Using explicit positive assessment in the language classroom: IRF, feedback, and learning opportunities

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 92, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 577-594

  Waring, Hansun Zhang ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56849125943     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00788.x     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78, 465-483.
2. Antaki, C. (2002). "Lovely": Turn-initial high-grade assessments in telephone closings. Discourse Studies, 4, 5-24.
3. Antaki, C., Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., & Rapley, M. (2000). "Brilliant. Next question...": High-grade assessment sequences in the completion of interactional units. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 235-262.
4. Beach, W. (1993). Transitional regularities for "casual" "okay" usages. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 325-352.
5. Benson, D., & Hughes, J. (1991). Method, evidence and inference-Evidence and inference for ethnomethodology. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences (pp. 109-136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Brooks, F. B., Donato, R., & McGlone, J. V. (1997). When are they going to say "it"right?Understanding learner talk during pair-work activity. Foreign Language Annals, 30(4), 524-541.
7. Button, G. (1987). Moving out of closings. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 101-151). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
8. Button, G. (1991). Conversation-in-a-series. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 251-277). Berkeley: University of California Press.
9. Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2001). Intonation and discourse: Current view from within. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 13-34). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
10. Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 27-50). New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589-621). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2006). Input, interaction and output: An overview. AILA Review, 19, 3-17.
13. Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Goldberg, J. A. (2004). The amplitude shift mechanism in conversational closing sequences. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 257-298). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
15. Hall, J. K. (1998). Differential teacher attention to learner utterances: The construction of different opportunities for learning in the IRF. Linguistics and Education, 9, 287-311.
16. Hall, J. K., & Walsh, M. (2002). Teacher-student interaction and language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 186-203.
17. He, A. W. (2004). CA for SLA: Arguments from the Chinese language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 88, 568-582.
18. Hellermann, J. (2003). The interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange: Teacher repetition in feedback moves. Language in Society, 32, 79-104.
19. Hellermann, J. (2005a). Syntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38, 105-130.
20. Hellermann, J. (2005b). The sequential and prosodic co-construction of a "quiz game"activity in classroom talk. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 919-944.
21. Holt, E., & Drew, P. (2005). Figurative pivots: The use of figurative expressions in pivotal topic transitions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38, 35-62.
22. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
23. Jarvis, J., & Robinson, M. (1997). Analyzing educational discourse: An exploratory study of teacher response and support to pupils learning. Applied Linguistics, 18, 212-228.
24. Jefferson, G. (1983). Notes on some orderliness of overlap onset. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature, No. 28. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University.
25. Kasper, G. (1986). Repair in foreign language teaching. In G. Kasper (Ed.), Learning, teaching and communication in the foreign language classroom (pp. 23-41). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
26. Kasper, G. (2004). Participant orientations in German conversation-for-learning. Modern Language Journal, 88, 551-567.
27. Kasper, G. (2006). Beyond repair: Conversation analysis as an approach to SLA. AILA Review, 19, 83-99.
28. Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35, 277-310.
29. Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching, 33, 79-96.
30. Lee, Y.-A. (2007). Third turn position in teacher talk: Contingency and the work of teaching. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 1204-1230.
31. Lemke, J. L. (1985). Using language in the classroom. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
32. Lerner, G. H. (1995). Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes, 19, 111-131.
33. Lerner, G. H. (2002). Turn-sharing: The choral co-production of talk-in-interaction. In C. Ford, B. Fox, & S. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 225-256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Local, J., & Kelly, J. (1986). Projection and "silences": Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies, 9, 185-204.
35. Long, M. (1983). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to nonnative speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 177-193.
36. Macbeth, D. (2003). Hugh Mehan's Learning Lessons reconsidered: On the differences between the naturalistic and critical analysis of classroom discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 239-280.
37. Macbeth, D. (2004). The relevance of repair for classroom correction. Language in Society, 33, 703-736.
38. Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing, and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 405-430.
39. Markee, N. (2004). Zones of interactional transition in ESL classes. Modern Language Journal, 88, 583-596.
40. McHoul, A. W. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7, 183-213.
41. McHoul, A. W. (1985). Two aspects of classroom interaction: Turn-taking and correction. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 13, 53-64.
42. McHoul, A. W. (1990). The organization of repair in classroom talk. Language in Society, 19, 349-377.
43. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44. Mori, J. (2004). Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 88, 536-550.
45. Morris, F. (2002). Negotiation and recasts in relation to error types and learner repair. Foreign Language Annals, 35, 395-404.
46. Nakahama, Y., Tyler, A., & van Lier, L. (2001). Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 377-405.
47. Nassaji, H., & Wells, G. (2000). What's the use of "triadic dialogue"?An investigation of teacher-learner interaction. Applied Linguistics, 21, 376-406.
48. Nystrand, M. (1997). Dialogic instruction: When recitation becomes conversation. In M. Nystrand, A. Gamoran, R. Kachur, & C. Prendergast (Eds.), Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom (pp. 1-29). New York: Teachers College Press.
49. Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Learner engagement: When recitation becomes conversation. In H. C. Waxman & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Contemporary research on teaching (pp. 257-276). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
50. Ohta, A. S. (1995). Applying sociocultural theory to an analysis of learner discourse: Learner-learner collaborative interaction in the zone of proximal development. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 93-121.
51. Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 573-595.
52. Pavlenko, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Second language learning as participation and the (re)construction of selves. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 155-177). New York: Oxford University Press.
53. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communicative tasks for second language instruction and research. In S. Gass & G. Crookes (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
54. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 57-101). New York: Cambridge University Press.
55. Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56. Rardin, J. P., & Tranel, D. D. (1988). Education in a new dimension: The counseling-learning approach to community language learning. Fort Lee, NJ: Counseling-Learning Publications.
57. Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 54-69). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
58. Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of "uh huh"and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71-93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
59. Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 161-216.
60. Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361-382.
62. Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1974). Opening up closings. In R. Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethodology (pp. 233-264). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
63. Seedhouse, P. (1997). The case of the missing "no": The relationship between pedagogy and interaction. Language Learning, 47, 547-583.
64. Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
65. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27, 4-13.
66. Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
67. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). New York: Oxford University Press.
68. Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
70. Tomasello, M. (1995). Joint attention as social cognition. In C. Moore & P. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
71. van Lier, L. (1984). Analyzing interaction in second language classrooms. ELT Journal, 38, 160-169.
72. van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum. London: Longman.
73. van Lier, L. (2000a). From input to affordance. Socio-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245-260). New York: Oxford University Press.
74. van Lier, L. (2000b). Constraints and resources in classroom talk: Issues in equality and symmetry. In C. N. Candlin & N. Mercer (Eds.), English language teaching in its social context: A reader (pp. 90-107). New York: Routledge.
75. van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
76. van Lier, L., & Matsuo, N. (2000). Variety of conversational experience: Looking for learning opportunities. Applied Language Learning, 11, 265-287.
77. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
78. Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. New York: Routledge.
79. Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5, 1-37.
80. Young, R. F., & Miller, E. R. (2004). Learning as changing participation: Discourse roles in ESL writing conferences. Modern Language Journal, 88, 519-535.