Science for all: A discursive analysis examining teacher support of student thinking in inclusive classrooms

Establishing Scientific Classroom Discourse Communities: Multiple Voices of Teaching and Learning Research

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 199-224

  Collins, Kathleen M ^a   Palincsar, Annemarie Sullivan ^b   Magnusson, Shirley J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917135465     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410611734     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Anderson, C., Holland, D. &Palincsar, A. (1997)Canonical and sociocultural approaches to research and reform in science education. Elementary School Journal ,97, 357-381.
2. Au, K. (1998)Social constructivism and the school literacy learning of students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Literacy Research ,30, 297-319.
3. Carlsen, W. (1992)Closing down the conversation:Discouraging student talk on unfamiliar science content. Journal of Classroom Interaction ,27(2) 15-21.
4. Collins, K. M. (1997, December). Talking about light:The construction of a shared discourse by first grade students in guided inquiry science .Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Scottsdale AZ..
5. Collins, K. M. (2003). Ability profiling and school failure: One child's struggle to be seen as competent. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Collins, K. M. (in press). Ability profiling and school failure: One child's struggle to be seen as competent. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Collins, K. M., MacLean, F., Palincsar, A. S. & Magnusson, S. (1998, November) The case of Robert: Influences of one student's ability to negotiate verbal, print, and scientific discourses on the construction of shared knowledge in guided inquiry science Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English, Nashville, TN.
8. Collins, K. M., Palincsar, A. & Magnusson, S. (1998, April). Metaphor, mediation, and meaning: Dialectical knowledge construction in guided inquiry science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
9. Dewey, J. (1990). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.(Original work published 1902).
10. Einstein, A. (1950). Out of my later years. New York: Philosophical Library.
11. Erickson, F. (1992).Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction. In LeCompte M. D. ,Millroy, W. L. & Preissle, J. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 202-225). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12. Forman, E., Minick, N. & Stone, A. (Eds.).(1993). Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Gee, J. P. (1991).What is literacy? In Mitchell C. & Weiler K. (Eds.), Rewriting literacy: Culture and the discourse of the other. Westport, CT: Bergen and Garvey.
14. Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). Bristol, England: Taylor and Francis.
15. Gersten, R. & Baker, S. (1998). Real world use of scientific concepts: Integrating situated cognition with explicit instruction. Exceptional Children, 65(1)23-35.
16. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
17. Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
18. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
19. Hicks, D. (1997). Working through discourse genres in school. Research in the Teaching of English ,31, 459-485.
20. John-Steiner, V. & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development. Educational Psychology ,31, 191-206.
21. Keller-Cohen, D. (1994).The web of literacy: Speaking, reading, and writing in 17th and 18th century America. In Keller-Cohen D. (Ed.), literacy: Interdisciplinary conversations (pp. 155-176). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
22. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
23. Magnusson, S. J. & Palincsar, A. S. (1995). The learning environment as a site of science education reform. Theory Into Practice ,34(1)43-50.
24. Magnusson, S. J., Palincsar, A. S. & Templin, M. (in press). Community, culture, and conversation in inquiry-based elementary science. In Flick L. & Lederman N. (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Press.
25. Magnusson, S. J. & Templin, M. (1995).Scientific practice and science learning: The community basis of scientific literacy. In Finley F. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching
26. Magnusson, S. J., Templin, M. & Boyle, R. A. (1997). Dynamic science assessment: A new approach for investigating conceptual change.Journal of the learning Sciences ,6, 91-142.
27. McDonnell, L. M., McLaughlin, M. J. & Morison, P. (Eds.).(1997). Educating one and all: Students with disabilities and standards based reform. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
28. Michaels, S. & O'Connor, M. C. (1990). literacy as reasoning within multiple discourses: Implications for policy and educational reform. Paper presented at the summer institute of the Council of Chief State School Officers.
29. Moje, E. (1995). Talking about science: An interpretation of the effects of teacher talk in a high school science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching ,32, 349-371.
30. Moje, E. (1997). Exploring discourse, subjectivity, and knowledge in chemistry class. Journal of Classroom Interaction ,32(2), 35-44.
31. Moll, L. (Ed.). (1990). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. National Research Council.(1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
33. Newman, D., Griffin, P. & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. O'Connor, M. C, & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly ,24, 318-335.
35. O'Connor, M. C & Michaels, S. (1996).Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion In Hicks D. (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 63-103). New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Palincsar, A. S., Collins, K. M., Marano, N. L. & Magnusson, S. (2000). Investigating the engagement and learning of students with learning disabilities in guided inquiry science teaching. language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools ,31, 240-251.
37. Palincsar, A. S., Magnusson, S. J, Collins, K. M. &Cutter, J. (2001). Making science accessible to all: Results of a design experiment in inclusive classrooms. learning Disabilities Quarterly ,24(1)15-32.
38. Palincsar, A. S., Magnusson, S., Marano, N., Ford, D. & Brown, N. (1998). Design principles informing and emerging from a community of practice. Paper prepared for a special issue of Teaching and Teacher Education focusing on Professional Development edited by Putnam R. and Borko H.
39. Penick, J. E. (1993). The mysterious closed system. The Science Teacher ,60(2)30-33.
40. Roberts, R. S. (1982). Teaching an old diver new tricks. The Science Teacher ,49(7)25-27.
41. Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity ,1(4)209-229.
42. Schwab, J. (1963).Problems, topics, and issues. In Ford G. W. & Pugno L. (Eds.), Education and the structure of knowledge (pp. 4-43). Chicago: Rand McNally.
43. Schwab, J. (1964).Structure of the disciplines: Meanings and significances. In Ford G. W. & Pugno L. (Eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum (pp. 6-30). Chicago: Rand McNally.
44. Sleeter, C. (1986). Learning disabilities: The social construction of a special education category. Exceptional Children ,53(1) 46-54.
45. Smith, D. & Neale, D. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education ,5(1) 1-20.
46. Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A. & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A construc -tivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the learning Sciences ,3, 115-163.
47. Trent, S., Artiles, A. & Englert, C. S. (1998).From deficit thinking to social constructivism: A review of theory, research, and practice in special education. In Pearson P. D. & Iran-Nejad A. (Eds.), Review of research in education, Vol. 23 (pp. 277-307). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
48. Valencia, R. (1997).(Ed.). The evolution of deficit thinking. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
49. Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.