An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 133, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 1387-1398

  Deliperi, Simone ^a   Bardwell, David N ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FLOWABLE HYBRID COMPOSITE; POLYMER; RESIN;

ADOLESCENT; CASE REPORT; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIGHT; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; REVIEW; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; ULTRASTRUCTURE; VISCOSITY;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADOLESCENT; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIGHT; MATRIX BANDS; MOLAR; POLYMERS; RUBBER DAMS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0036777216     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0055     Document Type: Article

References (130)

1. Lavelle CL. A cross-sectional survey into the durability of amalgam restorations. J Dent 1976;4(3):139-43.
2. Allan DN. A longitudinal study of dental restorations. Br Dent J 1977;143(3):87-9.
3. Paterson N. The longevity of restorations: a study of 200 regular attenders in a general dental practice. Br Dent J 1984;157(1):23-5.
4. Smales RJ, Webster DA, Leppard PI. Survival predictions of amalgam restorations. J Dent 1991;19:272-7.
5. Mjör IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55(1):58-63.
6. Roulet JF. Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam: results up to 6 years. Clin Oral Invest 1997;1(1):40-6.
7. Jokstad A, Mjör IA. Analysis of long-term clinical behavior of class-II amalgam restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1991;49(1):47-63.
8. Albers HF. Tooth-colored restoratives: An introductory text for selecting placing and finishing. 8th ed. Santa Rosa, Calif.: Alto Books; 1996:11g-1.
9. Lutz F, Krejci I. Mesio-occlusal amalgam restorations: quantitative in vivo data up to 4 years: a data base for the development of amalgam substitutes. Quintessence Int 1994;25(3):185-90.
10. Wilson NH, Wilson MA, Wastell DG, Smith GA. A clinical trial of a visible light cured posterior composite resin restorative material: five-year results. Quintessence Int 1988;19:675-81.
11. Letzel H. Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in multicentre clinical trial. J Dent 1989;17(supplement 1):S26-8.
12. Lundin SA, Koch G. Class I and II composite resin restorations: 4-year clinical follow up. Swed Dent J 1989;13:217-27.
13. Raskin A, Michotte-Theall B, Vreven J, Wilson NH. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite: 10 year report. J Dent 1999;27(1): 13-9.
14. Wilder AD Jr, May KN Jr, Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Leinfelder KF. Seventeen-year clinical study of ultraviolet-cured posterior composite Class I and II restorations. J Esthet Dent 1999;11(3):135-42.
15. Garber DA, Goldstein RE. Porcelain and composite inlays and onlays: Esthetic posterior restorations. Chicago: Quintessence; 1994: 23-31.
16. Jordan RE, Suzuki M. Posterior composite restorations: where and how they work best. JADA 1991;122(12):30-7.
17. Simonsen RJ. Move over amalgam: at last. Quintessence Int 1995;26(3):157.
18. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs; ADA Council on Dental Benefit Programs. Statement on posterior resin-based composite. JADA 1998;129:1627-8.
19. Christensen GJ. Amalgam vs. composite resin: 1998. JADA 1998;129:1757-9.
20. Gerbo L, Leinfelder KF, Mueninghoff LA, Russell C. Use of optical standards for determining wear of posterior composite resins. J Esthet Dent 1990;2(5):148-52.
21. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Three-year follow-up of five posterior composites: in vivo wear. J Dent 1993;21(2): 74-8.
22. Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up. J Dent 2000;28:375-82.
23. Bertolotti RL. Posterior composite technique utilizing directed polymerisation shrinkage and a novel matrix. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1991;3(4):53-8.
24. Keogh TP, Bertolotti RL. Creating tight, anatomically correct interproximal contacts. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45(1):83-102.
25. Liebenberg WH. Assuring restorative integrity in extensive posterior resin restorations: pushing the envelope. Quintessence Int 2000;31(3):153-64.
26. Pearson JD, Bouschlicher MR, Boyer DB. Polymerization shrinkage forces of condensable composites. J Dent Res 1999;78(special issue):448.
27. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Assessing the effect of composite formulation on polymerization stress. JADA 2000;131:497-503.
28. Spreafico RC, Gagliani M. Composite resin restorations on posterior teeth. In: Roulet JF, Degrange M. Adhesion: The silent revolution in dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 2000:253-76.
