Advancing signaling networks through proteomics

Expert Review of Proteomics

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 573-583

  Tekirian, Tina L ^a   Thomas, Stefani N ^a   Yang, Austin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Affinity; Crosslinking; Phosphoproteomics; Protein signaling module; Purification; Quantitative mass spectrometry; Systems reconstruction

Indexed keywords

PHOSPHOPEPTIDE; TAU PROTEIN;

BIOINFORMATICS; CYTOLOGY; ISOTOPE LABELING; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ISOLATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

HUMANS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 34548312349     PISSN: 14789450     EISSN: 17448387     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/14789450.4.4.573     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Choudhary J, Grant SG. Proteomics in postgenomic neuroscience: the end of the beginning. Nat. Neurosci. 7(5), 440-445 (2004). • Provides an overview of the integration of proteomics into the systems biology of the nervous system.
2. Conzelmann H, Saez-Rodriguez J, Sauter T et al. A domain-oriented approach to the reduction of combinatorial complexity in signal transduction networks. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 34 (2006). • Computational method used to construct reduced, hierarchically structured models of the dynamics of signaling pathways.
3. Aldridge BB, Burke JM, Lauffenburger DA, Sorger PK. Physicochemical modelling of cell signalling pathways. Nat. Cell Biol. 8(11), 1195-1203 (2006). •• Comprehensive review of the principles of mathematical modeling of biochemical pathways that is tailored to biologists with limited exposure to this area of research.
4. Pawson T, Nash P. Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science 300(5618), 445-452 (2003). • Review of the fundamental properties of protein interaction domains.
5. Cohen P. The role of protein phosphorylation in human health and disease. The Sir Hans Krebs Medal Lecture. Eur. J. Biochem. 268(19), 5001-5010 (2001).
6. Zhang J, Baines CP, Zong C et al. Functional proteomic analysis of a threetier PKC?-Akt-eNOS signaling module in cardiac protection. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 288(2), 954-961 (2005).
7. Ping P. Identification of novel signaling complexes by functional proteomics. Circ. Res. 93(7), 595-603 (2003). •• Thorough overview of the concept of protein signaling complexes and their characterization by functional proteomic approaches.
8. Forler D, Kocher T, Rode M et al. An efficient protein complex purification method for functional proteomics in higher eukaryotes. Nat. Biotechnol. 21(1), 89-92 (2003).
9. Rigaut G, Shevchenko A, Rutz B et al. A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration. Nat. Biotechnol. 17(10), 1030-1032 (1999). • Initial description of tandem affinity purification procedure for high affinity purification of protein complexes.
10. Koch HB, Zhang R, Verdoodt B et al. Large-scale identification of c-MYC-associated proteins using a combined TAP/MudPIT approach. Cell Cycle 6(2), 205-217 (2007).
11. Trakselis MA, Alley SC, Ishmael FT. Identification and mapping of protein-protein interactions by a combination of crosslinking, cleavage, and proteomics. Bioconjug. Chem. 16(4), 741-750 (2005). • Comprehensive overview of the fundamentals of crosslinking using crosslinkers with various functionalities.
12. Seebacher J, Mallick P, Zhang N et al. Protein crosslinking analysis using mass spectrometry, isotope-coded crosslinkers, and integrated computational data processing. J. Proteome Res. 5(9), 2270-2282 (2006). •• Novel integrative protein crosslinking approach using isotopically substituted crosslinking reagents in the presence of isotopically substituted solvent water to allow differentiation among protein crosslinks, monolinks and nonmodified peptides.
13. Camacho-Carvajal MM, Wollscheid B, Aebersold R, Steimle V, Schamel WW. Two-dimensional Blue native/SDS gel electrophoresis of mulitprotein complexes from whole cellular lysates: a proteomics approach. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 3(2), 176-182 (2004).
14. Peterman SM, Dufresne CP, Horning S. The use of a hybrid linear trap/FT-ICR mass spectrometer for on-line high resolution/high mass accuracy bottom-up sequencing. J. Biomol. Tech. 16(2), 112-124 (2005).
