Second language learning as a mediated process

Language Teaching

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 79-96

  Lantolf, James P ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042604408     PISSN: 02614448     EISSN: 14753049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0261444800015329     Document Type: Review

References (96)

1. Aljaafreh, A. & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern LanguageJournal, 78, 465-483.
2. Antón, M. (1999). A learner-centered classroom. Sociocultural perspectives on teacher-learner interaction in the second language classroom. The Modern LanguageJournal, 83, 303-318.
3. Antón, M. & Dicamilla, F. J. (1998). Socio-cognitive functions of LI collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 314-342.
4. Appel, G. & Lantolf. J. P. (1994). Speaking as mediation: a study of LI and L2 text reCall tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 437-452.
5. Belyayev, B. V. (1963). The psychology of leaching foreign languages. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
6. Broner, M. & Tarone, E. (1999). Is it fiin ? Language play in a fifth grade Spanish immersion classroom. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics. Stamford, CT. March.
7. Brooks, F. B. & Donato, R. (1994). Vygotskyan approaches to understanding foreign language learner discourse during communicative tasks. Hispania, 77, 262-274.
8. Brooks, F. B., Donato, R. & McGlone. J. V. (1997); When are they going to say ‘it’ right?: understanding learner talk during pair-work activity. Foreign Language A nnals, 30, 523-541.
9. Cazden, C. (1997). Performance before competence: assistance to child discourse in the zone of proximal development. In M. Cole, Y. Engeström, O. Vasquez, Mind, cultura, and activity. Seminal papers from the laboratory of comparative human cognition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 303-310.
10. Cook, G. (1997). Language play and language learning. ELT Journal, 51, 224-231.
11. Coughlan, P. & Duff, P. A. (1994). Same task, different activities: analysis of a SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language learning, 173-194.
12. Diaz, R. M. & Berk, L. E. (eds.) (1992). Private speech. From social interaction to self-regulation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Dicamilla, F. J. (1997). The function of repetition in the collaborative discourse of L2 learners. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 609-633.
14. Dicamilla, F. J. & Lantolf. J. P. (1994). The linguistic analysis of private writing. Language Sciences, 16, 83-98.
15. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. R Lantolf & G. Appel (eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research, 33-56.
16. Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory aud second language learning, 29-52.
17. Donato, R. & Adair-Hauck, B. (1992). Discourse perspectives on formal instruction. Language Awareness, 1, 73-90.
18. Donato, R. & McCormick, D. (1994). A sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies: the role of mediation. The Modem LanguageJournal, 78, 453-464.
19. Dunn, W. & Lantolf. J. P. (1998). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development and Krashen's i + 1: Incommensurable constructs; incommensurable theories. Language Learning, 48, 411-442.
20. Ellis, R. (1999). Task-based research and language pedagogy. LanguageTeaching Research (under review).
21. Foley, J. (1990). Task-based approaches to language learning from the learner's point of view. Language and Education, 4, 81-101.
22. Foley, J. (1991). A psycholinguistic framework for task-based approaches to language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 12, 62-75.
23. Frawley. W J. (1997). Kjgo/sty and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Frawley. W. & Lantolf. J. P. (1985). Second language discourse: aVygotskyan perspective. Applied Linguistics, 6, 19-44.
25. Gillette, B. (1994). The role of learner goals in L2 success. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research, 195-214.
26. Goss, N., Ying-Hua, Z. & Lantolf. J. P. (1994). Two heads may be better than one: mental activity in second-language grammaticality judgments. In E. Tarone, S. Gass, & A. Cohen (eds.). Research methodology in second-langnage acquisition, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 263-286.
27. Guerra, C. (1996). Krashen's i + 1 issue revisited from a Vygotskian perspective. TESOL-Gram (The Official Newsletter of Puerto Rico TESOL), 23, 7-8.
28. De Guerrero, M. C. M. (1987). The din phenomenon: mental rehearsal in the second language. Foreign Language Annals, 20, 537-548.
29. De Guerrero, M. C. M. (1994). Form and function of inner speech in adult second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language learning, 83-116.
30. De Guerrero, M. C. M. (1999). Inner speech as mental rehearsal: the case of advanced L2 learners. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 10, 27-55.
31. De Guerrero, M. C. M. & Villamil, O. (1994). Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revisions. The Modem LanguageJournal, 78, 484-496.
