The effect of postcuring on quantity of remaining double bonds, mechanical properties, and in vitro wear of two resin composites

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 447-452

  Peutzfeldt, A ^a   Asmussen, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Degree of conversion; Diametral tensile strength; Elastic modulus; Flexural strength; Resin composites; Secondary cure; Three body wear

Indexed keywords

CHARISMA; RESIN; SILICON DIOXIDE; WATER; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL SURGERY; ELASTICITY; HEAT; HUMAN; INFRARED SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; LIGHT; MECHANICS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PLIABILITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; ELASTICITY; HEAT; HUMANS; INLAYS; LIGHT; MECHANICS; PLIABILITY; SILICON DIOXIDE; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY, INFRARED; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME FACTORS; WATER; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0034242970     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00021-X     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Mörmann W, Ameye C, Lutz F. Komposit-Inlays: Marginale Adaptation. Randdichtigkeit, Porosität und okklusaler Verschleiss, Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitschrift 1982;37:438-41.
2. Lutz F, Krejci I, Mörmann W. Die zahnfarbene Seitenzahn-Restauration. Phillip Journal 1987;4:127-37.
3. Burke FJT, Watts DC, Wilson NHF, Wilson MA. Current status and rationale for composite inlays and onlays. British Dental Journal 1991;170:269-73.
4. Robinson PB, Moore BK, Swartz ML. Comparison of microleakage in direct and indirect composite resin restorations in vitro. Operative Dentistry 1987;12:113-6.
5. Shortall AC, Baylis RL, Baylis MA, Grundy JR. Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded Class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations, and direct composite resin inlays. International Journal of Prosthodontics 1989;2:217-23.
6. Sheth PJ, Jensen ME, Sheth JJ. Comparative evaluation of three resin inlay techniques: microleakage studies. Quintessence International 1989;20:831-6.
7. Cook WD, Johannson M. The influence of postcuring on the fracture properties of photo-cured dimethacrylate based dental composite resin. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 1987;21:979-89.
8. Kildal KK, Ruyter IE. How different curing methods affect the degree of conversion of resin-based inlay/onlay materials. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1994;52:315-22.
9. Reinhardt KJ. Die extraorale Vergütung von Komposit-Inlays. Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitschrift 1991;46:342-5.
10. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Post-cure heat treatments for composites: properties and fractography. Dental Materials 1992;8:290-5.
11. Park SH, Lee CS. The difference in degree of conversion between light-cured and additional heat-cured composites. Operative Dentistry 1996;21:213-7.
12. Bagis YH, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of post-cure temperature and heat duration on monomer conversion of photo-activated dental resin composite. Dental Materials 1997;13:228-32.
13. Wendt SL. The effect of heat used as secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. I. Diametral tensile strength, compressive strength, and marginal dimensional stability. Quintessence International 1987;18:265-71.
14. Wendt SL. The effect of heat used as secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. II. Wear, hardness, and color stability. Quintessence International 1987;18:351-6.
15. Kullmann W. Extraorale Photopolymerisation zur Optimierung physikalisch-technischer Merkmale von Füllungskunststoffen. Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitschrift 1988;43:383-6.
16. Reinhardt KJ, Smolka R. Kunststoffe im Seitenzahnbereich - Füllung oder Inlay?. Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitschrift 1988;43:909-13.
17. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Mechanical properties of heat treated restorative resins for use in the inlay/onlay technique. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 1990;98:564-7.
18. McCabe JF, Kagi S. Mechanical properties of a composite inlay material following post-curing. British Dental Journal 1991;171:246-8.
19. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Mechanical properties of three composite resins for the inlay/onlay technique. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1991;66:322-4.
20. Ferracane JL, Hopkin JK, Condon JR. Properties of heat-treated composites after aging in water. Dental Materials 1995;11:354-8.
21. Kildal KK, Ruyter IE. How different curing methods affect mechanical properties of composites for inlays when tested in dry and wet conditions. European Journal of Oral Sciences 1997;105:353-61.
22. Ruyter IE, Györösi PP. An infrared spectroscopic study of sealants. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 1976;84:396-400.
23. Willard HH, Merrit LL, Dean JA. Instrumental Methods of Analysis. New York: D Van Nostrand, 1974.
24. Reports of Councils and Bureaus. New American Dental Association Specification No. 27 for Direct Filling Resin. Journal of the American Dental Association 1977;94:1191-4.
25. International Organization for Standardization. Dentistry - resin-based filling materials. ISO 4049, 2nd ed., 1988.
26. de Gee AJ, Pallav P, Davidson CL. Effect of abrasion medium on wear of stress-bearing composites and amalgam in vitro. Journal of Dental Research 1986;65:654-8.
27. Pallav P, Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Wear rates of composites, an amalgam, and enamel under stress-bearing conditions. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1988;59:426-9.
28. Pallav P, de Gee AJ, Werner A, Davidson CL. Influence of shearing action of food on contact stress and subsequent wear of stress-bearing composites. Journal of Dental Research 1993;72:56-61.
29. Asmussen E. Factors affecting the quantity of remaining double bonds in restorative resin polymers. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 1982;90:490-6.
30. Ferracane JL. Elution of leachable components from composites. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 1994;21:441-52.
31. Braem M, Finger W, van Doren VE, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Mechanical properties and filler fraction of dental composites. Dental Materials 1989;5:346-9.
32. Chung KH, Greener EH. Correlation between the degree of conversion, filler concentration and mechanical properties of posterior composite resins. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 1990;17:487-94.
33. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. Journal of Dental Research 1997;76:1405-11.
34. Asmussen E. Restorative resins: hardness and strength vs. quantity of remaining double bonds. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 1982;90:484-9.
35. Ferracane JL. Correlation between hardness and degree of conversion during the setting reaction of unfilled dental restorative resins. Dental Materials 1985;1:11-4.
36. Ferracane JL, Greener EH. The effect of resin formulations on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 1986;20:121-31.
37. Rueggeberg FA, Craig RG. Correlation of parameters used to estimate monomer conversion in a light-cured composite. Journal of Dental Research 1988;67:932-7.
38. Ruyter IE. Types of resin-based inlay materials and their properties. International Dental Journal 1992;42:139-44.
39. Ruyter IE, Svendsen SA. Remaining methacrylate groups in composite restorative materials. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1978;36:75-82.