Long-term survival and cost-effectiveness of five dental restorative materials used in various classes of cavity preparations

International Dental Journal

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 126-130

  Smales, R J ^a,b   Hawthorne, W S ^a  

^a Prince Philip Dental Hospital ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOY; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL ALLOY; GLASS IONOMER; GOLD ALLOY; RESIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DENTAL SURGERY; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIME; TOOTH CROWN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; COMPOSITE RESINS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CROWNS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; GOLD ALLOYS; HUMANS; INLAYS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; METAL CERAMIC ALLOYS; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0030155350     PISSN: 00206539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bader JD. Guest editorial: the emergence of appropriateness-of-care issues. J Dent Res 1992 71: 502-504.
2. Hendriks FHJ, Letzel H, Vrijhoef MMA. Cost benefit analysis of direct posterior restorations. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1985 13: 256-259.
3. Marynuik G A, Schweitzer S O, Braun R J. Replacement of amalgams with crowns: cost-effectiveness analysis Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1988 16: 263-267.
4. Mjor I A. Problems and benefits associated with restorative materials: side-effects and long-term cost. Adv Dent Res 1992 6: 7-16.
5. Mjör I A. Long term cost of restorative therapy using different materials. Scand J Dent Res 1992 100: 60-65.
6. Loë H. Chairman of Ad Hoc Subcommittee. The benefits of dental amalgam (Appendix I) In Dental Amalgam A Scientific Review and Recommended Public Health Service Strategy for Research, Education and Regulation. pp171-172, Washington: Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 1993
7. Thylstrup A, Rolling I. The life table method in clinical dental research. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1975 3: 5-10.
8. Dixon W J. ed BMDP Statistical Software. Vol. 2. Berkley: University of California Press, 1990.
9. Mjor I A. Potential biological consequences of alternatives to dental amalgam. In Potential Biological Consequences of Mercury Released From Dental Amalgam. Proceedings from a conference. pp93-113, Stockholm: Swedish Medical Research Council, 1992
10. Williams K R, Bentley J E. Survey findings on dental fees. A comparison from 1982-93. J Am Dent Assoc 1994 125: 1260-1262.
11. Berry T G, Nicholson J, Troendle K. Almost two centuries with amalgam: where are we today? J Am Dent Assoc 1994 125: 392-399.
12. Anusavice K J. Treatment regimens in preventive and restorative dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1995 126: 727-743.
13. Leempoel PJB, Eschen S, De Haan A F J et al. An evaluation of crowns and bridges in a general dental practice. J Oral Rehabil 1985 12: 515-528.
14. Qvist J, Qvist V, Mjör I A. Placement and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990 48: 297-303.
15. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjör I A. Placement and longevity of toothcolored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990 48: 305-311.
16. Jokstad A, Mjör I A. Analysis of long-term clinical behavior of Class-II amalgam restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1991 49: 47-63.
17. Tyas M J. Cariostatic effect of glass ionomer cement: a five-year clinical study. Aust Dent J 1991 3: 236-239.
18. Hawthorne W S, Smales R J. Factors affecting the amount of long-term restorative dental treatment provided to 100 patients by 20 dentists in three Adelaide private practices. Aust Dent J (in press) 1996.
19. Hawthorne W, Smales R, Webster D. Long-term survivals of restorative materials in private dental practices. J Dent Res 1994 73. Program and Abstracts of Papers p747 Abstract 85.