32. De Guerrero, M. C. M. & Villamil, O. (2000). Activating the ZPD: mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern LanguageJournal, 84, 51-68.
33. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action, vol. 1. Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press.
34. Hall, J. K. (1995). ‘Aw, man, where you goin’?’: classroom interaction and the development of L2 interactional competence. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 37-62.
35. Hall. J. K. (1997). A consideration of SLA as a theory of practice: a response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 301-5.
36. Kinginger, C. (1998). Videoconferencing as access to spoken French. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 502-513.
37. Kinginger, C. (in press). Learning the pragmatics of solidarity in the networked foreign language classroom. In J. K. Hall & L S. Verplaeste (eds.). The construction cf foreign and second language learning through classroom interaction, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. Kramsch, C. (2000). Social discourse constructions of self in L2 learning. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 135-156.
39. Kuczaj, Stan A., II (1983). Crib speech and language play. New York: Springer-Verlag.
40. Lantolf, J. P. (1997). The function of language play in the acquisition of Spanish as a second language. In W. R. Glass & A. T. Perez-Leroux (eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 3-24.
41. Lantolf, J. P. (1999). Theorizing the role of private speech as language play in the acquisition of a second language. Featured paper at the Annual Conference of the New Zealand Association of Applied Linguistics. Auckland. September.
42. Lantolf, J. P. (ed.) (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. Lantolf, J. P. & Aljaafreh, A. (1995). Second language learning in the zone of proximal development: a revolutionary experience. International Journal of Educational Research, 23, 619-632.
44. Lantolf, J. P. & Appel, G. (eds.) (1994). I-jxntsWau approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
45. Lantolf, J. P. & Frawley, W (1984). Second language performance and Vygotskyan psycholinguistics: implications for L2 instruction. In A. Manning, P. Martin & K. McCall a (eds.), The tenth LACUSforum 1983, Columbia, SC: Hornebeam Press, 425-440.
46. Lantolf, J. P. & Pavlenko, A. (1995). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 108-124.
47. Leontiev, A. A. (1981). Psychology and the language learning process. Oxford: Pergamon.
48. Lidz, C. S. (1991). Guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
49. Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue. Talk, interaction, and contexts in dialogicalperspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
50. Luria. A. R. (1973). The working brain. New York: Basic Books.
51. McCafferty, S. (1994). The use of private speech by adult ESL learners at different levels of proficiency. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language reseasrch, 117-134.
52. McCafferty, S. & Ahmed, A. (2000). The appropriation of gestures of the abstract by L2 learners. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.). Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 199-218.
53. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand in mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54. Murphey, T. (1995). Conversational shadowing for rapport and interactional language acquisition. In M. Ahmed. T. Fujimura, Y. Kato & M. Leong (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International University of Japan Conference on SLR in Japan, Nagoya: Nazan University, 42-65.
55. Nassaji, H. & Cumming, A. (in press). What's in a ZPD? A case study of a young ESL student and teacher interacting through dialogue journals. Language Teaching and Learning.
56. Nassaji, H. & Swain, M. (in press). A Vygotskyan perspective towards corrective feedback in L2: the effect of random vs. negotiated help on the acquisition of English articles. Language Awareness.
57. Newman, D., Griffin, P. & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: uvrking for cognitive change in school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Ohta, A. S. (1995). Applying sociocultural theory to an analysis of learner discourse: learner-learner collaborative interaction in the zone of proximal development. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 93-122.
59. Ohta, A. S. (1997). The development of pragmatic competence in learner-learner classroom interaction. In L. Bouton (ed.). Pragmatics and language leaming, volume 8, 213-222.
60. Ohta, A. S. (2000). Re-thinking interaction in SLA: developmcntally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language leaming, 53-80.
61. Ohta, A. S. (in press a). Interactional routines and the socialization of interactional style in adult learners ofJapanese. Journal of Pragmatics.
62. Ohta, A. S. (in press b). Japanese second language acquisition in the classroom: what the voices of teachers and students tell us about the process of learning Japanese. In H. Nara (ed.), Admnces in Japanese pedagogy, Columbus, OH: Foreign Language Resource Center.