29. Tay FR, Wei SH. Indirect posterior restorations using a new chairside microhybrid resin composite system. J Adhes Dent 2001;3(1): 89-99.
30. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984;63: 1396-9.
31. Cox CF. Microleakage related to restorative procedures. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992;88(supplement 1):83-93.
32. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66: 1636-9.
33. Davidson CL. Resisting the curing contraction with adhesive composites. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:446-7.
34. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater 1991;7(2): 107-13.
35. Tjan AH, Bergh BH, Lidner C. Effect of various incremental techniques on the marginal adaptation of class II composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67(1):62-6.
36. Lutz F, Krejci I, Luescher B, Oldenburg TR. Improved proximal margin adaptation of Class II composite resin restorations by use of light-reflecting wedges. Quintessence Int 1986;17:659-64.
37. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. The importance of proximal curing in posterior composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1992;23: 605-7.
38. Weaver WS, Blank LW, Pelleu GB. A visible-light-activated resin cured through tooth structure. Gen Dent 1988;36:236-7.
39. Liebenberg WH. Successive cusp build-up: an improved placement technique for posterior direct resin restorations. J Can Dent Assoc 1996;62:501-7.
40. Liebenberg WH. The axial bevel technique: a new technique for extensive posterior resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 2000;31:231-9.
41. Klaff D. Blending incremental and stratified layering techniques to produce an esthetic posterior composite resin restoration with a predictable prognosis. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001;13(2):101-13.
42. Fusayama T. Indications for self-cured and light-cured composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67(1):46-51.
43. Garberoglio R, Coli P, Brannstrom M. Contraction gaps in Class II restorations with self-cured and light-cured resin composites. Am J Dent 1995;8: 303-7.
44. Verslus A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 1996;75:871-8.
45. Manhart J, Chen HY, Draegert U, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Vickers hardness and depth of cure of light cured packable composite resins (abstract 1807). J Dent Res 2000;79:369.
46. Rueggeberg FA, Ergle JW, Mettenburg DJ. Polymerization depths of contemporary light curing units using microhardness. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:340-9.
47. Kugel G. Direct and indirect adhesive restorative materials: a review. Am J Dent 2000;13(special number):35D-40D.
48. Fortin D, Vargas MA. The spectrum of composites: new technologies and materials. JADA 2000;131(supplement):26S-30S.
49. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Assessing the effect of composite formulation on polymerization stress. JADA 2000;131:497-503.
50. Wakefield CW, Kofford KR. Advances in restorative materials. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45(1):7-29.
51. Belvedere PC. Contemporary posterior direct composites using state-of-the-art techniques. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45(1):49-70.
52. Ferracane JL, Choi KK, Condon JR. In vitro wear of packable dental composites. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20(supplement 25):S60-S66.
53. Leinfelder KF, Bayne SC, Swift EJ. Packable composites: overview and technical considerations. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:234-49.
54. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2000;16(1):33-40.
55. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first generation flowable composites. JADA 1998;129:567-77.
56. Hurley E, Aboushala A, Perry R, Kugel G. Microleakage in class II restorations using a new posterior composite (abstract 487). J Dent Res 1998;77:692.
57. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Papathanasiou A, Falcone K, Congiu D, Kastali S. Microleakage of resin liners and packable composites using filled and unfilled adhesives (abstract 1887). J Dent Res 2002:81.
58. Ferdianakis K. Microleakage reduction from newer esthetic restorative materials in permanent molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998; 22:221-9.
59. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 1999;15(2):128-37.
60. Unterbrink GL, Liebenberg WH. Flowable resin composites as "filled adhesive": literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int 1999;30:249-57.
61. Tung FF, Estafan D, Scherer W. Microleakage of a condensable resin composite: an in vitro investigation. Quintessence Int 2000;31: 430-4.
62. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-53.
63. Pashley DH. Dentin bonding: overview of the substrate with respect to adhesive material. J Esthet Dent 1991;3(2):46-50.
64. Hickel R, Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations. Am J Dent 2000; 13(special number):41D-54D.
65. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982;16:265-73.
66. Leinfelder KF. Current developments in dentin bonding systems: major progress found in today's products. JADA 1993; 124(5):40-2.