15. Nesvizhskii AI, Aebersold R. Analysis, statistical validation and dissemination of large-scale proteomics datasets generated by tandem MS. Drug Discov. Today 9(4), 173-181 (2004).
16. Keller A, Nesvizhskii AI, Kolker E, Aebersold R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 74(20), 5383-5392 (2002).
17. Nesvizhskii AI, Keller A, Kolker E, Aebersold R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 75(17), 4646-4658 (2003).
18. Elias JE, Haas W, Faherty BK, Gygi SP. Comparative evaluation of mass spectrometry platforms used in large-scale proteomics investigations. Nat. Methods 2(9), 667-675 (2005).
19. Peng J, Elias JE, Thoreen CC, Licklider LJ, Gygi SP. Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: the yeast proteome. J. Proteome Res. 2(1), 43-50 (2003).
20. Nikolsky Y, Ekins S, Nikolskaya T, Bugrim A. A novel method for generation of signature networks as biomarkers from complex high throughput data. Toxicol. Lett. 158(1), 20-29 (2005). • First paper describing the use of MetaCore™ systems reconstruction technology.
21. Mrowka R, Patzak A, Herzel H. Is there a bias in proteome research? Genome Res. 11(12), 1971-1973 (2001).
22. von Mering C, Krause R, Snel B et al. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 417(6887), 399-403 (2002).
23. Hunter T. Signaling - 2000 and beyond. Cell 100(1), 113-127 (2000).
24. Mukherji M. Phosphoproteomics in analyzing signaling pathways. Expert. Rev. Proteomics. 2(1), 117-128 (2005). • Overview of recent developments in MS-based methods for phosphoproteome analysis and its application in the study of signal transduction pathways.
25. Ertmer A, Huber V, Gilch S et al. The anticancer drug imatinib induces cellular autophagy. Leukemia 21(5), 936-942 (2007).
26. Stephens P, Edkins S, Davies H et al. A screen of the complete protein kinase gene family identifies diverse patterns of somatic mutations in human breast cancer. Nat. Genet. 37(6), 590-592 (2005).
27. Bauman AL, Scott JD. Kinase- and phosphatase-anchoring proteins: harnessing the dynamic duo. Nat. Cell Biol. 4(8), E203-E206 (2002).
28. Oda Y, Nagasu T, Chait BT. Enrichment analysis of phosphorylated proteins as a tool for probing the phosphoproteome. Nat. Biotechnol. 19(4), 379-382 (2001).
29. Tao WA, Wollscheid B, O'Brien R et al. Quantitative phosphoproteome analysis using a dendrimer conjugation chemistry and tandem mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2(8), 591-598 (2005).
30. Zhou H, Watts JD, Aebersold R. A systematic approach to the analysis of protein phosphorylation. Nat. Biotechnol. 19(4), 375-378 (2001).
31. Rush J, Moritz A, Lee KA et al. Immunoaffinity profiling of tyrosine phosphorylation in cancer cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 23(1), 94-101 (2005).
32. Ficarro SB, McCleland ML, Stukenberg PT et al. Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Biotechnol. 20(3), 301-305 (2002).
33. Larsen MR, Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Roepstorff P, Jorgensen TJ. Highly selective enrichment of phosphorylated peptides from peptide mixtures using titanium dioxide microcolumns. Mol. Cell Proteomics 4(7), 873-886 (2005).
34. Beausoleil SA, Jedrychowski M, Schwartz D et al. Large-scale characterization of HeLa cell nuclear phosphoproteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 101(33), 12130-12135 (2004).
35. Pawson T, Scott JD. Signaling through scaffold, anchoring, and adaptor proteins. Science 278(5346), 2075-2080 (1997).
36. Blume-Jensen P, Hunter T. Oncogenic kinase signalling. Nature 411(6835), 355-365 (2001).
37. Ding SJ, Qian WJ, Smith RD. Quantitative proteomic approaches for studying phosphotyrosine signaling. Expert Rev. Proteomics 4(1), 13-23 (2007).
38. Gruhler A, Olsen JV, Mohammed S et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics applied to the yeast pheromone signaling pathway. Mol. Cell Proteomics 4(3), 310-327 (2005).
39. Cripps D, Thomas SN, Jeng Y et al. Alzheimer disease-specific conformation of hyperphosphorylated paired helical filament-Tau is polyubiquitinated through Lys-48, Lys-11, and Lys-6 ubiquitin conjugation. J. Biol. Chem. 281(16), 10825-10838 (2006).
