How did alternative splicing evolve?

Nature Reviews Genetics

Volumn 5, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 773-782

  Ast, Gil ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

5' UNTRANSLATED REGION; ALTERNATIVE RNA SPLICING; BASE PAIRING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EUKARYOTE; EVOLUTION; EXON; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; HUMAN; INTRON; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; YEAST;

ALTERNATIVE SPLICING; BASE PAIRING; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; INTRONS; MODELS, GENETIC; RNA SPLICE SITES; RNA, MESSENGER;

EUKARYOTA; PROTISTA;

EID: 5044222204     PISSN: 14710056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrg1451     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Lander, E. S. et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860-921 (2001).
2. Modrek, B. & Lee, C. A genomic view of alternative splicing. Nature Genet. 30, 13-19 (2002).
3. Mironov, A. A., Fickett, J. W. & Gelfand, M. S. Frequent alternative splicing of human genes. Genome Res. 9, 1288-1293 (1999).
4. Woodley, L. & Valcarcel, J. Regulation of alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Brief. Funct. Genomic. Proteomic. 1, 266-277 (2002).
5. Qiu, W. G., Schisler, N. & Stoltzfus, A. The evolutionary gain of spliceosomal introns: sequence and phase preferences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1252-1263 (2004). The authors suggest that introns were inserted to genes during evolution.
6. Coghlan, A. & Wolfe, K. H. Origins of recently gained introns in Caenorhabditis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 11362-11367 (2004).
7. Barrass, J. D. & Beggs, J. D. Splicing goes global. Trends Genet. 19, 295-298 (2003).
8. Wood, V. et al. The genome sequence of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nature 415, 871-880 (2002).
9. Graur, D. & Li, W.-H. Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, 1999).
10. Stamm, S., Zhang, M. Q., Marr, T. G. & Helfman, D. M. A sequence compilation and comparison of exons that are alternately spliced in neurons. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 1515-1526 (1994).
11. Carmel, I., Tal, S., Vig, I. & Ast, G. Comparative analysis detects dependencies among the 5′ splice-site positions. RNA 10, 828-840 (2004). Comparative analysis of 50,000 human and mouse homologous 5′ss reveal that the 5′ss provide 9 potential positions for U1 binding, but only 7 are involved in base pairing with a typical 5′ss.
12. Sorek, R. et al. Minimal conditions for exonization of intronic sequences; 5′ splice site formation in Alu exons. Mol. Cell 14, 221-231 (2004). A demonstration that the type of base pairing between the 5′ss and U1 regulates alternative versus constitutive splicing and also controls the inclusion/skipping ratio in alternative splicing.
13. Lear, A. L., Eperon, L. P., Wheatley, I. M. & Eperon, I. C. Hierarchy for 5′ splice site preference determined in vivo. J. Mol. Biol. 211, 103-115 (1990).
14. Moss, L. What Genes Can't Do (MIT Press, Cambridge, USA., 2003).
15. Brow, D. A. Allosteric cascade of spliceosome activation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 36, 333-360 (2002).
16. Hartmuth, K. et al. Protein composition of human prespliceosomes isolated by a tobramycin affinity-selection method. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16719-16724 (2002).
17. Zhou, Z., Licklider, L. J., Gygi, S. P. & Reed, R. Comprehensive proteomic analysis of the human spliceosome. Nature 419, 182-185 (2002).
18. Jurica, M. S. & Moore, M. J. Pre-mRNA splicing; awash in a sea of proteins. Mol. Cell 12, 5-14 (2003).
19. Graveley, B. R. Alternative splicing: increasing diversity in the proteomic world. Trends Genet 17, 100-107 (2001).
20. Maniatis, T. & Reed, R. An extensive network of coupling among gene expression machines. Nature 416, 499-506 (2002).
21. Cartegni, L., Chew, S. L. & Krainer, A. R. Listening to silence and understanding nonsense: exonic mutations that affect splicing. Nature Rev. Genet. 3, 285-298 (2002).