67. Kanca J 3rd. Adhesion to enamel, dentin, metal, and porcelain. Curr Opin Cosmet Dent 1994; 4:13-22.
68. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigão J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art, 1995. Quintessence Int 1995;26(2):95-110.
69. Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, et al. The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. Am J Dent 1996;9(4): 167-73.
70. Perdigão J, Lopes M. Dentin bonding: state of the art 1999. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20:1151-64.
71. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. JADA 2000;131(supplement):20S-25S.
72. Haller B. Recent developments in dentin bonding. Am J Dent 2000;13(1):44-50.
73. Hanning M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B. Self-etching primers vs. phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent 1999;24(3):172-80.
74. Perdigão J, Frankenberger R, Rosa BT, Breschi L. New trends in dentin/enamel adhesion. Am J Dent 2000;13(special number):25D-30D.
75. Frey O. Creating a reliable bond. An all-in-one system. Am J Dent 2000;13(special number):85D-87D.
76. Christensen GJ. Self-etching primers are here. JADA 2001;132: 1041-3.
77. Miyazaki M, Yoshida Y, Moore BK, Onose H. Effect of light exposure on fracture toughness and flexural strength of light-cured composites. Dent Mater 1996;12:328-32.
78. Sakaguchi RL, Berge HX. Reduced light energy density decreases post-gel contraction while maintaining degree of conversion. J Dent 1998;26:695-700.
79. Goracci G, Mori G, Casa de Martinis L. Curing light intensity and marginal leakage of resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 1996;27:355-62.
80. Mehl A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without 'softstart-polymerization.' J Dent 1997;25:321-30.
81. Kunzelmann KH, Clomb C, Hickel R. Marginal adaptation of composite fillings cured with different curing light concepts (abstract 2441). J Dent Res 2000;79:449.
82. Kanca J 3rd, Suh BI. Pulse activation: reducing resin-based composite contraction stresses at the cavosurface margins. Am J Dent 1999;12(3):107-12.
83. Suh BI. Controlling and understanding the polymerization shrinkage-induced stresses in light-cured composites. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20(supplement 25):S34-S41.
84. Kanca J 3rd. Clinical experience with PYRAMID stratified aggregate restorative and the VIP unit. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20(supplement 25):S67-S72.
85. Koran P, Kurschner R. Effect of sequential versus continuous irradiation of a light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion, and degree of polymerization. Am J Dent 1998;11(1):17-22.
86. Althoff O, Hartung M. Advances in light curing. Am J Dent 2000;13(special number):77D-81D.
87. Mehl A, Manhart J, Kremers L, Kunzelmann K-H, Hickel R. Physical properties and marginal quality of class II composite fillings after soft-start polymerization (abstract 2121). J Dent Res 1997;76:279.
88. Ernst CP, Kurschner R, Rippin G, Willershausen B. Stress reduction in resin-based composites cured with a two-step light-curing unit. Am J Dent 2000;13(2):69-72.
89. Dennison JP, Yaman P, Seir R, Hamilton JC. Effect of variable light intensity on composite shrinkage. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84: 499-505.
90. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Papathanasiou A, Kastali S. In vitro evaluation of composite microleakage using differing methods of polymerization (abstract 1293). J Dent Res 2001;80:197.
91. Rueggeberg F. Contemporary issues in photocuring. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20(supplement 25):S4-S15.
92. Blakenau R, Erickson RL, Rueggeberg F. New light curing options for composite resin restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20(2):122-35.
93. Fleming MG, Maillet WA. Photopolymerization of composite resin using the argon laser. J Can Dent Assoc 1999;65:447-50.
94. Brackett WW, Haisch LD, Covey DA. Effect of plasma arc curing on the microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent 2000;13(3):121-2.
95. Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A, Asmussen E. Characterization of resin composites polymerized with plasma arc curing units. Dent Mater 2000;16:330-6.
96. Mills RW, Jandt KD, Ashworth SH. Dental composite depth of cure with halogen and blue light emitting diode technology. Br Dent J 1999;186:388-91.
97. Kurachi C, Tuboy AM, Magalhaes DV, Bagnato VS. Hardness evaluation of a dental composite polymerized with experimental LED-based devices. Dent Mater 2001;17:309-15.
98. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res 1998;77:1435-45.
99. Losche GM. Marginal adaptation of Class II composite fillings: guided polymerization vs reduced light intensity. J Adhes Dent 1999;1(1):31-9.
