A protein-specifically adapted scoring function for the reranking of docking solutions

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 98-111

  Müller, Wolfgang ^a   Sticht, Heinrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

HPr; Modeling; Orthologs; Pair potential; Protein protein docking

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; GEOMETRY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN DOCKING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SCORING SYSTEM;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BINDING SITES; BINDING, COMPETITIVE; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHOSPHOENOLPYRUVATE SUGAR PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE SYSTEM;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

EID: 33847372500     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21310     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Uetz P, Giot L, Cagney G, Mansfield TA, Judson RS, Knight JR, Lockshon D, Narayan V, Srinivasan M, Pochart P, Qureshi-Emili A, Li Y, Godwin B, Conover D, Kalbfleisch T, Vijayadamodar G, Yang M, Johnston M, Fields S, Rothberg JM. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2000;403:623-627.
2. Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 2003;422:198-207.
3. Russell RB, Alber F, Aloy P, Davis FP, Korkin D, Pichaud M, Topf M, Sali A. A structural perspective on protein-protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2004;14:313-324.
4. Janin J, Henrick K, Moult J, Eyck LT, Sternberg MJ, Vajda S, Vakser I, Wodak SJ. CAPRI: a critical assessment of predicted interactions. Proteins 2003;52:2-9.
5. Mendez R, Leplae R, Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins 2005;60:150-169.
6. Jiang F, Kim SH. "Soft docking": matching of molecular surface cubes. J Mol Biol 1991;219:79-102.
7. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem AA, Aflalo C, Vakser IA. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:2195-2199.
8. Walls PH, Sternberg MJ. New algorithm to model protein-protein recognition based on surface complementarity. Applications to antibody-antigen docking. J Mol Biol 1992;228:277-297.
9. Norel R, Lin SL, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. Shape complementarity at protein-protein interfaces. Biopolymers 1994;34:933-940.
10. Jones S, Thornton JM. Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:13-20.
11. Lo Conte L, Chothia C, Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Mol Biol 1999;285:2177-2198.
12. Ausiello G, Cesareni G, Helmer-Citterich M. ESCHER: a new docking procedure applied to the reconstruction of protein tertiary structure. Proteins 1997;28:556-567.
13. Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJ. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 1997;272:106-120.
14. Mandell JG, Roberts VA, Pique ME, Kotlovyi V, Mitchell JC, Nelson E, Tsigelny I, Ten Eyck LF. Protein docking using continuum electrostatics and geometric fit. Protein Eng 2001;14:105-113.
15. Meyer M, Wilson P, Schomburg D. Hydrogen bonding and molecular surface shape complementarity as a basis for protein docking. J Mol Biol 1996;264:199-210.
16. Vakser IA, Aflalo C. Hydrophobic docking: a proposed enhancement to molecular recognition techniques. Proteins 1994;20:320-329.
17. Ackermann F, Herrmann G, Posch S, Sagerer G. Estimation and filtering of potential protein-protein docking positions. Bioinformatics 1998;14:196-205.
18. Robert CH, Janin J. A soft, mean-field potential derived from crystal contacts for predicting protein-protein interactions. J Mol Biol 1998;283:1037-1047.
19. Moont G, Gabb HA, Sternberg MJ. Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes. Proteins 1999;35:364-373.
20. Gray JJ, Moughon S, Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Kuhlman B, Rohl CA, Baker D. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2003;331:281-299.
21. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou H, Zhou Y. An accurate, residue-level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance-scaled, ideal-gas reference state. Protein Sci 2004;13:400-411.
22. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhu Q, Zhou Y. A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes. J Med Chem 2005;48:2325-2335.
23. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou Y. Docking prediction using biological information, ZDOCK sampling technique, and clustering guided by the DFIRE statistical energy function. Proteins 2005;60:314-318.
24. Sippl MJ. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1990;213:859-883.
25. Godzik A, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Topology fingerprint approach to the inverse protein folding problem. J Mol Biol 1992;227:227-238.
26. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 1992;358:86-89.
27. Ofran Y, Rost B. Analysing six types of protein-protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 2003;325:377-387.
28. Gohlke H, Klebe G. Drugscore meets CoMFA: adaptation of fields for molecular comparison (AFMoC) or how to tailor knowledge-based pair-potentials to a particular protein. J Med Chem 2002;45:4153-4170.
29. Radestock S, Bohm M, Gohlke H. Improving binding mode predictions by docking into protein-specifically adapted potential fields. J Med Chem 2005;48:5466-5479.
30. Garrett DS, Seok YJ, Peterkofsky A, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM. Solution structure of the 40,000 Mr phosphoryl transfer complex between the N-terminal domain of enzyme I and HPr. Nat Struct Biol 1999;6:166-173.
31. Wang G, Louis JM, Sondej M, Seok YJ, Peterkofsky A, Clore GM. Solution structure of the phosphoryl transfer complex between the signal transducing proteins HPr and IIA(glucose) of the Escherichia coli phosphoenolpyruvate: sugar phosphotransferase system. EMBO J 2000;19:5635-5649.
