Understanding biological functions through molecular networks

Cell Research

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 224-237

  Han, Jing Dong Jackie ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF GENETICS AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Data integration; Genetic variation; Modularity; Molecular function; Network

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL NUCLEUS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 38849146505     PISSN: 10010602     EISSN: 17487838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2008.16     Document Type: Review

References (91)

1. Tu BP, Kudlicki A, Rowicka M, McKnight SL. Logic of the yeast metabolic cycle: temporal compartmentalization of cellular processes. Science 2005; 310:1152-1158.
2. Bjorklund M, Taipale M, Varjosalo M, et al. Identification of pathways regulating cell size and cell-cycle progression by RNAi. Nature 2006; 439:1009-1013.
3. Papin JA, Hunter T, Palsson BO, Subramaniam S. Reconstruction of cellular signalling networks and analysis of their properties. 2005; Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:99-111.
4. Kholodenko BN. Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space. 2006; Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:165-176.
5. Waddington CH. The Strategy of the Genes. London: Allen & Unwin. 1957.
6. Bergman A, Siegal ML. Evolutionary capacitance as a general feature of complex gene networks. Nature 2003; 424:549-552.
7. Kauffman SA. Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. J TheorBiol 1969; 22:437-467.
8. Li F, Long T, Lu Y, Ouyang Q, Tang C. The yeast cell-cycle network is robustly designed. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:4781-4786.
9. Chen JF, Mandel EM, Thomson JM, et al. The role of microRNA1 and microRNA-133 in skeletal muscle proliferation and differentiation. Nat Genet 2006; 38:228-233.
10. Huang S, Eichler G, Bar-Yam Y, Ingber DE. Cell fates as high-dimensional attractor states of a complex gene regulatory network. Phys Rev Lett 2005; 94:128701.
11. Jasper H, Benes V, Atzberger A, et al. A genomic switch at the transition from cell proliferation to terminal differentiation in theDrosophila eye. Dev Cell 2002; 3:511-521.
12. Hughes TR, Marton MJ, Jones AR, et al. Functional discovery via a compendium of expression profiles. Cell 2000; 102:109-126.
13. Papin JA, Reed JL, Palsson BO. Hierarchical thinking in network biology: the unbiased modularization of biochemical networks. Trends Biochem Sci 2004; 29:641-647.
14. Peri S, Navarro JD, Kristiansen TZ, et al. Human protein reference database as a discovery resource for proteomics. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:D497-D501.
15. Vidal M A. Biological atlas of functional maps. Cell 2001; 104:333-339.
16. Marcotte EM. Computational genetics: finding protein function by nonhomology methods. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2000; 10:359-365.
17. Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:14863-14868.
18. von Mering C, Krause R, Snel B, et al. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 2002; 417:399-403.
19. Gunsalus KC, Ge H, Schetter AJ, et al. Predictive models of molecular machines involved in Caenorhabditis elegans early embryogenesis. Nature 2005; 436:861-865.
20. Goldberg DS, Roth FP. Assessing experimentally derived interactions in a small world. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:4372-4376.
21. Tong AH, Lesage G, Bader GD, et al. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 2004; 303:808-813.
22. Tong AH, Evangelista M, Parsons AB, et al. Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294:2364-2368.
23. Lin N, Wu B, Jansen R, Gerstein M, Zhao H. Information assessment on predicting protein-protein interactions. BMC Bioinformatics 2001; 5:154.
24. Matthews LR, Vaglio P, Reboul J, et al. Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein-protein interactions or "interologs". Genome Res 2001; 11:2120-2126.
25. Yu H, Luscombe NM, Lu HX, et al. Annotation transfer between genomes: protein-protein interologs andprotein-DNAregulogs. Genome Res 2004; 14:1107-1118.
26. Barrios-Rodiles M, Brown KR, Ozdamar B, et al. High-throughput mapping of a dynamic signaling network in mammalian cells. Science 2005; 307:1621-1625.
27. Tewari M, Hu PJ, Ahn JS, et al. Systematic interactome mapping and genetic perturbation analysis of a C. elegans TGF-beta signaling network. Mol Cell 2004; 13:469-482.
