An instructor self‐disclosure scale

Communication Research Reports

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 252-263

  Cayanus, Jacob L ^a   Martin, Matthew M ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845807382     PISSN: 08824096     EISSN: 17464099     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824090409359987     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Andersen, J. F., 1979. “ Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness ”. In Communication yearbook, Edited by: Nimmo, D., Vol. 3, 543–559. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
2. Cay anus, J. L., and Martin, M. M., Development of a teacher self‐disclosure scale. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention. New Orleans. November.
3. Chesebro, J. L., and McCroskey, J. C., 2001. The relationship of teacher clarity and immediacy with student state receiver apprehension, affect, and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50: 59–68.
4. Christophel, D., 1990. The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39: 323–340.
5. Cozby, P. C., 1973. Self‐disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 79: 73–91.
6. Downs, V. C., Javidi, M., and Nussbaum, J. F., 1988. An analysis of teacher's verbal communication within the college classroom: Use of humor, self‐disclosure, and narratives. Communication Education, 37: 127–141.
7. Ebersole, P., McFall, M., and Brandt, C., 1977. Imitation and prior classroom contact as determinants of reciprocal self‐disclosure. Psychological Reports, 41: 87–91.
8. Ellis, K., 2000. Perceived teacher confirmation: The development and validation of an instrument and two studies of the relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Human Communication Research, 26: 264–291.
9. Frymier, A. B., and Shulman, G. M., 1995. "What's in it for me?”;: Increasing content relevance to enhance students’ motivation. Communication Education, 44: 40–50.
10. Frymier, A. B., Shulman, G. M., and Houser, M., 1996. The development of a learner empowerment measure. Communication Education, 45: 181–199.
11. Fusani, D. S., 1994. Extra‐class communication: Frequency, immediacy, self‐disclosure, and satisfaction in student‐faculty interaction outside the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22: 232–255.
12. Goldstein, G. S., and Benassi, V. A., 1994. The relation between teacher self‐disclosure and student classroom participation. Teaching of Psychology, 21: 212–216.
13. Gorham, J., 1988. The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37: 40–53.
14. Jaasma, M. A., and Koper, R. J., Talk to me: An examination of the content of out‐of class interaction between students and faculty. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention. Washington, D.C. May.
15. Jourard, S. M., 1971. Self‐disclosure: The experimental investigation of the transparent self, New York: Wiley.
16. Knapp, J. L., Martin, M. M., and Myers, S. A., 2003. Out‐of‐class communication: The development and testing of a measure. Paper submitted for publication
17. Martin, M. M., and Anderson, C. M., 1995. The father‐young adult relationship: Interpersonal motives, self‐disclosure, and satisfaction. Communication Quarterly, 43: 119–130.
18. Martin, M. M., Anderson, C. M., and Mottet, T. P., 1997. The relationship between perceived understanding and self‐disclosure in the sibling relationship. Communication Research Reports, 14: 331–338.
19. Martin, M. M., Anderson, C. M., and Mottet, T. P., 1999. Perceived understanding and self‐disclosure in the stepparent‐stepchild relationship. Journal of Psychology, 133: 281–290.
20. Martin, M. M., Heisel, A. D., and Valencic, K. M., Students’ motives for communicating with their instructors: Considering instructors’ use of BATs. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Communication Association. Pittsburgh, PA. April.
21. Martin, M. M., Mottet, T. P., and Myers, S. A., 2000. Students’ motives for communicating with their instructors and affective and cognitive learning. Psychological Reports, 87: 830–834.
22. Martin, M. M., Myers, S. A., and Mottet, T. P., 1999. Students’ motives for communicating with their instructors. Communication Education, 48: 155–164.
23. Martin, M. M., Valencic, K. M., and Heisel, A. D., 2002. The relationship between students’ communication apprehension and their motives for communicating with their instructors. Communication Research Reports, 19: 1–7.
24. Martin, M. M., and Weber, K., Student interest and students’ motives for communicating with their instructors. Paper presented at the Southern States Communication Association Convention. Winston‐Salem, NC. April.
25. McCroskey, J. C., Assessment of affect toward communication and affect toward instruction in communication. Paper presented at the summer conference of the Speech Communication Association. Alexandria, VA.
26. Mitchell, M., 1993. Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85: 424–436.
27. Mottet, T. P., Martin, M. M., and Myers, S. A., 2004. Relationships among perceived instructor verbal approach and avoidance strategies and students’ motives for communicating with their instructors. Communication Education, 53: 116–122.
28. Myers, S. A., 1998. Students’ self‐disclosure in the college classroom. Psychological Reports, 83: 1067–1970.
29. Myers, S. A., Martin, M. M., and Knapp, J. L., 2003. The relationship between instructors’ interpersonal behaviors and out‐of‐class communication involving instructors and students. Paper submitted for publication
30. Myers, S. A., Martin, M. M., and Mottet, T. P., 2002a. The relationship between students’ communication motives and information seeking. Communication Research Reports, 29: 352–361.
31. Myers, S. A., Martin, M. M., and Mottet, T. P., 2002b. Students’ motives for communicating with their instructors: Considering instructor socio‐communicative style, student socio‐communicative orientation, and student gender. Communication Education, 51: 121–133.
32. Myers, S. A., Mottet, T. P., and Martin, M. M., 2000. The relationship between student communication motives and perceived instructor communicator style. Communication Research Reports, 17: 161–170.
33. Nadler, M. K., and Nadler, L. B., 2000. Out of class communication between faculty and students: A faculty perspective. Communication Studies, 51: 176–188.
34. Nadler, M. K., and Nadler, L. B., 2001. The roles of sex, empathy, and credibility in out of class communication between faculty and students. Women's Studies in Communication, 24: 241–261.
35. Nussbaum, J. F., Comadena, M. E., and Holladay, S. J., 1987. Classroom verbal behaviors of highly effective teachers. Journal of Thought, 22: 73–80.
36. Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., and Richmond, V. P., 1986. Power in the classroom V I: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35: 43–56.
37. Schiefele, U., 1991. Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26: 299–323.
38. Sorenson, G., 1989. The relationship among teachers’ self‐disclosive statements, students’ perceptions, and affective learning. Communication Education, 38: 259–276.
39. Titsworth, B. S., 2001. Immediate and delayed effects of interest cues and engagement cues on students’ affective learning. Communication Studies, 52: 169–179.
40. Tobias, S., 1994. Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64: 37–54.
41. Wambach, C., and Brothen, T., 1997. Teacher self‐disclosure and student classroom participation revisited. Teaching of Psychology, 24: 262–263.
42. Weber, K., Fornash, B., Corrigan, M., and Neupauer, N. C., 2003. The effect of interest on the recall of lecture material: An experiment. Communication Research Reports, 20: 116–123.
43. Weber, K., Martin, M. M., and Patterson, B. P., 2001. Teacher behavior, student interest, and affective learning: Putting theory to practice. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29: 71–90.
44. Weber, K., and Patterson, B. R., 2000. Student interest, empowerment, and motivation. Communication Research Reports, 17: 22–29.
45. Wheeless, L. R., 1976. Self‐disclosure and interpersonal solidarity: Measurement, validation, and relationships. Human Communication Research, 3: 47–61.
46. Wheeless, L. R., 1978. A follow‐up study of the relationships among trust, disclosure and interpersonal solidarity. Human Communication Research, 4: 143–157.
47. Wheeless, L. R., and Grotz, J., 1977. The measurement of trust and its relation to self‐disclosure. Human Communication Research, 3: 250–257.