by Aurora B kinase and plays an unexpected role in completion of cytokinesis. J. Cell Biol. 155, 1147-1157 (2001).
24. Meraldi, P., Draviam, V. M. & Sorger, P. K. Timing and checkpoints in the regulation of mitotic progression. Dev. Cell 7, 45-60 (2004).
25. Vigneron, S. et al. Kinetochore localization of spindle checkpoint proteins: Who controls whom? Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 4584-4596 (2004).
26. Wassmann, K., Liberal, V. & Benezra, R. Mad2 phosphorylation regulates its association with Mad1 and the APC/C. EMBO J. 22, 797-806 (2003).
27. Ditchfield, C. et al. Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E to kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 161, 267-280 (2003).
28. Zhou, B. B. & Elledge, S. J. The DNA damage response: Putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature 408, 433-439 (2000).
29. Wollman, R. et al. Efficient chromosome capture requires a bias in the 'search-and-capture' process during mitotic-spindle assembly. Curr Biol. 15, 828-832 (2005).
30. Silva, J. M. et al. Second-generation shRNA libraries covering the mouse and human genomes. Nature Genet. 37, 1281-1288 (2005).
31. Draviam, V. M., Shapiro, I., Aldridge, B. & Sorger, P. K. Misorientation and reduced sstretching of aligned sister kinetochores; promote chromosome missegregation in EB1-or APC-depleted cells. EMBO J. 25, 2814-2827 (2006).