Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 375-382

  Wassell, R W ^a   Walls, A W G ^a   McCabe, J F ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Composite; Composite inlay; Composite restoration; Wear

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; BARIUM DERIVATIVE; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; BRILLIANT DENTIN RESIN; INZOMA; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; SILICON DIOXIDE; TRIETHYLENE GLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE; WAX;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; PERIODONTICS; RECURRENT DISEASE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; ALUMINUM SILICATES; BARIUM COMPOUNDS; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INLAYS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); PERIODONTAL INDEX; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; RECURRENCE; SILICON DIOXIDE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WAXES;

EID: 0034242969     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00013-0     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Burke FJT, Watts DC, Wilson NHF, et al. Current status and rationale for composite inlays and onlays. British Dental Journal 1991;170:269-73.
2. James DF. An aesthetic inlay technique for posterior teeth. Quintessence International 1983;7:725-31.
3. Wassell RW, Walls AWG, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional restorations: three-year clinical results. British Dental Journal 1995;179:343-9.
4. Lutz F, Krejci I, Luecher B, et al. Improved proximal margin adaptation of Class II composite resin restorations by use of light reflecting wedges. Quintessence International 1986;17:569-664.
5. Loe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. 1. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1963;21:533-51.
6. McCabe JF, Carrick TE. Output from visible-light activation units and depth of cure of light-activated composites. Journal of Dentistry 1989;68:1534-9.
7. Wilson NHF, Smith GA, Wilson MA. A clinical trial of a visible light-cured composite resin restorative material: three year results. Quintessence International 1986;17:643-52.
8. Patel S. Indirect wear assessment at the restoration preparation margin of inlays and conventionally placed restorations made from a hybrid composite. MSc dissertation, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 1994.
9. Cvar JF, Ryge G. USPHS Publ. No. 720-244. San Francisco: US Government Printing Office, 1970.
10. Warren PR. 'Occlusin' Multi-Centre Clinical Assessment. Macclesfield: ICI Dental, 1989.
11. El-Mowafy OM, Lewis DW, Benmergui C, et al. Meta-analysis on long-term clinical performance of posterior composite restorations. Journal of Dentistry 1994;22:33-43.
12. Söderholm KJ, Roberts MJ, Antonson DE, et al. Visual and profilometric wear measurements. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1992;50:121-7.
13. Winkler MM, Lautenschlager EP, Bogohosian A, et al. Visual versus mechanical wear measurement of dental composite resin. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 1996;23:494-500.
14. Bryant RW. Comparison of three standards for quantifying occlusal loss of composite restorations. Dental Materials 1990;6:60-2.
15. Leinfelder KF. Evaluation of criteria used for assessing the clinical performance of composite resins in posterior teeth. Quintessence International 1987;18:531-6.
16. Leinfelder KF, Wilder AD, Teixeira LC. Wear rates of posterior composite resins. Journal of the American Dental Association 1986;112:829-33.
17. Mair LH, Vowles RW, Cunningham J, et al. The clinical wear of three posterior composites. British Dental Journal 1990;169:355-60.
18. van Dijken JW, Horstedt P. Marginal breakdown of 5-year-old direct composite inlays. Journal of Dentistry 1996;24:389-94.
19. Wendt SL. The effect of heat used as secondary cure upon the properties of three composite resins. II. Wear, hardness and colour stability. Quintessence International 1987;18:351-6.
20. McCabe JF, Kagi S. Mechanical properties of a composite inlay material following post-curing. British Dental Journal 1991;171:246-8.
21. Wassell RW, McCabe JF, Walls AWG. Wear rates of regular and tempered composites. Journal of Dentistry 1997;25:49-52.
22. Wassell RW. Composites for making dental inlays. PhD, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 1992.