28. CusickME, KlitgordN, Vidal M, Hill DE. Interactome: gateway into systems biology. Hum Mol Genet 2005; 14 Spec No. 2: R171-R181.
29. Ge H, Walhout AJ, Vidal M. Integrating 'omic' information: a bridge between genomics and systems biology. Trends Genet 2003 19:551-560.
30. Han JD, Dupuy D, Bertin N, Cusick ME, Vidal M. Effect of sampling on topology predictions of protein-protein interaction networks. Nat Biotechnol 2005; 23:839-844.
31. Han JD, Bertin N, Hao T, et al. Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature 2004; 430:88-93.
32. Said MR, Begley TJ, Oppenheim AV, Lauffenburger DA, Samson LD. Global network analysis of phenotypic effects: protein networks and toxicity modulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2004; 101:18006-18011.
33. Jansen R, Yu H, Greenbaum D, et al. A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein-protein interactions from genomic data. Science 2003; 302:449-453.
34. Lee I, Date SV, Adai AT, Marcotte EM. A probabilistic functional network of yeast genes. Science 2004; 306:1555-1558.
35. Rhodes DR, Tomlins SA, Varambally S, et al. Probabilistic model of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nat Biotechnol 2005;23:951-959.
36. Mootha VK, Lepage P, Miller K, et al. Identification of a gene causing human cytochrome c oxidase deficiency by integrative genomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:605-610.
37. Zhong W, Sternberg PW. Genome-wide prediction of C. elegans genetic interactions. Science 2006; 311:1481-1484.
38. Gilchrist M, Thorsson V, Li B, et al. Systems biology approaches identify ATF3 as a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor 4. Nature 2006; 441:173-178.
39. Sachs K, Perez O, Pe'er D, Lauffenburger DA, Nolan GP. Causal protein-signaling networks derived from multiparameter singlecell data. Science 2005; 308:523-529.
40. Gardner TS, di Bernardo D, Lorenz D, Collins JJ. Inferring genetic networks and identifying compound mode of action via expression profiling. Science 2003; 301:102-105.
41. Xia K, Dong D, Han JD. IntNetDB v1.0: An integrated proteinprotein interaction network database generated by a probabilistic model. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7:508.
42. Kirschner M, Gerhart J. Evolvability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:8420-8427.
43. Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 2004; 5:101-113.
44. Fraser HB, Hirsh AE, Steinmetz LM, Scharfe C, Feldman MW. Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science 2002; 296:750-752.
45. Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 2001 ; 411:41-42.
46. Yu H, Kim PM, Sprecher E, Trifonov V, Gerstein M. The importance of bottlenecks in protein networks: correlation with gene essentiality and expression dynamics. PLoS Comput Biol 2007; 3:e59.
47. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature 1998; 393:440-442.
48. Hartwell LH, Hopfield JJ, Leibler S, Murray AW. From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature 1999; 402:C47-52.
49. Girvan M, Newman ME. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:7821-7826.
50. Rives AW, Galitski T. Modular organization of cellular networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:1128-1133.
51. Rung J, Schlitt T, Brazma A, Freivalds K, Vilo J. Building and analysing genome-wide gene disruption networks. Bioinformatics 2002; 18 Suppl 2:S202-S210.
52. Milo R, Shen-Orr S, Itzkovitz S, et al. Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 2002; 298:824-827.
53. Wuchty S, Oltvai ZN, Barabasi AL. Evolutionary conservation of motif constituents in the yeast protein interaction network. Nat Genet 2003; 35:176-179.
54. Milo R, Itzkovitz S, Kashtan N, et al. Superfamilies of evolved and designed networks. Science 2004; 303:1538-1542.
55. Luscombe NM, Babu MM, Yu H, et al. Genomic analysis of regulatory network dynamics reveals large topological changes. Nature 2004; 431:308-312.
56. Ma'ayan A, Jenkins SL, Neves S, et al. Formation of regulatory patterns during signal propagation in a Mammalian cellular network. Science 2005; 309:1078-1083.
57. Pal C, Papp B, Lercher MJ, et al. Chance and necessity in the evolution of minimal metabolic networks. Nature 2006 440: 667-670.
58. Sharan R, Suthram S, Kelley RM, et al. Conserved patterns of protein interaction in multiple species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:1974-1979.
59. Conant GC, Wagner A. Convergent evolution of gene circuits. Nat Genet 2003; 34:264-266.
60. Teichmann SA, Babu MM. Gene regulatory network growth by duplication. Nat Genet 2004; 36:492-496.
