Relationships among Perceived Instructor Verbal Approach and Avoidance Relational Strategies and Students' Motives for Communicating with Their Instructors

Communication Education

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 116-122

  Mottet, Timothy P ^a   Martin, Matthew M ^b   Myers, Scott A ^b  

^a TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Motives to communicate; Student engagement; Teacher communication; Verbal relational strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 1142289579     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0363452032000135814     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-307.
2. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlational analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement. Change, 33, 10-17, 66.
5. Martin, M. M., Heisel, A. D., & Valencic, K. M. (2000, April). Students' motives for communicating with their instructors: Considering instructors' use of BATs. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Eastern Communication Association, Pittsburgh, PA.
6. Martin, M. M., Mottet, T. P., & Myers, S. A. (2000). Students' motives for communicating with their instructors and affective and cognitive learning. Psychological Reports, 87, 830-834.
7. Martin, M. M., Myers, S. A., & Mottet, T. P. (1999). Student motives for communicating with their instructors. Communication Education, 48, 155-164.
8. Mottet, T. P., & Richmond, V. P. (1998). An inductive analysis of verbal immediacy: Alternative conceptualization of relational verbal approach/avoidance strategies. Communication Quarterly, 46, 25-40.
9. Myers, S. A., Martin, M. M., & Mottet, T. P. (2002a). The relationship between student communication motives and information seeking. Communication Research Reports, 19, 352-361.
10. Myers, S. A., Martin, M. M., & Mottet, T. P. (2002b). Students' motives for communicating with their instructors: Considering instructor socio-communicative style, student socio-communicative orientation, and student gender. Communication Education, 51, 121-133.
11. Myers, S. A., Mottet, T. P., & Martin, M. M. (2000). The relationship between student communication motives and perceived instructor communicator style. Communication Research Reports, 17, 161-170.
12. National Survey of Student Engagement. (2000). The NSSE 2000 report: National benchmarks of effective educational practice. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning. Retrieved July 22, 2002, from the NSSE Web site: http://www.indiana.edu/%7Ensse/index.shtml/
13. Norton, R. (1978). Foundation of a communicator style construct. Human Communication Research, 4, 99-112.