Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 256-265

  Deliperi, Simone ^a,b   Bardwell, David N ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Tufts University School of Dental Medicine ^*  (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; COMPOSITE DENTAL RESIN; POLYURETHAN; RESIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOOTH CROWN;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; MOLAR; POLYURETHANES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOOTH CROWN;

EID: 33750390653     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00033.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. ADA Council On Scientific Affairs. Statement on posterior resin based composite. ADA Council on Dental Benefit Program. J Amer Dent Assoc 1998;129:1627-8.
2. Roulet JF. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam. J Dent 1997;25:459-73.
3. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:45-64.
4. Christensen GJ. Amalgam vs. composite resin. J Amer Dent Assoc 1998; 129:1757-9.
5. Swift EJ Jr., Perdigao J, Wilder AD, et al. Clinical evaluation of two one-bottle dentin adhesives at three years. JADA 2001;132:1117-23.
6. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, et al. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1994;73:1690-702.
7. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998;26:1-20.
8. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, et al. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent 2001;Supplement 6:119-44.
9. Hickel R, Manhart J, Garcìa Godoy F. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations. Am J Dent 2000;13:41D-54D.
10. Liebenberg WH. Assuring restorative integrity in extensive posterior resin restorations: pushing the envelope. Quintessence Int 2000;31:153-64.
11. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. Two-year clinical evaluation of non vital tooth whitening and resin composite restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17:369-79.
12. Krejci I, Duc O, Dietschi D, de Campos E. Marginal adaptation, retention and fracture resistance of adhesive composite restorations on devital teeth with and without posts. Oper Dent 2003; 28:127-35.
13. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Coiana C. Reconstruction of devital teeth using direct fiber-reinforced composite resins: a case report. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:165-71.
14. Denehy G, Cobb D. Impression matrix technique for cusp-replacement using direct composite resin. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16:227-34.
15. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. Direct cuspal-coverage posterior composite resin restorations: a case report. Oper Dent 2006;31:143-50.
16. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations. J Amer Dent Assoc 2002; 133:1387-98.
17. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Congiu MD. A clinical challenge: reconstruction of severely damaged endo/bleached teeth using a microhybrid composite resin. Two year case report. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2003;15:221-6.
18. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, et al. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodotics. Chicago (IL): Quintessence Publishing Books; 1997.
19. Smales RJ, Hawthorne WS. Long-term survival and cost-effectiveness of five dental restorative materials used in various classes of cavity preparations. Int Dent J 1996;46:126-30.
20. Plasmans PJJM, Creugers NHJ, Mulder J. Long-term survival of extensive amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 1998;77:453-60.
21. McDaniel JR, Davis RD, Murchison DF, Cohen RB. Causes of failure among cuspal-coverage amalgam restorations: a clinical survey. J Amer Dent Assoc 2000;131:173-7.
22. Kuijs RH, Fennis WM, Kreulen CM, et al. Does layering minimize shrinkage stresses in composite restorations? J Dent Res 2003;82:967-71.
23. Fennis WM, Kuijs RH, Kreulen CM, et al. Fatigue resistance of teeth restored with cuspal-coverage composite restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:313-7.
24. Fennis WM, Kuijs RH, Barink M, et al. Can internal stresses explain the fracture resistance of cusp-replacing composite restorations? Eur J Oral Sci 2005; 113:443-8.
25. Kuijs RH, Fennis WM, Kreulen CM, et al. A comparison of fatigue resistance of three materials for cusp-replacing adhesive restorations. J Dent 2006;34:19-25.
26. Magne P. Conservative restoration of compromised posterior teeth with direct composites: a 7-year report. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 2000;12:747-9.
27. Roeters JJ. Extended indications for directly bonded composite restorations: a clinician's view. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:81-7.
28. Pallesen U, Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7:71-9.
29. Leinfelder KF, Yarnell G. Occlusion and restorative materials. Dent Clin North Am 1995;39:355-61.
30. Swift EJ Jr. Processed composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001;13:284.
31. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Horsted-Bindslev P. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int 2001;32:199-205.
32. Wendt SL Jr. The effect of heat used as a secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. I. Diametra tensile strength, compressive strength, and marginal dimensional stability. Quintessence Int 1987;18:265-71.
33. Wendt SL Jr. The effect of heat used as secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. II. Wear, hardness, and color stability. Quintessence Int 1987;18:351-6.
34. Wendt SL Jr. Microleakage and cusp fracture resistance of heat-treated composite resin inlays. Am J Dent 1991;4:10-14.
35. Shortall AC, Baylis RL. Microleakage around direct composite inlays. J Dent 1991;19:307-11.
36. Wendt SL Jr., Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of a heat-treated resin composite inlay: 3-year results. Am J Dent 1992;5:258-62.
37. Krejci I, Guntert A, Lutz F. Scanning electron microscopic and clinical examination of composite resin inlays/onlays up to 12 months in situ. Quintessence Int 1994;25:403-9.
38. van Dijken JWV. A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52:368-76.
39. Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: three-year clinical results. Brit Dent J 1995; 179:343-9.
40. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. The effect of postcuring on the quantity of remaining double bonds, mechanical properties, and in vitro wear of two resin composites. J Dent 2000;28:447-52.
41. Ferracane J, Condon JR. Post-cure heat treatment for composites: properties and fractography. Dent Mat 1992;8:290-5.
42. Kildal KK, Ruyter IE. How different curing methods affect mechanical properties of composites for inlays when tested in dry and wet conditions. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105:353-61.
43. van Dijken JWV. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J Dent 2000;28:299-306.
44. Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up. J Dent 2000;28:375-82.
45. Mandikos MN, McGivney GP, Davis E, et al. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:386-95.
46. Liebenberg WH. Partial-coverage posterior ceramic restorations. Part 1: a return to diligence. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001;13:296-303.
47. Pallesen U, van Dijken JWV. An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system. Eur J Oral Sci 2000;108:239-46.
48. Kramer N, Frankenberger R. Leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic after six years: wear of luting composites. Oper Dent 2000;25:466-72.
49. Rasmusson CG, Lundin SA. Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: five-year results. Swed Dent J 1995;19:173-82.
50. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thompson VP, et al. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin. Quintessence Int 1991;22:143-51.
51. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:45-64.