Amalgam vs. composite resin: 1998

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 129, Issue 12, 1998, Pages 1757-1759

  Christensen, Gordon J ^a  

^a CLINICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; RESIN;

ARTICLE; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032434362     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0148     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Product use survey. Clin Res Associates Newsletter 1995;19(10):1-4.
2. Christensen GJ. Tooth sensitivity related to Class I and II resin restorations. JADA 1996;127(4):497-8.
3. Christensen GJ. Overcoming challenges with resin in Class II situations. JADA 1997;128(11):1579-80.
4. Christensen GJ. Preventing sensitivity in Class II composite resin restorations. JADA 1998;129(10):1469-70.
5. Filled polymer crowns: 1-2 year status reports. Clin Res Associates Newsletter 1998;22(10):1-3.
6. Alternatives for Class 2 restorations. Clin Res Associates Newsletter 1994;18(5):1-2.
7. Christensen GJ. Current use of tooth colored inlays, onlays, and direct placement resins. J Esthet Dent. (In press)
8. Limoli TM. Comparison of 1994 and 1998 national average and relative value. Dent Insurance Today 1998;11(1):3-9.
9. Christensen GJ. Dental fees: a candid discussion. JADA 1993;124(1):87-8.