22. Stoilov, P. et al. Defects in pre-mRNA processing as causes of and predisposition to diseases. DNA Cell Biol. 21, 803-818 (2002).
23. Pick, M., Flores-Flores, C. & Soreq, H. From brain to blood: aternative splicing evidence for the cholinergic basis of mammalian stress responses. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1018, 85-98 (2004).
24. Hastings, M. L. & Krainer, A. R. Pre-mRNA splicing in the new millennium. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13, 302-309 (2001).
25. Nissim-Rafinia, M. & Kerem, B. Splicing regulation as a potential genetic modifier. Trends Genet 18, 123-127 (2002).
26. Sharp, P.A. "Five easy pieces". Science 254, 663 (1991).
27. Berget, S. M. Exon recognition in vertebrate splicing. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 2411-2414 (1995).
28. Caceres, J. F. & Kornblihtt, A. R. Alternative splicing: multiple control mechanisms and involvement in human disease. Trends Genet. 18, 186-193 (2002).
29. Wagner, E. J. & Garcia-Blanco, M. A. Polypyrimidine tract binding protein antagonizes exon definition. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 3281-3288 (2001).
30. Faustino, N. A. & Cooper, T. A. Pre-mRNA splicing and human disease. Genes Dev. 17, 419-437 (2003).
31. Romfo, C. M., Alvarez, C. J., van Heeckeren, W. J., Webb, C. J. & Wise, J. A. Evidence for splice site pairing via intron definition in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 7955-7970 (2000). The authors show that that although S. pombe has SR-like proteins and factors involved in exon definition, there is no alternative splicing in that organism.
32. Lareau, L. F., Green, R. E., Bhatnagar, R. S. & Brenner, S. E. The evolving roles of alternative splicing. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14, 273-282 (2004).
33. Bon, E. et al. Molecular evolution of eukaryotic genomes: hemiascomycetous yeast spliceosomal introns. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 1121-1135 (2003).
34. Kuhn, A. N. & Kaufer, N. F. Pre-mRNA splicing in Schizosaccharomyces pombe: regulatory role of a kinase conserved from fission yeast to mammals. Curr. Genet. 42, 241-251 (2003).
35. Sugnet, C. W., Kent, W. J., Ares, M. Jr & Haussler, D. Transcriptome and genome conservation of alternative splicing events in humans and mice. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 66-77 (2004). The authors showed that alternative 5′ and 3′ splicing events contain intronic sequences that are conserved between humans and mice near the alternative splice site.
36. Sorek, R. & Ast, G. Intronic sequences flanking alternatively spliced exons are conserved between human and mouse. Genome Res. 13, 1631-1637 (2003). This paper demonstrates that alternatively spliced exons that are in humans and mice contain conserved intron regions that flank the conserved exon.
37. Sorek, R., Shamir, R. & Ast, G. How prevalent is functional alternative splicing in the human genome? Trends Genet. 20, 68-71 (2004). Alternative exons that are conserved between humans and mice tend to be smaller and their length (in nucleotides) is divisible by 3, which distinguishes them from constitutively spliced exons.
38. Resch, A., Xing, Y., Alekseyenko, A., Modrek, B. & Lee, C. Evidence for a subpopulation of conserved alternative splicing events under selection pressure for protein reading frame preservation. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1261-1269 (2004). The authors show that there is a bias of alternatively spliced exons (which are part of the reading frame) to be multiples of 3.
39. Zhuang, Y., Ma, F., Li-Ling, J., Xu, X. & Li, Y. Comparative analysis of amino acid usage and protein length distribution between alternatively and non-alternatively spliced genes across six eukaryotic genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 1978-1985 (2003).
40. Kondrashov, F. A. & Koonin, E. V. Evolution of alternative splicing: deletions, insertions and origin of functional parts of proteins from intron sequences. Trends Genet. 19, 115-119 (2003). The authors suggest that constitutively spliced exons become alternatively spliced exons (mostly by exon skipping) during evolution.
