Can internal stresses explain the fracture resistance of cusp-replacing composite restorations?

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Volumn 113, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 443-448

  Fennis, W M M ^a   Kuijs, R H ^a   Barink, M ^a   Kreulen, C M ^a   Verdonschot, N ^a   Creugers, N H J ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Composite; Cusp replacement, failure mechanism; FE model; Load application

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MASTICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PULP;

ADHESIVENESS; BICUSPID; BITE FORCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL PULP; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURES;

EID: 27144559447     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00233.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ROETERS JJ. Extended indications for directly bonded composite restorations: a clinician's view. J Adhesive Dent 2001; 3: 81-87.
2. KUIJS RH, FENNIS WMM, KREULEN CM, ROETERS FJM, BURGERSDIJK RCW. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations. Am J Dent 2003; 16: 13-16.
3. FENNIS WMM, KUIJS RH, KREULEN CM, VERDONSCHOT N, CREUGERS NHJ. Fatigue resistance of teeth restored with cuspal coverage composite restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 313-317.
4. EL ZOHAIRY AA, DE GEE AJ, DE JAGER N, VAN RUIJVEN LJ, FEILZER AJ. The influence of specimen attachment and dimension on microtensile strength. J Dent Res 2004; 83: 420-424.
5. REES JS, HAMMADEH M. Undermining of enamel as a mechu anism of abfraction lesion formation: a finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112: 347-352.
6. VERSLUIS A, TANTBIROJN D, PINTADO MR, DELONG R, DOUGLAS WH. Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 554-564.
7. VERSLUIS A, TANTBIROJN D, DOUGLAS WH. Why do shear tests pull out dentin? J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1298-1307.
8. BARINK M, VAN DER MARK PCP, FENNIS WMM, KUIJS RH, KREULEN CM, VERDONSCHOT N. A three-dimensional finite element model of the polymerisation process in dental restorations. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 1427-1435.
9. KUIJS RH, FENNIS WMM, KREULEN CM, BARINK M, VERDONSCHOT N. Does layering minimize shrinkage stresses in composite restorations? J Dent Res 2003; 82: 967-971.
10. VERDONSCHOT N, FENNIS WMM, KUIJS RH, STOLK J, KREULEN CM, CREUGERS NHJ. Generation of 3-D finite element models of restored human teeth using micro-CT techniques. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 310-315.
11. REES JS, JACOBSEN PH. Modelling the effects of enamel anisotropy with the finite element method. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22: 451-454.
12. SPEARS IR, VAN NOORT R, CROMPTON RH, CARDEW GE, HOWARD IC. The effects of enamel anisotropy on the distribution of stress in a tooth. J Dent Res 1993; 72: 1526-1531.
13. SPEARS IR. A three-dimensional finite element model of prismatic enamel, a re-appraisal of the data on the Young's modulus of enamel. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1690-1697.
14. CUY JL, MANN AB, LIVI KJ, TEAFORD MF, WEIHS TP. Nanoindentation mapping of the mechanical properties of human molar tooth enamel. Arch Oral Biol 2002; 47: 281-291.
15. AL-SALEHI SK, BURKE T. Methods used in dentin bonding tests: an analysis of 50 investigations on bond strength. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 717-723.
16. PILO R, BROSH T, LUGASSY H, BAHARAV H, HELFT M. The effect of irridiation time on the shear strength of composites. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 338-342.
17. NORTHEAST SE, VAN NOORT R, SHAGLOUF AS. Tensile peel failure of resin-bonded Ni/Cr beams: an experimental and finite element study. J Dent 1994; 22: 252-256.
18. TAM LE, PILLIAR RM. The effect of interface stiffness on dentin-composite interfacial fracture resistance. J Dent 2000; 28: 487-493.
19. CRAIG RG. Selected properties of dental composites. J Dent Res 1979; 58: 1544-1550.
20. O'BRIEN WJ. Dental Materials and Their Selection, 2nd edn. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence Publishing, 1997; 331-404.
21. YAMAGUCHI R, POWERS JM, DENNISON JB. Parameters affecting in vitro bond strength of composite to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 1989; 5: 153-156.
22. YAMAMOTO M, TAKAHASHI H. Tensile fatigue strength of light cure composite resins for posterior teeth. Dent Mater J 1995; 14: 175-184.
23. ELDIWANY M, POWERS JM, GEORGE LA. Mechanical properties of direct and post-cured composites. Am J Dent 1993; 6: 222-224.