61. Conant GC, Wolfe KH. Functional partitioning of yeast co-expression networks after genome duplication. PLoSBiol 2006; 4: e109.
62. Wapinski I, Pfeffer A, Friedman N, Regev A. Natural history and evolutionary principles of gene duplication in fungi. Nature 2007;449:54-61.
63. Famili I, Forster J, Nielsen J, Palsson BO. Saccharomyces cerevisiae phenotypes can be predicted by using constraint-based analysis of a genome-scale reconstructed metabolic network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:13134-13139.
64. Hasty J, McMillen D, Collins JJ. Engineered gene circuits. Nature 2002; 420:224-230.
65. Bhalla US, Ram PT, Iyengar R. MAP kinase phosphatase as a locus of flexibility in a mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling network. Science 2002; 297:1018-1023.
66. Albert R, Othmer HG The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. J Theor Biol 2003 ; 223:1-18.
67. Ideker T, Thorsson V, Ranish JA, et al. Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. Science 2001; 292:929-934.
68. King RD, Whelan KE, Jones FM, et al. Functional genomic hypothesis generation and experimentation by a robot scientist. Nature 2004; 427:247-252.
69. Bader GD, Hogue CW. An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics 2003; 4:2.
70. de Lichtenberg U, Jensen LJ, Brunak S, Bork P Dynamic complex formation during the yeast cell cycle. Science 2005; 307:724-727.
71. Bertin N, N. S, D. D, et al. Confirmation of organized modularity in the yeast interactome. PLoSBiology 2007; 5:e153.
72. de Bivort B, Huang S, Bar-Yam Y. Dynamics of cellular level function and regulation derived from murine expression array data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:17687-17692.
73. Xia K, Dong D, Xue H, et al. Identification of the Proliferation/ Differentiation Switch in the Cellular Network of Multicellular Organisms. PLoS Computational Biology 2006; 2:el45.
74. Xue H, Xian B, Dong D, et al. A modular network model of aging. Mol Syst Biol 2007; 3:147.
75. Segal E, Friedman N, Kaminski N, Regev A, Koller D. From signatures to models: understanding cancer using microarrays. Nat Genet 2005; 37 Suppl:S38-S45.
76. Segre D, Deluna A, Church GM, Kishony R. Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism. Nat Genet 2005; 37:77-83.
77. Ma W, La L, Ouyang Q, Tang C. Robustness and modular design of the Drosophila segment polarity network. Mol Syst Biol 2006; 2:70.
78. Lahav G, RosenfeldN, Sigal A, et al. Dynamics of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop in individual cells. Nat Genet 2004; 36:147-150.
79. Emahazion T, Feuk L, Jobs M, et al. SNP association studies in Alzheimer's disease highlight problems for complex disease analysis. Trends Genet 2001; 17:407-413.
80. Calvo S, Jain M, Xie X, et al. Systematic identification of human mitochondrial disease genes through integrative genomics. Nat Genet 2006; 38:576-582.
81. Lage K, Karlberg EO, Sterling ZM, et al. A human phenomeinteractome network of protein complexes implicated in genetic disorders. Nat Biotechnol 2007; 25:309-316.
82. Gandhi TK, Zhong J, Mathivanan S, et al. Analysis of the human protein interactome and comparison with yeast, worm and fly interaction datasets. Nat Genet 2006; 38:285-293.
83. Pujana MA, Han JD, Starita LM, et al. Network modeling links breast cancer susceptibility and centrosome dysfunction. Nat Genet 2007; 39:1338-1349.
84. Ghazalpour A, Doss S, Zhang B, et al. Integrating genetic and network analysis to characterize genes related to mouse weight. PLoS Genet 2006; 2:e130.
85. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 2003; 13:2498-2504.
86. Yu H, Zhu X, Greenbaum D, Karro J, Gerstein M. TopNet: a tool for comparing biological sub-networks, correlating protein properties with topological statistics. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:328-337.
87. Wernicke S, Rasche F. FANMOD: a tool for fast network motif detection. Bioinformatics 2006; 22:1152-1153.
88. Ramsey S, Orrell D, Bolouri H. Dizzy: stochastic simulation of large-scale genetic regulatory networks (supplementary material). JBioinform Comput Biol 2005; 3:437-454.
89. Adalsteinsson D, McMillen D, Eisten TC. Biochemical Network Stochastic Simulator (BioNetS): software for stochastic modeling of biochemical networks. BMC Bioinformatics 2004; 5:24.
90. Aho T, Smolander OP, Niemi J, Yli-Harja O. RMBNToolbox: random models for biochemical networks. BMC Syst Biol 2007; 1:22.
91. Alves R, Antunes F, Salvador A. Tools for kinetic modeling of biochemical networks. Nat Biotechnol 2006; 24:667-672.