41. Burge, C. B., Tuschl, T. & Sharp, P. A. in The RNA World, 525-560 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 1999).
42. Prabhala, G., Rosenberg, G. H. & Kaufer, N. F. Architectural features of pre-mRNA introns in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 8, 171-182 (1992).
43. Buvoli, M., Mayer, S. A. & Patton, J. G. Functional crosstalk between exon enhancers, polypyrimidine tracts and branchpoint sequences. EMBO J. 16, 7174-7183 (1997).
44. Modrek, B. & Lee, C. J. Alternative splicing in the human, mouse and rat genomes is associated with an increased frequency of exon creation and/or loss. Nature Genet 34, 177-180 (2003). Human-mouse comparative analysis reveals that alternative splicing is often associated with recent exon creation and/or loss. So, alternative splicing has the potential ability to create species-specific alternatively spliced exons.
45. Nurtdinov, R. N., Artamonova, I. I., Mironov, A. A. & Gelfand, M. S. Low conservation of alternative splicing patterns in the human and mouse genomes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12, 1313-1320 (2003).
46. Kondrashov, F. A. & Koonin, E. V. Origin of alternative splicing by tandem exon duplication. Hum. Mol. Genet 10, 2661-2669 (2001). Exon duplication could be a major route for generating functional diversity during the evolution of multicellular eukaryotes.
47. Letunic, I., Copley, R. R. & Bork, P. Common exon duplication in animals and its role in alternative splicing. Hum. Mol. Genet 11, 1561-1567 (2002). About 10% of all genes contain tandemly duplicated exons that might have a significant role in the rapid evolution of eukaryotic genes.
48. Lev-Maor, G., Sorek, R., Shomron, N. & Ast, G. The birth of an alternatively spliced exon: 3′ splice-site selection in Alu exons. Science 300, 1288-1291 (2003). This paper reveals a mechanism that governs 3′ splice-site selection of Alu exons during alternative splicing and identifies mutations that activated the exonization of a silent intronic Alu.
49. Makalowski, W., Mitchell, G. A. & Labuda, D. Alu sequences in the coding regions of mRNA a source of protein variability. Trends Genet. 10, 188-193 (1994).
50. Sorek, R., Ast, G. & Graur, D. Alu-containing exons are alternatively spliced. Genome Res. 12, 1060-1067 (2002). This paper indicates that internal exons that contain an Alu sequence are predominantly, if not exclusively, alternatively spliced.
51. Sipiczki, M. Where does fission yeast sit on the tree of life? Genome Biol. 1, 1011.1-1011.4 (2000).
52. Yang, Z. & Yoder, A. D. Estimation of the transition/transversion rate bias and species sampling. J. Mol. Evol. 48, 274-283 (1999).
53. Waterston, R. H. et al. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420, 520-562 (2002). Sequencing of the mouse genome reveals that most of the genes present in humans and mice are orthologues and the majority of these genes share the same intron/exon arrangement, as well as a high degree of conservation in homologous exon sequences.
54. Lim, L. P. & Burge, C. B. A computational analysis of sequence features involved in recognition of short introns. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 11193-11198 (2001). Splice-site analysis among different organisms.
55. Seraphin, B. & Kandels-Lewis, S. 3′ splice site recognition in S. cerevisiae does not require base pairing with U1 snRNA. Cell 73, 803-812 (1993).
56. O'Keefe, R. T. Mutations in U5 snRNA loop 1 influence the splicing of different genes in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 5476-5484 (2002).
57. Segault, V. et al. Conserved loop 1 of US small nuclear RNA is dispensable for both catalytic steps of pre-mRNA splicing in HeLa nuclear extracts. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 2782-2790 (1999).
58. Kretzner, L., Rymond, B. C. & Rosbash, M. S. cerevisiae U1 RNA is large and has limited primary sequence homology to metazoan U1 snRNA. Cell 50, 593-602 (1987).