32. Cornilescu G, Lee BR, Cornilescu CC, Wang G, Peterkofsky A, Clore GM. Solution structure of the phosphoryl transfer complex between the cytoplasmic A domain of the mannitol transporter IIMannitol and HPr of the Escherichia coli phosphotransferase system. J Biol Chem 2002;277:42289-42298.
33. Williams DC, Jr, Cai M, Suh JY, Peterkofsky A, Clore GM. Solution NMR structure of the 48-kDa IIAMannose-HPr complex of the Escherichia coli mannose phosphotransferase system. J Biol Chem 2005;280:20775-20784.
34. Muller W, Horstmann N, Hillen W, Sticht H. The transcription regulator RbsR represents a novel interaction partner of the phosphoprotein HPr-Ser46-P in Bacillus subtilis. FEBS J 2006;273:1251-1261.
35. Sanchez R, Sali A. Comparative protein structure modeling. Introduction and practical examples with modeller. Methods Mol Biol 2000;143:97-129.
36. Jia Z, Quail JW, Waygood EB, Delbaere LT. The 2.0-A resolution structure of Escherichia coli histidine-containing phosphocarrier protein HPr. A redetermination. J Biol Chem 1993;268:22490-22501.
37. Garrett DS, Seok YJ, Liao DI, Peterkofsky A, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM. Solution structure of the 30 kDa N-terminal domain of enzyme I of the Escherichia coli phosphoenolpyruvate: sugar phosphotransferase system by multidimensional NMR. Biochemistry 1997;36:2517-2530.
38. Feese MD, Comolli L, Meadow ND, Roseman S, Remington SJ. Structural studies of the Escherichia coli signal transducing protein IIAGlc: implications for target recognition. Biochemistry 1997;36:16087-16096.
39. van Montfort RL, Pijning T, Kalk KH, Hangyi I, Kouwijzer ML, Robillard GT, Dijkstra BW. The structure of the Escherichia coli phosphotransferase IIAmannitol reveals a novel fold with two conformations of the active site. Structure 1998;6:377-388.
40. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990;215:403-410.
41. Bateman A, Birney E, Cerruti L, Durbin R, Etwiller L, Eddy SR, Griffiths-Jones S, Howe KL, Marshall M, Sonnhammer EL. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:276-280.
42. Schultz J, Milpetz F, Bork P, Ponting CP SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool1, identification of signaling domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:5857-5864.
43. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;22:4673-4680.
44. Sayle RA, Milner-White EJ. RASMOL: biomolecular graphics for all. Trends Biochem Sci 1995;20:374-376.
45. Colovos C, Yeates TO. Verification of protein structures: patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions. Protein Sci 1993;2:1511-1519.
46. Hooft RW, Vriend G, Sander C, Abola EE. Errors in protein structures. Nature 1996;381:272.
47. Ritchie DW, Kemp GJ. Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations. Proteins 2000;39:178-194.
48. Tovchigrechko A, Vakser IA. Development and testing of an automated approach to protein docking. Proteins 2005;60:296-301.
49. Wallace AC, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Eng 1995;8:127-134.
50. Sanchez R, Sali A. Advances in comparative protein-structure modelling. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997;7:206-214.
51. Marti-Renom MA, Stuart AC, Fiser A, Sanchez R, Melo F, Sali A. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2000;29:291-325.
52. Sali A, Potterton L, Yuan F, van Vlijmen H, Karplus M. Evaluation of comparative protein modeling by MODELLER. Proteins 1995;23:318-326.
53. Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Baker D. Improved side-chain modeling for protein-protein docking. Protein Sci 2005;14:1328-1339.
54. Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin AM. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J Am Chem Soc 2003;125:1731-1737.
55. Berchanski A, Shapira B, Eisenstein M. Hydrophobic complementarity in protein-protein docking. Proteins 2004;56:130-142.
56. Ritchie DW. Evaluation of protein docking predictions using Hex 3.1 in CAPRI rounds 1 and 2. Proteins 2003;52:98-106.
57. Zacharias M. Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility. Protein Sci 2003;12:1271-1282.
58. Duan Y, Reddy BV, Kaznessis YN. Physicochemical and residue conservation calculations to improve the ranking of protein-protein docking solutions. Protein Sci 2005;14:316-328.
59. van Dijk AD, Kaptein R, Boelens R, Bonvin AM. Combining NMR relaxation with chemical shift perturbation data to drive protein-protein docking. J Biomol NMR 2006;34:237-244.
60. Heuser P, Bau D, Benkert P, Schomburg D. Refinement of unbound protein docking studies using biological knowledge. Proteins 2005;61:1059-1067.
61. Smith GR, Sternberg MJ, Bates PA. The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking. J Mol Biol 2005;347:1077-1101.
62. Aloy P, Querol E, Aviles FX, Sternberg MJ. Automated structure-based prediction of functional sites in proteins: applications to assessing the validity of inheriting protein function from homology in genome annotation and to protein docking. J Mol Biol 2001;311:395-408.
63. Lee K, Czaplewski C, Kim SY, Lee J. An efficient molecular docking using conformational space annealing. J Comput Chem 2005;26:78-87.
64. Riemann RN, Zacharias M. Refinement of protein cores and protein-peptide interfaces using a potential scaling approach. Protein Eng Des Sel 2005;18:465-476.
65. Bonvin AM. Flexible protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006;16:194-200.
66. Gray JJ. High-resolution protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006;16:183-193.
67. Melo F, Feytmans E. Novel knowledge-based mean force potential at atomic level. J Mol Biol 1997;267:207-222.
68. Fariselli P, Pazos F, Valencia A, Casadio R. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites in heterocomplexes with neural networks. Eur J Biochem 2002;269:1356-1361.
69. Otlewski J, Jaskolski M, Buczek O, Cierpicki T, Czapinska H, Krowarsch D, Smalas AO, Stachowiak D, Szpineta A, Dadlez M. Structure-function relationship of serine protease-protein inhibitor interaction. Acta Biochim Pol 2001;48:419-428.