Syntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talk

Research on Language and Social Interaction

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 105-130

  Hellermann, John ^a  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 13844304637     PISSN: 08351813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3801_4     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Auer, P. (1996). On the prosody and syntax of turn continuations. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies (pp. 57-100), Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2. Barnes, D., Britton, J., & Torbe, M. (1990). Language, the learner and the school. (4th ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
3. Beach, W. A. (1993). Transitional regularities for "casual" "Okay" usages. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 325-352.
4. Brazil, D. (1997). The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5. Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6. Button, G. (1992). Answers as interactional products: Two sequential practices used in job interviews. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 212-231). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
8. Clayman, S. E., & Maynard, D. W. (1995). Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. In P. ten Have & G. Psathas (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities (pp. 1-30). Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.
9. Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1986). An Introduction to English prosody. Tübigen, Germany: Niemeyer.
10. Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Ford, C. E. (Eds.). (2004). Sound patterns in interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
11. Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (Eds.). (1996). Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
12. Crow, B. K. (1994). Conversational episode structure. In R. L. Conville (Ed.), Uses of "structure" in communication studies (pp. 155-184). Westport, CT: Praeger.
13. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14. Erickson, F. (1992). They know all the lines: Rhythmic organization and contextualization in a conversational listing routine. In P. Auer & A. D. Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 365-397). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
15. Erickson, F. (1996). Going for the zone: The social and cognitive ecology of teacher-student interaction in classroom conversations. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 29-62). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Erickson, F., & Schultz, J. (1982). The counselor as gatekeeper. New York: Academic.
17. Fiksdal, S. (1990). The right time and pace. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
18. Ford, C. E. (1993). Grammar in interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19. Ford, C. E. (1999). Collaborative construction of task activity: Coordinating multiple resources in a high school physics lab. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 369-408.
20. Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Hellermann, J. (2004). Getting past "no": Sequence, action and sound production in the projection of no-initiated turns. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & C. E. Ford (Eds.), Sound production in interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
21. Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Practices in the construction of turns: The "TCU" revisited. Pragmatics, 6(3), 427-454.
22. Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A. (2002). Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In C. E. Ford, B. A. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 14-38). New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Fox, A. (1973). Tone sequence in English. Archivum Linguisticum, 4, 17-26.
24. Fox, B., Hayashi, M., & Jasperson, R. (1996). Resources and repair: A cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 183-237). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
25. Franck, D. (1985). Sentences in conversational turns: A case of syntactic "double bind." In M. Dascal (Ed.), Dialogue: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 233-245). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
26. French, P., & Local, J. (1983). Turn-competitive incomings. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, 17-38.
27. Goodwin, C. (1995). Sentence construction within interaction. In U. M. Quastoff (Ed.), Aspects of oral communication (pp. 198-219). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
28. Hellermann, J. (2002). The interactional and organizational work of prosody in classroom discourse activities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
29. Hellermann, J. (2003). The interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange: Teacher repetition in feedback moves. Language in Society, 32, 79-104.
30. Heritage, J. (1997). Conversation analysis and institutional talk: Analysing data. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative analysis: Theory, methods, and practice (pp. 161-182). London: Sage.
31. Heritage, J., & Sorjonen, M. L. (1994). Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences:And-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society, 23, 1-29.
32. Hoey, M. (1991). Some properties of spoken discourse. In R. Bowers & C. Brumfit (Eds.), Applied linguistics and English language teaching (pp. 64-85). London: Macmillan.
33. Jefferson, G. (1974). Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society, 2, 181-199.
34. Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language in Social Interaction, 35, 277-309.
35. Lerner, G. H. (1991). On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society, 20, 441-458.
36. Lerner, G. H. (1995). Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes, 19, 111-131.
37. Local, J. (1992). Continuing and restarting. In P. Auer & A. D. Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 273-296). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
38. Manke, M. P. (1997). Classroom power relations: Understanding student-teacher interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
39. Maynard, D. (1991). Interaction and asymmetry in clinical discourse. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 448-495.
40. McDermott, R., & Roth, D. (1978). The social organization of behavior: Interactional approaches. Annual Review of Anthropology, 7, 321-345.
41. McHoul, A. W. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom, Language and Society, 7, 183-213.
42. McHoul, A. W. (1990). The organization of repair in classroom talk. Language in Society, 19, 349-377.
43. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44. Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue. New York: Teachers College Press.
45. Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A. (Eds.). (1996). Interaction and grammar. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
46. Pickering, L. (1999). An analysis of prosodic systems in the classroom discourse of native speaker and nonnative speaker teaching assistants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville.
47. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (G. Jefferson, Ed., Vol. 1). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
48. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversations. Language, 50, 696-735.
49. Schegloff, E. A. (1979). The relevance of repair to syntax-for- conversation. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: discourse and syntax (pp. 261-286). New York: Academic.
50. Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Reflections on studying prosody in talk-in-interaction. Language and Speech, 41, 235-263.
51. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
52. Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. New York: Oxford University Press.
53. Stubbs, M. (1983). Language, schools and classrooms. London: Methuen.
54. Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics in Education, 5, 1-37.
55. Wennerstrom, A. (1998). Intonation as cohesion in academic discourse: A study of Chinese speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 1-25.
56. Wennerstrom, A. (2001). The music of everyday speech: Prosody and discourse analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
57. Wood, D., & Wood, H. (1988). Questioning versus student initiative. In J. T. Dillon (Ed.), Questioning and discussion: A multi-disciplinary study (pp. 280-305). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.