The relationship between student communication motives and perceived instructor communicator style

Communication Research Reports

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 161-170

  Myers, Scott A ^a   Mottet, Timothy P ^b   Martin, Matthew M ^c  

^a CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009916963     PISSN: 08824096     EISSN: 17464099     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824090009388762     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andersen, J. F., Norton, R. W., and Nussbaum, J. F., 1981. Three investigations exploring relationships between perceived teacher communication behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 30: 377–392.
2. Anderson, C. M., and Martin, M. M., 1995a. The effects of communication motives, interaction involvement, and loneliness on satisfaction. Small Group Research, 26: 118–138.
3. Anderson, C. M., and Martin, M. M., 1995b. Why employees speak to coworkers and bosses: Motives, gender, and organizational satisfaction. Journal of Business Communication, 32: 249–265.
4. Anderson, C. M., Martin, M. M., and Zhong, M., 1998. Motives for communicating with family and friends: A Chinese study. The Howard Journal of Communications, 9: 109–123.
5. Christophel, D. M., 1990. The relationship among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39: 323–340.
6. Comadena, M. E., Semlak, W. D., and Escott, M. D., 1992. Communicator style and teacher effectiveness: Adult learners versus traditional undergraduate students. Communication Research Reports, 9: 57–64.
7. Frymier, A. B., 1993. The impact of teacher immediacy on students’ motivation: Is it the same for all students?. Communication Quarterly, 41: 454–464.
8. Frymier, A. B., 1994. A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42: 133–144.
9. Graham, E. E., Barbato, C. A., and Perse, E. M., 1993. The interpersonal communication motives model. Communication Quarterly, 41: 172–186.
10. Holladay, S. J., and Coombs, W. T., 1993. Communicating visions: An exploration of the role of delivery in the creation of leader charisma. Management Communication Quarterly, 6: 405–427.
11. Holladay, S. J., and Coombs, W. T., 1994. Speaking of visions and visions being spoken: An exploration of the effects of content and delivery on perceptions of leader charisma. Management Communication Quarterly, 7: 165–189.
12. Jaasma, M. A., and Koper, R. J., 1999. The relationship of student‐faculty out‐of‐class communication to instructor immediacy and trust and to student motivation. Communication Education, 48: 41–47.
13. Martin, M. M., and Anderson, C. M., 1995. The father‐young adult relationship: Interpersonal motives, self‐disclosure, and satisfaction. Communication Quarterly, 43: 119–130.
14. Martin, M. M., Heisel, A. D., and Valencic, K. M., Students’ motives for communicating with their instructors IV: Considering instructors’ use of behavior alteration techniques. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Communication Association. Pittsburgh, PA. April.
15. Martin, M. M., Mottet, T. P., and Myers, S. A., Students’ motives for communicating with their instructors III: Considering socio‐communicative style and sex differences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association. Chicago, IL. November.
16. Martin, M. M., Mottet, T. P., and Myers, S. A., The relationships between students’ motives for communicating with their instructors and affective learning, cognitive learning, and satisfaction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Communication Association. Charleston, WV. April.
17. Martin, M. M., Myers, S. A., and Mottet, T. P., Students’ motives for communicating with their instructors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association. New York City. November.
18. Martin, M. M., Myers, S. A., and Mottet, T. P., 1999. Students’ motives for communicating with their instructors. Communication Education, 48: 155–164.
19. Myers, S. A., and Horvath, C. W., 1997. A further examination of teacher communicator style and college student learning. Journal of the Illinois Speech and Theatre Association, 38: 37–48.
20. Myers, S. A., and Knox, R. L., in press. Perceived instructor argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness, and student outcomes. Communication Research Reports.
21. Myers, S. A., and Rocca, K. A., 2000. Perceived instructor argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness in the college classroom: Effects on student perceptions of classroom climate, classroom apprehension, and state motivation. Manuscript submitted for publication
22. Myers, S. A., and Rocca, K. A., in press. The relationship between perceived instructor communicator style, argumentativeness, and verbal aggressiveness. Communication Research Reports.
23. Myers, S. A., Zhong, M., and Mitchell, W., 1995. The use of interpersonal communication motives in conflict resolution among romantic partners. Ohio Speech Journal, 33: 1–20.
24. Norton, R., 1977. “ Teacher effectiveness as a function of communicator style ”. In Communication Yearbook, Edited by: Ruben, B., Vol. 1, 525–542. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
25. Norton, R. W., 1978. Foundation of a communicator style construct. Human Communication Research, 4: 99–112.
26. Norton, R. W., 1983. Communicator style: Theory, applications, and measures., Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27. Norton, R. W., 1986. “ Communicator style in teaching: Giving form to content ”. In Communicating in college classrooms, Edited by: Civikly, J., 33–40. San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass.
28. Norton, R., and Nussbaum, J., 1980. “ Dramatic behaviors of the effective teacher ”. In Communication yearbook, Edited by: Nimms, D., Vol. 4, 565–582. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
29. Nussbaum, J., 1981. “ Effective teaching: A communication nonrecursive causal model ”. In Communication yearbook, Edited by: Burgoon, M., Vol. 5, 737–752. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
30. Nussbaum, J., and Scott, M., 1979. “ Student learning as a relational outcome of teacher‐student interaction ”. In Communication yearbook Vol. 3, 561–584.
31. Nussbaum, J., and Scott, M., 1980. “ Student learning as a relational outcome of teacher‐student interaction ”. In Communication yearbook, Edited by: Nimms, D., Vol. 4, 553–564. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
32. Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. P., and Richmond, V. P., 1986. Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy, and affective learning. Communication Education, 35: 43–55.
33. Potter, W. J., and Emanuel, R., 1990. Students’ preference for communication styles and their relationship to achievement. Communication Education, 39: 234–249.
34. Rubin, R. B., and Martin, M. M., 1998. “ Interpersonal communication motives ”. In Communication and personality: Trait perspectives, Edited by: McCroskey, J. C., Daly, J. A., Martin, M. M., and Bearry, M. J., 287–306. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
35. Rubin, R. B., Perse, E. M., and Barbato, C. A., 1988. Conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication motives. Human Communication Research, 14: 602–628.
36. Schroeder, A. B., and Leber, R. L., 1993. Communicator style perceptions of “best”; and “worst”; teachers. Forensic of Pi Kappa Delta, 78: 11–15.