Thinking like a Historian: College Students' Reading of Multiple Historical Documents

Journal of Literacy Research

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 141-176

  Hynd, Cynthia ^a   Holschuh, Jodi Patrick ^b   Hubbard, Betty P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990370552     PISSN: 1086296X     EISSN: 15548430     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15548430jlr3602_2     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Afflerbach P. VanSledright B. (1998, December). The challenge of understanding the past: How do fifth grade readers construct meaning from diverse history texts? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Austin, TX.
2. Berkin C. Miller C. Cherny R. W. Gormly J. (1990). Making America: A history of the United States. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
3. Britt M. A. Rouet J. F. Perfetti C. A. (1996). Using hypertext to study and reason about historical evidence. In Rouet J. F. Levonen J. T. Dillon A. Spiro R. (Eds.) Hypertext and Cognition (pp. 43–72). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Chaiken S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766.
5. Chaiken S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In Zanna M. P. Olson J. J. Herman C. P. (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Davidson P. (1990). Secrets of the Vietnam War. Novato, CA: Presidio.
7. Denzin N. K. Lincoln Y. S. (Eds.) (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Glaser B. G. Strauss A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
9. Hartmann D. K. (1995). Eight readers reading: The intertextual links of proficient readers reading multiple passages. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 520–560.
10. Hynd C. (2001). Refutational texts and the change process. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 699–714.
11. Hynd C. (2003). Conceptual change in response to persuasive messages. In Pintrich P. Sinatra G. (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 157–169). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Kvale S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. McNamara R. S. (1995). In retrospect: The tragedy and lessons of Vietnam. New York: Random House.
14. Merriam S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Perry W. T. Jr. (1968). Patterns of development in thought and values of students in a liberal arts college: A validation of a scheme (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED024315). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Perry W. T. Jr. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
17. Petty R. E. Cacioppo J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
18. Perfetti C. A. Britt M. A. Georgi M. C. (1995). Text-based learning and reasoning: Studies in history. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Public Broadcasting System (1998). LBJ: The American experience. [CITY, STATE]: PBS Home Video. http://www.pbs.org.
20. Rowe D. W. 1987. Literacy learning as an intertextual process. In Readence J. E. Baldwin R. S. (Eds.) Research in literacy: Merging perspectives: Thirty-sixth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 101–102). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
21. Simon B. (1999). Self defense for your mind. Georgia Magazine, 78, 35–40.
22. Rusk D. (1991). As I saw it. [CITY, STATE]: Penguin.
23. Sinatra G. Dole J. (1998). Case studies in conceptual change: A social psychological perspective. In Guzzetti B. Hynd C. (Eds.) Perspectives on conceptual change: Multiple ways to understand knowing and learning in a complex world (pp. 52–71). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Stahl S. Hynd C. Britton B. McNish M. Bosquet D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history?. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 430–457.
25. Wineburg S. S. (1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 495–519.
26. Worton M. Still J. (1990). Intertextuality: Theories and Practices. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.