Estimation and filtering of potential protein-protein docking positions

Bioinformatics

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 196-205

  Ackermann, Friedrich ^a,b   Herrmann, Grit ^a   Posch, Stefan ^a   Sagerer, Gerhard ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Instrumentation   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; TIME;

EID: 0031704966     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.2.196     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ackermann, F. (1997) Prädiktion und Bewertung von Protein-Protein-Dockingpositionen. Jacobs, Lage.
2. Ackermann, F., Herrmann, G., Kummert, F., Posch, S., Sagerer, G. and Schomburg, D. (1995a) Protein docking combining symbolic descriptions of molecular surfaces and grid-based scoring functions. In Rawlings, C., Clark, D., Altman, R., Hunter, L., Lengauer, T. and Wodak, S. (eds), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 3-11.
3. Ackermann, F., Herrmann, G., Posch, S. and Sagerer, G. (1995b) 3D-Segmentierungstechniken und vektorwertige Bewertungsfunktionen für symbolisches Protein-Protein-Docking. In Schomburg, D. and Lessel, U. (eds), Bioinformatics: From Nucleic Acids and Proteins to Cell Metabolism. VCH, Weinheim, pp. 105-124.
4. Barber, C.B., Dobkin, D.P. and Huhdanpaa, H. (1993) The quickhull algorithm for convex hull. TR GCG53, Geometry Centre, Minneapolis.
5. Biermann, R., Ackermann, F. and Posch, S. (1996) Robustness of geometrical shape descriptors for molecular surfaces. In Proceedings of the German Conference on Bioinformatics (GCB'96). University of Leipzig, pp. 171-173.
6. Cherfils, J. and Janin, J. (1993) Protein docking algorithms: simulating molecular recognition. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 3, 265-269.
7. Cherfils, J., Duquerroy, S. and Janin, J. (1991) Protein-protein-recognition analyzed by docking simulation. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet., 11, 271-280.
8. 1 subunit interface. Biopolymers, 25, 1229-1247.
9. Fischer, D., Lin, S.L., Wolfson, H. and Nussinov, R. (1995) A geometry-based suite of molecular docking processes. J. Mol. Biol., 248, 459-477.
10. Holm, L., Ouzounis, C., Sander, C., Tuparev, G. and Vriend, G. (1992) A database of protein structure families with common folding motifs. Protein Sci., 1, 1691.
11. Jackson, R.M. and Sternberg, M.J.E. (1995) A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: Application to the docking problem. J. Mol. Biol., 250, 258-275.
12. Janin, J. and Chothia, C. (1990) The structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J. Biol. Chem., 265, 16027.
13. Jiang, F. and Kim, S.-H. (1991) 'Soft docking'; Matching of molecular surface cubes. J. Mol. Biol., 219, 79-102.
14. Katchalski-Katzir, E., Shariv, I., Eisenstein, M., Friesem, A.A., Aflalo, C. and Vakser, I.A. (1992) Molecular surface recognition: Determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 2195-2199.
15. Kuntz, I.D., Blaney, J.M., Oatley, S.J., Langridge, R. and Ferrin, T.E. (1982) A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol., 161, 269.
16. Lee, R.H. and Rose, G.D. (1985) Molecular recognition. I. Automatic identification of topographic surface features. Biopolymers, 24, 1613-1627.
17. Lenhof, H.-P. (1995) An Algorithm for the Protein Docking Problem. Research Report MPI-1-95-1-023, Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken.
18. Meier, R., Ackermann, F., Herrmann, G., Posch, S. and Sagerer, G. (1995) Segmentation of molecular surfaces based on their convex hull. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, DC, pp. 552-555.
19. Meng, E.C., Shoichet, B.K. and Kuntz, I.D. (1992) Automated docking with grid-based energy evaluation. J. Comput. Chem., 13, 505-524.
20. Meyer, M., Wilson, P. and Schomburg, D. (1996). Hydrogen bonding and molecular surface shape complementarity as a basis for protein docking. J Mol. Biol , 264, 199-210.
21. Norel, R., Fischer, D., Wolfson, H. and Nussinov, R. (1994a) Molecular surface recognition by a computer vision-based technique. Protein Eng., 7, 39-46.
22. Norel, R., Lin, S., Wolfson, H. and Nussinov, R. (1994b) Shape complementarity at protein-protein interfaces. Biopolymers, 34, 933-940.
23. Norel, R., Lin, S., Wolfson, H. and Nussinov, R. (1995) Molecular surface complementarity at protein-protein interfaces: The critical role played by surface normals at well placed, sparse, points in docking. J. Mol. Biol., 252, 263-273.
24. Shoichet, B.K. and Kuntz, I.D. (1991) Protein docking and complementarity. J Mol Biol., 221, 327-346.
25. Totrov, M. and Abagyan, R. (1994) Detailed ab initio prediction of lysozyme-antibody complex with 1.6Å accuracy. Nature Struct. Biol., 1, 259-263.
26. Vakser, I.A. (1995) Protein docking for low resolution structures. Protein Eng., 8, 371-377.
27. Vakser, I.A. and Aflalo, C. (1994) Hydrophobie docking: A proposed enhancement to molecular recognition techniques. Proteins Struct. Fund. Genet., 20, 320-329.
28. Weiner, S.J., Kollmann, P.A., Case, D., Chandra Singh, U., Ghio, C., Alagona, G., Profeta, S. and Weiner, P. (1984) A new force field for molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic acids and proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc , 106, 765-784.
29. Wolfenden, R., Anderson, L., Cullis, P.M. and Southgate, C. (1981) Affinities of amino acid side chains for solvent water. Biochemistry, 20, 849.