100. Ciamponi AL, Del Portillo Lujan VA, Ferreira Santos JF. Effectiveness of reflective wedges on the polymerization of composite resins. Quintessence Int 1994;25:599-602.
101. Miller MB, Castellanos IR, Vargas MA, Denehy GE. Effect of restorative materials on microleakage of Class II composites. J Esthet Dent 1996;8(3):107-13.
102. Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, Ferracane JL. Microleakage of four Class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature. Quintessence Int 1997;28(2):135-44.
103. Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 2001;26(1):60-9.
104. Demarco FF, Ramos OL, Mota CS, Formolo E, Justino LM. Influence of different restorative techniques on microleakage in Class II cavities with gingival wall in cementum. Oper Dent 2001;26:253-9.
105. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 1996;21(1):17-24.
106. Jorgensen KD, Asmussen E, Shimokobe H. Enamel damages caused by contracting restorative resins. Scand J Dent Res 1975;83(2): 120-2.
107. Han L, Okamoto A, Iwaku M. The effects of various clinical factors on marginal enamel micro-cracks produced around composite restoration. Dent Mater J 1992;11(1):26-37.
108. Prati C, Simpson M, Mitchem J, Tao L, Pashley DH. Relationship between bond strength and microleakage measured in the same Class I restorations. Dent Mater 1992;8(1):37-41.
109. Thomas R, De Rijk W, Suh B. Location and magnitude of polymerisation shrinkage induced stress in composite by the finite elemental methods (abstract 3544). J Dent Res 1999;78:548.
110. Yoshikawa T, Morigami M, Tagami J. Environmental SEM observation on resin tooth interface using slow-start curing method (abstract 38). J Dent Res 2000;79:148.
111. Belli S, Inokoshi S, Ozer F, Pereira PN, Ogata M, Tagami J. The effect of additional enamel etching and flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations. Oper Dent 2001;26(1):70-5.
112. Friedl KH, Schmaltz G, Hiller KA, Markl A. Marginal adaptation of class V restorations with and without 'softstart-polymerization.' Oper Dent 2000;25(1):26-32.
113. Bouschlicher MR, Rueggeberg FA, Boyer DB. Effect of stepped light intensity on polymerization force and conversion in a photoactivated composite. J Esthet Dent 2000;12(1):23-32.
114. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Papathanasiou A. In vitro evaluation of composite microleakage using differing methods of polymerization. Am J Dent (in press).
115. Vanini L. Light and color in anterior composite restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1996;8:673-82.
116. Grundy JR. Finishing posterior composites. An SEM study of a range of instruments and their effect on a composite and enamel. Restorative Dent 1985;1(6):148-5.
117. Ratanapridakul K, Leinfelder KF, Thomas J. Effect of finishing on the wear rate of posterior composite resin. JADA 1989;118:333-5.
118. Eick JD, Gwinett AJ, Pashley DH, Robinson SJ. Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8(3):306-35.
119. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentin permeability and dentine adhesion. J Dent 1997;25:355-72.
120. Suzuki T, Finger WJ. Dentin adhesives: site of dentin vs. bonding of composite resins. Dent Mater 1988;4:379-83.
121. Prati C, Pashley DH. Dentin wetness, permeability and thickness and bond strength of adhesive systems. Am J Dent 1992;5(1):33-8.
122. Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res 1999;78:898-905.
123. Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effects of bonding system and light curing method on reducing stress of different C-factor cavities. J Adhes Dent 2001;3(2):177-83.
124. Ogata M, Okuda M, Nakajima M, Pereira PN, Sano H, Tagami J. Influence of the direction of tubules on bond strength to dentin. Oper Dent 2001;26(1):27-35.
125. Hannig M, Friedrichs C. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability. Oper Dent 2001;26(1):3-11.
126. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990;69:1240-3.
127. Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, et al. Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 1993;72:1434-42.
128. Swift EJ Jr, Triolo P Jr, Barkmeier WW, Bird JL, Bounds SJ. Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. Am J Dent 1996;9:100-4.
129. Dietschi D. Free-hand bonding in the esthetic treatment of anterior teeth: creating the illusion. J Esthet Dent 1997;9(4):156-64.
130. Dietschi D. Layering concepts in anterior composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 2001;3(1):71-80.