How different curing methods affect mechanical properties of composites for inlays when tested in dry and wet conditions

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Volumn 105, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 353-361

  Kildal, Kjersti Karine ^a   Ruyter, Ivar Eystein ^a  

^a Nordisk Institutt for Odontologiske Materialer   (Norway)

Author keywords

HPLC; Light curing; Water sorption

Indexed keywords

2,2 BIS (4 (2 METHACRYLOXYETHOXY)PHENYL)PROPANE; 2,2-BIS-(4-(2-METHACRYLOXYETHOXY)PHENYL)PROPANE; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; BRILLIANT DIRECT INLAY RESIN; BRILLIANT DIRECT-INLAY RESIN; CHARISMA; EOS; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; TRIETHYLENE GLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE; URETHANE DIMETHACRYLATE LUTING RESIN; WATER;

ABSORPTION; ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL SURGERY; ELASTICITY; EVALUATION; LIGHT; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; MOUTH; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PLIABILITY; PRESSURE; SOLUBILITY; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ABSORPTION; ADSORPTION; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL; COMPOSITE RESINS; ELASTICITY; EVALUATION STUDIES; INLAYS; LIGHT; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MOUTH; PLIABILITY; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; POLYURETHANES; PRESSURE; SOLUBILITY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; WATER;

EID: 0031205306     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: 16000722     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00252.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. DAVIDSON CL, DE GEE AJ, FEILZER A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1396-1399.
2. SHETH PJ, JENSEN ME, SHETH JJ. Comparative evaluation of three resin inlay techniques: microleakage studies. Quintessence Int 1989; 20: 831-836.
3. ROBINSON PB, MOORE BK, SWARTZ ML. Comparison of microleakage in direct and indirect composite resin restorations in vitro. Oper Dent 1987; 12: 113-116.
4. KILDAL KK, RUYTER IE. How different curing methods affect the degree of conversion of resin-based inlay/onlay materials. Acta Odontol Scand 1994; 52: 315-322.
5. RUYTER IE, ØYSÆD H. Composites for use in posterior teeth: composition and conversion. J Biomed Mater Res 1987; 21: 11-23.
6. CHUNG KH, GREENER EH. Correlation between the degree of conversion, filler concentration and mechanical properties of posterior composite resins. J Oral Rehab 1990; 17: 487-494.
7. HIRANO S, HIRASAWA T. Compressive creep and recovery of composite resins with various filler contents in water. Dent Mater J 1992; 11: 165-176.
8. DE GEE AJ, PALLAV P, WERNER A, DAVIDSON CL. Annealing as a mechanism of increasing wear resistance of composites. Dent Mater 1990; 6: 266-270.
9. ØYSÆD H, RUYTER IE. Composites for use in posterior teeth: mechanical properties tested under dry and wet conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 1986; 20: 261-271.
10. SÖDERHOLM KJ, ZIGAN M, RAGAN M, FISCHLSCHWEIGER W, BERGMAN M. Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1248-1254.
11. BRADEN M, CAUSTON EE, CLARKE RL. Diffusion of water in composite filling materials. J Dent Res 1976; 55: 730-732.
12. RUYTER IE, ESPEVIK S. Compressive creep of denture base polymers. Acta Odontol Scand 1980; 38: 169-177.
13. WENDT SL. The effect of heat used as a secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. I. Diametral tensile strength, compressive strength, and marginal dimensional stability. Quintessence Int 1987; 18: 265-271.
14. ASMUSSEN E, PEUTZFELDT A. Mechanical properties of heat treated restorative resins for use in the inlay/onlay technique. Scand J Dent Res 1990; 98: 564-567.
15. PEUTZFELDT A, ASMUSSEN E. Mechanical properties of three composite resins for the inlay/onlay technique. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 322-324.
16. ØYSÆD H, RUYTER IE. Water sorption and filler characteristics of composites for use in posterior teeth. J Dent Res 1986; 65: 1315-1318.
17. RUYTER IE, WELLENDORF H. Hvordan fungerer din herdelampe? Nor Tannlegeforen Tid 1992; 102: 592-596.
18. ISO TC 106/SC6/WG7 Working draft 2. Powered polymerization activators. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 1990.
19. FAN PL, WOZNIAK WT, REYES WD, STANFORD JW. Irradiance of visible light-curing units and voltage variation effects. J Am Dent Assoc 1987; 115: 442-445.
20. ISO 4049. Dentistry - resin-based filling materials. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 1988.
21. RUYTER IE, SJOVIK KLEVEN IJ. Monomers and filler content of resin-based crown and bridge materials. Dent Mater 1987: 3: 315-321.
22. RUYTER IE, ØYSÆD H. Compressive creep of light cured resin based restorative materials. Acta Odontol Scand 1982; 40: 319-324.
23. REINHARDT KJ, VAHL J. Unsicherheiten bei der Prüfung von Photopolymerisaten. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1981; 36: 635-640.
24. MILLER JC, MILLER JN. Statistics for analytical chemistry. 2nd edition. Chichester: Ellis Horwood Limited, 1988; 58-59.
25. DIN 53452. Prüfung von Kunststoffe, Biegeversuch. Beuth Verlag GmbH, Berlin and Köln, 1975.
26. IC ). J Oral Rehab 1982; 9: 133-138.
27. PAPADOGIANIS Y, BOYER DB, LAKES RS. Creep of conventional and microfilled dental composites. J Biomed Mat Res 1984; 18: 15-24.
28. RUYTER IE. Types of resin-based inlay materials and their properties. Int Dent J 1992; 42: 139-144.