40. Chi A, Huttenhower C, Geer LY et al. Analysis of phosphorylation sites on proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by electron transfer dissociation (ETD) mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104(7), 2193-2198 (2007).
41. Syka JE, Coon JJ, Schroeder MJ, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF. Peptide and protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101(26), 9528-9533 (2004).
42. Beausoleil SA, Villen J, Gerber SA, Rush J, Gygi SP. A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat. Biotechnol. 24(10), 1285-1292 (2006).
43. Olsen JV, Blagoev B, Gnad F et al. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 127(3), 635-648 (2006). •• Novel global quantitative analysis of the phosphoproteome and its temporal dynamics upon growth-factor stimulation in HeLa cells using phosphopeptide enrichment, stable-isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC), and multistage MS approaches.
44. Villen J, Beausoleil SA, Gerber SA, Gygi SP. Large-scale phosphorylation analysis of mouse liver. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104(5), 1488-1493 (2007). • Exemplary large-scale phosphoproteomic analysis incorporating tandem phosphopeptide enrichment methods, high-performance MS and optimized database search/data filtering strategies.
45. Schwartz D, Gygi SP. An iterative statistical approach to the identification of protein phosphorylation motifs from large-scale data sets. Nat. Biotechnol. 23(11), 1391-1398 (2005).
46. Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA et al. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol. 17(10), 994-999 (1999).
47. Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 1(5), 376-386 (2002).
48. Zappacosta F, Annan RS. N-terminal isotope tagging strategy for quantitative proteomics: results-driven analysis of protein abundance changes. Anal. Chem. 76(22), 6618-6627 (2004).
49. 18O-labeled internal standards. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 14(14), 1226-1232 (2000).
50. MacCoss MJ, Matthews DE. Quantitative MS for proteomics: teaching a new dog old tricks. Anal. Chem. 77(15), A294-A302 (2005). • Informative review of quantitative MS strategies in the context of the fundamentals of analytical chemistry that define their applicability, fitness and robustness.
51. 15N-isotope labelling of plants: using the greenhouse for structural proteomics. Proteomics 4(1), 226-234 (2004).
52. Wu CC, MacCoss MJ, Howell KE, Matthews DE, Yates JR III. Metabolic labeling of mammalian organisms with stable isotopes for quantitative proteomic analysis. Anal. Chem. 76(17), 4951-4959 (2004).
53. Zhang X, Jin QK, Carr SA, Annan RS. N-terminal peptide labeling strategy for incorporation of isotopic tags: a method for the determination of site-specific absolute phosphorylation stoichiometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 16(24), 2325-2332 (2002). • Original paper describing the near-infrared transmittance labeling strategy.
54. Zappacosta F, Collingwood TS, Huddleston MJ, Annan RS. A quantitative results-driven approach to analyzing multisite protein phosphorylation: the phosphate-dependent phosphorylation profile of the transcription factor Pho4. Mol. Cell Proteomics 5(11), 2019-2030 (2006).
55. Gerber SA, Rush J, Stemman O, Kirschner MW, Gygi SP. Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100(12), 6940-6945 (2003).
56. Steen H, Jebanathirajah JA, Springer M, Kirschner MW. Stable isotope-free relative and absolute quantitation of protein phosphorylation stoichiometry by MS. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102(11), 3948-3953 (2005).
57. Makarov A, Denisov E, Kholomeev A et al. Performance evaluation of a hybrid linear ion trap/orbitrap mass spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 78(7), 2113-2120 (2006).
58. Li X, Gerber SA, Rudner AD et al. Largescale phosphorylation analysis of ?-factor-arrested Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Proteome Res. 6(3), 1190-1197 (2007).
59. Pagel P, Kovac S, Oesterheld M et al. The MIPS mammalian protein-protein interaction database. Bioinformatics 21(6), 832-834 (2005).
60. Phosphosite: cell signalling technology www.phosphosite.org
61. Harvard Medical School http://motif-x.med.harvard.edu
62. PHOSIDA: phosphorylation site database www.phosida.com