Virtual reference service evaluation: Adherence to RUSA behavioral guidelines and IFLA digital reference guidelines

Library and Information Science Research

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 122-137

  Shachaf, Pnina ^a   Horowitz, Sarah M ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AUGUSTANA COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44949231071     PISSN: 07408188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2007.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Alford B.L., and Sherrell D.L. The role of affect in consumer satisfaction judgments of credence-based services. Journal of Business Research 37 (1996) 71-84
2. Arnold J., and Kaske N. Evaluating the quality of a chat service. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 5 2 (2005) 177-193
3. Bitner M.J., Booms B.H., and Tetreault S. The service encounter: Diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents. Journal of Marketing 54 (1990) 71-84
4. Bobrowsky T., Beck L., and Grant M. The chat reference interview: Practicalities and advice. Reference Librarian 43 89/90 (2005) 179-191
5. Bopp R., and Smith L. Reference and information services: An introduction (3rd ed.) (2001), Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, CO
6. Carter D.S., and Janes J. Unobtrusive data analysis of digital reference questions and service at the Internet Public Library: An exploratory study. Library Trends 49 2 (2000) 251-265
7. Churchill G.A., and Surprenant C. An investigation into the determinants of consumer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research 19 (1983) 491-504
8. Coffman S. Going live: Starting and running a virtual reference service (2003), American Library Association, Chicago, IL
9. Croft R., and Eichenlaud N. E-mail reference in a distributed learning environment: Best practices, user satisfaction, and the reference services continuum. Journal of Library Administration 45 1/2 (2006) 117-147
10. Cummings J., Cummings L., and Frederiksen L. User preferences in reference services: Virtual reference and academic libraries. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 7 1 (2007) 81-96
11. Dewdney P., and Ross C.S. Flying a light aircraft: Reference service evaluation from a user's viewpoint. Reference Quarterly 34 2 (1994) 217-230
12. Durrance J. Reference success: Does the 55 percent rule tell the whole story?. Library Journal 114 (1989) 31-36
13. Durrance J. Factors that influence reference success: What makes questionnaires willing to return?. The Reference Librarian 49/50 (1995) 243-265
14. Emery J. Is our best good enough? Educating end-users about licensing terms. Journal of Library Administration 42 3/4 (2005) 27-39
15. Fagan J.C., and Desai C.M. Communication strategies for instant messaging and chat reference services. Reference Librarian 38 79/80 (2003) 121-156
16. Fernandez J. Facing live reference. Online 28 3 (2004) 37-40
17. Gatten J.N., and Radcliff C.J. Assessing reference behaviors with unobtrusive testing. In: Wallace D.P., and Van Fleet C. (Eds). Library evaluation: A casebook and can-do guide (2001), Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, CO 105-115
18. Gers R., and Seward L.J. Improving reference service: Results of a state-wide survey. Library Journal 110 18 (1985) 32-35
19. Gilbert L.M., Liu M., Matoush T., and Whitlatch J.B. Digital reference and online instructional services in an integrated public/university library. The Reference Librarian 46 95-96 (2006) 149-172
20. Gross M., and Saxton M.L. Integrating the imposed query into the evaluation of reference service: A dichotomous analysis of user ratings. Library & Information Science Research 24 (2002) 251-263
21. Hernon P., and Calvert P. E-service quality in libraries: Exploring its features and dimensions. Library & Information Science Research 27 (2005) 377-404
22. Hernon P., and McClure C.R. Unobtrusive reference testing: The 55 percent rule. Library Journal 111 7 (1986) 37-41
23. International Federation of Library Associations. IFLA digital reference guidelines. Retrieved January 5, 2006, from (2005). http://www.ifla.org/VII/s36/pubs/drg03.htm
24. Janes J. Digital reference: Reference librarians' experiences and attitudes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53 7 (2002) 549-566
25. Kaske N., and Arnold J. An unobtrusive evaluation of online real time library reference services. Retrieved February 20, 2005, from (2002). http://www.lib.umd.edu/groups/digref/kaskearnoldunobtrusive.html
26. Katz W.A. Introduction to reference work. Vol.II: Reference services and reference processes (8th ed.) (2002), McGraw-Hill, New York
27. King V., Nichols J., and Padilla G. Moving back to campus: Creating a local virtual reference service. Internet Reference Services Quarterly 11 3 (2006) 1-17