59. Zhuang, Y. & Weiner, A. M. A compensatory base change in U1 snRNA suppresses a 5′ splice site mutation. Cell 46, 827-835 (1986).
60. Lund, M. & Kjems, J. Defining a 5′ splice site by functional selection in the presence and absence of U1 snRNA 5′ end. RNA 8, 166-179 (2002). This paper indicates that more than eight base pairs between U1 and the 5′ss will reduce the efficiency of the splicing reaction.
61. Burge, C. & Karlin, S. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 268, 78-94 (1997).
62. Herbert, A. The four Rs of RNA-directed evolution. Nature Genet 36, 19-25 (2004).
63. Davis, C. A., Grate, L., Spingola, M. & Ares, M. Jr. Test of intron predictions reveals novel splice sites, alternatively spliced mRNAs and new introns in meiotically regulated genes of yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 1700-1706 (2000).
64. Vilardell, J., Chartrand, R, Singer, R. H. & Warner, J. R. The odyssey of a regulated transcript. RNA 6, 1773-1780 (2000).
65. Okazaki, K. & Niwa, O. mRNAs encoding zinc finger protein isoforms are expressed by alternative splicing of an in-frame intron in fission yeast. DNA Res. 7, 27-30 (2000).
66. Muhia, D. K. et al. Multiple splice variants encode a novel adenylyl cyclase of possible plastid origin expressed in the sexual stage of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 22014-22022 (2003).
67. Fink, G. R. Pseudogenes in yeast? Cell 49, 5-6 (1987).
68. Dahan, O. & Kupiec, M. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene CDC40/PRP17 controls cell cycle progression through splicing of the ANC1 gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 2529-2540 (2004).
69. Freund, M. et al. A novel approach to describe a U1 snRNA binding site. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 6963-6975 (2003). An indication that a non-Watson-Crick paring can be formed only when it is adjacent to a Watson-Crick pairing.
70. Libri, D., Duconge, F., Levy, L. & Vinauger, M. A role for the Ψ-U mismatch in the recognition of the 5′ splice site of yeast introns by the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 18173-18181 (2002).
71. Nandabalan, K., Price, L. & Roeder, G. S. Mutations in U1 snRNA bypass the requirement for a cell type-specific RNA splicing factor. Cell 73, 407-415 (1993).
72. Dibb, N. J. & Newman, A. J. Evidence that introns arose at proto-splice sites. EMBO J. 8, 2015-2021 (1989).
73. Sverdlov, A, Rogozin, B., Babenko, V. N. & Koonin V. E. Reconstruction of ancestral protosplice sites. Curr. Biol. 14, 1505-1508 (2004).
74. Long, M. & Deutsch, M. Association of intron phases with conservation at splice site sequences and evolution of spliceosomal introns. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1528-1534 (1999).
75. Sverdlov, A. V., Rogozin, I. B., Babenko, V. N. & Koonin, E. V. Evidence of splice signal migration from exon to intron during intron evolution. Curr. Biol. 13, 2170-2174 (2003).
76. Robart, A. R., Montgomery, N. K., Smith, K. L. & Zimmerly, S. Principles of 3′ splice site selection and alternative splicing for an unusual group II intron from Bacillus anthracis. RNA 10, 854-862 (2004).
77. Kempken, F. & Windhofer, F. Alternative splicing of transcripts of the transposon Restless is maintained in the foreign host Neurospora crassa and can be modified by introducing mutations at the 5′ and 3′ splice sites. Curr. Genet. 46, 59-65 (2004).
78. Farrer, T., Roller, A. B., Kent, W. J. & Zahler, A. M. Analysis of the role of Caenorhabditis elegans GC-AG introns in regulated splicing. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3360-3367 (2002).
79. Thanaraj, T. A. & Clark, F. Human GC-AG alternative intron isoforms with weak donor sites show enhanced consensus at acceptor exon positions. Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 2581-2593 (2001).
80. Reed, R. Initial splice-site recognition and pairing during pre-mRNA splicing. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 6, 215-220 (1996).