63. Ohta, A. S. (in press c). Re-thinking recasts: a learner-centered examination of corrective feedback in the Japanese language classroom. In J. K. Hall & L. Vcrplaeste (eds.), The constmction of foreign and second language learning through classroom interaction, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
64. Platt, E. & Brooks, F. P. (1994). The acquisition-rich environment revisited. The Modem LanguageJournal, 78, 497-511.
65. Platt, E. & Troudi, S. (1997). Mary and her teachers: a Brego-speaking child's place in the mainstream classroom. The Modem LanguageJournal, 81, 28-59.
66. Robbins, D. (1996). L. S. Vygotsky's philosophy-psychology used as a metatheory in defining L2 classroom acquisition. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation. University of Hamburg, Germany.
67. Roebuck, R. (1998). Reading and reCall in LI and L2. A sociocultural approach. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
68. Roebuck, R. (2000). Subjects speak out: how learners position themselves in a psycholinguistic task. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.). Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 81-98.
69. Rommetveit, R. (1974). On message structure: a framctvork for the study of language and communication. New York: Wiley.
70. Rommetveit, R. (1985). Language acquisition as increasing linguistic structuring of experience and symbolic behavior control. In J. V. Wertsch (ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives, 183-204.
71. Salomon, G. (1991). On the cognitive effects of technology. In L. T. Landsman (ed.), Culture, schooling and psychological development, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 185-204.
72. Saville-troike, M. (1988). Private speech: evidence for second language learning strategies during the ‘silent’ period. Jonma of Child Language, 15, 567-590.
73. Schinke-llano, L. (1993). On the value of a Vygotskian framework for SLA theory and research. Language Learning, 43, 121-9.
74. Schinke-llano, L. (1995). Reenvisioning the second language classroom: a Vygotskian approach. In F. R. Eckman, D. Highland, P. W Lee & R. W. Weber (eds.). Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 21-8.
75. Sullivan, P. (2000). Playfulness as mediation in communicative language teaching in a Vietnamese classroom. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 117-134.
76. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (eds.), Principle & practice in applied linguistics. Studies in honour cf H. G. IViddowson, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125-144.
77. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 99-116.
78. Swain, M & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modem LanguageJournal, 82, 320-337.
79. Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1999). Task-bascd language learning: the uses of first language use. Unpublished manuscript currently under review. Languagelcaching Research.
80. Talyzina, N. (1981). The psychology of learning. Moscow: Progress Press.
81. Tarone, E. & Liu, G. (1995). Situational context, variation, and second language acquisition theory. In G. Cook & B.
82. Seidlhofer (eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: studies in honour of H. G. Wddowson, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 107-124.
83. Thorne, S. L. (2000). Beyond bounded activity systems: heterogeneous cultures in instructional uses of persistent conversation. In S. Herron (ed.), Proceedings of the thirty-third annual Hawai'i international conference sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
84. Ushakova, T. N. (1994). Inner speech and second language acquisition: an experimental-theoretical approach. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research, 135-156.
85. van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum. Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. London: Longman.
86. van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Socioadtural theory and second language learning, 247-262.
87. Villamil, O. & de Guerrero, M. C. M. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 51-75.
88. Villamil, O. & de Guerrero, M. C. M. (1998). Assessing the impact of peer revision on L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 19, 491-514.
89. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
90. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works ofL. S. Vygotsky. Volume 1. Thinking and speaking. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
91. Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: theory and practice. The Modem Language Journal, 81, 470-481.
92. Weir, R. (1962). Language in the trifc. The Hague: Mouton.
93. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry. Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
94. Wertsch. J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
95. Wertsch. J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
96. Wertsch. J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.