28. Kwon N. Assessing the virtual reference success using the revised RUSA guidelines for behavioral performance of reference and information service providers. Proceedings of the 6th Virtual Reference Desk Annual Conference (2004, November). http://www.vrd2004.org/proceedings/kwon.htm Retrieved May 15, 2006, from http://www.vrd2004.org/proceedings/kwon.htm
29. Kwon N. User satisfaction with referrals at a collaborative virtual reference service. Information Research 11 2 (2006). http://informationr.net/ir/11-2/paper246.html Retrieved April, 19, 2005, from http://informationr.net/ir/11-2/paper246.html
30. Kwon N. Public library patrons' use of collaborative chat reference service: The effectiveness of question answering by question type. Library & Information Science Research 29 (2007) 70-91
31. McClure C., Lankes R.D., Gross M., and Choltco-Devlin B. Statistics, measures and quality standards for assessing digital library services: Guidelines and procedures. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology. (ED 472588). Retrieved December 22, 2005, from (2002). http://quartz.syr.edu/quality/
32. Pomerantz J., Nicholson S., Belanger Y., and Lankes D. The current state of digital reference: Validation of a general digital reference model through a survey of digital reference services. Information Processing & Management 40 (2004) 347-363
33. Pomerantz J., Lou L., and McClure C.R. Peer review of chat reference transcripts: Approaches and strategies. Library & Information Science Research 28 (2006) 24-48
34. Radford M.L. Encountering virtual users: A qualitative investigation of interpersonal communication in chat reference. Journal of the American Association for Information Science and Technology 57 (2006) 1046-1059
35. Reference and User Services Association. Guidelines for behavioral performance of reference and information service providers. Retrieved January 5, 2006, from (2004). http://www.ala.org/ala/rusa/rusaprotools/referenceguide/guidelinesbehavioral.htm
36. Reference and User Services Association. Guidelines for implementing and maintaining virtual reference services. Retrieved September 20, 2005, from (2004). http://www.ala.org/ala/rusa/rusaprotools/referenceguide/virtrefguidelines.htm
37. Richardson J.V. Reference is better than we thought. Library Journal 127 15 (2002) 41-42
38. Ronan J., Reakes P., and Cornwell G. Evaluating online real-time reference in an academic library: Obstacles and recommendations. The Reference Librarian 79/80 (2003) 225-240
39. Saxton M.L., and Richardson J.V. Understanding reference transactions: transforming an art into a science (2002), Academic Press, New York
40. Shachaf P., and Horowitz S. Are virtual reference services color blind?. Library & Information Science Research 28 (2006) 501-520
41. Sloan B. Electronic reference services: Some suggested guidelines. Reference and Users Services Quarterly 38 1 (1998) 77-81
42. Stacy-Bates K. E-mail reference responses from academic ARL libraries: An unobtrusive study. Reference and User Services Quarterly 43 1 (2003) 59-70
43. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. The Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education (2000), Carnegie Foundation, Stanford, CA
44. Tunon J., Barsun R., and Ramiraz L.L. Pests, welcomed guests, or tolerated outsiders: Attitudes of academic librarians toward distance students from unaffiliated institutions. Journal of Library Administration 41 3/4 (2004) 485-505
45. Ueltschy L.C., Laroche M., Tamilia T.D., and Yannopoulosd P. Cross-cultural invariance of measures of satisfaction and service quality. Journal of Business Research 57 8 (2004) 901-912
46. Walter V.A., and Mediavilla C. Teens are from Neptune, librarians are from Pluto: An analysis of online reference transactions. Library Trends 54 2 (2005) 209-227
47. Ward D. Measuring the completeness of reference transactions in online chats; Results of an unobtrusive study. Reference and User Services Quarterly 44 1 (2003) 46-58
48. Ward D. Why users choose chat: A survey of behavior and motivations. Internet Reference Services Quarterly 10 1 (2005) 29-46
49. White M.D. Digital reference services: Framework for analysis and evaluation. Library & Information Science Research 23 (2001) 211-231
50. Whitlatch J.B. Unobtrusive studies and the quality of academic reference services. College & Research Libraries 50 2 (1989) 181-194
51. Whitlatch J.B. Reference service effectiveness. Reference Quarterly 30 2 (1990) 205-220
52. Whitlatch J.B. Evaluating reference services in the electronic age. Library Trends 50 2 (2001) 207-217
53. Zhuo F., Love M., Norwood S., and Massia K. Applying RUSA guidelines in the analysis of chat reference transcripts. College & Undergraduate Libraries 13 1 (2006) 75-88